Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


Background

Analysis of urinary organic acids (UOAs) by gas chromatography mass-spectrometry (GC-MS) is widely used in metabolomic studies. It is a complex test with many limitations and pitfalls yet there is limited evidence in the literature to support best practice. This study investigated the impact of drying down time and temperature on the recovery of 16 key analytes from solvent extracts.

Methods

Pooled urine specimens were enriched with organic acids. Urine aliquots (n = 3) were acidified and extracted into diethyl ether and ethyl acetate. Extracts were dried under nitrogen at ambient temperature (25 °C); 40 °C; 60 °C then left for 0; +5; +15 min. Dried extracts were derivatised with N,O,-bis-(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide prior to analysis by GC-MS. Urine specimens from individuals with biotinidase deficiency, maple syrup urine disease (MSUD) and ketotic hypoglycemia were analysed to demonstrate the potential clinical impact.

Results

Recovery of shorter chain hydroxycarboxylic acids decreased significantly when extracts were dried above 25 °C (mean recovery 89 % at 60 °C, p < 0.01) or left under nitrogen post-drying (mean recovery at ambient + 15 min, 40 °C + 15mins and 60 °C + 15mins was 56 %, 12 % and 2 %, respectively, p < 0.01). Whilst dicarboxylic acids/medium chain fatty acids were unaffected by temperature (mean recovery 100 %), prolonged drying reduced recovery (mean recovery 85 % at 60 °C + 15mins, p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Evaporation of solvent extracts with heat and/or prolonged drying under nitrogen results in significant losses of the shorter chain hydroxycarboxylic acids. The evaporation protocol must be carefully controlled to ensure accurate and reproducible results, preventing misdiagnoses and/or misinterpretation of results.

Citations & impact 


This article has not been cited yet.

Impact metrics

Alternative metrics

Altmetric item for https://www.altmetric.com/details/169579379
Altmetric
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/169579379

Funding 


Funders who supported this work.

UK Research and Innovation Medical Research Council