Downregulation of polι provokes an increase in sensitivity to killing by H₂O₂, but not to an alkylating agent or UVC

To study the biological function of human polι, we exposed MRC5-polι^KD cells, to different DNA-damaging agents. MRC5-polι^KD cells showed no significant increase in sensitivity either to UVC and UVA irradiations or to ethylmethane sulphonate (EMS) treatment (Figure 2A–C). In great contrast, MRC5-polι^KD cells were found to be hypersensitive to hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), which causes mainly oxidation of DNA bases and SSBs (Figure 2D), and to menadione (Figure 2E), a redox-cycling quinone that generates intracellular ROS (Watanabe et al, 2004). Moreover, these cells were moderately sensitive to low doses of potassium bromate (data not shown), an agent that allows a more specific introduction of 8-oxo-G in the genome (Ballmaier and Epe, 1995). To rule out the possibility that this sensitivity could be a side effect of the stable shRNA procedure, we transiently complemented the MRC5-polι^KD cells with POLI cDNA bearing silent mutations to avoid the recognition of the resulting mRNA by shRNA polι (Figure 2F). We observed that the sensitivity of complemented MRC5-polι^KD cells to H₂O₂ was rescued to the level of the control cell line. This indicates that the sensitivity of the knockdown cell line to H₂O₂ treatment is due to the low level of polι protein.

Open in a separate window

Figure 2

Sensitivities of MRC5-polι^KD cells to killing by various DNA-damaging agents. For each survival experiment, cells were exposed to increasing doses of the indicated genotoxic agent and counted 72 h later. Percentage of control growth was plotted for each data point, representing the mean of three independent experiments. (A) Cells were exposed to UVC, (B) UVA and (C) EMS for 1 h at 37°C in serum-free medium. (D) Cells were exposed to H₂O₂ for 10 min at 4°C. (E) Cells were exposed to menadione for 1 h at 37°C. (F) On the left panel, MRC5-polι^KD cells were transfected with either an empty vector (closed triangle) or a vector expressing polι (open triangle). After 24 h, cells were exposed to H₂O₂ as described above. On the right panel, western blots of extracts of MRC5-polι^KD and MRC5-NT cells containing an empty vector or polι expression vector, which were separated by SDS–PAGE and blotted using anti-polι antibody, are shown.

Because polβ^−/− MEFs are only slightly sensitive to H₂O₂ exposure (Sobol et al, 1996; Fortini et al, 2000; Horton et al, 2002, 2005; Polosina et al, 2004; Yoshimura et al, 2006), we investigated whether human cells expressing low levels of both polι and polβ show a stronger sensitivity to oxidative DNA damage. We therefore reduced the endogenous levels of polβ up to 80% using siRNA duplexes in MRC5-polι^KD and MRC5-NT cells (Figure 3A) and we then monitored cell survival after H₂O₂ treatment. We did not observe any difference in the sensitivity of MRC5-polι^KD/siRNA polβ when compared with MRC5-polι^KD/siRNA NT (Figure 3B). Furthermore, the MRC5-NT cells transiently downregulating polβ were not sensitive to H₂O₂. However, we could observe a moderate sensitivity of MRC5-NT/polβ^KD cells to the thymidine analogue 5-hydroxymethyl-2′-deoxyuridine (hmdUrd), demonstrating that the reduction in the levels of polβ we obtained by siRNA had a biological effect (Figure 3C). Our latest observation is in agreement with the reported study of Horton et al (2005) who used polβ^−/− MEFs. Altogether, these data suggest that some types of oxidation-induced DNA damages are repaired in a polβ-independent and polι-dependent manner in human cells.

Open in a separate window

Figure 3

Human cells downregulating polβ are not sensitive to oxidative damaging agents. (A) MRC5-polι^KD and MRC5-NT cells were transfected with polβ-specific siRNAs (lanes 2 and 4) or scrambled siRNAs (lanes 1 and 3). After 72 h, cells were harvested and extracts were separated by SDS–PAGE, and incubated with anti-polι and anti-polβ antibodies. β-Actin detection was used as a loading control. (B) MRC5-polι^KD and MRC5-NT cells were transfected with a pool of polβ-specific siRNAs 24 h before treatment with increasing doses of H₂O₂ for 10 min at 4°C. Cells were counted 72 h later. Percentage of control growth was plotted for each data point, representing the mean of three independent experiments. (C) MRC5 cells were transfected with polβ-specific siRNA. After 48 h, they were exposed to hmdUrd for 24 h and surviving cells were counted 72 h later and plotted as described above.

BER activity is reduced in extracts from cells downregulating pol

To examine whether polι can participate in SN-patch BER pathway, we reconstituted the repair of G·U oligonucleotide duplex in the presence of radioactively labelled dCTP and whole-cell extracts of MRC5 depleted for specialised DNA polymerases (Biade et al, 1998). To compare the BER activity in cell extracts having the same genetic background, we prepared extracts from MRC5 fibroblasts transiently transfected with siRNA specific to polβ, polι or both polβ/polι and not from the stable clone MRC5-polι^KD. We used non-targeted siRNA (NT) as a negative control. Downregulation of the DNA polymerases was verified by western blot (Figure 4A). Likewise, the H₂O₂ sensitivity of MRC5 transiently transfected with siRNA against polι was confirmed (Figure 4B). As shown in Figure 4C, after 30 min incubation of G·U oligonucleotide duplex, a full-length 40 mer product was generated with high efficiency in control NT-MRC5 cell extract (lane 3). This indicates that uracil-DNA glycosylase excises U base, AP endonuclease cleaves resulting abasic site and generates single-strand nick with 5′ deoxyribose phosphate residue. A DNA repair polymerase then removes dRP residue and incorporates ³²P-labelled dCMP nucleotide. Finally DNA ligase completes the restoration of the full-length 40 mer G·C duplex. In agreement with previous observations (Yoshimura et al, 2006), the polβ-depleted cell extract showed dramatic (up to 70%) decrease in the formation of fully repaired 40 mer duplex (Figure 4C, lanes 5 and 6, and Figure 4D) as compared with that of wild-type cell extract (Figure 4C, lanes 2 and 3, and Figure 4D). Interestingly, the polι-deficient cell extract also showed a strong reduction in the generation of a 40-mer product (Figure 4C, lanes 8 and 9, and Figure 4D) similar to that of the polβ-deficient extract (Figure 4C, lanes 5 and 6), suggesting that the DNA polymerase polι is involved in the BER pathway. However, depletion of both polβ and polι in MRC5 cell extracts did not decrease further formation of a 40-mer product (Figure 4D), suggesting (i) that the residual amount of polι and/or polβ is responsible for the remaining BER activity or (ii) the presence of third BER-specific DNA repair polymerase.

Open in a separate window

Figure 4

Cells downregulating polι show an impaired uracil-initiated base excision DNA repair synthesis in human cell-free extracts. (A) MRC5 cells were transfected with scrambled siRNAs (lane 1) or polι-specific siRNAs (lanes 2 and 4) or with polβ-specific siRNAs (lanes 3 and 4). After 72 h, cells were harvested and extracts were separated by SDS–PAGE. Immunoblots were incubated with anti-polι or anti-polβ antibodies. β-Actin detection was used as a loading control. (B) MRC5 cells were transfected with a pool of polι-specific siRNAs 24 h before treatment with increasing doses of H₂O₂ for 10 min at 4°C. Cells were counted 72 h later. Percentage of control growth was plotted for each data point, representing the mean of three independent experiments. (C) Denaturing gel of G·U repair products after incubation with siRNA-transfected MRC5 whole-cell extracts: 50 nM of G·U was incubated with 10 μg extract at 37°C, and aliquots were withdrawn at different time intervals and analysed on a 20% denaturing PAGE. Formation of 40 mer repair product was quantified by phosphorimaging. (D) The average initial rate of BER DNA repair synthesis in whole-cell extracts. For comparison, the DNA repair synthesis in extract from cells transfected with scrambled siRNA (NT) was assumed as 100%. Error bars show the s.d. of the mean of three independent experiments.

pol-deficient cells display a delay in G1 phase following exposure to H₂O₂

To better characterise the impact of polι downregulation on the response to oxidative DNA damage, we analysed the cell cycle profile of MRC5-polι^KD and MRC5-NT cells following H₂O₂ treatment. We, therefore, employed two different approaches to measure the progression of cells. In the first set of experiments, MRC5-polι^KD and MRC5-NT cells were exposed to H₂O₂, and were then pulse-labelled with BrdU just before harvesting at the indicated time points. In MRC5-NT cells, 36 h after treatment the number of cells in G1 phase decreased from 35 to 15%, whereas S-phase content remained unchanged (Figure 5A and B). In polι^KD cells, the number of cells in G1 was moderately affected post-treatment. However, 36 h later it re-increased, whereas S-phase cell number decreased (Figure 5A). At this time point, both cell lines displayed a slight accumulation in G2/M phase. This shows that polι^KD cells accumulate in G1 phase at later times after H₂O₂ and have difficulties in entering into a new S phase.

Open in a separate window

Figure 5

MRC5-polι^KD cells are delayed in G1 phase after H₂O₂ treatment. (A) MRC5-polι^KD and MRC5-NT cells were exposed to 2.5 mM H₂O₂ for 10 min at 4°C and pulse-labelled with BrdU for 20 min before harvesting at indicated time points. The percentage of cells in all phases (G1/S/G2–M) is indicated in the histogram (mean of three independent experiments). (B) Cells were treated as described above and representative cell cycle distribution of the indicated cells as measured by BrdU incorporation (vertical axis, log scale) and DNA content (horizontal axis, linear scale) in flow cytometric analysis is shown. The top panels show the cell cycle distributions in mock-treated cells and bottom panels show cell cycle distribution 36 h after H₂O₂ treatment. The percentage of cells in all phases (G1/S/G2–M) is indicated. (C, D) Cells were pulse-labelled with 10 μm BrdU for 10 min prior to H₂O₂ treatment (10 min at 4°C). (C) Progression of BrdU-positive cells through time in the cell cycle was assessed by flow cytometry analysis. Representative distribution of mock-treated MRC5-NT is shown at T=0 and 8 h. BrdU-positive cells were gated as G1/early S, S and lateS/G2 cells. (D) MRC5-polι^KD and MRC5-NT cells were treated as described above then the curves report the percentages of BrdU+ cells in S phase (left) or in G1 phase (right) at the indicated time points. The reported values are the mean of at least two independent experiments. (E) Representative cell cycle distribution of the indicated cells as measured by BrdU incorporation in flow cytometric analysis is shown. In red squares, the amount of BrdU+ cells in G1 phase is highlighted. A full-colour version of this figure is available at The EMBO Journal Online.

We asked whether this delay was a consequence of the fraction of cells exposed to H₂O₂ during DNA replication. To specifically monitor the progression of cells treated during the S phase, we pulse-labelled asynchronous cells with BrdU just before exposure or not to H₂O₂ (Figure 5C, left panel, the big box corresponds to cells treated in S phase). The cells were then grown in fresh medium for 8–48 h before analysis by flow cytometry. As they progressed through the cell cycle, BrdU-positive cells were gated in G1/early S-, S-, late S/G2-phase compartments according to their total DNA content (Figure 5C, right panel). We observed that both cell lines needed 24 h to progress through S phase after treatment (Figure 5D, left panel), whereas S phase lasted approximately 10–12 h in mock-treated cells (data not shown). This shows that H₂O₂ causes a S-phase delay in both cell lines. Interestingly, when we examined the progression of BrdU-positive cells through the G1 phase, we found that the percentage of MRC5-polι^KD cells was higher than control cells, especially for the late time points (Figure 5D, right panel and Figure 5E). Altogether, these results suggested that the absence of polι affects the progression of cells through G1/S phase, following exposure to an oxidising agent. It raises the possibility that polι might operate in a ‘backup' mechanism to repair oxidising DNA lesions that were either bypassed or not repaired at all during the S and G2/M phases, and were, as such, found present in the G1 phase of the next cell cycle.

pol is recruited to sites of DNA damage in human cells

So far, our results suggested a role of polι in the repair of oxidative DNA damage. We next investigated the localisation pattern of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged polι in living cells after inducing DNA damage in a restricted area of the nucleus by laser (Lan et al, 2005). We therefore overexpressed a full-length GFP–polι in HeLa cells and irradiated the cell nucleus with a 405 nm laser light. As shown in Figure 6A, left panel, polι accumulation was observed immediately after irradiation with 500 scans, which produces SSBs, base damage and double-strand breaks (Lan et al, 2005). As GFP–polι does not accumulate at the sites irradiated with lower laser dose, which mainly produces SSBs, possible substrates for GFP–polι may be either base damage or/and DNA double-strand breaks. However, the accumulation of polι was further enhanced by the presence of a photosensitiser (8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP)) (Figure 6A, right panel) that increases accumulation of DNA glycosylases after irradiation (Orimo et al, 2006; Prasad et al, 2007), suggesting that polι is recruited to sites of base damage in living cells.

Open in a separate window

Figure 6

Accumulation of polι at the sites of base damage induced by UV laser irradiation. (A) HeLa or XP-V cells transiently expressing GFP–polι were irradiated with 405 nm laser light (with or without preincubation with the photosensitiser 8-MOP). GFP signals before (top) and after (bottom) irradiation are shown (left panel). Numbers of scans are indicated below. Time course for the accumulation of GFP–polι without (open squares) or with (open squares) 8-MOP, after irradiation with a 405 nm laser (right panel). (B) Schematic representation of polι domains: UBM, ubiquitin-binding motif; NLD, nuclear localisation domain; PIP, interaction domain with PCNA; 5′dRP lyase domain. polι deletion constructs were made as described earlier (Kannouche et al, 2003). The fragments were cloned downstream of the GFP tag and transfected into HeLa cells. The cells were irradiated with a 405 nm laser light and the accumulation of mutants at the sites of DNA damage was analysed as indicated: +: accumulation in all scanned cells; +/−: accumulation in some cells; −: no accumulation. (C) Point mutations were introduced in GFP–polι by site-directed mutagenesis. The residues that were changed to alanine are indicated in red. The first and the last amino acids of each sequence are numbered. In the right panel, HeLa cells were transfected with different GFP–polι mutants and incubated for 24 h. Cells were then irradiated with a 405 nm laser light and the percentage of GFP–polι-expressing cells in which the protein was localised at the sites of oxidative damage was determined.

After UVC irradiation, the accumulation of polι into replication foci is largely dependent on polη (Kannouche et al, 2003). We aimed to ask whether polι could relocalise at the sites of laser-induced DNA damage in the absence of polη. XP-variant cells (XP2SASV) were transfected with peGFP–polι and were then irradiated. We observed an accumulation of GFP–polι at the irradiated sites (Figure 6A, right panel), suggesting that the recruitment of polι at the sites of oxidative DNA damage does not require the presence of polη.

The recruitment of pol to sites of DNA damage in human cells requires the NLD and UBM domains

To identify the domains of polι required for this relocalisation, we examined the localisation pattern of different GFP–polι mutants containing gross deletions and/or point mutation after irradiation. The primary sequence of polι (715 amino acids) contains no clear NLS. However, it has been reported that the sequences necessary for nuclear localisation are in the region of amino acids 219–451 (named NLD for nuclear localisation domain) (Kannouche et al, 2003). In this region (aa 228–252), Bebenek et al (2001) identified a helix-hairpin-helix (HhH) motif similar to that found in the NH2-terminal domain of polβ, which catalyses excision of a 5′dRP group from DNA. Recently, two ubiquitin-binding motifs (UBM1 and UBM2) were identified in the C terminus of polι at positions 498–526 and 679–707 in the human sequence. These UBM domains bind ubiquitin in a direct and non-covalent manner (Bienko et al, 2005; Plosky et al, 2006) (Figure 6B).

As shown in Figure 6B, removal of the N-terminal 218 amino acids (pBC41) did not affect the relocalisation of the protein at irradiated sites. pBC28, which contains a deletion of the C terminus from amino acid 451–715, was also able to relocalise but less efficiently, suggesting that the UBM domains might have a function in the recruitment of polι. Surprisingly, the construct containing amino acid 219–451 (pBC52), which corresponds to the NLD was sufficient for relocalisation. In contrast, the last 80 aa of polι are not sufficient to allow a relocalisation of the fusion protein at irradiated sites. These results indicate that the sequences necessary for relocalisation of polι at the sites of oxidative DNA damage are probably within the NLD region, even though the UBMs might also have a function in these dynamics.

We then investigated more precisely the importance of these domains in the relocalisation of polι by making point mutations (Figure 6C). The HhH of polι, which is containing the NLD, is also conserved among X-family proteins such as polβ and polλ (Moon et al, 2007). In contrast, this conservation is not detected among Y-family DNA polymerases (Supplementary Figure 1A). The 3D schematic structure shows some overlapping of the residues of the HhH of polβ and polι, mainly with the hairpin and the second helix (Supplementary Figure 1B). However, this overlap is less obvious than the one reported for polβ and polλ (Moon et al, 2007). We introduced point mutations in the helix 1 (H1) as well as in the hairpin of the polι sequence (Figure 6C). In addition, we constructed mutants harbouring a point mutation in the UBM1 domain. The protein with a mutation in the PCNA-interacting protein (PIP) box motif has been described earlier (Vidal et al, 2004). All these mutants were made as fusions with GFP protein to allow analysis of their localisation after irradiation by the laser. As expected, wild-type polι was able to accumulate at the sites of laser-induced DNA damage in 91% of irradiated cells (Figure 6C, right panel). Mutations in the UBM1 or PIP domain did not affect the relocalisation of the protein. In striking contrast, the NLD1–UBM1 mutant relocalised in only 38% of irradiated cells, whereas the single mutants NLD1 and NLD2 accumulated at the sites of DNA damage in 69 and 63% of cells, respectively. We therefore conclude that the HhH motif of polι, together with the UBM, contribute to an efficient recruitment to sites of laser-induced DNA damage.

To validate these observations, we examined the importance of these polι domains in the sensibility of cells to H₂O₂. In addition, the lysine residue K72 of polβ functions as a Schiff base during the β-elimination reaction. We speculated that the Lys237 of polι is its orthologue (see the arrow in Supplementary Figure 1). We checked whether the Lys237 was required to complement the MRC5-polι^KD phenotype. We then transiently complemented the MRC5-polι^KD cells with POLI cDNA-bearing silent mutations and different point mutations in NLD or UBM domains (Supplementary Figure 2). We observed that the sensitivity of complemented MRC5-polι^KD cells to H₂O₂ was rescued with most of the polι mutants. Interestingly, we found an incomplete complementation of MRC5-polι^KD phenotype when we expressed the NLD1–UBM1 mutant confirming that the HhH motif, together with the UBM of polι, is required for its function in the response to oxidative stress.

pol binds to chromatin after oxidative damage

We reported earlier that polι accumulates together with polη and PCNA in replication factories following UVC irradiation. Yet whereas polη foci were completely resistant to extraction by triton, a non-ionic detergent, polι was totally solubilised, suggesting that polι is less tightly bound to the chromatin than polη after UVC exposure (Kannouche et al, 2003; Kannouche and Lehmann, 2004). To determine the subnuclear localisation of polι and of different BER factors after oxidative damage, MRC5 fibroblasts were treated with H₂O₂, harvested and lysed in an appropriate buffer containing triton (Kannouche et al, 2004). After centrifugation, the supernatant was kept (triton-soluble fraction), whereas the pellet was solubilised in a buffer containing DNase enzyme (chromatin-bound fraction). The fractions were analysed for polι by western blotting. We found that the amount of polι in the chromatin-bound fraction was increased substantially following H₂O₂ treatment (Figure 7A). Similar results were obtained after irradiation of the cells with UVA (200 KJ/m²) (Supplementary Figure 3A). Additionally, polι foci induced by UVA irradiation were resistant to triton extraction (Supplementary Figure 3B). We also found that the scaffold factor XRCC1 became triton-resistant under conditions of oxidative stress as previously observed in HeLa cells (Heale et al, 2006). Unexpectedly, polβ was found in the triton-soluble fraction after both H₂O₂ (Figure 7A) and methylmethane sulphonate (MMS) treatment (data not shown), suggesting that its interaction with chromatin during BER must be very transient. The flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1), which is involved in LP BER as well as in DNA replication, was partially found in the triton-insoluble fraction. These data indicate that polι and XRCC1 are recruited to the chromatin after H₂O₂ treatment and we assume that this recruitment reflects a biological role of polι following oxidative damage in human cells.

Open in a separate window

Figure 7

polι becomes chromatin-bound after H₂O₂ and interacts with XRCC1. (A) MRC5 cells were exposed to 5 mM H₂O₂ for 10 min at 4°C and incubated for the indicated times prior to harvesting and subjected to fractionation into triton-soluble and triton-insoluble fractions. Extracts were analysed by western blotting with the indicated antibodies. (B) HEK293 cells were co-transfected with GFP–XRCC1 and different HA–polι mutants as indicated. For immunoprecipitation, anti-HA, anti-GFP or pre-immune IgG antibodies were incubated with cell lysates. On the left, immunoprecipitates were analysed by immunoblotting with α-HA or α-GFP antibodies. WCE: whole-cell extracts containing 1/20 of the lysates used for immunoprecipitation. On the right, immunoprecipitation of GFP alone was used as a negative control for interaction with HA–polι.

Human pol is involved in the cellular response to oxidising agents

This is the first report that shows a menadione and H₂O₂ sensitivities in human fibroblasts deficient for a DNA polymerase. This sensitivity is a direct result of the reduction of functional polι as transfection of MRC5-polι^KD cells with full-length POLI cDNA reversed this phenotype. So far, sensitivities to DNA-damaging agents have been observed in chicken DT40 cells and/or MEFs inactivated or mutated in POLB, POLL or POLQ genes (Horton et al, 2002; Braithwaite et al, 2005; Yoshimura et al, 2006; Tano et al, 2007).

polβ is the classical BER protein for removal of the 5′dRP moiety resulting from APE1 cleavage (reviewed in Almeida and Sobol, 2007). It has been extensively reported that MEF deficient for polβ is hypersensitive to mono-functional DNA-alkylating agents such as MMS. In contrast, polβ^−/− cells are not or are only slightly sensitive to oxidising agents that produce oxidative DNA damage, suggesting that polβ is not of primary importance in BER of oxidised DNA, or its activity can be complemented by another DNA polymerase. polι has been shown to be capable of removing the 5′dRP lesion subsequent to APE1 strand cleavage, but a deficiency in polι does not render cells sensitive to alkylation (Trivedi et al, 2005 and this paper). In contrast, cells with a reduced level of polι are sensitive to H₂O₂ and this phenotype is not synergistically increased by concomitant decrease of polβ level, suggesting that human DNA polymerase iota is important for protection of cells against cell killing due to oxidative stress. Altogether, these data indicate that, although both DNA polymerases exhibit dRP lyase activity, the two polymerases do not share the same lesion substrate. Presumably, polι participates in a specialised form of BER as speculated earlier by Bebenek et al (2001). This assumption is strengthened by the fact that extracts from cells downregulating polι show a reduced BER activity.

Accumulation of pol-deficient cells in G1 phase after H₂O₂ treatment

We showed that reduced levels of the polι protein have an impact on cell cycle progression before and after DNA damage. Indeed, we detected a slight accumulation of MRC5-polι^KD cells in G1 phase in untreated cells, probably due to spontaneous DNA damage (Figure 1C). This effect is increased after exposure to H₂O₂ (Figure 5). This G1 arrest was not observed immediately after treatment but rather occurred at late time points (24–36 h post-treatment). When we analysed the cell cycle progression of cells treated with H₂O₂ in S phase (revealed with BrdU pulse labelling prior to treatment), we obtained the same FACS profile with an accumulation of MRC5-polι^KD cells in G1 phase 24–36 h post-treatment as compared with the control cells. These data revealed that when MRC5-polι^KD cells are exposed to H₂O₂ during S phase, replication rates are reduced in the first S phase to the same extent as in control cells (Figure 5D). However, progression into the second cell cycle causes a G1 arrest in polι-deficient cells, whereas the control cells can progress through the second S phase. The simplest interpretation is that when MRC5-polι^KD cells arrive in the G1 phase, the limited quantity of polι leads to a reduced capacity in repairing or tolerating the remaining oxidised lesions present on the DNA inducing G1 arrest.

Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that in normal cells, polι is located in replication foci during S phase (Kannouche et al, 2003). This polymerase is able to incorporate a guanine opposite uracil and its derivatives providing a possible S-phase-dependent mechanism that can decrease the mutagenic potential of lesions formed by the deamination of cytosines (Vaisman and Woodgate, 2001). Therefore, even if the MRC5-polι^KD cells are allowed to undergo the first round of replication, we hypothesise that the absence of polι in S phase after H₂O₂ exposure affects the repair and/or bypass of some oxidised DNA lesions. Thus, MRC5-polι^KD cells will contain more mispairs and/or unrepaired lesions as compared with the control cells when cells will progress through the G1 phase inducing a G1 arrest.

pol interacts with XRCC1 and is recruited to sites of oxidative DNA damage

We observed that polι was bound to chromatin following H₂O₂ treatment. This recruitment was also detected after 200 kJ/m² of UVA irradiation. In contrast, polι remained triton soluble after UVC irradiation (Kannouche and Lehmann, 2004), demonstrating a specific involvement of polι in the response to oxidative stress. Further in vivo evidence for a role of polι in some aspect of BER is provided by its interaction with XRCC1, which has been shown to have central function in the repair of breaks in DNA (Caldecott, 2003b; Lan et al, 2004; Almeida and Sobol, 2007; Dianov and Parsons, 2007). This indicates that XRCC1 and polι exist in a common complex in vivo.

We also found that polι was recruited to sites of oxidative DNA damage induced with high laser dose. Although the laser treatment used in this study produces oxidative base damage, SSBs and double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs), we assume that polι is localised to sites of oxidative base damage as we observed that the accumulation of this polymerase was enhanced in the presence of 8-MOP, a photosensitiser that enhances the accumulation of human OGG1 and NTH1 after laser irradiation (Orimo et al, 2006; Prasad et al, 2007). Moreover, we excluded the possibility that polι was implicated in double-strand break repair as cells downregulating polι were not sensitive to neocarzinostatin (data not shown), a drug that induces high ratio of DSBs (Ohtsuki and Ishida, 1975; Favaudon, 1982).

We showed that the NLD regions of polι and its UBM1 domain were required for an efficient localisation of the protein to sites of oxidative DNA damage. Likewise, these domains are required to rescue the H₂O₂ sensibility of MRC5-polι^KD cells. In contrast, they appeared to be independent of the XRCC1–polι interaction, as all proteins mutated in NLD and/or UBM domains are still able to bind to XRCC1. It is possible that these domains of polι might target it to complexes assembled at the sites of damage. The UBM1 of polι binds ubiquitin in a direct and non-covalent manner (Bienko et al, 2005; Plosky et al, 2006). Therefore, polι could bind to any number of proteins that are specifically ubiquitinated. It has been shown that polι is able to bind monoubiquitinated PCNA through its PIP and UBM1 domains (Vidal et al, 2004; Bienko et al, 2005; Plosky et al, 2006). In our experiments, it seems unlikely that the localisation of polι at the sites of oxidative damage was dependent on PCNA as (1) polι mutated in the PIP domain is still localised to irradiated sites and (2) PCNA accumulates at SSBs, whereas polι relocalises to oxidative base damage (Lan et al, 2004; Hashiguchi et al, 2007). Interestingly, we also observed that the recruitment of polι at the sites of oxidative base damage was independent of polη, in contrast to its recruitment into replication factories during S phase (Kannouche et al, 2003). Thus, after UVC polι interacts with polη and PCNA into replication factories, whereas after oxidative DNA damage, polι is probably assembled into a new complex involving ubiquitinated proteins and XRCC1.

In vitro site-directed mutagenesis

Point mutations were introduced in different positions of GFP–polι using QuickChange II site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The sequences of the primers used are described in Table I. Mutant NLD1 was made using the primers NLD 240–243, mutant NLD2 was made using the primers NLD 240–243 and NLD 230–232, mutant UBM1 was made using the primers UBM 510–511 and mutant PIP was constructed as described earlier (Vidal et al, 2004). The panel of polι mutants were cloned into phCMV2 vector as described above. A silencing mutation in the wt POLI cDNA was introduced using primers 336–340.

Proliferation assay

MRC5-polι^KD or MRC5-NT cells were plated at 2 × 10⁵ per well of a six-well plate and incubated for 24 h. Cells were then exposed to increasing doses of H₂O₂ (0–7 mM; Sigma-Aldrich) in cold PBS at 4°C for 10 min; or EMS (0.01–1 mM; Sigma-Aldrich) in a medium without FCS at 37°C for 1 h or were treated with 0–20 μM of 5-hydroxymethyl-2′-deoxyuridine (hmdUrd; Sigma-Aldrich) for 24 h or exposed to increasing doses of menadione for 1 h in complete MEM medium at 37°C (0–50 μM; Sigma-Aldrich). UVA (320–400 nm) radiation was achieved by a metal halide lamp equipped with anticaloric filter KG1. The fluency of the UVA lamp was 12.3 J/s/m² and the cells were irradiated in MEM medium without phenol red. For the UVC (254 nm) lamp, the fluency was 0.35 J/s/m² and the cells were irradiated without any medium. After each treatment, cells were rinsed twice with PBS, incubated for 72 h in complete MEM medium and counted by Trypan blue staining using a Neubauer haemocytometer or an automatic counter.

Flow cytometric analysis

To study the cell cycle distribution, cells were treated for 10 min with 2.5 mM H₂O₂ in cold PBS, at 4°C and, at indicated times, 10 μM of BrdU (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to the dishes for 20 min prior harvesting. Alternatively, S-phase cells were pulse-labelled with 10 μM BrdU in complete medium for 10 min at 37°C. Cells were then treated as described above and re-incubated in fresh medium for the indicated time. Cells were then trypsinised, washed in PBS and fixed in 80% ice-cold ethanol overnight at −20°C. For BrdU staining, samples were incubated in 15 mM pepsin for 20 min at 37°C. The cells were pelleted and incubated with 2 N HCl and incubated for 20 min at room temperature. The pellet was washed in buffer Bu (0.1% FCS, 0.1% Tween 20, 0.1 M Hepes in PBS), and was incubated with anti-BrdU antibody diluted at 1:50 in buffer Bu (clone Bu20a; Dako) for 45 min. After centrifugation, cells were resuspended and incubated with anti-mouse-FITC antibody diluted at 1:50 in buffer Bu (Vector). For total DNA staining, cells were centrifuged and resuspended in PBS containing 25 μg/ml propidium iodide (Sigma-Aldrich) and 50 μg/μl RNAse (Sigma-Aldrich). The samples were analysed by flow cytometry on a FACScalibur (Becton Dickinson, BD Sciences) using the CellQuest Pro software (BD Sciences).

We thank Dr R Woodgate (NIH Bethesda, MD, USA) for providing purified antibody for polι, Dr P Radicella for the GFP–XRCC1 plasmid and Dr V Favaudon for providing the neocarzinostatin drug. We also thank AR Lehmann for the GFP–polι plasmids and for his critical comments on the paper. We are grateful to Caroline Pouvelle for assistance with cell culture and Yann Lecluse for FACS analysis. This study was supported by Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (ARC, no. 3573), by Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale (INE20040300464) and by Institut National du Cancer no. PL28 to PK, by Genome Network Project Japan to AY, and by CNRS GDRE182, ARC No. 4032, 3655 and EDF RB2007-02 to Murat Saparbaev. TBP was supported by an ARC fellowship and AZ was supported by Contract MRTN-Ct-2003-503618.