Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


Across the tree of life, species have repeatedly evolved similar phenotypes. While well-studied for ecological traits, there is also evidence for convergent evolution of sexually selected traits. Swordtail fish ( Xiphophorus ) are a classic model system for studying sexual selection, and female Xiphophorus exhibit strong mate preferences for large male body size and a range of sexually dimorphic ornaments. However, sexually selected traits have been lost multiple times in the genus. Phylogenetic relationships between species in this group have historically been controversial, likely as a result of prevalent gene flow, resulting in uncertainty over the number of losses of ornamentation and large body size. Here, we use whole-genome sequencing approaches to re-examine phylogenetic relationships within a Xiphophorus clade that varies in the presence and absence of sexually selected traits. Using wild-caught individuals, we determine the phylogenetic placement of a small, unornamented species, X. continens , confirming an additional loss of ornamentation and large body size in the clade. With these revised phylogenetic relationships, we analyze evidence for coevolution between body size and other sexually selected traits using a phylogenetically independent contrasts approach. These results provide insights into the evolutionary pressures driving the recurrent loss of suites of sexually selected traits.

Citations & impact 


This article has not been cited yet.

Impact metrics

Alternative metrics

Altmetric item for https://www.altmetric.com/details/140545515
Altmetric
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/140545515

Smart citations by scite.ai
Smart citations by scite.ai include citation statements extracted from the full text of the citing article. The number of the statements may be higher than the number of citations provided by EuropePMC if one paper cites another multiple times or lower if scite has not yet processed some of the citing articles.
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1101/2022.12.24.521833

Supporting
Mentioning
Contrasting
2
5
0