Abstract
Importance
Patient-directed educational materials are a promising implementation strategy to expand deprescribing reach and adoption, but little is known about the impact across medication groups with potentially different perceived risks.Objective
To examine the impact of a patient-directed education intervention on clinician deprescribing of potentially low-benefit (proton pump inhibitors) or high-risk medications (high-dose gabapentin, diabetes agents with hypoglycemia risks).Design, setting, and participants
This pragmatic multisite nonrandomized clinical trial took place at 3 geographically distinct US Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers from April 2021 to October 2022. The total study sample was composed of the intervention cohort and the historical control cohort cared for by 103 primary care practitioners (PCPs).Intervention
The primary intervention component was a medication-specific brochure, mailed during the intervention time frame to all eligible patients 2 to 3 weeks prior to upcoming primary care appointments. Patients seen by the same PCPs at the same sites 1 year prior to the study intervention served as controls.Main outcome and measures
The primary binary outcome variable was deprescribing 6 months after the intervention, defined as complete cessation or any dose reduction of the target medication using VA pharmacy dispensing data.Results
The total study sample included 5071 patients. The overall rate of deprescribing among the intervention cohort (n = 2539) was 29.5% compared with 25.8% among the controls (n = 2532). In an unadjusted model, the intervention cohort was statistically significantly more likely to have deprescribing (odds ratio [OR], 1.17 [95% CI, 1.03-1.33]; P = .02). In a multivariable logistic regression model nesting patients within PCPs within sites and controlling for patient and PCP characteristics, the odds of deprescribing in the intervention cohort were 1.21 times that of the control cohort (95% CI, 1.05-1.38; P = .008). The difference in deprescribing prevalence between the intervention and control cohorts (proton pump inhibitors: 29.4% vs 25.4%; gabapentin: 40.2% vs 36.2%; hypoglycemia risk: 27.3% vs 25.1%) did not statistically significantly differ by medication group (P = .90).Conclusion and relevance
This nonrandomized clinical trial found that patient-directed educational materials provided prior to scheduled primary care appointments can effectively promote deprescribing for potentially low-benefit and high-risk medication groups.Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0429490.References
Articles referenced by this article (37)
Proton pump inhibitor use: systematic review of global trends and practices.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol, (9):1159-1172 2023
MED: 37420019
Role of the US Veterans Health Administration Clinical Pharmacy Specialist Provider: Shaping the Future of Comprehensive Medication Management.
Can J Hosp Pharm, (2):152-158 2020
MED: 32362673
Rates of Deintensification of Blood Pressure and Glycemic Medication Treatment Based on Levels of Control and Life Expectancy in Older Patients With Diabetes Mellitus.
JAMA Intern Med, (12):1942-1949 2015
MED: 26502220
Academic Detailing to Reduce Sedative-Hypnotic Prescribing in Older Veterans.
J Pharm Pract, (2):287-294 2019
MED: 31446823
Deciding When It's Better to Deprescribe Medicines Than to Continue Them.
JAMA, (24):2328-2330 2023
MED: 38019481
Impact of large scale, multicomponent intervention to reduce proton pump inhibitor overuse in integrated healthcare system: difference-in-difference study.
BMJ, e076484 2024
MED: 38604668
Effectiveness of the MOVE! Multidisciplinary weight loss program for veterans in Los Angeles.
Prev Chronic Dis, E112 2013
MED: 23823701
The three numbers you need to know about healthcare: the 60-30-10 Challenge.
BMC Med, (1):102 2020
MED: 32362273
Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement.
BMJ, a2390 2008
MED: 19001484
Barriers and enablers to deprescribing in long-term care: A qualitative investigation into the opinions of healthcare professionals in Ireland.
PLoS One, (12):e0274552 2022
MED: 36520798
Show 10 more references (10 of 37)
Citations & impact
Impact metrics
Alternative metrics
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/168194904
Article citations
Approaches to Deprescribing Proton Pump Inhibitors in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review.
J Clin Med, 13(20):6283, 21 Oct 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 39458232 | PMCID: PMC11508458
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
Direct-to-consumer strategies to promote deprescribing in primary care: a pilot study.
BMC Prim Care, 23(1):53, 22 Mar 2022
Cited by: 6 articles | PMID: 35317734 | PMCID: PMC8939089
Deprescribing Education vs Usual Care for Patients With Cognitive Impairment and Primary Care Clinicians: The OPTIMIZE Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial.
JAMA Intern Med, 182(5):534-542, 01 May 2022
Cited by: 34 articles | PMID: 35343999 | PMCID: PMC8961395
Deprescribing Medications Among Older Adults From End of Hospitalization Through Postacute Care: A Shed-MEDS Randomized Clinical Trial.
JAMA Intern Med, 183(3):223-231, 01 Mar 2023
Cited by: 20 articles | PMID: 36745422 | PMCID: PMC9989899
Deprescribing versus continuation of chronic proton pump inhibitor use in adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 3:CD011969, 16 Mar 2017
Cited by: 77 articles | PMID: 28301676 | PMCID: PMC6464703
Review Free full text in Europe PMC