Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Influence of a symptom management telehealth intervention on older adults' early recovery outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery.

Author information

Affiliations

  • 1. University of Nebraska Medical Center, Lincoln, 68588-0220, USA.
      Authors
    • Barnason S 1
    (1 author)

Heart & Lung : the Journal of Critical Care, 01 Sep 2009, 38(5):364-376
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2009.01.005 PMID: 19755186 PMCID: PMC2900787

Free full text in Europe PMC

Abstract 

Objective

The study objective was to examine the effect of a symptom management (SM) telehealth intervention on physical activity and functioning and to describe the health care use of older adult patients (aged > 65 years) after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABS) by group (SM intervention group and usual care group).

Methods

A randomized clinical trial design was used. The study was conducted in 4 Midwestern tertiary hospitals. The 6-week SM telehealth intervention was delivered by the Health Buddy (Health Hero Network, Palo Alto, CA). Measures included Modified 7-Day Activity Interview, RT3 accelerometer (Stayhealthy, Inc, Monrovia, CA), physical activity and exercise diary, Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36, and subjects' self-report and provider records of health care use. Follow-up times were 3 and 6 weeks and 3 and 6 months after CABS.

Results

Subjects (N = 232) had a mean age of 71.2 (+4.7) years. There were no significant interactions using repeated-measures analyses of covariance. There was a significant group effect for average kilocalories/kilogram/day of estimated energy expenditure as measured by the RT3 accelerometer, with the usual care group having a higher estimated energy expenditure. Both groups had significant improvements over time for role-physical, vitality, and mental functioning. Both groups had similar health care use.

Conclusion

Subjects were able to return to preoperative levels of functioning between 3 and 6 months after CABS and to increase their physical activity over reported preoperative levels of activity. Further study of those patients undergoing CABS who could derive the most benefit from the SM intervention is warranted.

Free full text 

Logo of nihpaLink to Publisher's site
Heart Lung. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2900787
NIHMSID: NIHMS147690
PMID: 19755186

Influence of a Symptom Management Telehealth Intervention on Older Adults' Early Recovery Outcomes following Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery (CABS)

Susan Barnason, PhD, APRN-CNS, CEN, CCRN, FAHA, Associate Professor, Lani Zimmerman, PhD, RN, FAHA, Professor, Janet Nieveen, PhD, RN, Assistant Professor, and Paula Schulz, PhD, RN, Assistant Professor
University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Nursing-Lincoln Division
Connie Miller, PhD, RN, Assistant Professor
University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Nursing-Omaha Division
Melody Hertzog, PhD, Faculty and Tu Chunhao, Graduate Assistant
University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Nursing-Lincoln Division
Author information Copyright and License information Disclaimer

Introduction

Health related quality of life (HRQOL) generally improves for most patients following coronary artery bypass surgery (CABS).1-4 However, age-related factors (e.g., multiple comorbidities, more impaired physical functioning prior to their CABS) may contribute to older adults experiencing slower recovery or poor outcomes.5,6 Older adults may also experience ongoing symptoms after CABS and may have more impaired physical and psychosocial functioning, as well as limitations in their physical activity.7,8 Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a standard of care and is routinely prescribed to facilitate recovery of functioning and physical activity, as well as promote coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factor lifestyle modification after CABS. However, CR alone may not be able to adequately address the needs to improve physical activity and functioning among older adults at risk for impaired recovery after having CABS.9,10 Specific interventions to address the age-related recovery needs of older CABS patients, such as managing frequently occurring symptoms, may in turn improve patients' functioning and physical activity abilities.6,11 Therefore, one of the major goals of this randomized clinical trial (RCT) was to examine the effect of a symptom management (SM) intervention on older adult patients (≥ 65 years) following CABS. Patients who were eligible to participate were randomly assigned using a previously generated randomization schedule. The primary aim of this study was to determine if there were differences between the symptom management (SM) and usual care (UC) groups on physical activity, physiological and psychosocial functioning. A secondary aim was to describe the healthcare utilization of older adults following CABS.

Background

Heart surgery is routinely performed on older adults.12 Recovery of older adults can be hampered following CABS due to having more symptoms (e.g., fatigue, shortness of breath, sleep problems) 4,7, impaired functional capacity 13, as well as being at higher risk for declines in physical functioning due to coexisting cardiac disease and other comorbidities.14,15 Outcomes following CABS surgery, such as surgery related morbidity and mortality, have significantly improved over the last several years for patients regardless of age.16 However, there is a need to examine clinically sensitive outcomes that are indicative of the recovery variability following CABS.17,18 Examining early recovery outcomes, such as physical activity, physiological and psychosocial functioning, can help to determine the efficacy of interventions delivered to older adults after CABS.

Physical Activity

Physical activity and exercise are recommended for older adults,19 and are considered essential for all patients following a CABS.20,21 Unequivocally, physical activity at moderate levels, for 30 minutes daily or most days, has cardiovascular benefits;20,21 with high energy expenditure physical activity even halting and causing regression of coronary atherosclerosis.22 Improved health perception, satisfaction and quality of life at five to six years after CABS is related to engaging in regular exercise.23 However, initiating and maintaining physical activity and exercise regardless of age, is extremely difficult as evidenced by only 15-50% of patients still exercising six months after cardiac rehabilitation.24-26 Physical activity is an important indicator of early recovery outcomes as it is a predictor future morbidity, mortality and impaired physiological and psychological functioning for older adults.19,27,28

Physiological and Psychosocial Functioning

Numerous studies have examined recovery of functioning among older adults following CABS and report improvements of both physical and psychosocial functioning over time.1,4,29 These studies indicate that physical functional abilities improve; usually peaking at approximately three months, then plateauing; and in some cases improvements continue up through the first year after CABS. Cardiac rehabilitation facilitates further improves physical functioning in older CABS patients; specifically increasing extremity strength, ankle range of motion, balance, and gait.27

By three weeks after CABS, regardless of age, patients' tension, anger, confusion and depression begins to dissipate.30 Overall mood and perceptions of tenseness,31 as well as anxiety and depression,32 and psychosocial functioning (role-emotional, social and mental functioning)1 improves for patients over the first three to six months following CABS. Although most patients recover after a cardiac event (CABS or myocardial infarction) with relative equanimity, although approximately 25% of subjects (N=174)33 had long-term problems in psychosocial recovery which were related to failure to return to work, leisure and sexual activities despite being physically fit. There is also a close association between CABS patients' levels of physiological and psychosocial functioning; with poorer physical functioning associated with higher levels of depression at one and three months after surgery.34 Poor functional health recovery after CABS is predictive of long-term survival.35 These studies demonstrate patients' functioning after CABS can be impaired, regardless of age. Therefore, a closer examination of functioning as an early recovery outcome following CABS is warranted.

Healthcare Utilization

Hospital readmission, attributable to cardiac-related problems, is a commonly recognized measure of health care utilization following cardiac surgery.4,36-38 Hospital readmission rates within one month (30-days) to 6-weeks following heart surgery have ranged from 8-34%.4,36,37,39-41 Cardiac-related problems necessitating hospitalization within 30 days of CABS (N=110) were related to wound infection (19%), atrial fibrillation (13%), pleural effusions (11%) and thromboembolic events (10%).36 Other reported problems requiring rehospitalizations have included respiratory and cardiac problems (i.e., cardioversion, chest inflammation);42 as well as chest pain (with or without shortness of breath), incision problems, and analgesic reactions (e.g., nausea, vomiting, itching, constipation, and general malaise).41 These studies support the importance of measuring health care utilization as an important outcome associated with early recovery following CABS.43

Design and Methods

This study used a randomized, two-group (N = 280) repeated measures design with measurements taken at time of discharge (baseline measures), 3- and 6-weeks, and 3- and 6-months postoperatively among older adult patients (65 years or older). One group received usual care (UC) and the symptom management (SM) intervention and the comparison group received usual care (UC) only. The study sample size of 280 was based on a power analysis of pilot data on the primary variables of physiological functioning. Pilot data using the physical, role-physical and vitality functioning subscales of the MOS SF-36 were measured at 3 follow-up times in subjects after CABS. Based upon the correlation among the observations from the same subject that was no greater than 0.55; a sample size of 123 subjects per group was recommended as it would provide at least 80% power (testing at the 5% level of statistical significance [2-sided] to detect a difference in the true means of the outcome variables of 0.3 standard deviation (a difference characterized as small to medium effect for social science research). To allow for an ineligibility rate and loss to follow-up equivalent to the loss of [similar, equals] 15% of the observations, and therefore had a targeted accrual for this study of 280 subjects based on the power analysis.

The investigators44 developed the symptom management (SM) telehealth intervention implemented in this study to improve patients' self-efficacy and skills related to self-care management of early recovery symptoms. The six-week SM intervention was delivered via the Health Buddy ® telehealth device; for a total of 42 daily sessions. The SM intervention provided subjects with strategies (e.g., adequate rest, pain management, progressing physical activity incrementally) designed to address commonly occurring symptoms experienced after recovery from CABS, as a means to improve outcomes (physical activity, functioning); and a long term outcome of having less healthcare utilization.

Age-eligible postoperative CABS participants were recruited from December 2002 through August 2006 from four Midwestern tertiary hospitals. Initially, 280 patients consented to participate in the study. Data analyses were conducted on 232 subjects, as there were 34 (23.8%) subjects that did not receive the allocated intervention in the intervention group, compared to 15 subjects (11%) that did not receive the allocated intervention in the UC group. Reasons for not receiving the treatment as allocated, in both groups, included the following: a) subject burden (n=36), b) rehospitalizations or transfer to extended care facility (n=4), c) equipment malfunction (n=3), d) inability to reach subject per telephone for follow-up data collection (n=2); and e) inability to complete the intervention protocol (n=3). Figure 1 depicts the study enrollment and attrition for a total of 123 subjects in the usual care group and 109 in the SM group.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is nihms-147690-f0001.jpg

Subject Enrollment and Attrition.

Measures

Besides the demographic and clinical data collected as reported in Table 1, other data measures used included the Modified 7-day Activity Interview, RT3® accelerometer, Physical Activity and Exercise diary and Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 (MOS SF-36).

Table 1

Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Study Participants (N=232).

CategoryTotal (N=232)
Demographic Variablesn(%)
Marital StatusMarried20086.21
Single31.29
Widowed2410.34
Divorced52.16
Currently WorkingYes10545.26
Type of ProcedureCABG17374.57
OPCAB5724.57
Other20.86
GenderMale19482.76
Female4017.24
Clinical Variables n (%)
NYHA ClassificationI11248.48
II9541.13
III239.96
IV10.43
Ejection Fraction< 50%4519.74
≥ 50%18380.26
Previous MIYes2812.07
DiabetesYes5423.28
HypertensionYes17173.71
High cholesterolYes17274.14
History of Tobacco UseYes11850.86
History of Smokeless
Tobacco		Yes73.04
Family History of CADYes16270.13
PVDYes3314.22
Participation in
Cardiac Rehabilitation
after CABS		Yes18180.44
Additional Variables Mean SD
Length of Stay5.451.20
Age71.214.91
Education Level13.343.04
Discharge Hemoglobin10.651.14
Body Mass Index28.474.59
Charlson Comorbidity
Index (Average # of
Comorbidities		1.131.23

Physical Activity

In this study physical activity data were collected using the Modified 7-Day Activity Interview (for baseline), the RT3® accelerometer (Stayhealthy, Inc.) and the Physical Activity and Exercise Diary (for follow up times).

  • a) Modified 7- Day Activity Interview45 was used to assess the subject's baseline physical activity level before surgery (average kcal/kg/day expended and average minutes/day spent in moderate or greater activity). Data collected from the tool includes hours per day spent in sleep and in light, moderate, hard and very hard activity (based on MET levels) and yield the total kilocalories per kg of body weight expended per day and total calories expended per day are derived from the tool. The instrument has acceptable test-retest reliability.46 Construct validity and criterion validity have been reported.47

  • b) RT3® Accelerometer was used as an objective measure of physical activity at follow-up times of 3- and 6-weeks and 3- and 6 months after CABS. It is approximately the size and weight of a pager. Subjects wore the accelerometer on their waistbands continuously, except during bathing and sleeping times, for three consecutive days each data collection period. Results from Hertzog et al.48 demonstrated additional support for using 3 days of data collection as used in this study. Reliability estimates (interclass correlations) for 3-days of self-reported recorded data collection of minutes of moderate or higher physical activity in a diary and RT3® ranged from .76-.84 at 3-weeks, 6-weeks and 3-months after CABS. TheRT3® yields “activity counts” of the subject's amount of activity; which can be converted to kcals expended. In this study, average daily activity counts and average kcal/kg/day expended were evaluated. The RT3® is a triaxial accelerometer which measures body motion (specifically, the electrical energy of acceleration and deceleration) during activities that involve energy cost. Triaxial accelerometers have documented validity with indirect calorimetry, with correlations ranging from .48 - .92.49-51 Reliability of this instrument has also been reported.52-54

  • c) Physical Activity and Exercise Diary was a daily log used by subjects for each of the same three days that each subject wore the RT3® accelerometer at each follow-up time (3- and 6-weeks and 3- and 6-months after CABS). Subjects recorded the amount of time they spent in the various categories of activity levels (light, moderate, hard, very hard activities) and sleep. These categories were adapted from the Modified 7-Day Activity Interview.45 Diary data included: a) average kcal/kg/day expended and b) mean number of minutes spent in light, moderate, hard, and very hard levels of physical activity. Three-day activity diaries such as the one proposed for this study have been used successfully as estimates of physical activity.55,56 The correlations between estimates of 3-day diary reports and the RT3® accelerometer demonstrated high generalizability coefficients (ICCs); with the RT3® accelerometer estimates of energy expenditure compare with the 3-days of data at three data collection points ranging from .85 - .97.48

Physiological and Psychosocial Functioning

The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (MOS SF-36, version 2.0)57 consists of eight subscales measuring both physiological and psychosocial functioning (general health, physical, role-physical, role emotional, social, bodily pain, mental health, and vitality functioning). Measurement of the MOS SF-36 were taken at baseline during hospitalization (based on the subject's report of pre-procedure level of functioning) and at 6-weeks and 3- and 6-months after CABS. In this study, measures were not taken at 3-weeks as clinically CABS patients are still recuperating from their acute hospitalization following CABS; and there was a need to minimize subject burden in the study. Subscale scores have a range of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better or higher functioning. Reported reliability, using Cronbach's alpha, have ranged from .78-.93.58-60 The instrument also has reported discriminant validity.59 Physiological functioning was measured using three of the MOS SF-36 subscales: physical functioning (10 items), role limitations due to physical problems (4 items), and vitality (4 items) or the perceptions of energy and fatigue. Psychosocial functioning was measured by three of the MOS SF-36 subscales: mental health (5 items), social (2 items), and role limitations due to emotional problems (3 items). In this study, the Cronbach's alphas for the both physiological subscales (physical, role physical and vitality) and the psychosocial subscales (role emotional, mental and social) for all data collection times ranged from 0.89-.90.

Health care utilization

At each follow-up time period subjects were queried about whether they had accessed any healthcare providers/services; specifically if they had been rehospitalized, been to the Emergency department, or to their healthcare provider (e.g., primary care provider, cardiologist and surgeon). If the subject had accessed any healthcare services, the frequency and purpose of the utilization was recorded. For those patients who reported use of healthcare, the hospital and/or healthcare provider was contacted by mail to validate the date of the hospitalization or healthcare visit, and to determine the reason for the healthcare encounter. This information cross-validated the subjects' self-reports.

Findings

The sample of subjects (n=232) was comprised of 83% men and 17% women; with 86% of the sample being married. There were 109 subjects in the symptom management group and 123 subjects in the usual care group. Subjects had a mean age of 71.2 (± 4.7) years. The majority of subjects had an average of 13 or more years of formal education and approximately 80% of subjects in both groups participated in cardiac rehabilitation after hospital discharge. There were no statistically or clinically significant group differences on demographic (e.g., age, length of stay, race, and marital status) or baseline clinical variables (e.g., comorbidities, body mass index, discharge hemoglobin, and cardiac rehabilitation participation). Refer to Table 1 for an overview of the subjects' clinical and demographic characteristics.

Physical Activity

Using repeated measures analysis of covariance (RM-ANCOVA), there was no significant interaction or time effect for EEE (average kcal/kg/day expended) using the diary; however, there was a significant group effect F(1,177)=8.2, p<.01. The UC group had a higher mean kcal/kg/day expended compared to the SM group. However, the SM group did have a higher mean kcal/kg/day energy expenditure at the 3-week time period; corresponding to the time before most subjects had started in a CR program. Refer to Table 2 for results of RM-ANOVA's for physical activity and physical and psychosocial functioning measures. See table 3 for a summary of raw and adjusted mean scores for all of the physical activity variables. There were no significant (p<.05) interactions or main effects for group using baseline measures of physical activity as the covariate for the other 3 measures of physical activity. There were significant time effects [F(3, 459)= 17.3, p<.01] for the RT3 average daily activity counts, with daily activity counts increasing over time. Similarly, the total group had significantly [F (3, 531)=12.9, p<.01] increased levels of moderate or greater activity, as measured by the diary, over time. The greatest improvements in both the activity counts and levels of moderate or higher activity intensity occurred between 6-weeks and 3-months following CABS. Although not significant, descriptively the SM group reported higher levels of engaging in “moderate or higher” levels of physical activity daily and had higher levels of EEE (kcal/kg/day) using the diary measure, specifically at the 3-week follow-up time period, in comparison to the UC group.

Table 2

RM-ANCOVA for Physical Activity and Physical and Psychosocial Functioning Variables

GroupTimeGroup * Time
VariablesF
(df)		PF
(df)		pF
(df)		p
Physical Activity
Average Daily Activity Counts (RT3)1.6
(1,153)		.2017.3
(3,459)		 <.01 1.6
(3,459)		.20
Average kcal/kg/Day EEE (RT3)1.5
(1,153)		.201.3
(3,459)		.201.4
(3,459)		.20
Average Total kcal/kg/Day EEE
(Diary)		8.2
(1,177)		 <.01 0.9
(3,531)		.406.7
(3,531)		.10
Average Daily Minutes in Moderate
or Greater Activity (Diary		2.0
(1,177)		.1012.9
(3,531)		 .01 1.3
(3,531)		.20
Physical Functioning (MOS SF-36 subscales)
Physical1.3
(1,207)		.25.70
(2,414)		.49.93
(2,414)		.39
Role-Physical1.2
(1,207)		.267.2
(2,414)		 <.01 1.39
(2,414)		.24
Vitality.03
(1,207)		.804.3
(2,414)		 <.01 .02
(2,414)		.90
Psychosocial Functioning (MOS SF-36 subscales)
Role-Emotional.06
(1,205)		.40.30
(2,412)		.70.50
(2,412)		.60
Social.90
(1,204)		.40.7
(2,410)		.501.8
(2,410)		.20
Mental.10
(1,207)		.408.10
(2,414)		 <.0005 .50
(2,414)		.60

Table 3

Raw and Adjusted Means for the Physical Activity Variables by group .

RT3: Average Daily Activity Counts
Raw Means
(SD)		 N 3 wk 6wk 3 mo 6mo
Symptom
Management		73125768.2
(68981.9)		158004.1
(70062.1)		1910410.1
(115060.0)		175428.9
(99817.5)
Usual Care83128104.5
(76195.6)		170801.7
(114718.4)		209748.7
(130548.4)		213716.2
(132035.6)
Adjusted Means
Symptom
Management		73125972.7158650.8191546.8176064.1
Usual Care83127924.7170233.0209304.0213157.6
RT3: Average Daily Kcal/Kg (EEE)
Raw Means
(SD)		 N 3 wk 6wk 3 mo 6mo
Symptom
Management		7325.5 (3.0)26.6 (2.9)27.9 (4.6)27.4 (4.0)
Usual Care8325.6 (3.1)27.3 (4.6)28.8 (5.4)28.2 (5.3)
Adjusted Means
Symptom
Management		7325.526.728.027.5
Usual Care8325.527.328.828.8
Diary: Average Daily Kcal/Kg (EEE)
Raw Means
(SD)		N3 wk6wk3 mo6mo
Symptom
Management		8125.1 (3.8)26.6 (4.7)28.7 (5.6)28.3 (5.5)
Usual Care9924.3 (2.6)26.2 (4.6)28.6 (6.2)30.0 (7.8)
Adjusted Means
Symptom
Management		8125.126.628.628.3
Usual Care9924.326.328.730.2
Diary: Average Daily Minutes in Moderate or Greater Physical Activity
Raw Means
(SD)		N3 wk6wk3 mo6 mo
Symptom
Management		81111.9(99.1)145.4(118.8)196.0(144.5)185.5(143.6)
Usual Care9992.9 (70.1)126.9(195.7)195.7(150.7)223.8(179.2)
Adjusted Means
Symptom
Management		81110.2144.4194.6185.2
Usual Care9993.2144.5198.7227.6

Physiological and Psychosocial Functioning

Physiological and psychosocial functioning were measured using subscales of the MOS SF-36. While there were no significant (p<.05) interactions or main effects for group, there were some significant time effects for both physiological and psychosocial functioning using RM-ANCOVA with baseline measures as the covariate; refer to Table 4 for physiological measures of the MOS SF 36 and Table 5 for the psychosocial measures of the MOS SF 36. Physiological functioning peaked at 3-months and then plateaued at 6-months as compared to the psychosocial measures of functioning peaking at the 6-week time period and plateauing at 3- and 6-months. The significant time effects for physiological functioning indicated the total group had improvements in role-physical functioning (e.g., household chores) [F (2, 414) = 4.3, p<.01] and in vitality functioning (e.g., level of fatigue) [F (2, 414) = 8.1, p<.01)] over time. Additionally, psychosocial functioning, specifically mental functioning significantly improved over time [F (2, 414) = 8.1, p<.0005)].

Table 4

Raw and Adjusted Means for Physiological Functioning MOS SF-36 Variables by group.

Physical Functioning: MOS SF-36 Subscale
Raw Means
and SD		N6 Weeks
M (SD)		3 Months
M (SD)		6 Months
M (SD)
Symptom
Management
Group		9880.7 (13.5)86.1 (15.6)89.0 (16.5)
Usual Care
Group		11279.1 (15.7)85.6 (14.4)85.5 (18.9)
Adjusted Means
Symptom
Management
Group		9880.786.289.1
Usual Care
Group		11279.185.585.4
Role Physical Functioning: MOS SF-36 Subscale
Raw Means
and SD		N6 Weeks
M (SD)		3 Months
M (SD)		6 Months
M (SD)
Symptom
Management
Group		9880.0 (22.1)89.2 (18.4)89.4 (20.7)
Usual Care
Group		11274.3 (24.5)88.1 (18.2)88.6 (21.0)
Adjusted Means
Symptom
Management
Group		9879.989.089.3
Usual Care
Group		11274.488.388.7
Vitality Functioning: MOS SF-36 Subscale
Raw Means
and SD		N6 Weeks
M (SD)		3 Months
M (SD)		6 Months
M (SD)
Symptom
Management
Group		9871.4 (14.5)75.8 (13.6)76.0 (16.6)
Usual Care
Group		11269.5 (14.8)74.4 (13.2)74.3 (15.1)
Adjusted Means
Symptom
Management
Group		9870.675.175.3
Usual Care
Group		11270.275.074.9

Table 5

Raw and Adjusted Means for Psychosocial Functioning MOS SF-36 Variables by group.

Role-emotional Functioning: MOS SF-36 Subscale
Raw Means N6 Weeks
M (SD)		3 Months
M (SD)		6 Months
M (SD)
Symptom
Management
Group		9798.9 (6.1)99.2 (4.0)99.0 (4.7)
Usual Care
Group		11298.6 (7.6)100 (0.0)98.7 (9.4)
Adjusted Means
Symptom
Management
Group		9798.999.299.0
Usual Care
Group		11298.610098.7
Mental Functioning: MOS SF-36 Subscale
Raw Means
and SD		N6 Weeks
M (SD)		3 Months
M (SD)		6 Months
M (SD)
Symptom
Management
Group		9890.5 (8.9)92.0 (7.5)90.0 (10.5)
Usual Care
Group		11289.7 (9.7)91.8 (8.2)90.3 (11.7)
Adjusted Means
Symptom
Management
Group		9890.391.889.6
Usual Care
Group		11289.992.090.7
Social Functioning: MOS SF-36 Subscale
Raw Means
And SD		N6 Weeks
M (SD)		3 Months
M (SD)		6 Months
M (SD)
Symptom
Management
Group		9794.7 (14.0)96.9 (14.9)97.3 (10.7)
Usual Care
Group		11197.3 (10.0)97.9 (10.1)95.6 (14.8)
Adjusted Means
Symptom
Management
Group		9794.696.797.2
Usual Care
Group		11197.498.095.7

Health Care Utilization

The groups in this study had very similar rates of rehospitalizations, ED visits and clinic visits for cardiac-related problems. In the SM group a total of 20/109 (18%) subjects, compared to 18/123 (15%) in the UC group were rehospitalized over the 6-months following CABS. There were 3 subjects (3%) in the SM group and 4 subjects (3%) in the UC group who had two to three rehospitalizations over the 6-months after CABS. Similarly, there were 20 patients (18%) in the SM group, compared to 18 in the UC group (15%) who had ED visits over the 6-month period after CABS. In relation to clinic visits, there were 66 subjects (60%) in the SM group and 65 subjects (53%) in the UC group who had one reported clinic visit during the study period. Some subjects had from two to three clinic visits during the 6-months after CABS; which included 13 subjects (12%) in the SM group and 4 subjects (3%) in the UC group. Clinic visits reflected routine types of care (e.g., follow-up of diagnostic studies such as lipid panels, routine follow-up with surgeon after CABS).

Discussion

The findings from this study have been useful in examining clinically relevant outcomes associated with the early recovery of patients following CABS. While traditional measures of morbidity, mortality and complications related to CABS are important to determining surgery success; these measures are not particularly sensitive to the health related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes indicative of recovery after CABS. Study findings demonstrated the progressive increases in both physiological and psychosocial functioning trajectories that occur over time after CABS for both SM and UC groups. Psychosocial functioning peaked much sooner after CABS in comparison to physiological functioning. These findings are consistent with previous studies of the investigators 1,4,61 and other researchers.29,32,62,63 By six months following CABS, subjects reported relatively high levels of functioning, which also reflects a high level of HRQoL. The improved functioning scores over time may also represent the sense of optimism patients often experience when they are satisfied with improvements in their health status following CABS.23

Although it was disappointing that there were no significant differences in the levels of functioning by SM or UC groups; the sample of subjects in this study may have represented a group of patients that were less impaired or disabled prior to their CABS, as indicated by baseline functioning scores on MOS SF-36 which indicated a higher baseline status than reported by other researchers. Both Ballan et al. 64 and Elliott et al.17 reported mean physical and role-physical functioning scores <55 on the MOS SF-36 subscales prior to cardiac surgery; compared to scores of ≥ 80 on these subscales in the current study. Psychosocial functioning subscales of social, mental and role-emotional functioning mean baseline scores <6017, compared to mean scores of ≥ 80 in the current study. Furthermore, Elliott et al.17 also found mental and social functioning scores by six months after CABS had actually decreased, and were lower than baseline scores; whereas psychosocial functioning in this study had improved over time, with no declines observed in either the SM or UC group.

While there was only one significant group difference in physical activity between the SM and the UC groups in this study, the physical activity outcomes measured demonstrated that older adults achieved a return to a level of physical activity comparable to baseline or pre-procedure, by three months after their cardiac surgery. However, even by 6-months after CABS, neither group met the recommended levels of physical activity and exercise for cardiac patients.19-21 The findings in this study, similar to other studies, reflect the need to further examine the way many older adults are unable to achieve and/or sustain levels of physical activity and exercise as recommended.

Overall, the subjects in this study had uneventful recoveries following CABS, as reflected by similar patterns of rehospitalization, ED and clinic visits. Although not significantly by group, the SM group did have slightly more health care resource utilization. This may reflect the SM group receiving intervention strategies recommending they seek additional health care or contact with their health care providers if symptoms or postoperative problems did not improve. Descriptive data related to healthcare utilization provided in this study has been lacking or very limited in other studies of patients' recovery after CABS.

Limitations

Study findings are limited due to the homogenous sample of subjects, who had fairly high levels of preoperative functioning; and therefore, findings may not be generalizable to the larger CABS population. In this study the use of two different measures of EEE was a limitation. The measure of baseline or preoperative physical activity was measured subjectively by patient self-report (Modified 7-day Activity Interview) and was measured at follow-up times using the RT3® accelerometer, an objective measure. In future studies more explicit measures of the patient's level of disability and physical activity is indicated, to identify determinants of and interventions for assisting patients with potential for impaired recovery after CABS. The baseline status of functioning prior to CABS was limited to the self-report data obtained from the MOS SF-36. Furthermore, the healthcare utilization findings in the study were limited to descriptive statistical analysis due to the types of healthcare resource utilization evaluated in this study and the relatively small number of subjects having ED visits or being rehospitalized. In this study the intent to treat was not initiated at the actual enrollment of subjects in the study. Subjects consented to participate in the study and were enrolled in the study during their hospital stay at tertiary medical centers; and were usually discharged within 5-7 days after CABS. We found that several patients were overwhelmed by their recovery when they returned home and elected not to participate any further in the study, therefore we had subjects who necessitated being dropped out of the study. In this study, it was optimal to enroll subjects while hospitalized as patients are discharged to home in rural communities at a distance from the tertiary hospital which would make it extremely challenging to enroll patients in a timely basis for studies of early recovery after cardiac events. Based on this finding related to attrition, for future studies we would recommend an attrition rate of 20% be utilized in determining sample size to account for this disparity.

Conclusions

The majority of CABS subjects in this study were able to return to preoperative levels of physical activity and functioning between three to six months after surgery. Although subjects in the SM group did not have significantly different physical activity recovery, a slightly higher performance of moderate or higher intensity physical activity early in recovery (3-weeks after CABS) was noted. The effects of CR may have diminished the effects of the SM intervention in the early recovery period. Subjects in this study had uneventful recoveries, resulting in only a small number of subjects requiring rehospitalization for cardiac-related problems. Although the SM group did not significantly impact the selected recovery outcomes targeted in this report, the intervention was able to be successfully delivered in the subject's home, for the 6-week duration, to older adults following CABS, many of whom resided in rural communities throughout the Midwest.

While the overall trends of subjects' physical activity and functional recovery demonstrate improvement over time, researchers11 have recommended consideration should be given to the level of baseline physical activity (e.g., level of sedentary activity), level of deconditioning and comorbidities6 when designing interventions. The degree of functional recovery directly relates to survival after cardiac surgery;35 thus emphasizing the importance of identifying and intervening with patients who experience poor functioning cannot be underscored enough. Recent studies also point to the likelihood that there are distinct patterns of recovery after CABS that reflect those patients who have an improved versus non-improved health related quality of life.17,18 Based on study findings, subanalysis work is in progress to examine which subgroups of CABS patients (e.g., gender groups, subjects with higher disease burden) were the most responsive to the symptom management intervention used in this study to guide future research. Using strategies, such as the SM intervention, are warranted to optimize recovery for older adults after CABS, particularly related to improving physical activity and functioning.

Acknowledgements

Funded by NIH/NINR R01 NR007759

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

1. Barnason S, Zimmerman L, Anderson A, Mohr-Burt S, Nieveen J. Functional status outcomes of patients with a coronary artery bypass graft over time. Heart & Lung. 2000;29(1):33–46. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
2. Hunt JO, Hendrata MV, Myles PS. Quality of life 12 months after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Heart Lung. 2000;29(6):401–411. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
3. Ross AC, Ostrow L. Subjectively perceived quality of life after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. American Journal of Critical Care. 2001;10:11–16. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
4. Zimmerman L, Barnason S, Brey BA, Catlin S, Nieveen J. Comparison of recovery patterns for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass in the early discharge period. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 2002;17(3):132–141. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
5. Barnason S, Zimmerman L, Nieveen J, et al. Usefulness of RISKO heart hazard appraisal to quantify CAD risk factor burden on the preoperative functioning of coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 2007;22(2):81–87. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
6. Dolansky MA, Moore SM. Older adults' early disability following a cardiac event. West J Nurs Res. 2008;30(2):163–180. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
7. Zimmerman L, Barnason S, Nieveen J, Schmaderer M. Symptom management intervention in elderly coronary artery bypass graft patients. Outcomes Management. 2004;8(1):5–12. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
8. Zimmerman L, Barnason S, Schulz P, et al. The effects of a symptom management intervention on symptom evaluation, physical functioning, and physical activity for women after coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2007;22(6):493–500. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
9. Chan D, Chau J, Chang AM. Acute coronary syndromes: Cardiac rehabilitation programmes and quality of life. J Adv Nurs. 2005;49(6):591–599. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
10. Worcester MUC, Murphy BM, Elliott PC, et al. Trajectories of recovery of quality of life in women after an acute cardiac event. British Journal of Health Psychology. 2007;12(1; 1):1–15. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
11. Anderson JA, Petersen NJ, Kistner C, Soltero ER, Willson P. Determining predictors of delayed recovery and the need for transitional cardiac rehabilitation after cardiac surgery. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2006;18(8):386–392. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
12. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2008 update: A report from the american heart association statistics committee and stroke statistics subcommittee. Circulation. 2008;117(4):e25–146. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
13. LaPier TK. Functional status of patients during subacute recovery from coronary artery bypass surgery. Heart & Lung. 2007;36:114–124. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
14. Bayliss EA, Bayliss MS, Ware JE, Jr, Steiner JF. Predicting declines in physical function in persons with multiple chronic medical conditions: What we can learn from the medical problem list. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004;2:47. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
15. Rumsfeld JS, Ho PM, Magid DJ, et al. Predictors of health-related quality of life after coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77(5):1508–1513. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
16. Barner HB. Operative treatment of coronary atherosclerosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85(4):1473–1482. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
17. Elliott D, Lazarus R, Leeder SR. Health outcomes of patients undergoing cardiac surgery: Repeated measures using short form-36 and 15 dimensions of quality of life questionnaire. Heart Lung. 2006;35(4):245–251. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
18. LeGrande MR, Elliott PC, Murphy BM, et al. Health related quality of life trajectories and predictors following coronary artery bypass surgery. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2006;4:49–62. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
19. Nelson ME, Rejeski WJ, Blair SN, et al. Physical activity and public health in older adults: Recommendation from the american college of sports medicine and the american heart association. Circulation. 2007;116(9):1094–1105. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
20. Smith SC, Allen J, Blair SN, et al. AHA/ACC guidelines for secondary prevention for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2006 update. Journal of American Geriatric Society. 2006;47:2130–2139. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
21. Thompson PD, Buchner D, a IL, et al. AHA scientific statement. exercise and physical activity in the prevention and treatment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: A statement from the council on clinical cardiology (subcommittee on exercise, rehabilitation, and prevention) and the council on nutrition, physical activity, and metabolism (subcommittee on physical activity) Circulation. 2003;107(24):3109–3116. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
22. Hambrecht R, Adams V, Erbs S, et al. Regular physical activity improves endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease by increasing phosphorylation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Circulation. 2003;107(25):3152–3158. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
23. Treat-Jacobson D, Lindquist RA. Functional recovery and exercise behavior in men and women 5 to 6 years following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 2004;26(5):479–498. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
24. Ades PA, Savage P, Tischler MD, Poehlman ET, Dee JD, Niggel J. Determininants of disability in older cardiac patients. American Heart Journal. 2002;143(1):151–156. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
25. Bock BC, Carmona-Barros RE, Esler JL, Tilkemeier PL. Program participation and physical activity maintenance after cardiac rehabilitation. Behav Modif. 2003;27(1):37–53. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
26. Moore SM, Dolansky MA. Randomized trial of a home recovery intervention following coronary artery bypass surgery. Research in Nursing and Health. 2001;24:93–104. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
27. Dolansky MA, Moore SM. Effects of cardiac rehabilitation on the recovery outcomes of older adults after coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2004;24(4):236–244. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
28. Focht BC, Brawley LR, Rejeski WJ, Ambrosius WT. Group-mediated activity counseling and traditional exercise therapy programs: Effects on health-related quality of life among older adults in cardiac rehabilitation. Ann Behav Med. 2004;28(1):52–61. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
29. Allen JK, Young DK, Xu A. Predictors of long-term change in functional status after coronary artery bypass graft surgery in women. Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing. 1998;13(2):10–27. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
30. Papadantonaki A, Stotts NA, Paul SM. Comparison of quality of life before and after coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Heart Lung. 1994;23(1):45–52. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
31. Gilliss CL, Gortner SR, Hauck WW, Shinn JA, Sparacino PA, Tompkins C. A randomized clinical trial of nursing care for recovery from cardiac surgery. Heart Lung. 1993;22(2):125–133. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
32. King KB, Porter LA, Rowe MA. Functional, social, and emotional outcomes in women and men in the first year following coronary artery bypass surgery. J Womens Health. 1994;3(5):347–354. [Google Scholar]
33. Moser DK, Dracup K. Psychosocial recovery from a cardiac event: The influence of perceived control. Heart Lung. 1995;24(4):273–280. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
34. Lopez V, Ying CS, Poon C, Wai Y. Physical, psychological and social recovery patterns after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A prospective repeated measures questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007;44(8):1304–1315. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
35. Koch CG, Li L, Lauer M, Sabik J, Starr NJ, Blackstone EH. Effect of functional health-related quality of life on long-term survival after cardiac surgery. Circulation. 2007;115(6):692–699. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
36. Beggs VL, Birkemeyer NJ, Nugent WC, Dacey LJ, O'Connor GT. Factors related to rehospitaliztion within thirty days of dishcarge after coronary artery bypass grafting. Best Practices and Benchmarking in Health Care. 1996;1(4):180–186. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
37. Deaton C, Weintraub WS, Ramsay J, Przykucki R, Zellinger M, Causey K. Patient perceived health status, hospital length of stay, and readmission after coronary artery bypass surgery. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 1998;12(4):62–71. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
38. Riegel B, Gates D, Gocka I, Medina L, Odell C, Martha R, et al. Effectiveness of a program of early hospital discharge of cardiac surgery patients. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 1996;11(1):63–75. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
39. Hwang CW, Anderson GF, Diener-West M, Powe NR. Comorbidity and outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery at cardiac specialty hospitals versus general hospitals. Med Care. 2007;45(8):720–728. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
40. Jarvinen O, Huhtala H, Laurikka J, Tarkka MR. Higher age predicts adverse outcomes and readmission after coronary artery bypass grafting. World Journal of Surgery. 2003;27(12):1317–1322. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
41. Sabourin CB, Funk M. Readmission of patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Heart& Lung. 1999;28(4):243–250. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
42. Skaggs BC, Yates BC. Quality of life comparisons after angioplasty and coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Heart & Lung. 1999;28(8):409–417. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
43. Torrance GW. Preferences for health outcomes and cost-utility analyses. The American Journal of Managed Care. 1997;3(Suppl):S8–S20. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
44. Zimmerman L, Barnason S. Use of a telehealth device to deliver a symptom management intervention to cardiac surgical patients. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2007;22(1):32–37. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
45. Hellman EA, Williams MA, Thalken L. Modifications of the 7-day activity interview for use among older adults. Journal of Applied Gerontology. 1996;15(1):116–132. [Google Scholar]
46. Blair SN, Haskell WL, Ho P, Paffenbarger RS, Jr., Vranizan KM, Farquhar JW, et al. Assessment of habitual physical acitivity by a seven-day recall in a community survey and controlled experiments. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1985;122(5):794–804. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
47. Hellman EA, Williams MA, Thalken L. Construct validity of the modified 7-day activity interview used with older adults with cardiac problems. REHABIL NURS RES. 1996;5(4):126–133. [Google Scholar]
48. Hertzog MA, Nieveen JL, Zimmerman LM, et al. Longitudinal field comparison of the RT3 and an activity diary with cardiac patients. J Nurs Meas. 2007;15(2):105–120. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
49. Hendelman D, Miller K, Baggett C, Debold E, Freedson P. Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2000;32(9, Suppl):S442–S449. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
50. Jakicic JM, Winters C, Lagally K, Ho J, Robertson RJ, Wing RR. The accuracy of the tritac-R3D accelerometer to estimate energy expenditure. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 1999;31(747):754. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
51. Welk GJ, Blair SN, Wood K, Jones S, Thompson RW. A comparative evaluation of three accelerometry-based physical activity monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(9):S489–S497. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
52. DeVoe D, Gotshall R. Comparison of the RT3 research tracker and tritrac RT3 accelerometers. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2003;97:510–518. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
53. King GA, Torres N, Potter C, Brooks TJ, Coleman KJ. Comparison of activity monitors to estimate energy cost of treadmill exercise. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2004;36:1244–1251. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
54. Rowlands AV, Thomas PW, Eston RG, Topping R. Validation of the RT3 triaxial accelerometer for the assessment of physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(3):518–524. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
55. Bouchard C, Tremblay A, Leblanc C, Lortie G, Savard R, Theriault G. A method to assess energy expenditure in children and adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 1983;37(3):461–467. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
56. Sirard J, Melanson E, Li L, Freedson P. Field evaluation of the computer science and applications, inc. physical activity monitor. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2000;32(3):695–700. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
57. Ware JE. The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36). 1. conceptual framework anditem selection. MedCare. 1992;30(6):473–483. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
58. Jette D, Downing J. Health status of individuals entering a cardiac rehabilitation program as measured by the medical outcomes study 36-item short-form study (SF-36) Physical Therapy. 1994;74(6):521–527. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
59. McHorney C, Ware J, Rachel J, Sherbourne C. The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36): III. tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Medical Care. 1994;32(1):40–66. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
60. McHorney C, Ware J, Rogers W, Raczek A, Rachel J. The validity and relaitve precision of MOS short- and long-form health status scales and dartmouth COOP charts. Medical Care. 1992;30(5 (suppl.)):S253–S265. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
61. Schulz P, Zimmerman L, Barnason S, Nieveen J. Gender differences in recovery after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 2005;20(2):58–64. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
62. Cronin SN, Logsdon C, Miracle V. Psychosocial and functional outcomes in women after coronary artery bypass surgery. Crit Care Nurse. 1997;17(2Gender):19. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
63. Jaarsma T, Kastermans MC. Recovery and quality of life one year after coronary artery bypass grafting. Scand J Caring Sci. 1997;11(2):67–72. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
64. Ballan A, Lee G. A comparative study of patient perceived quality of life pre and post coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Aust J Adv Nurs. 2007;24(4):24–28. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

Full text links 

Read article at publisher's site: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2009.01.005

Read article for free, from open access legal sources, via Unpaywall: https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc2900787?pdf=renderUnpaywall

Citations & impact 

Impact metrics

36
Citations
Jump to Citations

Citations of article over time

Smart citations by scite.ai
Smart citations by scite.ai include citation statements extracted from the full text of the citing article. The number of the statements may be higher than the number of citations provided by EuropePMC if one paper cites another multiple times or lower if scite has not yet processed some of the citing articles.
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2009.01.005

Supporting
Mentioning
Contrasting
1
93
0

Article citations

Go to all (36) article citations

Similar Articles 

To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.

Funding 

Funders who supported this work.

NINR NIH HHS (2)