Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


Purpose

To evaluate the clinical outcome of 16 eyes undergoing Descemet membrane endothelial transfer (DMET).

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, a consecutive series of 16 eyes from 16 patients was evaluated after subtotal detachment of the Descemet graft after a Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty procedure (n = 8) or intended DMET (n = 8) for either Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (n = 10) or bullous keratopathy (BK; n = 6).

Results

All 8 Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty procedures were complicated by subtotal detachment of the donor graft. The remaining 8 eyes that underwent a DMET procedure were uneventful and no postoperative complications occurred, except 1 eye with BK that experienced a postoperative wound leak. Throughout all postoperative time points, the partially attached status of all Descemet grafts was maintained. Although all eyes operated on for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy showed initial central corneal clearance, no eye operated for BK demonstrated any degree of corneal deturgescence. Ultimately, all 16 corneas decompensated and 15 of the 16 patients elected retransplantation, while 1 patient declined further surgery for health reasons. Retransplantation was performed on average 10.3 (±7.4) months (range, 3-31 mo) postoperatively.

Conclusions

Ultimately, regardless of the etiology of endothelial dysfunction, DMET fails to provide satisfactory results in the long term; durable corneal clearance may therefore require the presence of a nearly completely attached Descemet graft.

References 


Articles referenced by this article (25)


Show 10 more references (10 of 25)

Citations & impact 


Impact metrics

Jump to Citations

Citations of article over time

Smart citations by scite.ai
Smart citations by scite.ai include citation statements extracted from the full text of the citing article. The number of the statements may be higher than the number of citations provided by EuropePMC if one paper cites another multiple times or lower if scite has not yet processed some of the citing articles.
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1097/ico.0000000000001395

Supporting
Mentioning
Contrasting
1
14
0

Article citations


Go to all (7) article citations