Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


The role of angiogenic factors in the onset of clinical manifestations of preeclampsia was demonstrated in 2003 by the implication of sFlt-1, PlGF and VEGF, and in 2006 by the implication of soluble endoglin. Placental ischemia and inflammation observed in preeclampsia alter both the production and progression of angiogenic factors during pregnancy. During the first trimester, the combination of PlGF with clinical, biophysical and biological factors results in a better test than the conventional one. However, the clinical value of this method remains to be confirmed. During the second and third trimesters, the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio may be used, with or without pre-existing renal disease, for short-term prediction, diagnosis, and prognosis, and to evaluate the effectiveness of preeclampsia treatment. While a sFlt-1/PlGF ratio<38 and≤33, respectively, rules out the short-term onset and diagnosis of preeclampsia, a sFlt-1/PlGF ratio≥85 between 20 and 34 weeks of pregnancy and≥110 beyond 34 weeks of pregnancy confirms a diagnosis of preeclampsia. Angiogenic and non-angiogenic preeclampsia are identified by a sFlt-1PlGF≥85 and<85, respectively, with the risk of maternal and fetal complications at two weeks differing between the two. Similarly, a sFlt-1/PlGF ratio>665 and>205, respectively, is a good short-term predictor of adverse outcomes of early and late-onset preeclampsia. These values could be incorporated into future guidelines for better clinical management of preeclampsia.

Citations & impact 


Impact metrics

Jump to Citations

Citations of article over time

Alternative metrics

Altmetric item for https://www.altmetric.com/details/81569776
Altmetric
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/81569776

Smart citations by scite.ai
Smart citations by scite.ai include citation statements extracted from the full text of the citing article. The number of the statements may be higher than the number of citations provided by EuropePMC if one paper cites another multiple times or lower if scite has not yet processed some of the citing articles.
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1016/j.nephro.2018.10.005

Supporting
Mentioning
Contrasting
0
2
0

Article citations

Similar Articles 


To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.