Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Validation of roche COBAS Amplicor assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in rectal and pharyngeal specimens by an omp1 PCR assay.

Author information

Affiliations

  • 1. Department of Public Health, The University of Melbourne, Royal Women's Hospital, Women's and Children's Health, Melbourne, Australia.
      Authors
    • Lister NA 1
    (1 author)

ORCIDs linked to this article

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 01 Jan 2004, 42(1):239-241
https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.42.1.239-241.2004 PMID: 14715759 PMCID: PMC321736

Free full text in Europe PMC

Abstract 

Screening guidelines for men who have sex with men (MSM) recommend testing of extragenital sites (pharyngeal and rectal) for gonorrhoea and chlamydia. Testing of specimens from these sites is not validated by most commercial nucleic amplification tests, such as the COBAS Amplicor assay. To investigate the utility of the COBAS Amplicor assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in extragenital specimens, this study developed and evaluated confirmatory tests using the omp1 gene as an alternative target for amplification by PCR. Of anal and throat swabs collected from men in male-only saunas, 52 swabs that tested C. trachomatis positive by COBAS Amplicor and 30 swabs that tested as negative were included for confirmatory omp1 PCR testing. A total of 49 (94%) COBAS Amplicor-positive samples were confirmed by the omp1 PCR. A substantial proportion of specimens were confirmed by using a nested omp1 PCR (27%). Not confirmed by any omp1 PCR were three anal swabs (6%). It is most probable that these samples contained lower bacterial levels that were near or below the detection level of the omp1 PCR assays. The findings of this study support the confident reporting of C. trachomatis detected by COBAS Amplicor in extragenital specimens and support the utility of this assay as a screening test for MSM.

Free full text 

Logo of jcmLink to Publisher's site
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Jan; 42(1): 239–241.
PMCID: PMC321736
PMID: 14715759

Validation of Roche COBAS Amplicor Assay for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in Rectal and Pharyngeal Specimens by an omp1 PCR Assay

N. A. Lister, S. N. Tabrizi,* C. K. Fairley, and S. Garland
Author information Article notes Copyright and License information Disclaimer

Abstract

Screening guidelines for men who have sex with men (MSM) recommend testing of extragenital sites (pharyngeal and rectal) for gonorrhoea and chlamydia. Testing of specimens from these sites is not validated by most commercial nucleic amplification tests, such as the COBAS Amplicor assay. To investigate the utility of the COBAS Amplicor assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in extragenital specimens, this study developed and evaluated confirmatory tests using the omp1 gene as an alternative target for amplification by PCR. Of anal and throat swabs collected from men in male-only saunas, 52 swabs that tested C. trachomatis positive by COBAS Amplicor and 30 swabs that tested as negative were included for confirmatory omp1 PCR testing. A total of 49 (94%) COBAS Amplicor-positive samples were confirmed by the omp1 PCR. A substantial proportion of specimens were confirmed by using a nested omp1 PCR (27%). Not confirmed by any omp1 PCR were three anal swabs (6%). It is most probable that these samples contained lower bacterial levels that were near or below the detection level of the omp1 PCR assays. The findings of this study support the confident reporting of C. trachomatis detected by COBAS Amplicor in extragenital specimens and support the utility of this assay as a screening test for MSM.

Bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in men who have sex with men (MSM) are an important public health concern (9, 11). Their early detection and treatment may avoid transmission to sexual partners, serious sequelae, or STI-facilitated human immunodeficiency virus transmission (5, 6, 8). Screening for asymptomatic bacterial STIs is one method of control for such infections (7, 20), and guidelines have subsequently been developed for screening of MSM (1, 3, 4, 17, 19). These guidelines recommend routine screening of extragenital sites (pharyngeal and rectal) for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis by using conventional tests, such as culture or nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs).

NAATs are commonly used as screening tests for N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis, but most commercial NAATs have not been validated for use with extragenital specimens. Some laboratories may have developed in-house NAATs for detection of C. trachomatis in extragenital specimens, such as C. trachomatis conjunctivitis (10). Preliminary data from commercial NAATs suggest that ligase chain reaction (LCR; Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, Ill.) and the COBAS Amplicor PCR assay (Roche Diagnostics Systems Inc., Pleasanton, Calif.) are both sensitive and specific for C. trachomatis detection of extragenital specimens (12, 15, 24).

One method to investigate the validity of positive results with extragenital specimens from commercial NAATs is to conduct confirmatory testing by using an alternative specific target for amplification. For example, a PCR for the major outer membrane protein (MOMP) has been used for confirming chlamydia-positive genital specimens detected by commercial NAATs (18, 23). Because MOMP is coded for by the single-copy omp1 gene, a PCR directed at omp1 may be less sensitive than the COBAS Amplicor PCR or LCR that is directed at a multicopy plasmid target (16). An advantage of omp1 PCR is its applicability to typing C. trachomatis in clinical specimens by sequencing the PCR product (2, 13, 16).

To investigate the utility of the COBAS Amplicor PCR assay as a screening test for C. trachomatis in MSM, this study conducted omp1 PCR on COBAS Amplicor-positive rectal and pharyngeal specimens obtained from men attending male-only saunas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants and specimens.

Specimens were collected from men who participated in a screening program in male-only saunas in Melbourne, Australia (14). All specimens from this program were tested for C. trachomatis by COBAS Amplicor PCR (14). A sample of 52 C. trachomatis-positive swabs were collected from 43 men (47 anal swabs and 5 throat swabs). Eight men testing positive had repeat positive anal swabs collected before treatment, and one man had C. trachomatis detected from both anal and throat swabs. The throat and anal swabs collected from 15 men testing C. trachomatis negative were also included in the analysis (15 anal swabs and 15 throat swabs).

DNA was isolated directly from the clinical samples by using the automated MagNA Pure LC (Roche Diagnostics), and the COBAS Amplicor PCR assay was performed as previously described (21). An additional PCR for amplification of β-globin sequence was conducted for detection of inhibition and sample adequacy (22).

omp1 PCR amplification.

Three PCRs targeting the four omp1 variable domains (VDs) were used (VD1-4, VD1/2, and VD3/4). PCR VD1-4 was used on all 52 swab samples, and PCRs VD1/2 and VD3/4 were used on samples that were negative by PCR VD1-4. Not all samples underwent all omp1 PCRs, and the cumulative results of all three omp1 PCRs were compared to the COBAS Amplicor PCR results.

PCR VD1-4 used the primers P1 (13) and OMP2 (13) to amplify an approximately 1.1-kb region of the omp1 gene including all four VDs. PCR VD1/2 used the primers P1 and CT6 (2) to amplify a region of omp1 including VDs 1 and 2, and PCR VD2/3 used the primers CT6 (sense) and OMP2 to amplify a region including VDs 3 and 4. According to the omp1 nucleotide sequence of C. trachomatis serovar strain J/UW36/Cx (GenBank accession no. AF063202), primer P1 is positioned at bases 1 to 22, primer OMP2 is at bases 1115 to 1136, and primer CT6 is at bases 655 to 679. The primary reason for conducting PCR VD1-4 followed by a second round of amplification with PCRs VD1/2 and VD3/4 was to sequence omp1 amplicons, achieve sequence for all omp1 VDs, and determine the corresponding C. trachomatis serovars of samples. (The sequencing results are currently being analyzed.)

PCR VD1-4 (13) was carried out with 20 μl of the DNA preparation and a 0.5 μM concentration of each primer in the PCR mixture (50-μl reaction volume) and using a decreased annealing temperature of 50°C in the PCR cycle. VD1/2 and VD3/4 were nested PCRs carried out as described for PCR VD1-4, using 2 μl of the VD1-4 product as target DNA and using an increased annealing temperature of 55°C in the PCR cycle. These nested PCRs were optimized using C. trachomatis reference strains and patient VD1-4 PCR-positive samples as positive controls and patient COBAS Amplicor C. trachomatis-negative samples as negative controls. Strict procedures avoiding specimen contamination and carryover were followed with nested PCRs. This included discarding PCR tube lids and replacement with new, sterile lids every time tubes were opened. Also, C. trachomatis reference strains with serotypes different from the predominant types in this study sample were used as controls, because any likely carryover would be indicated after sequencing of products.

Each time a PCR was conducted, the assay included one reaction mixture containing no DNA as negative control and one or two reference strains of C. trachomatis serovar B, D, E, F, G, K, or L2 as positive controls. Also, randomly selected COBAS Amplicor C. trachomatis-negative patient samples were used as negative controls. For nested PCRs VD1/2 and VD3/4, a positive VD1-4 PCR product was included as a positive control. PCR products were visualized by gel electrophoresis (5 μl of each PCR product on a 1.5% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide). The presence or absence of a band of the estimated product size determined the positive and negative omp1 PCR results.

RESULTS

Of the 52 C. trachomatis PCR-positive samples by COBAS Amplicor, 35 (67%) were positive by omp1 PCR utilizing VD1-4 primers. Of the 17 samples testing negative with PCR VD1-4, 14 (27%) were omp1 positive on assay with nested PCRs VD1/2 and VD3/4. Overall, three anal swabs were not confirmed by any omp1 PCR (6%). The results of omp1 PCRs are summarized in Table ​Table1.1. A total of 49 (94%; 95% confidence interval, 88 to 99%) COBAS Amplicor-positive samples were confirmed by the omp1 PCRs. This represents confirmation of 38 of 41 (93%) men diagnosed with C. trachomatis by COBAS Amplicor. Table ​Table11 shows the cospecificity (100%) and cosensitivity (94%) of C. trachomatis detection by omp1 PCR.

TABLE 1.

Comparative results of the COBAS Amplicor PCR assay and omp1 PCRs for detection of C. trachomatis

Extragenital sampleomp1 PCR resultNo. of COBAS PCR samplesa:
PositiveNegativeTotal
Anal swabPositive44044
Negative31518
Throat swabPositive505
Negative01515
Total523082
aCospecificity = 100%; cosensitivity = 94%.

DISCUSSION

In our study of extragenital samples (anal and throat swabs from males), 94% of COBAS Amplicor-positive samples were confirmed by testing for omp1. This supports both the confident reporting of C. trachomatis detected by COBAS Amplicor in extragenital specimens and the utility of this assay as a screening test for MSM.

A substantial proportion of extragenital specimens were confirmed positive for C. trachomatis by using a nested omp1 PCR (14 samples [27%]) with only 3 anal swabs (6%) not confirmed by any omp1 PCR. The multicopy plasmid target of the COBAS Amplicor assay offers high sensitivity, and a lower sensitivity with the omp1 PCR was expected because omp1 is a single-copy gene target. Other studies have also reported genital samples positive by a plasmid-directed PCR or LCR assay that could not be amplified by omp1 PCR. Vincelette and colleagues (23) reported 12 (24%) endocervical swab specimens, 5 urethral swab specimens, and 3 (18%) urine specimens from women as false-positive COBAS Amplicor: i.e., not confirmed by omp1 PCR (23). Pederson and colleagues (16) reported 53% of urine samples and 18% of vaginal flush samples that were positive by LCR (Abbott) could not be amplified by omp1 PCR and have described reasons for the unsuccessful omp1 PCR, including the low copy number of the target present in the sample (16).

The three COBAS Amplicor-positive and omp1 PCR-negative anal samples all contained adequate amplifiable DNA and a lack of inhibitors, as shown by β-globin detection (14, 21, 22). It is most probable that these samples were not false positives, but rather contained bacterial levels that were below the detection level of the omp1 PCR assay. In addition, one patient who had an omp1-negative anal sample also had C. trachomatis detected from a urine sample that was collected at the same time. This urine sample was COBAS Amplicor and omp1 PCR C. trachomatis positive (data not shown) and supports the likelihood that the anal swab was C. trachomatis positive. To improve omp1 detection in samples that may have DNA degraded from freeze-thawing, this study used primers targeting smaller regions of the omp1 gene and nested PCR (PCRs VD1/2 and VD3/4). Also, to demonstrate the specificity of the omp1 PCR methods used in this study, a selection of the omp1 PCR products were sequenced. Approximately 80% of all PCR products had adequate concentrations of DNA for sequencing reactions. The results of sequencing are currently being analyzed and will be published separately (data not shown).

The calculated sensitivity and specificity of C. trachomatis PCRs (Table ​(Table1)1) demonstrate a high likelihood of C. trachomatis infection with a positive omp1 PCR. Although the sensitivity was 93%, it does not rule out C. trachomatis infection in omp1 PCR-negative cases, which may be due to low copy number. Until a larger-scale study is conducted, it is difficult to advocate that diagnostic laboratories implement routine omp1 PCR testing to validate the COBAS Amplicor. Based on our results, there is a high likelihood of a positive COBAS PCR being a true positive. Laboratories may select to perform confirmatory assays such as omp1 PCR; however, due to the lower sensitivity of omp1-directed PCR, some positives may not be confirmed. Nevertheless, this study demonstrates the utility of COBAS Amplicor PCR for detection of C. trachomatis in anal and throat samples.

Because C. trachomatis is a potential risk factor for human immunodeficiency virus transmission, confident testing of sexually active MSM for C. trachomatis carriage at extragenital sites is essential. In many instances, NAATs for the detection of C. trachomatis are now the assays of choice for public health screening purposes. Until larger-scale studies are conducted for the validation of NAATs with extragenital specimens, the findings of this study support the confident reporting of C. trachomatis detected by COBAS Amplicor.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by funding from the Public Health Research Projects 2002-03 (Communicable Diseases), the Victorian Department of Human Services, Australia.

We gratefully acknowledge the research team involved in the collection of specimens used in this study (14).

REFERENCES

1. Australian College of Sexual Health Physicians. Accessed 29 July 2003. Clinical guidelines for the management of sexually transmissible infections among priority populations. [Online.] http://www.ashm.org.au.
2. Cabral, T., A. M. Jolly, and J. L. Wylie. 2003. Chlamydia trachomatis omp1 genotypic diversity and concordance with sexual network data. J. Infect. Dis. 187:279-286. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
3. California Sexually Transmitted Disease Controllers Association. 2001. Guidance for STD clinical preventive services for persons infected with HIV. Sex. Transm. Dis. 28:460-463. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2002. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines 2002. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 51(RR-6):1-78. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
5. Cohen, M. 1998. Sexually transmitted diseases enhance HIV transmission: no longer a hypothesis. Lancet 351:5-7. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
6. Craib, K. J., D. R. Meddings, S. A. Strathdee, R. S. Hogg, J. S. Montaner, M. V. O'Shaughnessy, and M. T. Schechter. 1995. Rectal gonorrhoea as an independent risk factor for HIV infection in a cohort of homosexual men. Genitourin. Med. 71:150-154. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
7. Fairley, C. K., and F. J. Bowden. 2002. Screening for sexually transmissible infection in primary health care. Venereology 14:3-7. [Google Scholar]
8. Fleming, D. T., and J. N. Wasserheit. 1999. From epidemiological synergy to public health policy and practice: the contribution of other sexually transmitted diseases to sexual transmission of HIV infection. Sex. Transm. Infect. 75:3-17. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
9. Fox, K. K., C. del Rio, K. K. Holmes, E. W. Hook III, F. N. Judson, J. S. Knapp, G. W. Procop, S. A. Wang, W. L. H. Whittington, and W. C. Levine. 2001. Gonorrhea in the HIV era: a reversal in trends among men who have sex with men. Am. J. Public Health 91:959-964. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
10. Garland, S. M., A. Malatt, S. Tabrizi, D. Grando, M. I. Lees, J. H. Andrew, and H. R. Taylor. 1995. Chlamydia trachomatis conjunctivitis: prevalence and association with genital tract infection. Med. J. Aust. 162:363-366. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
11. Geisler, W. M., W. L. Whittington, R. J. Suchland, and W. E. Stamm. 2002. Epidemiology of anorectal chlamydial and gonococcal infections among men having sex with men in Seattle: utilizing serovar and auxotype strain typing. Sex. Transm. Dis. 29:189-195. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
12. Golden, M. R., S. G. Astete, R. Galvan, A. Lucchetti, J. Sanchez, C. L. Celum, W. L. H. Whittington, W. E. Stamm, K. K. Holmes, and P. A. Totten. 2003. Pilot study of COBAS PCR and ligase chain reaction for detection of rectal infections due to Chlamydia trachomatis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:2174-2175. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
13. Jurstrand, M., L. Falk, H. Fredlund, M. Lindberg, P. Olcén, S. Andersson, K. Persson, J. Albert, and A. Bäckman. 2001. Characterization of Chlamydia trachomatis omp1 genotypes among sexually transmitted disease patients in Sweden. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:3915-3919. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
14. Lister, N. A., A. Smith, S. Tabrizi, P. Hayes, N. A. Medland, S. Garland, and C. K. Fairley. 2003. Screening for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis in men who have sex with men (MSM) at male-only saunas. Sex. Transm. Dis. 30:886-889. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
15. Page-Shafer, K., A. Graves, C. Kent, J. E. Balls, V. M. Zapitz, and J. D. Klausner. 2002. Increased sensitivity of DNA amplification testing for the detection of pharyngeal gonorrhea in men who have sex with men. Clin. Infect. Dis. 34:173-176. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
16. Pedersen, L. N., H. O. Kjaer, J. K. Moller, T. F. Orntoft, and L. Ostergaard. 2000. High-resolution genotyping of Chlamydia trachomatis from recurrent genital infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:3068-3071. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
17. Public Health—Seattle and King County. 2001. Sexually transmitted diseases and human immunodeficiency virus screening guidelines for men who have sex with men. Sex. Transm. Dis. 28:457-459. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
18. Puolakkainen, M., E. Hiltunen-Back, T. Reunala, S. Suhonen, P. Lahteenmaki, M. Lehtinen, and J. Paavonen. 1998. Comparison of performances of two commercially available tests, a PCR assay and a ligase chain reaction test, in detection of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:1489-1493. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
19. Sexually Transmitted Infections in Gay Men Action Group. Accessed 28 July 2003. Sexually transmitted infection testing guidelines for men who have sex with men. [Online.] http://www.sesahs.nsw.gov.au/publichealth/InfectiousDiseases/.
20. Skov, S. 2002. Screening and mass treatment programs for bacterial sexually transmitted infections: a literature review. Venereology 14:8-19. [Google Scholar]
21. Tabrizi, S. N., C. K. Fairley S. Chen, O. Giouzeppos, B. Paterson, F. J. Bowden, and S. Garland. 2000. Evaluation of patient-administered tampon specimens for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Sex. Transm. Dis. 27:133-137. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
22. Tabrizi, S. N., S. Chen, M. A. Cohenford, B. B. Lentrichia, E. Coffman, T. Schultz, J. W. Tapsall, and S. M. Garland. Evaluation of real-time polymerase chain reaction assays for confirmation of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in clinical samples tested positive in the Roche COBAS Amplicor assay. Sex. Transm. Infect., in press. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract]
23. Vincelette, J., J. Schirm, M. Bogard, A. Bourgault, D. S. Luijt, A. Bianchi, P. C. van Voorst Vader, A. Butcher, and M. Rosenstraus. 1999. Mulitcentre evaluation of the fully automated COBAS Amplicor PCR test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:74-80. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
24. Winter, A. J., G. Gilleran, K. Eastick, and J. D. Ross. 2000. Comparison of a ligase chain reaction-based assay and cell culture for detection of pharyngeal carriage of Chlamydia trachomatis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:3502-3504. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

Full text links 

Read article at publisher's site: https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.42.1.239-241.2004

Read article for free, from open access legal sources, via Unpaywall: https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc321736?pdf=renderUnpaywall

Citations & impact 

Impact metrics

27
Citations
Jump to Citations

Citations of article over time

Alternative metrics

Altmetric item for https://www.altmetric.com/details/7579551
Altmetric
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/7579551

Article citations

Go to all (27) article citations

Data 

Data behind the article

This data has been text mined from the article, or deposited into data resources.

BioStudies: supplemental material and supporting data

Nucleotide Sequences

Similar Articles 

To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.