Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


Background

The associations of egg consumption with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes are still unclear.

Objective

We aimed to quantitatively summarize the literature on egg consumption and risk of CVD, cardiac mortality, and type 2 diabetes by conducting a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.

Design

A systematic literature review was conducted for published studies in PubMed and EMBASE through March 2012. Additional information was retrieved through Google or a hand review of the reference from relevant articles. Studies were included if they had a prospective study design, were published in English-language journals, and provided HRs and 95% CIs for the associations of interest. Data were independently extracted by 2 investigators, and the weighted HRs and 95% CIs for the associations of interest were estimated by using a random-effects model.

Results

A total of 22 independent cohorts from 16 studies were identified, including participants ranging in number from 1600 to 90,735 and in follow-up time from 5.8 to 20.0 y. Comparison of the highest category (≥1 egg/d) of egg consumption with the lowest (<1 egg/wk or never) resulted in a pooled HR (95% CI) of 0.96 (0.88, 1.05) for overall CVD, 0.97 (0.86, 1.09) for ischemic heart disease, 0.93 (0.81, 1.07) for stroke, 0.98 (0.77, 1.24) for ischemic heart disease mortality, 0.92 (0.56, 1.50) for stroke mortality, and 1.42 (1.09, 1.86) for type 2 diabetes. Of the studies conducted in diabetic patients, the pooled HR (95% CI) was 1.69 (1.09, 2.62) for overall CVD.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis suggests that egg consumption is not associated with the risk of CVD and cardiac mortality in the general population. However, egg consumption may be associated with an increased incidence of type 2 diabetes among the general population and CVD comorbidity among diabetic patients.

Free full text 


Logo of ajcnLink to Publisher's site
Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 Jul; 98(1): 146–159.
Published online 2013 May 15. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.112.051318
PMCID: PMC3683816
PMID: 23676423

Egg consumption in relation to risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis1,2,3

Abstract

Background: The associations of egg consumption with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes are still unclear.

Objective: We aimed to quantitatively summarize the literature on egg consumption and risk of CVD, cardiac mortality, and type 2 diabetes by conducting a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.

Design: A systematic literature review was conducted for published studies in PubMed and EMBASE through March 2012. Additional information was retrieved through Google or a hand review of the reference from relevant articles. Studies were included if they had a prospective study design, were published in English-language journals, and provided HRs and 95% CIs for the associations of interest. Data were independently extracted by 2 investigators, and the weighted HRs and 95% CIs for the associations of interest were estimated by using a random-effects model.

Results: A total of 22 independent cohorts from 16 studies were identified, including participants ranging in number from 1600 to 90,735 and in follow-up time from 5.8 to 20.0 y. Comparison of the highest category (≥1 egg/d) of egg consumption with the lowest (<1 egg/wk or never) resulted in a pooled HR (95% CI) of 0.96 (0.88, 1.05) for overall CVD, 0.97 (0.86, 1.09) for ischemic heart disease, 0.93 (0.81, 1.07) for stroke, 0.98 (0.77, 1.24) for ischemic heart disease mortality, 0.92 (0.56, 1.50) for stroke mortality, and 1.42 (1.09, 1.86) for type 2 diabetes. Of the studies conducted in diabetic patients, the pooled HR (95% CI) was 1.69 (1.09, 2.62) for overall CVD.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that egg consumption is not associated with the risk of CVD and cardiac mortality in the general population. However, egg consumption may be associated with an increased incidence of type 2 diabetes among the general population and CVD comorbidity among diabetic patients.

INTRODUCTION

Although elevated circulating cholesterol is an established risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD)4 (15), studies have shown inconsistent results on dietary cholesterol intake and risk of CVD (614). On the basis of 2 meta-analyses (15, 16), a 100-mg dietary cholesterol intake would increase plasma total cholesterol by 2.2–2.5 mg/dL, LDL cholesterol by 1.9 mg/dL, and HDL cholesterol by 0.4 mg/dL. In addition, some cholesterol feeding studies (1719) observed that dietary cholesterol intake had little effect on the change in the ratio of LDL to HDL cholesterol. However, the association between dietary cholesterol intake and risk of CVD remains unclear (20).

Egg consumption is one of the main sources of dietary cholesterol. A medium egg contains ~225 mg cholesterol (21). A meta-analysis of clinical trials (22) found that the addition of 100 mg dietary cholesterol from eggs increased the ratio of total to HDL cholesterol by 0.02 units as well as plasma total cholesterol by 2.2 mg/dL and HDL cholesterol by 0.3 mg/dL. However, a few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published later reported that egg consumption did not appreciably alter plasma total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol (2325), HDL cholesterol (24, 25), or the ratio of total to HDL cholesterol (19, 25, 26). In addition, 2 RCTs (27, 28) found that consuming 2 eggs/d for 6 wk had no adverse effect on endothelial function. To date, no RCT data are available, whereas many observational studies relating egg consumption to the risk of CVD (2936) and diabetes (3741) have been published. However, the findings from these studies are inconsistent. To quantitatively investigate the overall longitudinal associations of egg consumption with incidence of CVD, type 2 diabetes, and cardiac mortality, we conducted a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Data sources and searches

We performed this meta-analysis according to the guidelines of the Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (42). A systematic literature search was conducted to identify published studies in PubMed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/) and EMBASE (http://www.embase.com/) through March 2012; the terms “egg intake or consumption,” “coronary heart disease,” “myocardial infarction,” “stroke,” “cardiovascular disease,” “mortality or death,” and “diabetes mellitus” were used. Additional information was retrieved through a Google search or a hand review of the references from relevant articles. To get additional data or de novo results for this meta-analysis, we contacted authors of the primary studies (43, 44).

Study selection

Studies were included in this meta-analysis if they had a prospective study design, were published in English-language journals, and provided HRs with 95% CIs for CVD, mortality, or type 2 diabetes in relation to egg consumption.

As shown in Figure 1, we retrieved 72 articles from PubMed and EMBASE or by hand-searching. Of these articles, 53 were excluded for one of the following reasons: 1) did not relate egg consumption to an outcome of interest; 2) was a review, editorial, abstract, or letter to editor; 3) was an animal study; 4) was not in English; or 5) was not a prospective cohort study. Of the 19 remaining articles (2937, 41, 4351), 2 (29, 45) were excluded because they did not report HRs with corresponding 95% CIs, and 1 study (49) was excluded because it used continuous variable (g/d) for egg consumption. Of the 16 identified eligible studies (3037, 41, 43, 44, 4648, 50, 51), 2 studies (30, 37) reported results from 4 independent cohorts, 3 studies (37, 43, 50) reported results stratified by sex, and 2 studies (33, 34) reported results for both CVD and mortality. In addition, 2 studies (31, 48) updated the results of early studies conducted in the same cohorts. In summary, 22 independent cohorts from 16 studies were included in the final data set for the meta-analysis: 8 eligible studies (3036, 44) (8 cohorts) provided data on CVD, 6 studies (33, 34, 43, 46, 47, 50) (8 cohorts) on mortality, 3 studies (37, 41, 51) (5 cohorts) on type 2 diabetes in the general population, 4 studies (30, 33, 35, 48) (4 cohorts) on CVD, and 3 studies (33, 34, 50) (3 cohorts) on mortality in diabetic patients.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is ajcn981146fig1.jpg

Process of study selection.

Data extraction and quality assessment

The following data were extracted from each included study: name of the first author, publication year, study population, country of origin, size of the sample, age range or mean age of the participants, proportion of men, duration of follow-up, methods for diet assessment, categories of egg intake, number of events, methods for case identification, adjusted covariates, and HRs or RRs and their 95% CIs in the corresponding exposure categories. All procedures, including the literature search, study selection, and data extraction, were independently performed by 2 authors (JYS and PX). Any discrepancies were resolved by group discussion.

To evaluate the quality of the studies included, we designed a scoring system with several a priori selected important characteristics that can affect study quality based on the literature. The scoring system was created to account for study eligibility (1 point if inclusion and exclusion criteria were clear), exposure (1 point if egg consumption was assessed by a validated tool, and 1 point if egg consumption was appropriately categorized), outcome (1 point if outcome of interest was not solely based on self-report), and statistical analysis (1 point if adjustment included a few major demographic and lifestyle variables such as age, BMI, smoking, and physical activity). The scoring system was designed with reference to the Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (42) and allowed a total score up to 5 points, with 5 reflecting the highest quality.

Statistical analysis

We estimated the pooled HRs (95% CIs), from a comparison of the highest category of egg consumption with the lowest, by using a random-effects model proposed by DerSimonian and Laird (52). All pooled HRs and 95% CIs were estimated by using data from the fully adjusted models. In this meta-analysis, the pooled HRs of overall CVD, type 2 diabetes, stroke, and ischemic heart disease (IHD) [including coronary artery disease, coronary heart disease (CHD), and myocardial infarction in relation to egg consumption were estimated. In adddition, the pooled HRs of mortality from overall CVD, IHD, and stroke were assessed. In addition, we computed the pooled HRs of overall CVD and mortality in patients with diabetes. Because the number of exposure categories was heterogeneous across primary studies or cohorts, we could not standardize egg consumption for all of the included studies. Thus, we calculated the pooled HRs (95% CI) by comparing the highest with the lowest category of egg consumption. If the results were generated from the same cohorts in different publications, we used data from the most recent publication. Because most of the studies reported results on total stroke, we combined ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke if the data on total stroke were not available, and the new results were used for the pooled estimation of stroke risk. In addition, the HRs with 95% CIs of overall CVD and mortality were pooled in studies among diabetic patients.

Cochran's test was used to evaluate the statistical heterogeneity and the I2 statistic was calculated to quantify the degree of inconsistency across individual studies. In addition, the Egger asymmetry test was used to examine publication bias (53). Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess whether the results could have been affected markedly by any single study. All analyses were performed by using STATA statistical software (version 11.0; STATA Corp). All statistical tests were 2-sided, and a P value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Study characteristics

Characteristics of the 22 included cohorts from 16 eligible studies are shown in Table 1 (in the general population) and Table 2 (in diabetic individuals). Of 8 independent cohort studies of CVD in the general population, 7 were conducted in Western countries and 1 in Asia. The number of participants and duration of the follow-up ranged from 1600 to 90,735 and from 6 to 20 y, respectively. Of 8 independent cohort studies of mortality, 5 were conducted in Western countries and 3 in Asia. The number of individuals and duration of the follow-up ranged from 4077 to 37,130 and from 9 to 20 y, respectively. All 5 independent cohort studies of type 2 diabetes were conducted in Western countries. The number of participants and duration of follow-up ranged from 1669 to 36,295 and from 11 to 20 y, respectively (Table 1). In patients with diabetes, 4 studies (30, 33, 35, 48) reported HRs on overall CVD risk, and 3 studies (33, 34, 50) reported results on overall mortality. The number of patients and duration of follow-up ranged from 341 to 5672 and from 7 to 20 y, respectively. All studies in diabetic patients were conducted in Western countries (Table 2). Egg consumption was assessed by using a self-administered or interview-based food-frequency questionnaire and categorized into 3–6 groups. The quality scores for all included studies were ≥3 points based on our 5-point scoring system.

TABLE 1

Characteristics of the general population in the included studies1

SourceParticipantsAgeMenDuration of follow-upExposure assessmentExposure categoriesNo. of incidentsCase identification methodsAdjusted variables
ny%y
Type 2 diabetes
 Vang et al, 2008 (51), AMS and AHS, USA840145–8861.117.0Semiquantitative questionnaire0, 1/wk, ≥1/wk543 diabetesSelf-administered questionnairesAge and sex
 Djousse et al, 2009 (37), PHS I, USA20,70340–8610020.0Self-administered questionnaire0, <1/wk,1921 diabetesPhysician's self-reportedAge, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, vigorous exercise, and history of hypercholesterolemia and hypertension
1/wk,
2–4/wk,
5–6/wk,
≥7/wk
 Djousse et al, 2009 (37), WHS, USA36,29539–90011.7Self-administered questionnaire0,2112 diabetesSelf-reported diabetes was confirmed by telephone interviews, supplemental questionnaire, or review of medical recordsAge, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, exercise, red meat intake, quintiles of energy intake, fruit and vegetables, SFAs, trans fatty acids, PUFAs, family history of diabetes, and history of hypercholesterolemia and hypertension
<1/wk,
1/wk,
2–4/wk,
5–6/wk,
≥7/wk
 Djousse et al, 2010 (41), CHS, USA166965–9510011.3Picture-sort questionnaireNever,142 diabetesDiagnosed by clinical examination according to ADA 2010 criteriaAge, race, BMI, smoking status, alcohol consumption, physical activity, cereal-fiber intake, and field center
<1/mo,
1–3/mo,
1–4/wk,
almost daily
Djousse et al, 2010 (41), CHS, USA222965–98011.3Picture-sort questionnaireNever,171 diabetesDiagnosed by clinical examination according to ADA 2010 criteriaAge, race, BMI, smoking status, alcohol consumption, physical activity, cereal-fiber intake, and field center
<1/mo, 1–3/mo, 1–4/wk, almost daily
Cardiovascular disease
 Hu et al, 1999 (30), HPFS, USA237,85140–751007.2Self-administered questionnaire<1/wk,866 CHD,Review medical recordAge, BMI, 2-y time periods, cigarette smoking, parental history of myocardial infarction, multivitamin supplement use, vitamin E supplement use, alcohol consumption, history of hypertension, physical activity, and total energy intake
1/wk,258 stroke
2–4/wk,
5–6/wk,
≥1/d
 Hu et al, 1999 (30), NHS, USA80,08234–59013.2Self-administered questionnaire<1/wk,939 CHD,Review medical recordAge, BMI, 2-y time periods, cigarette smoking, parental history of myocardial infarction, multivitamin supplement use, vitamin E supplement use, alcohol consumption, menopausal status and postmenopausal hormone use, history of hypertension, physical activity, and total energy intake
1/wk,563 stroke
2–4/wk,
5–6/wk,
≥1/d
 He et al, 2003 (31), HPFS, USA243,73240–7510014.0Semi-quantitative questionnaire<1/wk,455 ischemic stroke, 125 hemorrhagic strokeMedical recordAge, BMI, physical activity, history of hypertension, smoking status, aspirin use, multivitamin use, total servings of fruit and vegetables, total energy intake, hypercholesterolemia, and consumption of alcohol, potassium, fiber, and vitamin E
1/wk,
2–4/wk,
5–6/wk,
≥1/d
 Nakamura et al, 2006 (32), JPHCPS, JapanTotal: 90,735; cohort I: 41,234; cohort II: 49,471I: 40–59; II: 40–69I: 48.2;II: 47.410.2Self-administered questionnaire<1 d/wk,462 CHDMedical recordAge, sex, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, use of cholesterol-lowering drugs, smoking, alcohol, intention to avoid cholesterol-rich diets, cohort effects, and consumption frequencies of meat, fish, vegetables, and fruit
1–2 d/wk,
3–4 d/wk,
almost daily
 Qureshi et al, 2007 (33), NHANES I, USA973425–7438.616.6Self-administered questionnaire<1/wk,655 total stroke,RegistryAge, sex, race-ethnicity, systolic BP, DM, serum cholesterol, cigarette smoking, BMI, and education status
1–6/wk,591 ischemic stroke
≥7/wk(ICD-9-CM codes 430, 431–434.9, or 437.0–437.1);
1584 CAD (ICD-9-CM codes 410–414)
Djousse and Gaziano, 2008 (34), PHS, USA21,32740–8610020.0Self-administered questionnaire<1/wk,1550 new MI,QuestionnaireAge, BMI, smoking, history of hypertension, vitamin intake, alcohol consumption, vegetable consumption, breakfast cereal, physical activity, treatment arm a-fib, DM, hypercholesterolemia, and parental history of premature MI
1/wk,1342 total stroke
2–4/wk,
5–6/wk,
≥7/wk
 Houston et al, 2011 (35), Health ABC Study, USA160070–7944.59.0Self-administered questionnaire<1/wk,158 CVDAnnual clinical examination and medical recordAge, sex, race, education, field center, smoking, alcohol use, physical activity, BMI, total energy intake, protein intake, fiber intake, multivitamin use, supplemental vitamin E use, statin use, aspirin use, oral estrogen use (women), prevalent hypertension, and SFAs
1–2/wk,
≥3/wk
 Zazpe et al, 2011 (36), SUN Project, Spain14,18520–9040.95.8Self-administered questionnaire<1/wk,91 CVDSelf-reported questionnaire and medical recordAge, sex, total energy intake, adherence to the Mediterranean food pattern, alcohol intake, BMI, smoking status, physical activity, family history of CVD, diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia
1/wk,
2–4/wk,
>4/wk
 Yaemsiri et al, 2012 (44), WHI-OS, USA87,02550–7907.6Self-administered questionnaire<1/wk,1049 ischemic strokeSelf-report and medical recordAge, race, education, family income, years as a regular smoker, hormone replacement therapy use, physical activity, alcohol intake, aspirin use, use of antihypertensive medication and cholesterol-lowering medication, BMI, systolic BP, total energy intake, dietary vitamin E, intake of fruit and vegetables and fiber, and history of CHD, a-fib, and diabetes
1/wk,
2–4/wk,
5–6/wk,
≥1/d
Mortality
 Mann et al, 1997 (46), UK10,80216–7938.013.3Self-administered questionnaire<1/wk,64 IHD deathRegistryAge, sex, smoking, and social class
392 all-cause death1–5/wk,
≥6/wk
 Sauvaget et al, 2003 (47), LSS, Japan37,13034–10338.316.0Self-administered questionnaireNever,1462 stroke deathRegistryHR stratified by sex and birth cohort and adjusted for city, radiation dose, BMI, smoking status, alcohol habits, education level, history of diabetes, or hypertension
≤1/wk,
2–4/wk,
almost daily
 Nakamura et al, 2004 (43), NIPPON DATA80, Japan4077Mean10013.0Self-administered questionnaire<1/wk,39 IHD death,RegistryAge, serum creatinine, total cholesterol, blood glucose, BMI, systolic and diastolic BP, use of BP-lowering drugs, cigarette smoking, and alcohol intake
50.3 (>30)1–2/wk, 0.5/d,112 stroke death,
1/d640 all-cause death
 Nakamura et al, 2004 (43), NIPPON DATA80, Japan5186Mean 50.7 (>30)013.3Self-administered questionnaire<1/wk,41 IHD death,RegistryAge, serum creatinine, total cholesterol, blood glucose, BMI, systolic and diastolic BP, use of BP-lowering drugs, cigarette smoking, and alcohol intake
1–2/wk,107 stroke death,
0.5/d,562 all-cause death
1/d
 Qureshi et al, 2007 (33), NHANES-I, USA973425–7438.616.6Self-administered questionnaire<1/wk,3117 all-cause deathRegistryAge, sex, race-ethnicity, systolic BP, DM, serum cholesterol, cigarette smoking, BMI, and education status
1–6/wk,
≥7/wk
 Djousse and Gaziano, 2008 (34), PHS, USA21,32740–8610020.0Self-administered questionnaire<1/wk,5169 all-cause deathSelf or family-reported questionnaireAge, BMI, smoking, history of hypertension, vitamin intake, alcohol consumption, vegetable consumption, breakfast cereal, physical activity, treatment arm a-fib, DM, hypercholesterolemia, and parental history of premature MI
1/wk,
2–4/wk,
5–6/wk,
≥7/wk
 Scrafford et al, 2010 (50), NHANES III, USA6833>171008.8Self-administered questionnaire<1/wk,198 CHD deathRegistryAge, energy, marital status, education status, race-ethnicity, BMI, diabetes, hypertension, and alcohol intake
1–6/wk,(ICD-10 codes I20–I25), 63 stroke death (ICD-10 codes I60–I69)
≥7/wk
 Scrafford et al, 2010 (50), NHANES III, USA8113>1708.9Self-administered questionnaire<1/wk,168 CHD death,RegistryAge, energy, marital status, education status, race-ethnicity, BMI, diabetes, hypertension, and alcohol intake
1–6/wk,74 stroke death
≥7/wk
1ADA, American Diabetes Association; a-fib, atrial fibrillation; AMS and AHS, Adventist Mortality Study and Adventist Health Study; BP, blood pressure; CAD, coronary artery disease; CHD, coronary heart disease; CHS, Cardiovascular Health Study; CVD, cardiovascular disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; Health ABC, Health, Aging and Body Composition; HPFS, Health Professionals Follow-Up Study; ICD, International Classification of Diseases; IHD, ischemic heart disease; JPHCPS, Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study; LSS, the Life Span Study; MI, myocardial infarction; NHS, Nurses’ Health Study; NIPPON DATA80, National Integrated Project for prospective Observation of Non-communicable Disease and Its Trends In the Aged, 1980; PHS, Physicians’ Health Study; WHI-OS, Women's Health Initiative Observational Study; WHS, Women's Health Study.
2Two cohort studies have the outcomes for stroke from the same cohort, HPFS.

TABLE 2

Characteristics of individuals with diabetes in the included studies1

SourceParticipantsAgeMenDuration of follow-upExposure assessmentExposure categoriesIncidenceCase identification methodsAdjusted variables
ny%y
Cardiovascular disease
 Hu et al, 1999 (30), HPFS, USA118740–751007.2Self-administered questionnaire<1/wk,1/wk,2–4/wk,5–6/wk,≥1/dNot reportedReview medical recordAge, BMI, 2-y time periods, cigarette smoking, parental history of myocardial infarction, multivitamin supplement use, vitamin E supplement use, alcohol consumption, history of hypertension, physical activity, and total energy intake
 Hu et al, 1999 (30), NHS, USA2412234–59013.2Self-administered questionnaire<1/wk,1/wk,2–4/wk,5–6/wk,≥1/dNot reportedReview medical recordAge, BMI, 2-y time periods, cigarette smoking, parental history of myocardial infarction, multivitamin supplement use, vitamin E supplement use, alcohol consumption, menopausal status and postmenopausal hormone use, history of hypertension, physical activity, and total energy intake
 Tanasescu et al, 2004 (48), NHS, USA25672Mean: 48.4 (≥30)010.1Semiquantitative questionnaire<1/wk,1 to <3/wk,3/wk,>3–6/wk,>6/wk619 CVDReview medical recordAge, smoking, postmenopausal hormone use, parental history of MI before 60 y of age, alcohol intake, physical activity, BMI, total caloric intake, protein intake, fiber intake, multivitamin use, vitamin E supplement use, and diabetes medication use
 Qureshi et al, 2007 (33), NHANES I, USA34925–7438.616.6Self-administered questionnaire<1/wk,1–6/wk,≥7/wk57 total stroke, 132 CADRegistryAge, sex, race-ethnicity, systolic BP, DM, serum cholesterol, cigarette smoking, BMI, and education status
 Houston et al, 2011 (35), Health ABC Study, USA34170–7944.59.0Self-administered questionnaire<1/wk,1–2/wk,≥3/wk45 CVDAnnual clinical examination and medical recordAge, sex, race, education, field center, smoking, alcohol use, physical activity, BMI, total energy intake, protein intake, fiber intake, multivitamin use, supplemental vitamin E use, statin use, aspirin use, oral estrogen use (women), prevalent hypertension, and SFAs
Mortality
 Qureshi et al, 2007 (33), NHANES I, USA34925–7438.616.6Self-administered questionnaire<1/wk,1–6/wk,≥7/wk253 all-cause deathRegistryAge, sex, race-ethnicity, systolic BP, DM, serum cholesterol, cigarette smoking, BMI, and education status
 Djousse and Gaziano, 2008 (34), PHS, USA43740–8610020.0Self-administered questionnaire<1/wk,1/wk,2–4/wk,5–6/wk,≥7/wk263 all-cause deathSelf or family-reported questionnaireAge, BMI, smoking, history of hypertension, vitamin intake, alcohol consumption, vegetable consumption, breakfast cereal, physical activity, treatment arm a-fib, hypercholesterolemia, and parental history of premature MI
 Scrafford et al, 2010 (50), NHANES III, USA743>1745.78.8Self-administered questionnaire<1/wk,1–6/wk,≥7/wk66 CHD death,24 stroke deathRegistryAge, sex, and energy intake
1a-fib, atrial fibrillation; BP, blood pressure; CAD, coronary artery disease; CHD, coronary heart disease; CVD, cardiovascular disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; Health ABC, Health, Aging and Body Composition; HPFS, Health Professionals Follow-Up Study; MI, myocardial infarction; NHS, Nurses’ Health Study; PHS, Physicians’ Health Study.
2Two cohort studies have the outcomes for CVD from the same cohort, NHS.

Egg consumption and risk of CVD

A total of 9839 incident cases of CVD from 348,420 participants in 8 cohorts were identified during an average of 11.3 y of follow-up, 5401 incident cases of IHD from 239,729 participants in 5 cohorts were documented with an average of 11.9 y follow-up, and 4189 incident cases of stroke from 241,900 participants in 5 cohorts were determined in 12.1 y follow-up. In comparison with those who never consumed egg or ate egg less than once per week, individuals who ate egg once per day or more did not have significantly higher risks of overall CVD, IHD, and stroke. The pooled HRs (95% CIs) were 0.96 ( 0.88, 1.05) for overall CVD, 0.97 (0.86, 1.09) for IHD, and 0.93 (0.81, 1.07) for stroke (Figure 2).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is ajcn981146fig2.jpg

Pooled HRs and 95% CIs for incident IHD, stroke, and overall CVD. The pooled estimates were obtained by using a random-effects model. The dots indicate the adjusted HRs from a comparison of the highest category of egg consumption (≥1 egg/d) with the lowest (<1 egg/wk or never). The size of the shaded square is proportional to the weight of the individual study. The horizontal lines represent 95% CIs. The diamond data markers indicate the pooled HRs. CVD, cardiovascular disease; IHD, ischemic heart disease.

Egg consumption and risk of mortality

Of 103,202 participants in 8 cohorts, 11,845 overall deaths were documented during an average of 15.3 y follow-up. In particular, 510 deaths were from IHD and 1,818 deaths were from stroke. No significant associations were found between egg consumption and mortality. The pooled HRs were 1.13 (95% CI: 0.95, 1.33) for overall mortality, 0.98 (95% CI: 0.77, 1.24) for IHD mortality, and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.56, 1.50) for stroke mortality in a comparison of the highest (≥1 egg/d) with the lowest category (never or <1 egg/wk) of egg consumption (Table 3).

TABLE 3

Pooled HRs (95% CIs) of diabetes and mortality according to egg consumption1

Egg consumptionHomogeneity
SourceNo. ofcohortsNo. ofparticipants (events)Duration offollow-upLowestHighestI2P
y%
Mortality
Overall8103,202 (11,845)15.31.01.13 (0.95, 1.33)59.20.01
IHD2535,011 (510)11.41.00.98 (0.77, 1.24)0.00.61
Stroke561,339 (1818)13.81.00.92 (0.56, 1.50)40.50.15
Overall in diabetic patients31529 (606)13.81.01.27 (0.78, 2.06)55.90.08
Type 2 diabetes569,297 (4889)14.81.01.42 (1.09, 1.86)53.50.07
1The pooled estimates were obtained by using a random-effects model.
2IHD, ischemic heart disease.

Egg consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes

A total of 4889 of 69,297 participants in 5 cohorts developed type 2 diabetes during an average of 14.8 y follow-up. Egg consumption was associated with an elevated risk of incident type 2 diabetes. The pooled HR was 1.42 (95% CI: 1.09, 1.86) in a comparison of the highest with the lowest category of egg consumption (Table 3).

Egg consumption and risk of CVD and mortality in patients with diabetes

The pooled database for CVD includes 7549 diabetic patients in 4 cohorts during an average of 9.5 y follow-up and 606 deaths were documented among 1529 diabetic participants in 3 cohorts with an average of 13.8 y follow-up. Patients with diabetes who ate eggs more than once per day were 1.69 times as likely to develop CVD comorbidity than were those who never ate eggs or ate eggs less than once per week (pooled HR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.09, 2.62) (Figure 3). CVD, cardiovascular disease. However, egg consumption was not significantly associated with risk of overall mortality (Table 3).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is ajcn981146fig3.jpg

Pooled HRs and 95% CIs of incident overall CVD in diabetic patients. The pooled estimates were obtained by using a random-effects model. The dots indicate the adjusted HRs from a comparison of the highest category of egg consumption (≥1 egg/d) with the lowest (<1 egg/wk or never). The size of the shaded square is proportional to the weight of the individual study. The horizontal lines represent 95% CIs. The diamond data markers indicate the pooled HR.

Sensitivity analyses

We did not find significant heterogeneity (I2: 0.0–59.2%) among the included studies in the main analyses, except for pooled overall mortality (I2: 59.2%, P = 0.01), which combined death from all causes. In addition to comparing 2 extreme categories, we performed sensitivity analyses by replacing the highest category with the second highest category, and the results were generally consistent. In addition, we found that none of the studies markedly influenced the pooled estimate when we excluded one study at a time in the meta-analysis.

Publication bias

Publication bias was assessed by using the Egger's regression asymmetry test. No evidence of substantial publication bias was found: P = 0.67 (in the general population) and P = 0.66 (in diabetic patients) for overall CVD incidence, P = 0.999 (in the general population) and P = 0.29 (in diabetic patients) for overall mortality, and P = 0.47 for incidence of type 2 diabetes.

DISCUSSION

Accumulated epidemiologic evidence generated from this meta-analysis suggests that egg consumption is not associated with an increased risk of overall CVD, IHD, stroke, or mortality. However, compared with those who never consume eggs, those who eat 1 egg per day or more are 42% more likely to develop type 2 diabetes. Among diabetic patients, frequent egg consumers (ie, ≥ 1 egg/d) are 69% more likely to have CVD comorbidity.

A few strengths of this meta-analysis need to be highlighted. First, most of the studies or cohorts involved in this meta-analysis had a large sample size and long-term follow-up period, which potentiated the statistical power to evaluate the relation between egg consumption and risk of CVD, mortality and type 2 diabetes. For example, our meta-analysis for the risk of CVD comprises >345,000 male and female individuals with a wide age range (20–90 y) and an average of 11.3 y of follow-up. Also, our pooled estimation was based on prospective cohort studies, which largely reduced the likelihood of inherent selection bias and recall bias from the included primary studies. Because of practical and ethical considerations, it may not be feasible to conduct a long-term, double-blinded, and placebo-controlled randomized trial on egg consumption and chronic diseases. Thus, the value of this meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies is enhanced. In addition, this meta-analysis allowed us to examine the longitudinal associations of egg consumption with multiple chronic diseases. Moreover, sensitivity analyses showed that our findings were robust, and the pooled estimates were not substantially affected by any of the included primary studies.

Several limitations also need to be considered. First, our results may have been affected by the inherent limitations of primary studies. The possibility of residual confounding or bias, including diet measurement errors, cannot be excluded. In particular, our inability to standardize egg consumption in all of the included studies might have confounded our results, although the likelihood should be small because the reference group and the highest egg consumption group were similar in most primary studies. In addition, the heterogeneity of exposure categories across the individual studies limited our capability to examine a possible dose-response relation. In addition, although we found little evidence of publication bias by statistical tests, publication bias may have existed because of unpublished data or publications in non-English journals.

It has been thought that egg consumption may increase the risk of CVD because egg is a major dietary source of cholesterol. However, whether dietary cholesterol intake significantly affects the lipid profile and, consequently, is associated with the risk of CVD is still unclear. There are several possible explanations for the null association findings between egg consumption and the risk of CVD in this meta-analysis. First, the overall effect of egg consumption on circulating cholesterol concentrations may not be sufficient to appreciably increase the risk of CVD (54). A meta-analysis (22) found that the addition of 100 mg dietary cholesterol from eggs (approximately half of an egg) per day would increase plasma LDL cholesterol by 1.9 mg/dL, HDL cholesterol by 0.3 mg/dL, and the ratio of total to HDL cholesterol by 0.02 units. Another meta-analysis (15) reported that consuming 1 egg/d increased plasma LDL cholesterol by 4.1 mg/dL, increased HDL cholesterol by 0.9 mg/dL, and had little effect on the ratio of LDL to HDL cholesterol—a major predictor of CHD. Of note, the unfavorable effect of egg consumption on LDL and total cholesterol may be attenuated by its favorable effect on HDL cholesterol. Second, most of the included studies were conducted in Western countries that traditionally have a relatively high-cholesterol diet. Thus, it is likely that the background cholesterol concentration among these participants was already high, so that changes in their cholesterol concentrations might not be sensitive to egg consumption (55, 56). Third, egg is also a good source of nutrients, which may provide a cardioprotective effect. For example, egg is a good source of B vitamins, including choline, which may lower homocysteine concentrations (57, 58). Thus, the overall effect of egg consumption may reflect the interactions of cholesterol with other nutrients in egg. Notably, 2 RCTs showed that consumption of 2 eggs/d for 6 wk did not induce an adverse effect on endothelial function—an indicator of CHD risk (27, 28).

In addition, we found that egg consumption was associated with an increased risk of CVD in diabetic patients. The mechanisms are not fully understood. Presumably, diabetic patients are at high risk of developing CVD and may be more sensitive to egg consumption. A small change in circulating cholesterol may substantially increase the risk of CVD in patients with diabetes. Also, a study indicated that cholesterol synthesis and plasma lipid concentrations, including total cholesterol and triglyceride, were higher in type 2 diabetic patients with uncontrolled hyperglycemia (59). Hence, egg consumption may induce unfavorable effects on lipid profiles and lead to an increased risk of CVD in patients with diabetes. However, a diet intervention study (60) showed that an energy-restricted high-protein diet with high cholesterol (2 eggs/d) for 12 wk increased HDL cholesterol concentrations compared with an energy-restricted high-protein diet with low cholesterol (egg replaced by 100 g lean animal protein) in type 2 diabetic patients. Of note, both intervention and control diets significantly reduced body weight, total cholesterol, fasting plasma glucose and insulin, and blood pressure.

In the current meta-analysis, we observed a positive association between egg consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes. Although the findings were inconsistent, some animal studies suggested that high cholesterol feeding increased fasting plasma glucose concentrations or induced hyperinsulinemia and impaired glucose tolerance (6163). Studies have also suggested that elevated serum cholesterol might be associated with an increased islet cholesterol content and directly induce β cell dysfunction by reducing glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (64, 65). In addition, studies have indicated that dietary cholesterol might be associated with chronic, low-grade inflammation (66, 67), which is a mechanism underlying the development of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Moreover, our results on egg consumption and risk of diabetes are supported by some other human studies (3840, 68) that do not meet our inclusion criteria. Furthermore, some prospective cohort studies found that dietary cholesterol intake was associated with risk of type 2 diabetes (69, 70) and gestational diabetes (71). However, RCTs in participants consuming a carbohydrate-restricted diet showed that consumption of 3 eggs/d for 12 wk did not significantly change plasma fasting glucose (72, 73) and insulin resistance (73) compared with placebo (equivalent amount of egg substitute without dietary cholesterol). Of note, the possibility cannot be completely excluded that the observed positive associations between egg consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes are explained by residual confounding from unmeasured factors, because diabetes was the secondary outcome in most included studies. Nevertheless, future studies are warranted.

In conclusion, this meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies does not support an increase in the risk of CVD and mortality in the general population with regular egg consumption. However, egg consumption may be associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes, and diabetic patients with frequent egg consumption may be more likely to develop CVD comorbidity. Clearly, more studies are needed to elucidate the potential mechanisms linking egg consumption to diabetes risk. Particularly, experimental studies are warranted to explore how dietary cholesterol is involved in glucose and insulin homeostasis. Although we have drawn attention to the association between high egg consumption and the risk of type 2 diabetes, and the potential increased risk of CVD with egg consumers in patients with type 2 diabetes, the results of this meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution and may not justify changes in current dietary advice on egg consumption until more scientific data become available.

Acknowledgments

The authors’ responsibilities were as follows—KH: conceived the study concept and design; JYS and PX: completed the literature search, study selection, and data extraction and prepared the tables and figures; PX: performed the data analysis; and JYS, PX, and KH: interpreted the results and drafted the manuscript. All authors: critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content and approved the final version. None of the authors had any conflicts of interest to disclose.

Footnotes

4Abbreviations used: CHD, coronary heart disease; CVD, cardiovascular disease; IHD, ischemic heart disease; RCT, randomized controlled trial.

REFERENCES

1. Castelli WP. Epidemiology of coronary heart disease: the Framingham study. Am J Med 1984;76(2A):4–12. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
2. Martin MJ, Hulley SB, Browner WS, Kuller LH, Wentworth D. Serum cholesterol, blood pressure, and mortality: implications from a cohort of 361,662 men. Lancet 1986;2:933–6. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
3. Castelli WP, Garrison RJ, Wilson PW, Abbott RD, Kalousdian S, Kannel WB. Incidence of coronary heart disease and lipoprotein cholesterol levels. The Framingham Study. JAMA 1986;256:2835–8. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
4. Klag MJ, Ford DE, Mead LA, He J, Whelton PK, Liang KY, Levine DM. Serum cholesterol in young men and subsequent cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 1993;328:313–8. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
5. Stamler J, Daviglus ML, Garside DB, Dyer AR, Greenland P, Neaton JD. Relationship of baseline serum cholesterol levels in 3 large cohorts of younger men to long-term coronary, cardiovascular, and all-cause mortality and to longevity. JAMA 2000;284:311–8. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
6. McGee DL, Reed DM, Yano K, Kagan A, Tillotson J. Ten-year incidence of coronary heart disease in the Honolulu Heart Program. Relationship to nutrient intake. Am J Epidemiol 1984;119:667–76. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
7. Shekelle RB, Stamler J. Dietary cholesterol and ischaemic heart disease. Lancet 1989;1:1177–9. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
8. Posner BM, Cobb JL, Belanger AJ, Cupples LA, D'Agostino RB, Stokes J., III Dietary lipid predictors of coronary heart disease in men. The Framingham Study. Arch Intern Med 1991;151:1181–7. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
9. Kromhout D, Menotti A, Bloemberg B, Aravanis C, Blackburn H, Buzina R, Dontas AS, Fidanza F, Giampaoli S, Jansen A, et al. Dietary saturated and trans fatty acids and cholesterol and 25-year mortality from coronary heart disease: the Seven Countries Study. Prev Med 1995;24:308–15. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
10. Ascherio A, Rimm EB, Giovannucci EL, Spiegelman D, Stampfer M, Willett WC. Dietary fat and risk of coronary heart disease in men: cohort follow up study in the United States. BMJ 1996;313:84–90. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
11. Hu FB, Stampfer MJ, Manson JE, Rimm E, Colditz GA, Rosner BA, Hennekens CH, Willett WC. Dietary fat intake and the risk of coronary heart disease in women. N Engl J Med 1997;337:1491–9. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
12. Oh K, Hu FB, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC. Dietary fat intake and risk of coronary heart disease in women: 20 years of follow-up of the Nurses’ Health Study. Am J Epidemiol 2005;161:672–9. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
13. Xu J, Eilat-Adar S, Loria C, Goldbourt U, Howard BV, Fabsitz RR, Zephier EM, Mattil C, Lee ET. Dietary fat intake and risk of coronary heart disease: the Strong Heart Study. Am J Clin Nutr 2006;84:894–902. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
14. Skeaff CM, Miller J. Dietary fat and coronary heart disease: summary of evidence from prospective cohort and randomised controlled trials. Ann Nutr Metab 2009;55:173–201. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
15. Clarke R, Frost C, Collins R, Appleby P, Peto R. Dietary lipids and blood cholesterol: quantitative meta-analysis of metabolic ward studies. BMJ 1997;314:112–7. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
16. Howell WH, McNamara DJ, Tosca MA, Smith BT, Gaines JA. Plasma lipid and lipoprotein responses to dietary fat and cholesterol: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 1997;65:1747–64. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
17. Herron KL, Vega-Lopez S, Conde K, Ramjiganesh T, Roy S, Shachter NS, Fernandez ML. Pre-menopausal women, classified as hypo- or hyperresponders, do not alter their LDL/HDL ratio following a high dietary cholesterol challenge. J Am Coll Nutr 2002;21:250–8. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
18. Herron KL, Vega-Lopez S, Conde K, Ramjiganesh T, Shachter NS, Fernandez ML. Men classified as hypo- or hyperresponders to dietary cholesterol feeding exhibit differences in lipoprotein metabolism. J Nutr 2003;133:1036–42. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
19. Greene CM, Zern TL, Wood RJ, Shrestha S, Aggarwal D, Sharman MJ, Volek JS, Fernandez ML. Maintenance of the LDL cholesterol:HDL cholesterol ratio in an elderly population given a dietary cholesterol challenge. J Nutr 2005;135:2793–8. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
20. Djoussé L, Gaziano JM. Dietary cholesterol and coronary artery disease: a systematic review. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2009;11:418–22. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
21. McCance RA, Widdowson EM. The composition of foods. 6th summary ed. Cambridge, UK: Royal Society of Chemistry. 2004. [Google Scholar]
22. Weggemans RM, Zock PL, Katan MB. Dietary cholesterol from eggs increases the ratio of total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in humans: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 2001;73:885–91. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
23. Reaven GM, Abbasi F, Bernhart S, Coulston A, Darnell B, Dashti N, Kim H, Kulkarni K, Lamendola C, McLaughlin T, et al. Insulin resistance, dietary cholesterol, and cholesterol concentration in postmenopausal women. Metabolism 2001;50:594–7. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
24. Goodrow EF, Wilson TA, Houde SC, Vishwanathan R, Scollin PA, Handelman G, Nicolosi RJ. Consumption of one egg per day increases serum lutein and zeaxanthin concentrations in older adults without altering serum lipid and lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations. J Nutr 2006;136:2519–24. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
25. Wenzel AJ, Gerweck C, Barbato D, Nicolosi RJ, Handelman GJ, Curran-Celentano J. A 12-wk egg intervention increases serum zeaxanthin and macular pigment optical density in women. J Nutr 2006;136:2568–73. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
26. Mayurasakorn K, Srisura W, Sitphahul P, Hongto PO. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol changes after continuous egg consumption in healthy adults. J Med Assoc Thai 2008;91:400–7. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
27. Katz DL, Evans MA, Nawaz H, Njike VY, Chan W, Comerford BP, Hoxley ML. Egg consumption and endothelial function: a randomized controlled crossover trial. Int J Cardiol 2005;99:65–70. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
28. Njike V, Faridi Z, Dutta S, Gonzalez-Simon AL, Katz DL. Daily egg consumption in hyperlipidemic adults–effects on endothelial function and cardiovascular risk. Nutr J 2010;9:28. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
29. Dawber TR, Nickerson RJ, Brand FN, Pool J. Eggs, serum cholesterol, and coronary heart disease. Am J Clin Nutr 1982;36:617–25. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
30. Hu FB, Stampfer MJ, Rimm EB, Manson JE, Ascherio A, Colditz GA, Rosner BA, Spiegelman D, Speizer FE, Sacks FM, et al. A prospective study of egg consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease in men and women. JAMA 1999;281:1387–94. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
31. He K, Merchant A, Rimm EB, Rosner BA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Ascherio A. Dietary fat intake and risk of stroke in male US healthcare professionals: 14 year prospective cohort study. BMJ 2003;327:777–82. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
32. Nakamura Y, Iso H, Kita Y, Ueshima H, Okada K, Konishi M, Inoue M, Tsugane S. Egg consumption, serum total cholesterol concentrations and coronary heart disease incidence: Japan Public Health Center-based prospective study. Br J Nutr 2006;96:921–8. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
33. Qureshi AI, Suri FK, Ahmed S, Nasar A, Divani AA, Kirmani JF. Regular egg consumption does not increase the risk of stroke and cardiovascular diseases. Med Sci Monit 2007;13:CR1–8. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
34. Djoussé L, Gaziano JM. Egg consumption in relation to cardiovascular disease and mortality: the Physicians’ Health Study. Am J Clin Nutr 2008;87:964–9. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
35. Houston DK, Ding J, Lee JS, Garcia M, Kanaya AM, Tylavsky FA, Newman AB, Visser M, Kritchevsky SB. Dietary fat and cholesterol and risk of cardiovascular disease in older adults: the Health ABC Study. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2011;21:430–7. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
36. Zazpe I, Beunza JJ, Bes-Rastrollo M, Warnberg J, de la Fuente-Arrillaga C, Benito S, Vazquez Z, Martinez-Gonzalez MA. Egg consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease in the SUN Project. Eur J Clin Nutr 2011;65:676–82. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
37. Djoussé L, Gaziano JM, Buring JE, Lee IM. Egg consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes in men and women. Diabetes Care 2009;32:295–300. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
38. Qiu C, Frederick IO, Zhang C, Sorensen TK, Enquobahrie DA, Williams MA. Risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in relation to maternal egg and cholesterol intake. Am J Epidemiol 2011;173:649–58. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
39. Shi Z, Yuan B, Zhang C, Zhou M, Holmboe-Ottesen G. Egg consumption and the risk of diabetes in adults, Jiangsu, China. Nutrition 2011;27:194–8. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
40. Radzevičienė L, Ostrauskas R. Egg consumption and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a case-control study. Public Health Nutr 2012;15:1437–41. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
41. Djoussé L, Kamineni A, Nelson TL, Carnethon M, Mozaffarian D, Siscovick D, Mukamal KJ. Egg consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes in older adults. Am J Clin Nutr 2010;92:422–7. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
42. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000;283:2008–12. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
43. Nakamura Y, Okamura T, Tamaki S, Kadowaki T, Hayakawa T, Kita Y, Okayama A, Ueshima H. Egg consumption, serum cholesterol, and cause-specific and all-cause mortality: the National Integrated Project for Prospective Observation of Non-communicable Disease and Its Trends in the Aged, 1980 (NIPPON DATA80). Am J Clin Nutr 2004;80:58–63. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
44. Yaemsiri S, Sen S, Tinker L, Rosamond W, Wassertheil-Smoller S, He K. Trans fat, aspirin, and ischemic stroke in postmenopausal women. Ann Neurol 2012;72:704–15. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
45. Snowdon DA. Animal product consumption and mortality because of all causes combined, coronary heart disease, stroke, diabetes, and cancer in Seventh-day Adventists. Am J Clin Nutr 1988;48(Suppl):739–48. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
46. Mann JI, Appleby PN, Key TJ, Thorogood M. Dietary determinants of ischaemic heart disease in health conscious individuals. Heart 1997;78:450–5. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
47. Sauvaget C, Nagano J, Allen N, Grant EJ, Beral V. Intake of animal products and stroke mortality in the Hiroshima/Nagasaki Life Span Study. Int J Epidemiol 2003;32:536–43. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
48. Tanasescu M, Cho E, Manson JE, Hu FB. Dietary fat and cholesterol and the risk of cardiovascular disease among women with type 2 diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;79:999–1005. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
49. Trichopoulou A, Psaltopoulou T, Orfanos P, Trichopoulos D. Diet and physical activity in relation to overall mortality amongst adult diabetics in a general population cohort. J Intern Med 2006;259:583–91. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
50. Scrafford CG, Tran NL, Barraj LM, Mink PJ. Egg consumption and CHD and stroke mortality: a prospective study of US adults. Public Health Nutr 2011;14:261–70. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
51. Vang A, Singh PN, Lee JW, Haddad EH, Brinegar CH. Meats, processed meats, obesity, weight gain and occurrence of diabetes among adults: findings from Adventist Health Studies. Ann Nutr Metab 2008;52:96–104. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
52. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177–88. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
53. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315:629–34. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
54. Barraj L, Tran N, Mink P. A comparison of egg consumption with other modifiable coronary heart disease lifestyle risk factors: a relative risk apportionment study. Risk Anal 2009;29:401–15. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
55. Sacks FM, Salazar J, Miller L, Foster JM, Sutherland M, Samonds KW, Albers JJ, Kass EH. Ingestion of egg raises plasma low density lipoproteins in free-living subjects. Lancet 1984;1:647–9. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
56. Hopkins PN. Effects of dietary cholesterol on serum cholesterol: a meta-analysis and review. Am J Clin Nutr 1992;55:1060–70. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
57. Cho E, Zeisel SH, Jacques P, Selhub J, Dougherty L, Colditz GA, Willett WC. Dietary choline and betaine assessed by food-frequency questionnaire in relation to plasma total homocysteine concentration in the Framingham Offspring Study. Am J Clin Nutr 2006;83:905–11. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
58. Olthof MR, Brink EJ, Katan MB, Verhoef P. Choline supplemented as phosphatidylcholine decreases fasting and postmethionine-loading plasma homocysteine concentrations in healthy men. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;82:111–7. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
59. Bennion LJ, Grundy SM. Effects of diabetes mellitus on cholesterol metabolism in man. N Engl J Med 1977;296:1365–71. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
60. Pearce KL, Clifton PM, Noakes M. Egg consumption as part of an energy-restricted high-protein diet improves blood lipid and blood glucose profiles in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Br J Nutr 2011;105:584–92. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
61. Adamopoulos PN, Papamichael CM, Zampelas A, Moulopoulos SD. Cholesterol and unsaturated fat diets influence lipid and glucose concentrations in rats. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 1996;113:659–63. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
62. Basciano H, Miller AE, Naples M, Baker C, Kohen R, Xu E, Su Q, Allister EM, Wheeler MB, Adeli K. Metabolic effects of dietary cholesterol in an animal model of insulin resistance and hepatic steatosis. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2009;297:E462–73. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
63. Collino M, Aragno M, Castiglia S, Miglio G, Tomasinelli C, Boccuzzi G, Thiemermann C, Fantozzi R. Pioglitazone improves lipid and insulin levels in overweight rats on a high cholesterol and fructose diet by decreasing hepatic inflammation. Br J Pharmacol 2010;160:1892–902. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
64. Hao M, Head WS, Gunawardana SC, Hasty AH, Piston DW. Direct effect of cholesterol on insulin secretion: a novel mechanism for pancreatic beta-cell dysfunction. Diabetes 2007;56:2328–38. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
65. Kruit JK, Kremer PH, Dai L, Tang R, Ruddle P, de Haan W, Brunham LR, Verchere CB, Hayden MR. Cholesterol efflux via ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1) and cholesterol uptake via the LDL receptor influences cholesterol-induced impairment of beta cell function in mice. Diabetologia 2010;53:1110–9. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
66. Tannock LR, O'Brien KD, Knopp RH, Retzlaff B, Fish B, Wener MH, Kahn SE, Chait A. Cholesterol feeding increases C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A levels in lean insulin-sensitive subjects. Circulation 2005;111:3058–62. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
67. Subramanian S, Han CY, Chiba T, McMillen TS, Wang SA, Haw A, 3rd, Kirk EA, O'Brien KD, Chait A. Dietary cholesterol worsens adipose tissue macrophage accumulation and atherosclerosis in obese LDL receptor-deficient mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2008;28:685–91. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
68. Feskens EJ, Kromhout D. Habitual dietary intake and glucose tolerance in euglycaemic men: the Zutphen Study. Int J Epidemiol 1990;19:953–9. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
69. Meyer KA, Kushi LH, Jacobs DR, Jr, Folsom AR. Dietary fat and incidence of type 2 diabetes in older Iowa women. Diabetes Care 2001;24:1528–35. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
70. Salméron J, Hu FB, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Rimm EB, Willett WC. Dietary fat intake and risk of type 2 diabetes in women. Am J Clin Nutr 2001;73:1019–26. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
71. Bowers K, Tobias DK, Yeung E, Hu FB, Zhang C. A prospective study of prepregnancy dietary fat intake and risk of gestational diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr 2012;95:446–53. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
72. Mutungi G, Ratliff J, Puglisi M, Torres-Gonzalez M, Vaishnav U, Leite JO, Quann E, Volek JS, Fernandez ML. Dietary cholesterol from eggs increases plasma HDL cholesterol in overweight men consuming a carbohydrate-restricted diet. J Nutr 2008;138:272–6. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
73. Ratliff J, Mutungi G, Puglisi MJ, Volek JS, Fernandez ML. Carbohydrate restriction (with or without additional dietary cholesterol provided by eggs) reduces insulin resistance and plasma leptin without modifying appetite hormones in adult men. Nutr Res 2009;29:262–8. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition are provided here courtesy of American Society for Nutrition

Citations & impact 


Impact metrics

Jump to Citations

Citations of article over time

Alternative metrics

Altmetric item for https://www.altmetric.com/details/1481942
Altmetric
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/1481942

Article citations


Go to all (143) article citations

Other citations

Similar Articles 


To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.


Funding 


Funders who supported this work.

NIDDK NIH HHS (1)

NINDS NIH HHS (1)