Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Association between relative age at school and persistence of ADHD in prospective studies: an individual participant data meta-analysis.

Collaborators (160)

The lancet. Psychiatry, 25 Oct 2023, 10(12):922-933
https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(23)00272-9 PMID: 37898142 

A comment on this article appears in "Relative age and persistence of ADHD diagnosis in young children." Lancet Psychiatry. 2023 Dec;10(12):910-911. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(23)00334-6.

Abstract 

Background

The youngest children in a school class are more likely than the oldest to be diagnosed with ADHD, but this relative age effect is less frequent in older than in younger school-grade children. However, no study has explored the association between relative age and the persistence of ADHD diagnosis at older ages. We aimed to quantify the association between relative age and persistence of ADHD at older ages.

Methods

For this meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and PubPsych up to April 1, 2022, with terms related to "cohort" and "ADHD" with no date, publication type, or language restrictions. We gathered individual participant data from prospective cohorts that included at least ten children identified with ADHD before age 10 years. ADHD was defined by either a clinical diagnosis or symptoms exceeding clinical cutoffs. Relative age was recorded as the month of birth in relation to the school-entry cutoff date. Study authors were invited to share raw data or to apply a script to analyse data locally and generate anonymised results. Our outcome was ADHD status at a diagnostic reassessment, conducted at least 4 years after the initial assessment and after age 10 years. No information on sex, gender, or ethnicity was collected. We did a two-stage random-effects individual participant data meta-analysis to assess the association of relative age with persistence of ADHD at follow-up. This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020212650.

Findings

Of 33 119 studies generated by our search, we identified 130 eligible unique studies and were able to gather individual participant data from 57 prospective studies following up 6504 children with ADHD. After exclusion of 16 studies in regions with a flexible school entry system that did not allow confident linkage of birthdate to relative age, the primary analysis included 41 studies in 15 countries following up 4708 children for a period of 4 to 33 years. We found that younger relative age was not statistically significantly associated with ADHD persistence at follow-up (odds ratio 1·02, 95% CI 0·99-1·06; p=0·19). We observed statistically significant heterogeneity in our model (Q=75·82, p=0·0011, I2=45%). Participant-level sensitivity analyses showed similar results in cohorts with a robust relative age effect at baseline and when restricting to cohorts involving children with a clinical diagnosis of ADHD or with a follow-up duration of more than 10 years.

Interpretation

The diagnosis of ADHD in younger children in a class is no more likely to be disconfirmed over time than that of older children in the class. One interpretation is that the relative age effect decreases the likelihood of children of older relative age receiving a diagnosis of ADHD, and another is that assigning a diagnostic label of ADHD leads to unexplored carryover effects of the initial diagnosis that persist over time. Future studies should be conducted to explore these interpretations further.

Funding

None.

Full text links 

Read article at publisher's site: https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(23)00272-9

Citations & impact 

Impact metrics

1
Citation
Jump to Citations

Alternative metrics

Altmetric item for https://www.altmetric.com/details/155754855
Altmetric
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/155754855

Article citations

Similar Articles 

To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.

Funding 

Funders who supported this work.

Medical Research Council (5)

NHLBI NIH HHS (1)

NIAAA NIH HHS (1)

NIDA NIH HHS (1)

NIEHS NIH HHS (4)

NIMH NIH HHS (17)

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (1)

Wellcome Trust (2)