Abstract
Background
Properly performed high-quality imaging is critical in the diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). Currently, conventional imaging in the form of an anteroposterior view of the pelvis and at least a second view is still the first step in the diagnosis of FAIS. Here, by determining the various parameters, the acetabular configuration should also be accurately assessed with regard to a combination with dysplasia or acetabular retroversion. MRI: MRI should also be demanded as standard before joint-preserving surgery. It allows for more precise detection of morphology, secondary chondrolabral damage, and thus helps identify outcome-relevant risk factors and cases that are too advanced in terms of degenerative aspects.Other imaging methods
Depending on the problem, MRI can be supplemented by intravenous or intra-articular application of contrast agents (indirect or direct MRA), determination of torsion, and, if necessary, even with the performance of a traction MRA. While the importance of invasive MRA has decreased due to the improvements of 3‑Tesla scanners in clinical practice, rotational analysis has gained in importance. Computed tomography (CT), although associated with increased radiation exposure, allows high-resolution imaging of bony structures and extremely illustrative 3D planning of complex corrections, and is an alternative to MRI for this purpose or in contraindications.Prospects
4D simulations appear useful and may make diagnostics and therapy planning safer and easier in the future. Thus, a broad portfolio of imaging techniques is available today, the advances of which have contributed significantly to the development of differentiated joint-preserving surgery of the hip joint.References
Articles referenced by this article (44)
The Warwick Agreement on femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI syndrome): an international consensus statement.
Br J Sports Med, (19):1169-1176 2016
MED: 27629403
What are the radiographic reference values for acetabular under- and overcoverage?
Clin Orthop Relat Res, (4):1234-1246 2015
MED: 25384429
Retroversion of the acetabulum. A cause of hip pain.
J Bone Joint Surg Br, (2):281-288 1999
MED: 10204935
Does the Rule of Thirds Adequately Detect Deficient and Excessive Acetabular Coverage?
Clin Orthop Relat Res, (5):974-987 2021
MED: 33300754
Ischial spine projection into the pelvis : a new sign for acetabular retroversion.
Clin Orthop Relat Res, (3):677-683 2008
MED: 18264856
The Femoro-Epiphyseal Acetabular Roof (FEAR) Index: A New Measurement Associated With Instability in Borderline Hip Dysplasia?
Clin Orthop Relat Res, (3):861-869 2016
MED: 27796801
[False profile of the pelvis. A new radiographic incidence for the study of the hip. Its use in dysplasias and different coxopathies].
Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic, 643-652 1961
MED: 14464207
The faux profil (oblique view) of the hip in the standing position. Contribution to the evaluation of osteoarthritis of the adult hip.
Ann Rheum Dis, (11):676-681 1998
MED: 9924210
The 'Hip Vacuum Sign'-a new radiographic phenomenon in femoro-acetabular impingement.
J Hip Preserv Surg, (4):346-351 2016
MED: 29340164
Comparison of six radiographic projections to assess femoral head/neck asphericity.
Clin Orthop Relat Res, 181-185 2006
MED: 16456309
Show 10 more references (10 of 44)
Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
What MRI Findings Predict Failure 10 Years After Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement?
Clin Orthop Relat Res, 475(4):1192-1207, 01 Apr 2017
Cited by: 25 articles | PMID: 27580735 | PMCID: PMC5339116
Patient-Specific 3-D Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Dynamic Simulation of Hip Impingement and Range of Motion Can Replace 3-D Computed Tomography-Based Simulation for Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement: Implications for Planning Open Hip Preservation Surgery and Hip Arthroscopy.
Am J Sports Med, 47(12):2966-2977, 05 Sep 2019
Cited by: 28 articles | PMID: 31486679
Location of Intra- and Extra-articular Hip Impingement Is Different in Patients With Pincer-Type and Mixed-Type Femoroacetabular Impingement Due to Acetabular Retroversion or Protrusio Acetabuli on 3D CT-Based Impingement Simulation.
Am J Sports Med, 48(3):661-672, 21 Jan 2020
Cited by: 22 articles | PMID: 31961701
[Imaging in joint-preserving hip surgery].
Radiologe, 62(3):271-284, 03 Mar 2022
Cited by: 1 article | PMID: 35238995 | PMCID: PMC8894169
Review Free full text in Europe PMC