Abstract
Aims
Despite higher rates of revision after total hip arthroplasty (THA) being reported for uncemented stems in patients aged > 75 years, they are frequently used in this age group. Increased mortality after cemented fixation is often used as a justification, but recent data do not confirm this association. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the design of the stem and the type of fixation on the rate of revision and immediate postoperative mortality, focusing on the age and sex of the patients.Methods
A total of 333,144 patients with primary osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip who underwent elective THA between November 2012 and September 2022, using uncemented acetabular components without reconstruction shells, from the German arthroplasty registry were included in the study. The revision rates three years postoperatively for four types of stem (uncemented, uncemented with collar, uncemented short, and cemented) were compared within four age groups: < 60 years (Young), between 61 and 70 years (Mid-I), between 71 and 80 years (Mid-II), and aged > 80 years (Old). A noninferiority analysis was performed on the most frequently used designs of stem.Results
The design of the stem was found to have no significant influence on the rate of revision for either sex in the Young group. Uncemented collared stems had a significantly lower rate of revision compared with the other types of stem for females in the Mid-I group. There was a significantly higher rate of revision for uncemented stems in females in the Mid-II group compared with all other types of stem, while in males the rate for uncemented stems was only significantly higher than the rate for cemented stems. Cemented stems had a significantly lower revision rate compared with uncemented and short stems for both sexes in the Old cohort, as did females with collared stems. The rate of immediate postoperative mortality was similar for all types of stem in the Old age group, as were the American Society of Anesthesiologists grades.Conclusion
In patients aged > 80 years, uncemented and short stems had significantly higher revision rates compared with cemented and collared stems, especially in females. The design of the stem and type of fixation have to be analyzed in more detail than only considering cemented and uncemented fixation, in order to further improve the success of THA.Full text links
Read article at publisher's site: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.106b3.bjj-2023-0820.r2
Citations & impact
This article has not been cited yet.
Impact metrics
Alternative metrics
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/160995927
Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
[Influence of the Type of Hip-Component Fixation and Age of Patients on Mid-Term Revision Rate of Total Hip Replacement].
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech, 85(1):46-53, 01 Jan 2018
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 30257769
Uncemented and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
Acta Orthop, 81(1):34-41, 01 Feb 2010
Cited by: 228 articles | PMID: 20180715 | PMCID: PMC2856202
Improved survival of uncemented versus cemented femoral stems in patients aged < 70 years in a community total joint registry.
Clin Orthop Relat Res, 471(11):3588-3595, 20 Jul 2013
Cited by: 24 articles | PMID: 23873609 | PMCID: PMC3792261
International primary hip arthroplasty registry review: findings from current reports.
Ir J Med Sci, 192(6):2851-2858, 16 Mar 2023
Cited by: 1 article | PMID: 36928594
Review