Abstract
Background
In last years the diffusion of carbapenem resistance in Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) is increasing worldwide, mainly due to the expression of carbapenemases. Cefiderocol has molecular characteristics that ideally confers activity against all CR-GNB, but resistant strains have already been identified. We describe cefiderocol susceptibility profile among multi-drug resistant Gram-negative isolated from pediatric patients.Methods
Prospective, single pediatric center study, 1st January 2020-15th June 2023. All GNB carbapenemases producers or phenotypically carbapenem-resistant isolated in the study period were tested for cefiderocol susceptibility. Clinical and microbiological data were collected. A descriptive analysis was performed, comparing the groups of cefiderocol-resistant vs. cefiderocol-susceptible Enterobacterales and non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria (NF-GNB).Results
Forty-seven GNB were tested for cefiderocol susceptibility; 38% were cefiderocol-resistant: 16/30 (52%) among Enterobacterales and 2/17 (12%) among NF-GNB. None of the patients were previously exposed to cefiderocol. Looking at Enterobacterales, resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam was higher among cefiderocol-resistant vs. cefiderocol-susceptible strains (62% vs 36%, respectively), as MBL expression (67% vs. 36%, respectively). Too few NF-GNB were cefiderocol-resistance to draw any conclusion. No difference in ICU admission and mortality was identified comparing cefiderocol-resistant vs. susceptible strains. Patients colonized/infected by cefiderocol-resistant strains had been previously hospitalized more frequently.Conclusion
In our cohort cefiderocol resistance was mostly registered among Enterobacterales, and especially among MBL producers' strains (that were alongside resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam). This could be explained by the known possible cross resistance mechanism among ceftazidime/avibactam and cefiderocol. Also, correlation of cefiderocol-resistance with previous hospitalization could be associated with horizontal resistance transmission. Looking at our data, we believe that cefiderocol should be use cautiously, especially empirically and in monotherapy, due to the high resistance rate.Citations & impact
Impact metrics
Article citations
Transmission Dynamics and Novel Treatments of High Risk Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: The Lens of One Health.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel), 17(9):1206, 12 Sep 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 39338368 | PMCID: PMC11434721
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
The Etiology of Bloodstream Infections at an Italian Pediatric Tertiary Care Hospital: A 17-Year-Long Series.
Pathogens, 13(8):675, 09 Aug 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 39204275 | PMCID: PMC11357311
Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
Cefiderocol: A Siderophore Cephalosporin with Activity Against Carbapenem-Resistant and Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli.
Drugs, 79(3):271-289, 01 Feb 2019
Cited by: 160 articles | PMID: 30712199
Review
Activity of cefiderocol and synergy of novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor-based combinations against metallo-β-lactamase-producing gram-negative bacilli: insights from a two-year study (2019-2020).
J Chemother, 35(3):198-204, 22 Jun 2022
Cited by: 6 articles | PMID: 35731718
In vitro activity of cefiderocol against Gram-negative bacterial pathogens in Germany.
J Glob Antimicrob Resist, 28:12-17, 14 Dec 2021
Cited by: 1 article | PMID: 34920174
Structural insights into the molecular mechanism of high-level ceftazidime-avibactam resistance conferred by CMY-185.
mBio, 15(2):e0287423, 05 Jan 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 38179965 | PMCID: PMC10865806