Abstract
Purpose
Tremendous interest and need lie at the intersection of telemedicine and minimally invasive surgery. Robotics provides an ideal environment for surgical telementoring and telesurgery given its endoscopic optics and mechanized instrument movement. We review the present status, current challenges and future promise of telemedicine in endoscopic and minimally invasive surgery with a focus on urological applications.Materials and methods
Two paired investigators screened PubMed®, Scopus® and Web of Science® databases for all full text English language articles published between 1995 and 2016 using the key words "telemedicine," "minimally invasive surgical procedure," "robotic surgical procedure," "education" and "distance." We categorized and included studies of level of interaction between proctors and trainees. Research design, special equipment, telecommunication network bandwidth and research outcomes of each study were ascertained and analyzed.Results
Of 65 identified reports 38 peer-reviewed studies qualified for inclusion. Series were categorized into 4 advancing levels, ie verbal guidance, guidance with telestration, guidance with tele-assist and telesurgery. More advanced levels of surgical telementoring provide more effective and experiential teaching but are associated with increased telecommunication network bandwidth requirements and expenses. Concerns regarding patient safety and legal, financial, economic and ethical issues remain to be reconciled.Conclusions
Telementoring and telesurgery in minimally invasive surgery are becoming more practical and cost effective in facilitating teaching of advanced surgical skills worldwide and delivery of surgical care to underserved areas, yet many challenges remain. Maturity of these modalities depends on financial incentives, favorable legislation and collaboration with cybersecurity experts to ensure safety and cost-effectiveness.Citations & impact
Impact metrics
Citations of article over time
Alternative metrics
Smart citations by scite.ai
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been
supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1016/j.juro.2017.06.082
Article citations
Telesurgery: humanitarian and surgical benefits while navigating technologic and administrative challenges.
J Robot Surg, 18(1):393, 05 Nov 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 39499368
AI solutions for overcoming delays in telesurgery and telementoring to enhance surgical practice and education.
J Robot Surg, 18(1):403, 11 Nov 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 39527379 | PMCID: PMC11554828
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
Unraveling the role of cloud computing in health care system and biomedical sciences.
Heliyon, 10(7):e29044, 02 Apr 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 38601602 | PMCID: PMC11004887
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
Structured feedback and operative video debriefing with critical view of safety annotation in training of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled study.
Surg Endosc, 38(6):3241-3252, 23 Apr 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 38653899 | PMCID: PMC11133174
Telementoring Experience for Complex Bariatric Operation-Laparoscopic Single-Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy (SADI-S).
Obes Surg, 34(5):1983-1986, 26 Mar 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 38530550
Go to all (36) article citations
Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
White paper: technology for surgical telementoring-SAGES Project 6 Technology Working Group.
Surg Endosc, 33(3):684-690, 07 Jan 2019
Cited by: 11 articles | PMID: 30617422
Telementoring in robotic surgery.
Curr Opin Urol, 23(2):141-145, 01 Mar 2013
Cited by: 18 articles | PMID: 23357931
Review
Is it the End for Urologic Pelvic Laparoscopic Surgery?
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 27(3):139-146, 01 Jun 2017
Cited by: 2 articles | PMID: 28582377
Review
Telemedicine in surgery.
Br J Surg, 90(6):647-658, 01 Jun 2003
Cited by: 51 articles | PMID: 12808611
Review