Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Optimal timing of anticoagulation after acute ischaemic stroke with atrial fibrillation (OPTIMAS): a multicentre, blinded-endpoint, phase 4, randomised controlled trial.

Show less

Collaborators (437)

Author information

Affiliations

  • 1. Stroke Research Centre, Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Comprehensive Stroke Service, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
      Authors
    • Werring DJ 1
    (1 author)
  • 2. Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK.
      Authors
    • Dehbi HM 2
    • Ahmed N 2
    • Balogun M 2
    • Bennett K 2
    • Bordea E 2
    • Caverly E 2
    • Chau M 2
    • Cullen M 2
    • Doré CJ 2
    • Fenner R 2
    • Gill A 2
    • Hunter R 2
    • Jayanthi A 2
    • Mazurczak I 2
    • Ndoutoumou A 2
    • Sims H 2
    • Vanniyasingam T 2
    • Freemantle N 2
    (18 authors)
  • 3. Stroke Research Centre, Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
      Authors
    • Arram L 3
    • Best JG 3
    • Massingham S 3
    • Nash PS 3
    (4 authors)
  • 4. Research Department of Haematology, University College London, London, UK; Department of Haematology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
      Authors
    • Cohen H 4
    (1 author)
  • 5. Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, University Department of Geriatric Medicine Felix Platter, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
      Authors
    • Engelter ST 5
    (1 author)
    • Show all (11)

ORCIDs linked to this article

Lancet (London, England), 23 Oct 2024, :S0140-6736(24)02197-4
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(24)02197-4 PMID: 39491870 

Abstract 

Background

The optimal timing of anticoagulation for patients with acute ischaemic stoke with atrial fibrillation is uncertain. We investigated the efficacy and safety of early compared with delayed initiation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with acute ischaemic stroke associated with atrial fibrillation.

Methods

We performed a multicentre, open-label, blinded-endpoint, parallel-group, phase 4, randomised controlled trial at 100 UK hospitals. Adults with atrial fibrillation and a clinical diagnosis of acute ischaemic stroke and whose physician was uncertain of the optimal timing for DOAC initiation were eligible for inclusion in the study. We randomly assigned participants (1:1) to early (ie, ≤4 days from stroke symptom onset) or delayed (ie, 7-14 days) anticoagulation initiation with any DOAC, using an independent online randomisation service with random permuted blocks and varying block length, stratified by stroke severity at randomisation. Participants and treating clinicians were not masked to treatment assignment, but all outcomes were adjudicated by a masked independent external adjudication committee using all available clinical records, brain imaging reports, and source images. The primary outcome was a composite of recurrent ischaemic stroke, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, unclassifiable stroke, or systemic embolism incidence at 90 days in a modified intention-to-treat population. We used a gatekeeper approach by sequentially testing for a non-inferiority margin of 2 percentage points, followed by testing for superiority. OPTIMAS is registered with ISRCTN (ISRCTN17896007) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03759938), and the trial is ongoing.

Findings

Between July 5, 2019, and Jan 31, 2024, 3648 patients were randomly assigned to early or delayed DOAC initiation. 27 participants did not fulfil the eligibility criteria or withdrew consent to include their data, leaving 3621 patients (1814 in the early group and 1807 in the delayed group; 1981 men and 1640 women) in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. The primary outcome occurred in 59 (3·3%) of 1814 participants in the early DOAC initiation group compared with 59 (3·3%) of 1807 participants in the delayed DOAC initiation group (adjusted risk difference [RD] 0·000, 95% CI -0·011 to 0·012). The upper limit of the 95% CI for the adjusted RD was less than the non-inferiority margin of 2 percentage points (pnon-inferiority=0·0003). Superiority was not identified (psuperiority=0·96). Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage occurred in 11 (0·6%) participants allocated to the early DOAC initiation group compared with 12 (0·7%) participants allocated to the delayed DOAC initiation group (adjusted RD 0·001, -0·004 to 0·006; p=0·78).

Interpretation

Early DOAC initiation within 4 days after ischaemic stroke associated with atrial fibrillation was non-inferior to delayed initiation for the composite outcome of ischaemic stroke, intracranial haemorrhage, unclassifiable stroke, or systemic embolism at 90 days. Our findings do not support the current common and guideline-supported practice of delaying DOAC initiation after ischaemic stroke with atrial fibrillation.

Funding

British Heart Foundation.

Full text links 

Read article at publisher's site: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(24)02197-4

Citations & impact 

This article has not been cited yet.

Impact metrics

Alternative metrics

Altmetric item for https://www.altmetric.com/details/169617319
Altmetric
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/169617319

Similar Articles 

To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.

Funding 

Funders who supported this work.

British Heart Foundation