Abstract
Free full text
Cross-Reactive Neutralizing Antibodies Directed against Pandemic H1N1 2009 Virus Are Protective in a Highly Sensitive DBA/2 Mouse Influenza Model
Abstract
Our ability to rapidly respond to an emerging influenza pandemic is hampered somewhat by the lack of a susceptible small-animal model. To develop a more sensitive model, we pathotyped 18 low-pathogenic non-mouse-adapted influenza A viruses of human and avian origin in DBA/2 and C57BL/6 mice. The majority of the isolates (13/18) induced severe morbidity and mortality in DBA/2 mice upon intranasal challenge with 1 million infectious doses. Also, at a 100-fold-lower dose, more than 50% of the viruses induced severe weight loss, and mice succumbed to the infection. In contrast, only two virus strains were pathogenic for C57BL/6 mice upon high-dose inoculation. Therefore, DBA/2 mice are a suitable model to validate influenza A virus vaccines and antiviral therapies without the need for extensive viral adaptation. Correspondingly, we used the DBA/2 model to assess the level of protection afforded by preexisting pandemic H1N1 2009 virus (H1N1pdm) cross-reactive human antibodies detected by a hemagglutination inhibition assay. Passive transfer of these antibodies prior to infection protected mice from H1N1pdm-induced pathogenicity, demonstrating the effectiveness of these cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies in vivo.
Respiratory tract infections are the third leading cause of mortality in the world (27). Influenza, a disease of the airways caused by influenza viruses, is responsible for approximately half a million deaths and 3 to 5 million hospitalizations per year (28). In addition to the annual disease burden, influenza A virus is more notoriously known for its ability to cause pandemics. Three pandemics have been reported in the twentieth century: the first that occurred in 1918 (Spanish influenza) killed 20 to 50 million individuals (15); the other two in 1957 and 1968, although less lethal, killed millions due to the lack of preexisting immunity. In April 2009, two cases of febrile illness were confirmed to be caused by swine-origin influenza A virus (H1N1) (4, 8). Continuous spread within North America and other parts of the world has signaled the first influenza pandemic of this century.
To study the pathogenicity of influenza A viruses, including the current pandemic A (H1N1) 2009 virus (H1N1pdm), in mammalian hosts and to determine the effectiveness of pharmaceutical interventions, it is essential to have a sensitive animal model. Although influenza has some important differences in mice and humans, a murine model is the only animal model thus far described that allows for relatively high group numbers and any relatively high throughput. Unfortunately, only a few strains of influenza A virus—almost exclusively belonging to the highly pathogenic avian influenza virus isolates of the H5 and H7 subtypes—are pathogenic in most commonly used mouse strains without adaptation through serial passaging. The hemagglutinin (HA) proteins of these H5 and H7 viruses contain a basic amino acid cleavage site, allowing them to spread systemically (12, 19, 26). Most other subtypes of influenza virus, including H1N1 and H3N2, either do not infect or cause very mild disease in mice. The requirement for adaptation of a pandemic virus to commonly used mouse strains can lead to a delay in the gathering of important data to help guide public health control strategies. As such, the lack of a sensitive small-animal model to study the infection dynamics of various subtypes of avian influenza viruses severely hampers the rapid and effective response required during a pandemic or prepandemic situation.
This study was designed to demonstrate the utility of DBA/2 mice, previously reported to be susceptible to highly pathogenic influenza viruses (1), to study infections caused by several influenza A virus subtypes isolated from birds or humans without the need for prior adaptation. To assess the utility of the model to respond to emerging strains, we used DBA/2 mice to examine the functional activity of sera from individuals previously shown to have preexisting cross-reactive H1N1pdm antibodies. It is hypothesized that these individuals may be partially protected from infection because of the presence of cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies produced after infection with a different but related H1N1 virus. This hypothesis is supported by in vitro microneutralization and hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assays (2, 10); however, it is not yet known whether these antibodies are also functional in vivo.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Mice and viruses.
Six- to 10-week-old female C57BL/6 and DBA/2 mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME) and housed in the Animal Resource Center at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (St. Jude). The mice received food and water ad libitum, and all experiments were conducted in accordance with rules of the Institutional Animal Control and Use Committee of St. Jude.
Twenty-three influenza A viruses (Table (Table1)1) from nine different hemagglutinin subtypes (H1 to H7, H9, and H10) were propagated in the chorioallantoic cavity of 10-day-old embryonated chicken eggs. The allantoic fluid containing infectious particles was harvested 48 h after inoculation, and the infectious titers (50% egg infectious doses [EID50]) of the viruses were determined. All virus stocks had minimum titers of 108.5 EID50/ml.
TABLE 1.
Influenza A virus isolate | Subtype | % Mortality by mouse strain and dose | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
DBA/2 mice | C57BL/6 mice at 106 EID50 | |||
106 EID50 | 104 EID50 | |||
A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 | H1N1 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
A/Memphis/3/2008a | H1N1 | 100 | 88 | 0 |
A/California/4/2009b | H1N1 | 100 | 100 | 60 |
A/mallard/Alberta/79/2003 | H2N3 | 33 | 0 | NDd |
A/mallard/Alberta/33/2004 | H2N4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
X31 (A/Hong Kong/1/1968)c | H3N2 | 100 | 100 | 0 |
A/pintail duck/Alberta/66/2005 | H4N1 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
A/mallard/Alberta/147/2007 | H4N6 | 0 | ND | ND |
A/Hong Kong/213/2003a | H5N1 | 100 | 100 | 76 |
A/Vietnam/1203/2004a | H5N1 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
A/shorebird/Delaware/101/2004 | H5N7 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
A/ruddy turnstone/Delaware/103/2007 | H5N9 | 100 | 25 | ND |
A/teal/Hong Kong/W312/1997 | H6N1 | 100 | 100 | 40 |
A/mallard/Alberta/154/2003 | H6N5 | 100 | 40 | 0 |
A/shorebird/Delaware/22/2006 | H7N3 | 100 | 100 | 0 |
A/Netherlands/33/2003a | H7N7 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
A/mallard/Alberta/177/2004 | H7N9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A/quail/Hong Kong/G1/1997 | H9N2 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
A/duck/Hong Kong/Y280/1997 | H9N2 | 100 | 20 | 0 |
A/mallard/Alberta/162/2007 | H9N5 | 0 | 0 | ND |
A/mallard/Alberta/221/2006 | H9N6 | 0 | 0 | ND |
A/blue-winged teal/Alberta/271/2007 | H10N5 | 100 | 75 | 0 |
A/mallard/Alberta/56/2004 | H10N7 | 100 | 75 | 0 |
Inoculation of mice with influenza A virus.
C57BL/6 and DBA/2 mice were inoculated with influenza A viruses intranasally in 30 μl of sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) after sedation with avertin (2,2,2-tribromoethanol; Sigma-Aldrich, MO). The 50% mouse lethal dose (MLD50) was determined after mice were infected with 10-fold serial dilutions of the viruses from 106 EID50 to 101 EID50. Morbidity and mortality were monitored for 21 days, and the MLD50 values were calculated by the Reed-Munch method (20). Groups of five mice per inoculum size per isolate were tested with the exception of seasonal H1N1 (at 106 EID50, n = 6; at 104 EID50, n = 8), H1N1pdm (104 EID50, n = 9), H2N3 (106 EID50, n = 3; 104 EID50, n = 4), H2N4 (104 EID50, n = 4), H4N6 (106 EID50, n = 3), H5N9 (106 EID50, n = 6; 104 EID50, n = 4), H5N7 (106 EID50, n = 10), H7N3 (106 EID50, n = 9; 104 EID50, n = 4), H7N9 (104 EID50, n = 4), H9N2/Y280 (106 EID50, n = 10), H9N5 (106 and 104 EID50, n = 4), H10N5 (106 EID50, n = 6; 104 EID50, n = 8), and H10N7 (104 EID50, n = 4) for DBA/2 mice and H5N7 (106 EID50, n = 8), H6N5 (106 EID50, n = 6), H7N3 (106 EID50, n = 10), H7N9 (106 EID50, n = 4), and H9N2 (106 EID50, n = 4) for C57BL/6.
Lung viral titers.
Lungs were collected on days 2 and 7 postinoculation with 104 EID50 of influenza A virus and stored at −80°C. They were homogenized in 1.0 ml of minimal essential medium, and homogenates were spun for 5 min at 1,000 × g to remove cellular debris. The supernatant was used to quantify the amount of infectious virus present in the lungs. Depending on the virus isolate, virus titers were determined in eggs or Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells as described previously (1).
Hemagglutination inhibition and virus neutralization assays.
Influenza A virus-neutralizing activity in serum was quantified by hemagglutination inhibition and virus microneutralization (VN) assay. Sera were first treated with receptor-destroying enzyme (RDE) (RDE II Seiken; Denka Seiken UK Ltd., United Kingdom) for 18 h at 37°C, followed by a 30-min inactivation at 56°C. HI assays were done with 4 hemagglutination units of the virus and 0.5% turkey red blood cells (H1N1pdm) or 0.5% chicken red blood cells (avian virus isolates), as described previously (10). For a VN assay the serum was diluted 2-fold starting at a 1:10 dilution in PBS and incubated for 1 h at 37°C with 100 50% tissue culture infective doses (TCID50) of A/California/4/09 virus. Next, 100 μl of the mixture of virus and serum was added to MDCK cells for 1 h at 37°C. Following the aspiration of the supernatant, cells were washed with PBS, and 200 μl of fresh minimal essential medium supplemented with 0.1% bovine serum albumin (A8412; Sigma-Aldrich), antibiotics (Invitrogen, NY), vitamins (Invitrogen), and 1 μg/ml tosylsulfonyl phenylalanyl chloromethyl ketone (TPCK)-trypsin (Worthington, NJ) was added. After 3 to 4 days at 37°C, the assay was developed by HA assay using turkey red blood cells. The average HI and VN titers were calculated following log2 transformation of the highest serum dilution able to inhibit hemagglutination or virus replication, respectively.
Passive antibody transfer.
Human sera were collected as part of a clinical trial conducted during the influenza seasons of 2007 to 2008 and 2008 to 2009 in the Greater Vancouver Area of British Columbia, Canada, or in the vicinity of the Greater Hartford Area of Connecticut. All participants received the standard dose of the licensed trivalent split-virus influenza vaccine containing A/Solomon Islands/3/2006-like (H1N1), A/Wisconsin/67/2005-like (H3N2), and B/Malaysia/2506/2004-like viruses in 2007 to 2008 or A/Brisbane/59/2007 (H1N1)-like, A/Brisbane/10/2007 (H3N2)-like, and B/Florida/4/2006-like viruses in 2008 to 2009. Sera were collected before vaccination and 4 weeks after vaccination. Postvaccination sera from individuals aged 65 years and older with detectable HI and VN titers toward H1N1pdm (A/California/4/2009) were pooled and heat inactivated for 30 min at 56°C. To study the effect of neutralizing antibodies, we used age-matched pooled human sera without detectable HI and VN titers to H1N1pdm (A/California/4/2009), seasonal H1N1 (A/Brisbane/59/2007), and H7N3 (A/shorebird/Delaware/22/2006) viruses. Ferret polyclonal sera obtained from ferrets 14 days after inoculation with the H1N1pdm virus (HI titer of 2,560; VN titer of 320) or PBS was used as a positive or negative control, respectively. A total of 400 μl of pooled human sera, diluted 1:1 in PBS, was injected intraperitoneally into 10 mice 24 h prior to inoculation with a lethal dose of virus. The positive and negative controls were also injected into 10 mice each for the H1N1pdm experiment, while five PBS control mice were included in the H7N3 and seasonal H1N1 follow-up experiment.
Cytokine analysis.
Lungs were collected on days 2 and 7 postinoculation with 104 EID50 of influenza A virus, and concentrations of CCL2, CCL5, interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) were determined as described previously (1). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions (Quantikine kits; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). At least four animals infected with a particular strain of influenza A virus were tested for one cytokine at a given time point.
Statistical analysis.
Statistical analyses of differences in mortality were determined by using the log rank test. The Student's t test was used to analyze differences in lung virus titers between the different strains of mice following ln transformation of the data as well as to determine statistical significance in cytokine and chemokine production and weight loss after influenza A virus infection.
RESULTS
Increased susceptibility of DBA/2 mice to influenza A virus isolates.
To assess the utility of DBA/2 mice as a more universal small-animal model for influenza, we tested a range of different viral subtypes for their ability to induce morbidity and mortality in this host. A set of 23 viruses belonging to nine different hemagglutinin subtypes was selected and used to inoculate DBA/2 mice. At a dose of 106 EID50, 18 (78%) of the viruses were pathogenic, and mice succumbed to infection at 5 to 12 days postinoculation, depending on the virus isolate (Table (Table1).1). Inoculation with a lower dose of virus (104 EID50) caused severe weight loss and death of DBA/2 mice in 14 of 22 (64%) virus isolates tested (Table (Table1).1). These isolates included a seasonal human H1N1 virus from 2008 and both H10 viruses. The ability to induce severe disease, as measured by weight loss and mortality, in DBA/2 mice was not limited to certain subtypes of influenza virus; however, virus isolates of the H2 and H4 subtypes were only mildly pathogenic. Few isolates were pathogenic at 102 EID50, and these included the two mouse-adapted influenza A viruses (A/Puerto Rico/8/1934, 100% mortality; X31, 60% mortality), two highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza A viruses (A/Hong Kong/213/2003, 84% mortality; A/Vietnam/1203/2004, 100% mortality), a low-pathogenic H7N3 (A/shorebird/Delaware/22/2006, 45% mortality) virus, and the H1N1pdm (100% mortality). Eighteen isolates were also tested in C57BL/6 mice at a dose of 106 EID50. Only the mouse-adapted virus A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 virus, three highly pathogenic viruses, an H6N1 virus (A/teal/Hong Kong/W312/1997), and the H1N1pdm virus caused severe disease and mortality (Table (Table11).
Nonadapted avian influenza A viruses can replicate to high titers in C57BL/6 and DBA/2 mice.
We hypothesize that the large difference in the degrees of pathogenicity of avian influenza A viruses between DBA/2 and C57BL/6 mice may be due to increased replication efficiency. To test this, we measured day 2 and day 7 postinoculation pulmonary viral loads in mice infected with 104 EID50 of H7N3 or H10N5 virus (Fig. (Fig.1).1). These avian virus isolates were selected for their exceptionally large difference in pathology scores between DBA/2 and C57BL/6 mice. High-dose inoculation (106 EID50) with H7N3 or H10N5 virus induced 7% and 4% maximum weight loss in C57BL/6 mice, while DBA/2 mice succumbed to infection with 102 or 104 EID50, respectively. On day 2 postinoculation, lung viral titers of DBA/2 and C57BL/6 mice were similar for both H7N3 (106.25 versus 106.75 EID50/ml, respectively) and H10N5 virus (105.3 versus 106.0 EID50/ml, respectively) (Fig. (Fig.1).1). Interestingly, titers in H7N3-infected lungs were approximately 1 log10 higher than those in H10N5-infected lungs. At day 7 postinoculation, H7N3-infected lungs of DBA/2 mice had higher virus loads than those of C57BL/6 mice (P < 0.05) (Fig. (Fig.1).1). Lungs of H10N5-infected DBA/2 mice also contained more virus than those of C57BL/6 mice; however, this difference was not significant (P = 0.07).
To assess the ability of other non- or low-pathogenic avian influenza A virus isolates to infect mice, we measured the serological response against the challenge virus in convalescent-phase serum as a surrogate marker for viral replication. In C57BL/6 mice, an HI titer was detected postinoculation with five of the eight virus isolates studied, suggesting that the majority of the isolates replicate in the respiratory tract of mice (Table (Table2).2). Inoculation of three viruses, an H4N1, H6N5, and an H5N7 virus, did not cause seroconversion in C57BL/6 mice. Because DBA/2 mice are generally more susceptible to influenza virus infection and because fewer isolates were non- or low-pathogenic isolates, we tested convalescent-phase serum following inoculation with only five virus isolates. Of the five convalescent-phase sera tested, three contained a detectable HI titer whereas two (an H4N6 and an H9N6 virus) did not (Table (Table2).2). These data suggest that most influenza virus isolates are capable of replicating in the respiratory tract of mice, but the outcome after infection depends entirely on the mouse strain, virus strain, or a combination of both.
TABLE 2.
Influenza A virus isolate | Subtype | HI titera | |
---|---|---|---|
DBA/2 mice | C57BL/6 mice | ||
A/Memphis/3/2008 | H1N1 | ND2 | 40 |
A/mallard/Alberta/33/2004 | H2N4 | 40 | 20 |
A/pintail duck/Alberta/66/2005 | H4N1 | ND | <10 |
A/mallard/Alberta/147/2007 | H4N6 | <10 | ND |
A/shorebird/Delaware/101/2004 | H5N7 | 40 | <10 |
A/mallard/Alberta/154/2003 | H6N5 | ND | <10 |
A/mallard/Alberta/177/2004 | H7N9 | 40 | 80 |
A/mallard/Alberta/221/2006 | H9N6 | <10 | ND |
A/blue-winged teal/Alberta/271/2007 | H10N5 | ND | 160 |
A/mallard/Alberta/56/2004 | H10N7 | ND | 40 |
Pandemic H1N1 2009 virus A/California/4/2009 is highly pathogenic in DBA/2 mice.
Based on the results presented above, we next looked at the replication of the H1N1pdm viruses in DBA/2 and C57BL/6 mice. Inoculation of mice with 106 to 102 EID50 of A/California/4/09, a representative H1N1pdm virus, resulted in 100% mortality after 8 to 12 days, and inoculation with 101 EID50 caused significant weight loss in 100% and mortality in 50% of DBA/2 mice (Table (Table1).1). In contrast, C57BL/6 mice lost a significant amount of weight (14%; P < 0.05) by day 7 when inoculated with 106 EID50, and 60% of the mice died. Inoculation with 105 to 104 EID50 did not cause death of C57BL/6 mice. Therefore, the MLD50 for A/California/4/2009 was 105-fold lower in DBA/2 than in C57BL/6 mice, a finding consistent with results with other virus strains.
Increased pathogenicity is often associated with higher viral loads and increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines such as CCL2, IL-6, and TNF-α. At day 2 postinoculation with 104 EID50 of H1N1pdm, lung viral titers of DBA/2 mice and C57BL/6 mice were similar (Fig. (Fig.1).1). There were also no significant differences in the levels of CCL2, CCL5, and IL-6 between the strains (Table (Table3),3), but levels of TNF-α were significantly higher in DBA/2 than C57BL/6 mice (P < 0.01). At day 7 postinfection, lung homogenates of DBA/2 mice had higher viral loads than C57BL/6 mice (P < 0.01) (Fig. (Fig.1)1) as well as significantly higher concentrations of CCL2 and IL-6 (P < 0.01) (Table (Table33).
TABLE 3.
Cytokine | Cytokine concn (pg/ml) by mouse strain at:a | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Day 2 | Day 7 | |||
DBA/2 | C57BL/6 | DBA/2 | C57BL/6 | |
CCL2 | 4,013 | 3,387 | 10,145* | 4,520 |
CCL5 | 4,212 | 2,924 | 5,703 | 7,060 |
IL-6 | 710 | 950 | 1,057* | 735 |
TNF-α | 236* | 102 | 96 | 109 |
IFN-γ | 46 | 42 | 1,097 | 900 |
Passive transfer of cross-reactive human neutralizing antibodies protects against H1N1pdm-induced pathogenicity.
To assess the functionality of human cross-reactive polyclonal antibodies, passive antibody transfer experiments were performed using the highly susceptible DBA/2 mice. Human sera were obtained from individuals not previously exposed to the H1N1pdm virus but who had cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies to it, with an HI titer of 160 and VN titer of 95. Twenty-four hours after passive transfer, mice were inoculated with 102 EID50 (3 to 5 50% lethal doses [LD50]) of A/California/4/2009 virus, and morbidity and mortality were assessed. As expected, all control mice treated with PBS died within 10 days of inoculation (Fig. (Fig.2a).2a). Mice treated with ferret serum containing high levels of H1N1pdm-specific neutralizing antibodies did not succumb to infection (P < 0.001) and lost significantly less weight on days 7, 10, 13, and 15 than mice in all other groups (P < 0.01) (Fig. (Fig.2b).2b). DBA/2 mice injected with pooled human serum containing cross-reactive antibodies had a higher survival rate (75%) than mice in the PBS control group (0%; P < 0.01) and mice receiving human serum without detectable cross-neutralizing antibodies (15%; P < 0.05). Increased survival of the mice injected with cross-neutralizing antibodies was accompanied by a decrease in percent weight loss on days 10 (11%) and 13 (20%) postinfection (P < 0.01) (Fig. (Fig.2b).2b). These data indicate that H1N1pdm-specific neutralizing antibodies induced after infection with a related H1N1 virus can protect DBA/2 mice from a lethal challenge and are likely responsible for the age-related attack rates seen in humans. The protective effect of human serum without any neutralizing antibodies was validated using two additional challenge models, a seasonal H1N1 (A/Memphis/33/2008) and an avian H7N3 (A/shorebird/Delaware/22/2006) virus isolate. The survival rates increased significantly for the seasonal H1N1 virus (90%; P < 0.01) but not for H7N3 (17%; P > 0.05), suggesting that in vitro HI or VN assays underestimate the levels of preexisting neutralizing immunity to influenza A virus strain in humans.
DISCUSSION
The present study establishes that DBA/2 mice are very susceptible to most influenza A virus isolates and that infection often results in debilitating pneumonia and subsequent death. This sensitivity of DBA/2 mice was used to demonstrate that H1N1pdm is more pathogenic than the circulating seasonal H1N1 viruses and that preexisting human cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies can prevent H1N1pdm-induced mortality and morbidity.
Small-animal models, like mouse models, have frequently been used for influenza virus research, including areas such as pathogenesis, vaccine efficacy, and antiviral therapies. The preferred strains, C57BL/6 and BALB/c, display few clinical symptoms upon high-dose inoculation with most influenza A virus isolates, and only highly pathogenic or mouse-adapted viruses cause severe morbidity and mortality at low doses. As such, it was generally believed that mice are resistant to most human and avian influenza A viruses. The current study, as well as a recent report by Driskell et al (6), provides substantial evidence to suggest that BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice are susceptible to infection with many different influenza A virus isolates (H1 to H7 and H9 to H11) even if the infection does not cause significant disease. In contrast, DBA/2 mice become sick and often succumb to infection with the majority of the tested isolates. This enhanced susceptibility of DBA/2 mice was previously reported for highly pathogenic and mouse-adapted influenza viruses (1, 23) and now includes many nonadapted avian influenza isolates.
The mechanism for the difference in susceptibilities between C57BL/6 and DBA/2 mice is not yet fully understood but involves multiple genetic differences between the two mouse lineages, affecting several pathways and processes (1). Certain influenza viruses grow to higher titers in DBA/2 mice (A/Hong Kong/213/2003 [H5N1] or A/Memphis/33/2008 [H1N1]) (data not shown) while others do not (H7N3 and H10N5) (this study). Irrespective of the difference in viral loads, DBA/2 mice respond more vigorously, producing larger quantities of certain proinflammatory molecules like TNF-α, which was shown to correlate with increased morbidity and mortality in humans (5). Previous work has shown that the lack of a functional hemolytic complement (Hc) in DBA/2 mice may result in a less effective adaptive immune response, increasing the viral load during later stages of the infection (1, 11). In the same study, histopathologic evaluation of DBA/2 and C57BL/6 mice after H5N1 virus infection was able to clearly show more extensive involvement of the entire lung as well as necrotic epithelium on day 4 in the DBA/2 mice. At day 7 there was a dramatic difference in the numbers of cells that stained positive for influenza virus between the two strains. In the C57BL/6 mice, an inflammatory response was observed in the parenchyma, with multifocal macrophages within the infiltrate that stained positive for influenza virus. In contrast, the DBA/2 mice maintained widespread intensely positive staining of the airway epithelium, alveolar macrophages, and type I and type II cells in the alveolar wall. Overall, the combined effect of poor clearance, excessive inflammation, and elevated virus titers likely creates a highly pathogenic environment in DBA/2 mice.
The exceptional susceptibility of DBA/2 mice for influenza virus infections was used to demonstrate the effectiveness of H1N1pdm cross-neutralizing human antibodies in reducing H1N1pdm-driven mortality. Approximately 50% of the U.S. population over 75 years of age has low levels of preexposure cross-reactive antibodies to H1N1pdm (13). The age of these individuals suggests that these antibodies were generated between 1918 and 1930 when an antigenically similar H1N1 virus was possibly circulating among humans. We show in this study that these cross-reactive antibodies are also fully functional in vivo and may offer some degree of protection to an otherwise at-risk elderly population against the current H1N1pdm. The identity of the neutralizing epitopes has yet to be identified but could be located within the antigenic site Sa (29). Interestingly, there was a small but significant level of protection when mice were injected with human serum without detectable levels of virus-neutralizing antibodies. The protection was specific for H1N1 viruses since the transfer of HI negative serum did not affect the survival after challenge with an H7N3 virus. The protection is possibly mediated by antibodies specific for the M2 protein (18, 24, 25) or to nonneutralizing epitopes on the HA or neuraminidase (NA) (3, 14, 16, 21, 22). These data also suggest that the current in vitro assays (HI and VN) are underestimating the level of preexisting protective immunity in the human population. Addition of serum factors, like C1q, has been shown to increase the sensitivity of these assays (7, 17). The limited capacity of HI or VN assays to detect neutralizing antibodies was previously noted in preclinical H5N1 ferret vaccine studies. A single dose of inactivated H5N1 vaccine did not induce a detectable HI or VN titer; however, the animals were protected from a lethal challenge with highly pathogenic H5N1 virus (9).
Although the DBA/2 mouse model will provide a useful analytical tool to study viruses and antiviral therapies, the model may not necessarily reflect the natural response to influenza viruses in humans. With the exception of highly pathogenic H5N1 viruses, one should be careful in interpreting pathogenesis data upon infection with these avian isolates as described in the current study.
To summarize, we have confirmed that the DBA/2 mouse model is a suitable and highly susceptible animal model to study infection of influenza A viruses of various subtypes, including those previously known to infect humans. Also, this model will allow us to define the requirements of viruses of avian origin to infect mammalian hosts and rapidly evaluate vaccines or antiviral therapies in the event of a pandemic emergency.
Acknowledgments
We thank David Walker for isolating and propagating influenza A virus isolates. We also acknowledge Nancy Cox, Sasha Klimov, and Ruben Donis of the Centers of Disease Control, Ron Fouchier of Erasmus Medical Center, Malik Peiris and Guan Yi of the University of Hong Kong, and the World Health Organization Global Influenza Surveillance Network as a source of influenza A viruses. Finally, we thank M. Ducatez and S. Schultz-Cherry for critically reviewing the paper.
This project was funded in part by grants from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, under contract HHSN266200700005C, by Department of Defense award W81XWH-09-1-0391, by the Centers of Infectious Diseases Control at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, and by the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print on 19 May 2010.
REFERENCES
Articles from Journal of Virology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)
Full text links
Read article at publisher's site: https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.02444-09
Read article for free, from open access legal sources, via Unpaywall: https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc2897626?pdf=render
Free to read at jvi.asm.org
http://jvi.asm.org/cgi/content/abstract/84/15/7662
Free after 4 months at jvi.asm.org
http://jvi.asm.org/cgi/reprint/84/15/7662
Free after 4 months at jvi.asm.org
http://jvi.asm.org/cgi/content/full/84/15/7662
Citations & impact
Impact metrics
Article citations
N-Glycolylneuraminic Acid in Animal Models for Human Influenza A Virus.
Viruses, 13(5):815, 01 May 2021
Cited by: 11 articles | PMID: 34062844 | PMCID: PMC8147317
Live-attenuated H1N1 influenza vaccine candidate displays potent efficacy in mice and ferrets.
PLoS One, 14(10):e0223784, 14 Oct 2019
Cited by: 14 articles | PMID: 31609986 | PMCID: PMC6791556
Cross-reactive antibodies binding to H4 hemagglutinin protect against a lethal H4N6 influenza virus challenge in the mouse model.
Emerg Microbes Infect, 8(1):155-168, 01 Jan 2019
Cited by: 20 articles | PMID: 30866770 | PMCID: PMC6455122
Genetic characterization and pathogenic potential of H10 avian influenza viruses isolated from live poultry markets in Bangladesh.
Sci Rep, 8(1):10693, 16 Jul 2018
Cited by: 9 articles | PMID: 30013138 | PMCID: PMC6048039
Replication and pathogenic potential of influenza A virus subtypes H3, H7, and H15 from free-range ducks in Bangladesh in mammals.
Emerg Microbes Infect, 7(1):70, 25 Apr 2018
Cited by: 14 articles | PMID: 29691394 | PMCID: PMC5915612
Go to all (47) article citations
Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin Stalk-Specific Antibodies in Human Serum are a Surrogate Marker for In Vivo Protection in a Serum Transfer Mouse Challenge Model.
mBio, 8(5):e01463-17, 19 Sep 2017
Cited by: 53 articles | PMID: 28928215 | PMCID: PMC5605943
Computationally Optimized Broadly Reactive H2 HA Influenza Vaccines Elicited Broadly Cross-Reactive Antibodies and Protected Mice from Viral Challenges.
J Virol, 95(2):e01526-20, 22 Dec 2020
Cited by: 22 articles | PMID: 33115871 | PMCID: PMC7944441
Immunization with live virus vaccine protects highly susceptible DBA/2J mice from lethal influenza A H1N1 infection.
Virol J, 9:212, 19 Sep 2012
Cited by: 6 articles | PMID: 22992381 | PMCID: PMC3502422
Evaluation of neutralizing efficacy of monoclonal antibodies specific for 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza A virus in vitro and in vivo.
Arch Virol, 159(3):471-483, 22 Sep 2013
Cited by: 10 articles | PMID: 24057757
Funding
Funders who supported this work.
NIAID NIH HHS (1)
Grant ID: HHSN266200700005C