Abstract
Objective
To develop predictive equations, estimating the probability that an individual intensive care unit (ICU) patient will receive life support within the next 24 hrs.Design
Prospective, multicenter, inception cohort study.Setting
Forty-two ICUs in 40 U.S. hospitals, including 26 that were randomly selected and 14 volunteer hospitals, primarily university or large tertiary care centers.Patients
A consecutive sample of 17,440 ICU admissions.Interventions
None.Measurements and main results
A series of multivariate equations were developed to create daily estimates of probability of life support in the next 24 hrs. These equations used demographic, physiologic, and treatment information obtained at the time of ICU admission and during the first 7 ICU days. The most important determinants of next day risk for life support were the current day's therapy and Acute Physiology Score of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III score. Other predictor variables included diagnosis, age, chronic health status, emergency surgery, previous day Acute Physiology Score, and hospital stay and location before ICU admission. The cross-validated ICU day 1, 2, and 3 predictive equations had receiver operating characteristic areas of 0.90. Survival, ICU readmission rate, and the number and type of therapies received by patients predicted at < 10% risk for active treatment suggest that discharge of patients meeting these criteria to an intermediate care unit or hospital ward could reduce ICU bed demand without compromising patient safety.Conclusions
Accurate, objective predictions of next day risk for life support can be developed, using readily available patient information. Supplementing physician judgment with these objective risk assessments deserves evaluation for the role of these assessments in enhancing patient safety and improving ICU resource utilization.Citations & impact
Impact metrics
Article citations
A Machine Learning Based Discharge Prediction of Cardiovascular Diseases Patients in Intensive Care Units.
Healthcare (Basel), 10(6):966, 24 May 2022
Cited by: 1 article | PMID: 35742018 | PMCID: PMC9222879
The Critical Care Society of Southern Africa Consensus Statement on ICU Triage and Rationing (ConICTri).
South Afr J Crit Care, 35(1b), 15 Aug 2019
Cited by: 1 article | PMID: 37719327 | PMCID: PMC10503494
Comparison of Unplanned Intensive Care Unit Readmission Scores: A Prospective Cohort Study.
PLoS One, 10(11):e0143127, 23 Nov 2015
Cited by: 21 articles | PMID: 26600463 | PMCID: PMC4658118
Readmissions and death after ICU discharge: development and validation of two predictive models.
PLoS One, 7(11):e48758, 07 Nov 2012
Cited by: 51 articles | PMID: 23144958 | PMCID: PMC3492441
Severity of illness scoring systems in the intensive care unit.
Crit Care Med, 39(1):163-169, 01 Jan 2011
Cited by: 113 articles | PMID: 20838329
Review
Go to all (35) article citations
Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
Intensive care unit length of stay: Benchmarking based on Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV.
Crit Care Med, 34(10):2517-2529, 01 Oct 2006
Cited by: 135 articles | PMID: 16932234
The Stability and Workload Index for Transfer score predicts unplanned intensive care unit patient readmission: initial development and validation.
Crit Care Med, 36(3):676-682, 01 Mar 2008
Cited by: 84 articles | PMID: 18431260
Determinants of postintensive care unit mortality: a prospective multicenter study.
Crit Care Med, 31(2):428-432, 01 Feb 2003
Cited by: 74 articles | PMID: 12576947
Admitting cancer patients to the intensive care unit.
Crit Care Clin, 4(1):183-191, 01 Jan 1988
Cited by: 20 articles | PMID: 3061577
Review