Abstract
Introduction
In 2018, the US Preventive Services Task Force updated cervical cancer screening recommendations to allow for screening every 5 years with primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in combination with cytology (cotesting) or every 5 years with primary HPV screening alone. Despite these changes, the uptake of primary HPV screening has been lower than expected. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the patient perspective of an integrated health system transition from cotesting to primary HPV testing among a 30- to 65-year-old cohort.Methods
Semistructured phone interviews were conducted from July to December 2023 at Kaiser Permanente Colorado with 16 members aged 30-65 years. Interviews asked about reactions to the forthcoming change in cervical cancer screening, personal concern about cervical cancer risk, feedback on patient-facing education materials, and preference on communication timing and modality.Results
Participants reported concerns about cervical cancer screening intervals, primarily the reduction in frequency leading to underdiagnosis of sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Participants recommended defining the rationale for the change to primary HPV testing in the patient education materials. Participants preferred communication about the change in-clinic between practitioner and patient.Discussion
The interviews identified key themes, including the differentiation between cervical cancer and STI screening methodologies, potential underdiagnosis of STI and cervical cancer, and the rationale supporting primary HPV testing and associated screening intervals.Conclusion
These qualitative findings can inform health systems of potential patient concerns to address when considering the transition from cotesting every 3 years to primary HPV testing every 5 years for cervical cancer screening.Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
Cervical cancer screening for individuals at average risk: 2020 guideline update from the American Cancer Society.
CA Cancer J Clin, 70(5):321-346, 30 Jul 2020
Cited by: 320 articles | PMID: 32729638
Screening for Cervical Cancer With High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Testing: A Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), Rockville (MD), 27 Sep 2018
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 30256575
ReviewBooks & documents Free full text in Europe PMC
Screening for Cervical Cancer in Primary Care: A Decision Analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA, 320(7):706-714, 01 Aug 2018
Cited by: 66 articles | PMID: 30140882 | PMCID: PMC8653579
Screening for Cervical Cancer: A Decision Analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), Rockville (MD), 04 May 2012
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 22553886
ReviewBooks & documents Free full text in Europe PMC