Abstract
Free full text
Cutting Edge: CD4+ T Cell Control of CD8+ T Cell Reactivity to a Model Tumor Antigen
Abstract
Neoantigens resulting from the inherent genomic instability of tumor cells generally do not trigger immune recognition. Similarly, transfection of tumors with model Ags often fails to elicit CD8+ T cell responses or alter a tumor's growth rate or lethality. We report here that the adoptive transfer of activated Th1-type CD4+ T cells specific for a model tumor Ag results in the de novo generation of CD8+ T cells with specificity to that Ag and concomitant tumor destruction. The anti-tumor effects of the CD4+ T cells required the presence of both MHC class I and class II on host cells, as evidenced by experiments in knockout mice, suggesting that CD4+ T cells enhanced the ability of host APC to activate endogenous CD8+ T cells. These results indicate that the apparent inability of tumor cells expressing highly immunogenic epitopes to activate tumor-specific CD8+ T cells can be altered by activated CD4+ T cells.
Most tumor cells are characterized by genetic instability, which results in deletions and additions to the tumor genome (1) and leads to the generation of new tumor Ags. These neoantigens often fail to elicit immune recognition and tumor destruction. In mouse models, tumor cells have been transfected with genes encoding a variety of highly immunogenic Ags with no change in the tumor's growth rate or lethality. These Ags include OVA (2), glycoprotein from lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (3), nucleoprotein (4), and hemagglutinin (5) from influenza A virus and β-galactosidase (β-gal)2 from Escherichia coli (6).
CD8+ T cells have long been thought to play a central role as immune effectors in the tumor setting. However, while LacZ-transfected tumor cell lines can be recognized by β-gal-specific CD8+ T cells, they do not elicit β-gal-specific CD8+ T cells. Why is this the case? β-Gal is large (1023 aa) and contains many potential immunogenic epitopes. Ag-specific cytolytic responses are efficiently elicited after immunization of mice with a variety of different recombinant viruses encoding LacZ (7).
CD4+ T cells may serve to control the activation and persistence of the CD8+ T cell response, because they play a major role in the induction of autoimmune disease and in the orchestration of anti-viral immunity (8-11). CD8+ T cells specific for viral Ags have been found to be inhibited under conditions in which CD4+ T cell help was lacking (12). To explore the impact of CD4+ T cells on Ag-specific CD8+ T cells in the tumor setting, we generated a β-gal-specific, IL-2-secreting, Th1-type CD4+ T cell clone, B12, and used a LacZ-transduced tumor, WP4.β-gal, as a target. Using this experimental system, we address the question: What are the effects of Ag-specific CD4+ T cells on the function of endogenous, Ag-specific CD8+ T cells?
Materials and Methods
Generation of CD4+ T cell clones
C57BL/6 mice (National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD) were immunized with a vaccinia virus expressing β-gal (13). Three weeks later, spleens were harvested and CD4+ cells were isolated by passage over a negative selection column (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). CD4+ T cells were plated at 8 × 105 cells/well in 24-well plates in complete media (6). Irradiated syngeneic splenocytes pulsed with 100 μg/ml of β-gal protein (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) were added at 2 × 106 cells/well every 2 wk. Recombinant IL-2 (Chiron, Emeryville, CA) was added on day 3 of culture at 5 CU/ml. Reactivity after limiting dilution cloning was assessed by incubation of 2 × 105 CD4+ T cells with 2 × 105 splenocytes pulsed with 100 μg/ml β-gal protein. Supernatants were evaluated for the presence of IL-4 and IL-2 by ELISA (Endogen, Woburn, MA). Control CD4+ T cell clones were similarly generated from mice immunized with OVA protein (Sigma) in IFA. FACS analysis was performed on the T cell clone using anti-CD4 (L3T4) and anti-CD8 (Ly-2) Abs (PharMingen, San Diego, CA). Stained cells were analyzed on a FACScan (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA).
For Ab blocking experiments, 105 effectors were incubated with 1 × 105 splenocytes in the presence of 20 μg/ml of Abs specific for I-Ab (M5/114.15.2), CD4 (L3T4), or MHC class I (28-8-6) (PharMingen). After 30 min, 100 μg/ml of OVA or β-gal protein was added. Supernatants were assayed for the presence of IL-2 by ELISA (Endogen).
Tumors
The weakly immunogenic, methylcholanthrene-induced MCA-205 fibrosarcoma and a clone of this line, WP4.WT, have been described previously (14). WP4.WT was retrovirally transduced with an LSXN-based retrovirus encoding the LacZ gene driven by a long terminal repeat to produce the WP4.β-gal line, which was cloned by limiting dilution and selected for high expression of β-gal as assessed by 5-bromo-4-chloro-3 indoyl β-d-galactoside (X-Gal) staining.
In vivo experiments
A total of 5 × 105 tumor cells were injected i.v., and CD4+ T cells were transferred i.v. 3 days later. Mice were sacrificed on day 14–16 after tumor injection, lungs were removed and stained with india ink, and lung nodules were counted in a blinded fashion. In Ab-depletion experiments, mice were given the mAb 2.43 as described (2). Depletion was confirmed by FACS analysis. Class II knockout (KO) and β2-microglobulin (β2m) KO mice (C57BL/6TacfBR-[KO]AβbN5 and C57BL/6GphTacfBR[KO]β2mN5) and their respective controls are on a B6 background and were obtained from Taconic (Germantown, NY).
To generate CD8+ cultures, mice were inoculated with tumor cells then treated with 3 × 105 CD4+ T cells 3 days later. Fifteen days later, splenocytes were harvested then incubated in upright T25 flasks (two spleens pooled per three flasks) in 20 ml of culture medium with 1 μM peptide for 6 days. The β-gal96–103 peptide used was DAPIYTNV (15). Irrelevant peptides varied between experiments and included NP366–374 (ASNENMETM), hgp10025–33 (KVPRNQDWL), or mgp10025–33 (EGSRNQDWL). IFN-γ release was measured in supernatants after overnight incubation of 2 × 105 cells with 1 μM peptide added directly to the culture well.
Results and Discussion
Generation of an experimental tumor system using β-gal as a model Ag
To study the effects of Ag-specific CD4+ T cells on the function of endogenous, Ag-specific CD8+ T cells, we generated a β-gal specific, CD4+ T cell population from mice immunized with a vaccinia virus containing the LacZ gene. After enrichment for CD4+ T cells, splenocytes were restimulated in vitro with β-gal protein. The β-gal-specific T cell line was cloned by limiting dilution, yielding two types of specific clones: those that secreted predominantly Th1-type cytokines, and those that secreted predominantly Th2-type cytokines (Fig. 1A).
One Th1-type CD4+ (Fig. 1B) clone, B12, produced IL-2 and IFN-γ, but not IL-4 or IL-10, and grew continuously for over 9 mo, allowing for further study. Ab-blocking experiments showed that the β-gal reactivity was class II restricted and CD4 dependent (Fig. 1C). As a β-gal-expressing tumor target, we employed a LacZ-transfected WP4.β-gal subclone, which was shown to be able to process and present Ags on its surface because it could be recognized by Kb-restricted, β-gal-specific CD8+ T cells (not shown).
CD4+ T cell clone mediates regression of β-gal-expressing tumor in vivo: requirement for host MHC class I and class II molecules
To evaluate if the B12 β-gal-specific, CD4+ T cell clone could mediate tumor destruction, the WP4.β-gal tumor was injected i.v. and allowed to establish for 3 days. Groups treated with the B12 clone had significantly fewer pulmonary nodules than untreated controls at doses as low as 1 × 105 cells in titering experiments (data not shown). Treatment of WP4.β-gal with 3 × 105 B12 clone significantly reduced the average number of lung nodules in repeated experiments (for example from 85 to 17 in Fig. 2A or 174 to 6 in Fig. 2D). The presence of host CD8+ cells was required for this effect (Fig. 2B). To determine the specificity of the observed tumor treatment, the parental WP4.WT was included in the same experiment. No therapy was observed in mice bearing the parental tumor, indicating that tumor expression of β-gal was required (Fig. 2C). Adoptive transfer of a control Th1-type CD4+ T cell clone specific for OVA had no effect on the β-gal expressing tumor (not shown).
No specific release of IL-2 was observed upon coculture of the CD4+ B12 clone with tumor. As is characteristic of mouse sarcomas, the WP4.WT and WP4.β-gal tumor cell lines stained positive for MHC class I but negative for MHC class II (not shown), even after treatment with IFN-γ. In contrast, the expression of I-Ab was up-regulated on the B16 melanoma control cell line after incubation with IFN-γ, as previously shown (16).
CD4+ T cells are known to interact with MHC class II-expressing host cells, especially dendritic cells (DC), altering their ability to activate other components of the immune system. To assess whether the presence of host MHC class I and MHC class II was required for tumor eradication after adoptive transfer of the CD4+ B12 clone, we performed experiments using the WP4.β-gal tumor in KO mice with homozygous deficiencies in β2m (Fig. 2E) or MHC class II (Fig. 2F). The B12 clone was therapeutically ineffective against the WP4.β-gal tumor in both strains, indicating a requirement for both MHC class I and MHC class II expression by host cells.
Antitumor effect of CD4+ T cells is through an indirect mechanism involving the recruitment of host Ag-specific CD8+ T cells
APC, such as DC, can cross-present shed β-gal tumor Ag in the context of both MHC class I and class II molecules. The interaction of a host APC with Ag-specific CD4+ T cells can make it capable of stimulating naive, endogenous CD8+ cytotoxic T cells, which may then function as specific effector cells capable of lysing tumor. CD8+ T cells were important effector cells in our model because depletion of CD8+ T cells in wild-type mice abrogated the therapeutic effects of the CD4+ T cell clone (Fig. 2, A and B).
To directly assess the induction of Ag-specific host CD8+ T cells, fresh splenocytes from tumor-bearing mice that had been treated with the B12 clone were cocultured with the Kb-restricted, immunodominant β1 epitope from β-gal (15). In three experiments, potent β-gal-specific CD8+ T cell responses were elicited (Fig. 3A). CD8+ T cells were generated only from mice receiving the B12 helper clone that were then exposed to the β-gal peptide, but not a control peptide, ex vivo. CD8+ T cell responses were not elicited in nontumor bearing mice whose peptide-stimulated splenocytes exhibited a stimulation index of 0.9, nor were any Ag-specific CD8+ T cells seen in mice bearing the parental tumor.
The transfer of a similarly generated, IL-2-secreting, OVA-specific CD4+ Th clone into WP4.β-gal bearing mice did not induce β-gal-specific CD8+ T cells (Fig. 3B). These findings are consistent with experiments described above in which we failed to observe a reduction of WP4.β-gal nodules in mice treated with OVA-specific CD4+ T cells. Finally, no specific CD8+ T cells were induced after transfer of the B12 clone to MHC class II KO mice (Fig. 3C). This finding correlated with the failure of the B12 clone to eradicate tumor in MHC class II KO mice (see Fig. 2).
Implications for immune activation of anti-tumor CD8+ T cells
The data presented here point to an active cooperation between CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the eradication of tumor cells. The adoptive transfer of CD4+ T cells has been reported to treat established tumor (17-19); however, CD4+ T cells in these systems were hypothesized to act through NK or macrophage effector cells or by direct lysis of a MHC class II-positive tumor. Ossendorp et al. have found that generation of specific CD4+ T cells through immunization with a helper epitope resulted in increased anti-tumor activity that is mediated by CD8+ effector cells, even when the tumor cells used are MHC class II negative (20). The present manuscript is the first in which the transfer of CD4+ T cells specific for a model tumor Ag have been found to elicit the de novo generation of CD8+ T cells specific for that same Ag.
CD8+ T cells have been widely reported to transfer tumor immunity and to treat established tumors upon adoptive transfer (21, 22). They are thought to work by directly destroying tumor cells in situ. In contrast, adoptive transfer of the CD4+ T cell clone described here activates endogenous CD8+ effector cells. The activation of specific CD8+ T cells by CD4+ T cells may be most efficient when cells recognize the same Ag presented by a DC, in the context of both MHC class I and class II molecules. Recognition of DC by CD4+ T cells can lead to IL-2-production resulting in proliferative effects on proximate CD8+ T cells. Perhaps more importantly, CD4+ T cells activate DC, enhancing their ability to stimulate naive CD8+ T cells (23, 24). DC “conditioning” is characterized, in part, by the up-regulation of CD80/CD86 and MHC class I and II levels and the production of IL-12 (25), a process mediated in large part by the interaction of CD40, expressed on the APC, and CD40 ligand, expressed on activated helper cells (26).
Thus, we propose that DC do not fully mature in the microenvironment of the tumor, where help is limiting and inflammatory signals are lacking. The striking ability of CD4+ T cells to treat established tumors in this model system suggests that these DC are then unable to activate naive CD8+ T cells, important mediators of tumor destruction. Provision of Ag-specific CD4+ T cells by adoptive transfer or by activation in vivo after vaccination may result in the de novo induction of CD8+ T cell function in patients with cancer.
Acknowledgments
We thank Martha Blalock for expert graphics, Arnold Mixon for FACS analyses, and Paul Spiess for excellent technical assistance.
Footnotes
2Abbreviations used in this paper: β-gal, β-galactosidase; KO, knockout; β2m, β2-microglobulin; DC, dendritic cell.
References
Full text links
Read article at publisher's site: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.164.2.562
Read article for free, from open access legal sources, via Unpaywall: https://www.jimmunol.org/content/jimmunol/164/2/562.full.pdf
Citations & impact
Impact metrics
Citations of article over time
Alternative metrics
Smart citations by scite.ai
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been
supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.4049/jimmunol.164.2.562
Article citations
Identification, sorting and profiling of functional killer cells via the capture of fluorescent target-cell lysate.
Nat Biomed Eng, 8(3):248-262, 31 Aug 2023
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 37652987
The expression pattern of Immune checkpoints after chemo/radiotherapy in the tumor microenvironment.
Front Immunol, 13:938063, 28 Jul 2022
Cited by: 4 articles | PMID: 35967381 | PMCID: PMC9367471
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
Bidirectional crosstalk between therapeutic cancer vaccines and the tumor microenvironment: Beyond tumor antigens.
Fundam Res, 3(6):1005-1024, 26 Mar 2022
Cited by: 3 articles | PMID: 38933006 | PMCID: PMC11197801
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
Augmenting Vaccine Immunogenicity through the Use of Natural Human Anti-rhamnose Antibodies.
ACS Chem Biol, 13(8):2130-2142, 02 Jul 2018
Cited by: 19 articles | PMID: 29916701 | PMCID: PMC6103300
The opposing roles of CD4+ T cells in anti-tumour immunity.
Immunology, 27 Apr 2018
Cited by: 68 articles | PMID: 29700809
Review
Go to all (103) article citations
Data
Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
Th1 and Th2 cell clones to a poorly immunogenic tumor antigen initiate CD8+ T cell-dependent tumor eradication in vivo.
J Immunol, 165(10):5495-5501, 01 Nov 2000
Cited by: 46 articles | PMID: 11067902
CD4+ Th-APC with acquired peptide/MHC class I and II complexes stimulate type 1 helper CD4+ and central memory CD8+ T cell responses.
J Immunol, 182(1):193-206, 01 Jan 2009
Cited by: 44 articles | PMID: 19109150
Induction of specific immune responses by polycation-based vaccines.
J Immunol, 169(9):5217-5226, 01 Nov 2002
Cited by: 18 articles | PMID: 12391240
Dendritic cells, interleukin 12, and CD4+ lymphocytes in the initiation of class I-restricted reactivity to a tumor/self peptide.
Crit Rev Immunol, 18(1-2):87-98, 01 Jan 1998
Cited by: 21 articles | PMID: 9419451
Review
Funding
Funders who supported this work.
Intramural NIH HHS (2)
Grant ID: Z01 BC010763-01
Grant ID: Z99 CA999999