Abstract
Objectives
Assess the acceptance and ease of use of Nutrition Practice Guidelines for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus by dietitians in a variety of settings; determine if nutrition care activities of dietitians change when practice guidelines are available; measure changes in patient control of blood glucose level, measured as glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c); compare patient satisfaction with care and perceptions about quality of life.Design
Using the approach of outcomes research, volunteer dietitians were recruited and assigned randomly to a usual care group or a practice guidelines group. Patients with type 1 diabetes were enrolled by dietitians and followed up for a 3-month period. Outcome measures included dietitian care activities, changes in patient HbA1c levels, and patient satisfaction and perceptions about quality of life.Subjects/settings
Dietitians from across the United States who responded to a recruitment notice participated. Their work settings included diabetes referral centers, endocrinology clinics, primary care and community health clinics, hospitals, and a worksite clinic. They recruited patients from their setting for the study. Outcome data were available from dietitians providing care to 24 patients using the new practice guidelines and dietitians providing care to 30 patients using more traditional methods.Statistical analysis
chi 2 Test, t test, and analysis of covariance.Results
Dietitians in the practice guidelines group spent 63% more time with patients and were more likely to do an assessment and discuss results with patients than dietitians in the usual care group. Practice guidelines dietitians paid greater attention to glycemic control goals. Levels of HbA1c improved at 3 months in 21 (88%) of practice guidelines patients compared with 16 (53%) of usual care patients. Practice guidelines patients achieved greater reductions in HbA1c level than usual care patients (-1.00 vs -0.33). This difference was statistically significant and clinically meaningful.Conclusions/applications
Dietitians responded positively to practice guidelines for type 1 diabetes. Use of guidelines resulted in changes in dietitian practices and produced greater improvements in patient blood glucose outcomes at 3 months compared with usual care. Practice guidelines did not significantly influence patient satisfaction with care of perceived quality of life.Full text links
Read article at publisher's site: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-8223(98)00017-0
Read article for free, from open access legal sources, via Unpaywall: http://www.jandonline.org/article/S0002822398000170/pdf
References
Articles referenced by this article (23)
Position statement
Diabetes Care., (suppl 1):S8- 1996
Nutrition principles for the management of diabetes and related complications.
Diabetes Care, (5):490-518 1994
MED: 8062628
Position statement
Diabetes Care., (suppl 1):S16- 1996
Title not supplied
1997
Scientific underpinnings for the profession: dietitians in research.
J Am Diet Assoc, (6):593-597 1997
MED: 9183318
Assessment of nutrition care provided to patients with diabetes in primary-care clinics.
J Am Diet Assoc, (7):854-856 1992
MED: 1497752
Evaluation and comparison of the nutrition care process for persons with diabetes among inpatient and outpatient dietitians.
Diabetes Educ, (5):403-408 1993
MED: 8137696
Medical nutrition therapy in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus improves clinical outcome.
J Am Diet Assoc, (6):700-701 1995
MED: 7759749
Expanded role of the dietitian in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial: implications for clinical practice. The DCCT Research Group.
J Am Diet Assoc, (7):758-64, 767 1993
MED: 8320401
The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
N Engl J Med. 1993
Show 10 more references (10 of 23)
Citations & impact
Impact metrics
Article citations
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 5:CD014513, 31 May 2023
Cited by: 5 articles | PMID: 37254718 | PMCID: PMC10233616
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
The Impact of Exercise Training Intensity on Physiological Adaptations and Insulin Resistance in Women with Abdominal Obesity.
Healthcare (Basel), 10(12):2533, 14 Dec 2022
Cited by: 3 articles | PMID: 36554057 | PMCID: PMC9778339
Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 8:CD004398, 31 Jul 2020
Cited by: 54 articles | PMID: 32748975 | PMCID: PMC8475791
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
Medical and Psychological Considerations for Carbohydrate-Restricted Diets in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes.
Curr Diab Rep, 19(6):27, 27 Apr 2019
Cited by: 5 articles | PMID: 31030356
Review
Insights on Medical Nutrition Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: An Indian Perspective.
Adv Ther, 36(3):520-547, 07 Feb 2019
Cited by: 9 articles | PMID: 30729455 | PMCID: PMC6824451
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
Go to all (70) article citations
Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
Impact of gestational diabetes mellitus nutrition practice guidelines implemented by registered dietitians on pregnancy outcomes.
J Am Diet Assoc, 106(9):1426-1433, 01 Sep 2006
Cited by: 61 articles | PMID: 16963348
Effectiveness of medical nutrition therapy provided by dietitians in the management of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
J Am Diet Assoc, 95(9):1009-1017, 01 Sep 1995
Cited by: 154 articles | PMID: 7657902
Effectiveness of medical nutrition treatment delivered by dietitians on glycaemic outcomes and lipid profiles of Arab, Omani patients with Type 2 diabetes.
Diabet Med, 29(2):236-244, 01 Feb 2012
Cited by: 30 articles | PMID: 21824187
Effectiveness of Dietetic Consultations in Primary Health Care: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.
J Acad Nutr Diet, 117(12):1941-1962, 19 Aug 2017
Cited by: 75 articles | PMID: 28826840
Review