Abstract
Despite recent advancements in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), nearly all patients ultimately relapse and many become refractory to their previous therapies. Although many therapies exist with diverse mechanisms of action, it is not yet clear how the differences in MM biology across patients impacts the likelihood of success for existing therapies and those in the pipeline. Therefore, we not only need the ability to predict which patients are at high risk for disease progression, but also a means to understand the mechanisms underlying their risk. We hypothesized that knowledge of the biological networks that give rise to MM, specifically the transcriptional regulatory network (TRN) and the mechanisms by which mutations impact gene regulation, would enable improved predictions of disease progression and actionable insights for treatment. Here we present a method to infer TRNs from multi-omics data and apply it to the generation of a MM TRN that links chromosomal abnormalities and somatic mutations to downstream effects on gene expression via perturbation of transcriptional regulators. We find that 141 genetic programs underlie the disease and that the activity profile of these programs fall into one of 25 distinct transcriptional states. These transcriptional signatures prove to be more predictive of outcomes than do mutations and reveal plausible mechanisms for relapse, including the establishment of an immuno-suppressive microenvironment. Moreover, we observe subtype-specific vulnerabilities to interventions with existing drugs and motivate the development of new targeted therapies that appear especially promising for relapsed refractory MM.
Full text links
Read article at publisher's site: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.01.012351
Read article for free, from open access legal sources, via Unpaywall: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41698-021-00185-0.pdf
Citations & impact
This article has not been cited yet.
Impact metrics
Alternative metrics
Smart citations by scite.ai
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been
supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1101/2020.04.01.012351
Supporting
Mentioning
Contrasting
0
5
0