Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


Ceftazidime-avibactam (MIC50/90, 0.12/0.25 μg/ml) inhibited 99.9% (20,698/20,709) of Enterobacteriaceae isolates at ≤8 μg/ml. This compound was active against resistant subsets, including ceftazidime-nonsusceptible Enterobacter cloacae (MIC50/90, 0.25/0.5 μg/ml) and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) phenotype isolates. An ESBL phenotype was noted among 12.4% (1,696/13,692 isolates from targeted species) of the isolates, including 776 Escherichia coli (12.0% for this species; MIC50/90, 0.12/0.25 μg/ml), 721 Klebsiella pneumoniae (16.3%; MIC50/90, 0.12/0.25 μg/ml), 119 Klebsiella oxytoca (10.3%; MIC50/90, 0.06/0.25 μg/ml), and 80 Proteus mirabilis (4.9%; MIC50/90, 0.06/0.12 μg/ml) isolates. The most common enzymes detected among ESBL phenotype isolates from 2013 (n = 743) screened using a microarray-based assay were CTX-M-15-like (n = 307), KPC (n = 120), SHV ESBLs (n = 118), and CTX-M-14-like (n = 110). KPC producers were highly resistant to comparators, and ceftazidime-avibactam (MIC50/90, 0.5/2 μg/ml) and tigecycline (MIC50/90, 0.5/1 μg/ml; 98.3% susceptible) were the most active agents against these strains. Meropenem (MIC50/90, ≤0.06/≤0.06 μg/ml) and ceftazidime-avibactam (MIC50/90, 0.12/0.25 μg/ml) were active against CTX-M-producing isolates. Other enzymes were also observed, and ceftazidime-avibactam displayed good activity against the isolates producing less common enzymes. Among 11 isolates displaying ceftazidime-avibactam MIC values of >8 μg/ml, three were K. pneumoniae strains producing metallo-β-lactamases (all ceftazidime-avibactam MICs, >32 μg/ml), with two NDM-1 producers and one K. pneumoniae strain carrying the bla(KPC-2) and bla(VIM-4) genes. Therapeutic options for isolates producing β-lactamases may be limited, and ceftazidime-avibactam, which displayed good activity against strains, including those producing KPC enzymes, merits further study in infections where such organisms occur.

Free full text 


Logo of aacLink to Publisher's site
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Jun; 59(6): 3509–3517.
Published online 2015 May 14. Prepublished online 2015 Apr 6. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00163-15
PMCID: PMC4432207
PMID: 25845862

Ceftazidime-Avibactam Activity Tested against Enterobacteriaceae Isolates from U.S. Hospitals (2011 to 2013) and Characterization of β-Lactamase-Producing Strains

Abstract

Ceftazidime-avibactam (MIC50/90, 0.12/0.25 μg/ml) inhibited 99.9% (20,698/20,709) of Enterobacteriaceae isolates at ≤8 μg/ml. This compound was active against resistant subsets, including ceftazidime-nonsusceptible Enterobacter cloacae (MIC50/90, 0.25/0.5 μg/ml) and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) phenotype isolates. An ESBL phenotype was noted among 12.4% (1,696/13,692 isolates from targeted species) of the isolates, including 776 Escherichia coli (12.0% for this species; MIC50/90, 0.12/0.25 μg/ml), 721 Klebsiella pneumoniae (16.3%; MIC50/90, 0.12/0.25 μg/ml), 119 Klebsiella oxytoca (10.3%; MIC50/90, 0.06/0.25 μg/ml), and 80 Proteus mirabilis (4.9%; MIC50/90, 0.06/0.12 μg/ml) isolates. The most common enzymes detected among ESBL phenotype isolates from 2013 (n = 743) screened using a microarray-based assay were CTX-M-15-like (n = 307), KPC (n = 120), SHV ESBLs (n = 118), and CTX-M-14-like (n = 110). KPC producers were highly resistant to comparators, and ceftazidime-avibactam (MIC50/90, 0.5/2 μg/ml) and tigecycline (MIC50/90, 0.5/1 μg/ml; 98.3% susceptible) were the most active agents against these strains. Meropenem (MIC50/90, ≤0.06/≤0.06 μg/ml) and ceftazidime-avibactam (MIC50/90, 0.12/0.25 μg/ml) were active against CTX-M-producing isolates. Other enzymes were also observed, and ceftazidime-avibactam displayed good activity against the isolates producing less common enzymes. Among 11 isolates displaying ceftazidime-avibactam MIC values of >8 μg/ml, three were K. pneumoniae strains producing metallo-β-lactamases (all ceftazidime-avibactam MICs, >32 μg/ml), with two NDM-1 producers and one K. pneumoniae strain carrying the blaKPC-2 and blaVIM-4 genes. Therapeutic options for isolates producing β-lactamases may be limited, and ceftazidime-avibactam, which displayed good activity against strains, including those producing KPC enzymes, merits further study in infections where such organisms occur.

INTRODUCTION

Enterobacteriaceae species cause a variety of infection types and these organisms, including those producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and carbapenemases, have been implicated in severe health care-associated infections (HAIs) that are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide (1, 2). Among Gram-negative organisms associated with HAI in the United States, 15% of Klebsiella pneumoniae or Klebsiella oxytoca isolates and 2% of Escherichia coli isolates have been shown to be resistant to three or more antimicrobial classes and were categorized as multidrug resistant (MDR) (2). These isolates were the cause of central line-associated bloodstream infections, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and surgical site infections. Additionally, among hospitals reporting severe HAIs, 20% described the occurrence of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella isolates that are usually MDR (2) and more recently, pandrug-resistant (PDR) isolates producing carbapenemases have been reported (3). Due to steadily increasing levels of antimicrobial resistance among Enterobacteriaceae isolates, therapeutic options are becoming scarcer, and antimicrobial agents with safety and efficacy challenges are often the last resource for treating patients with infections caused by these organisms. In a meta-analysis, patients with bacteremia due to ESBL-producing organisms had a statistically significant increased mortality and were more likely to have a delay in receiving appropriate antimicrobial treatment (3); thus, having reliable therapeutic options to treat infections caused by MDR and PDR Enterobacteriaceae isolates is extremely important.

Ceftazidime-avibactam is a combination of a cephalosporin and a diazabicyclooctane (DBO) β-lactamase inhibitor with prolonged deacylation rates (4). This non-β-lactam agent has good inhibitory properties against enzymes belonging to Ambler structural classes A and C, as well as some class D enzymes. Avibactam greatly improves (4- to 1,024-fold MIC reduction) the activity of ceftazidime versus most Enterobacteriaceae species that produce β-lactamase enzymes (5), including isolates producing KPC and CTX-M enzymes that are prevalent in the United States (6, 7) and many other geographic regions.

In this study, we evaluate the activities of ceftazidime-avibactam and comparator antimicrobial agents tested against 20,709 clinical Enterobacteriaceae isolates collected in U.S. hospitals during the period from 2011 to 2013. Among this collection, 743 isolates collected during 2013 were tested for common β-lactamase genes and were analyzed separately.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial isolates.

A total of 20,709 Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates were collected in 79 U.S. hospitals during 2011 (3,233 isolates), 2012 (8,640 isolates), and 2013 (8,836 isolates) as part of the International Network for Optimal Resistance Monitoring (INFORM) program. These nonduplicate consecutively collected isolates considered clinically significant were recovered from bloodstream infections (2,216 isolates), hospitalized patients with pneumonia (2,424 isolates), skin/soft tissue infections (3,493 isolates), urinary tract infections (2,686 isolates), intra-abdominal infections (110 isolates), and other sites (779 isolates). Species identification was confirmed by standard biochemical tests and using the matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) Biotyper (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA) according to the manufacturer's instructions, where necessary.

Susceptibility testing.

Broth microdilution testing methods using validated dry-form panels (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Cleveland, OH) were performed to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility of ceftazidime-avibactam (inhibitor at fixed concentration of 4 μg/ml; range tested, 0.015 to 32 μg/ml) and comparator agents (8). Comparator agents included ceftazidime (range tested, 0.015 to 32 μg/ml), ceftriaxone (0.06 to 8 μg/ml), ampicillin-sulbactam (0.25 to 32 μg/ml), piperacillin-tazobactam (0.5 to 64 μg/ml), meropenem (0.12 to 8 μg/ml), levofloxacin (0.12 to 4 μg/ml), gentamicin (1 to μg/ml), tigecycline (0.015 to 16 μg/ml), and colistin (0.5 to 8 μg/ml). Concurrent quality control (QC) testing was performed to ensure proper test conditions and procedures. QC strains included Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and 35218 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, and all QC results were within published ranges. Susceptibility breakpoints were used to determine susceptibility/resistance rates according CLSI and EUCAST guidelines (9, 10). As indicated by pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) target attainment simulations, a ceftazidime-avibactam-susceptible breakpoint of ≤8 μg/ml was applied for all Enterobacteriaceae species (11). E. coli, Klebsiella spp. and Proteus mirabilis isolates displaying the CLSI criteria for an ESBL phenotype (MIC of >1 μg/ml for aztreonam, ceftazidime, and/or ceftriaxone) (9) were grouped as ESBL phenotype. Ceftazidime-nonsusceptible isolates displayed MIC values of ≥8 μg/ml, which are intermediate or resistant MIC values according to the CLSI breakpoint criteria (9).

Screening for β-lactamases.

All 743 isolates collected in U.S. hospitals during 2013 displaying the CLSI ESBL phenotypic criteria as described above were tested for β-lactamase-encoding genes using the microarray-based assay Check-MDR CT101 kit (Check-points, Wageningen, Netherlands). The assay was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. This kit has the capabilities to detect CTX-M groups 1, 2, 8 + 25, and 9, TEM wild-type (WT) and ESBL, SHV WT and ESBL, ACC, ACT/MIR, CMY II, DHA, FOX, KPC, and NDM-1. The most common mutations that expand the spectrum of TEM and SHV enzymes are detected, and these mutations include 104K, 164S/C/H, or 123S for TEM and 138S, 238A, and 240K for SHV.

All isolates displaying a ceftazidime-avibactam MIC of >4 μg/ml were screened for the presence of metallo-β-lactamase and serine-carbapenemase-encoding gene families blaIMP, blaVIM, blaNDM, blaKPC, blaOXA-48, blaGES, blaIMI, blaNMC-A, and blaSME by PCR as previously described (12). Amplicons were sequenced on both strands, and results were analyzed using the Lasergene software package (DNASTAR, Madison, WI). Amino acid sequences were compared with those available through the internet using NCBI/BLAST. These isolates were also submitted to a simplified protein extraction, and the hydrolysis of the extracts was measured against ceftazidime, meropenem, and imipenem as previously described (13).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Overall, 99.9% (20,698 of 20,709) of Enterobacteriaceae strains were inhibited at a ceftazidime-avibactam MIC of 8 μg/ml or less, which is the ceftazidime-avibactam-susceptible breakpoint supported by PK/PD target attainment simulation studies (Table 1) (9, 11). Ceftazidime-avibactam MIC50 and MIC90 values were only 0.12 and 0.25 μg/ml, respectively, for this collection of isolates, and this MIC90 value was only greater than the one for meropenem (MIC90, ≤0.06 μg/ml) (Table 2) among the comparator agents. Several antimicrobial agents displayed good activity (>90% susceptibility) against Enterobacteriaceae isolates by applying the CLSI breakpoint criteria, and those with higher susceptibility rates were meropenem (98.4%), tigecycline (98.0%), piperacillin-tazobactam (91.9%), and gentamicin (91.1%) (Table 2).

TABLE 1

Frequency distribution of Enterobacteriaceae isolates collected in U.S. hospitals during 2011 to 2013 and tested against ceftazidime-avibactam

Organism/group (n)No. (%) of isolates with ceftazidime-avibactam MIC (μg/ml) of:
MIC (μg/ml)
≤0.030.060.120.250.512481632>3250%90%
All Enterobacteriaceae (20,709)3,166 (15.3)6,743 (47.8)6,960 (81.5)2,510 (93.6)932 (98.1)267 (99.4)81 (99.8)25 (99.9)14 (99.9)6 (>99.9)1 (>99.9)4 (100.0)0.120.25
    E. coli
        All (6,486)998 (15.4)2,808 (58.7)2,211 (92.8)375 (98.6)74 (99.7)16 (99.9)3 (100.0)1 (100.0)0.060.12
        ESBL phenotype (776)a50 (6.4)128 (22.9)371 (70.7)150 (90.1)57 (97.4)16 (99.5)3 (99.9)1 (100.0)0.120.25
    K. pneumoniae
        All (4,421)260 (5.9)1,566 (41.3)1,671 (79.1)510 (90.6)267 (96.7)99 (98.9)40 (99.8)5 (99.9)0 (99.9)0 (99.9)0 (99.9)3 (100.0)0.120.25
        ESBL phenotype (721)a29 (4.0)35 (8.9)151 (29.8)155 (51.3)206 (79.9)97 (93.3)40 (98.9)5 (99.6)0 (99.6)0 (99.6)0 (99.6)3 (100.0)0.251
        Meropenem nonsusceptible (276)b11 (4.0)7 (6.5)19 (13.4)41 (28.3)91 (61.2)66 (85.1)33 (97.1)5 (98.9)0 (98.9)0 (98.9)0 (98.9)3 (100.0)0.52
    K. oxytoca
        All (1,159)68 (5.9)551 (53.4)386 (86.7)98 (95.2)41 (98.7)13 (99.8)0 (99.8)2 (100.0)0.060.25
        ESBL phenotype (119)a2 (1.7)8 (8.4)44 (45.4)24 (65.5)28 (89.1)11 (98.3)0 (98.3)2 (100.0)0.251
    P. mirabilis
        All (1,626)1,074 (66.1)498 (96.7)42 (99.3)9 (99.8)2 (99.9)0 (99.9)0 (99.9)0 (99.9)0 (99.9)0 (99.9)0 (99.9)1 (100.0)≤0.030.06
        ESBL phenotype (80)a24 (30.0)40 (80.0)10 (92.5)4 (97.5)1 (98.8)0 (98.8)0 (98.8)0 (98.8)0 (98.8)0 (98.8)0 (98.8)1 (100.0)0.060.12
    E. cloacae
        All (2,261)38 (1.7)114 (6.7)1,084 (54.7)644 (83.1)275 (95.3)82 (98.9)16 (99.6)7 (>99.9)0 (>99.9)0 (>99.9)1 (100.0)0.120.5
        Ceftazidime nonsusceptible (473)c7 (1.5)4 (2.3)32 (9.1)128 (36.2)207 (79.9)72 (95.1)15 (98.3)7 (99.8)0 (99.8)0 (99.8)1 (100.0)0.51
    E. aerogenes
        All (831)37 (4.5)266 (36.5)347 (78.2)133 (94.2)40 (99.0)5 (99.6)0 (99.6)2 (99.9)0 (99.9)1 (100.0)0.120.25
        Ceftazidime nonsusceptible (165)c6 (3.6)4 (6.1)52 (37.6)72 (81.2)23 (95.2)5 (98.2)0 (98.2)2 (99.4)0 (99.4)1 (100.0)0.250.5
    M. morganii (776)369 (47.6)261 (81.2)85 (92.1)37 (96.9)15 (98.8)8 (99.9)0 (99.9)0 (99.9)1 (100.0)0.060.12
    C. koseri (503)38 (7.6)273 (61.8)144 (90.5)36 (97.6)7 (99.0)4 (99.8)1 (100.0)0.060.12
    C. freundii (547)7 (1.3)86 (17.0)256 (63.8)132 (87.9)46 (96.3)15 (99.1)3 (99.6)1 (99.8)0 (99.8)1 (100.0)0.120.5
    S. marcescens (1,260)6 (0.5)83 (7.1)583 (53.3)433 (87.7)127 (97.8)16 (99.0)8 (99.7)1 (99.8)1 (99.8)2 (100.0)0.120.5
    P. vulgaris (301)146 (48.5)130 (91.7)21 (98.7)1 (99.0)3 (100.0)0.060.06
    Providencia spp. (538)125 (23.2)107 (43.1)130 (67.3)102 (86.2)35 (92.8)9 (94.4)10 (96.3)6 (97.4)12 (99.6)2 (100.0)0.120.5
KPC producers, 2013 only (120)10 (8.3)1 (9.2)6 (14.2)11 (23.3)18 (38.3)34 (66.7)26 (88.3)11 (97.5)0 (97.5)0 (97.5)0 (97.5)1 (100.0)14
CTX-M-15-like-producers, 2013 only (284)9 (3.2)11 (7.0)32 (18.3)123 (61.6)70 (86.3)33 (97.9)5 (99.6)1 (100.0)0.251
CTX-M-14-like-producers, 2013 only (107)8 (7.5)6 (13.1)28 (39.3)49 (85.0)14 (98.1)2 (100.0)0.250.5
aCLSI criteria for an ESBL phenotype for E. coli, Klebsiella spp., and P. mirabilis were applied (MIC of >1 μg/ml for aztreonam, ceftazidime, and/or ceftriaxone).
bMeropenem-nonsusceptible isolates were categorized according to the CLSI criteria (MIC, ≥2 μg/ml) (8, 9).
cCefazidime-nonsusceptible isolates were categorized according to the CLSI criteria (MIC, ≥8 μg/ml) (8, 9).

TABLE 2

Activities of ceftazidime-avibactam and comparator antimicrobial agents tested against Enterobacteriaceae isolates collected during 2011 to 2013 in U.S. hospitalsa

Isolates (n) and antimicrobial agent(s)MIC (μg/ml)
% S/I/R by criteriab
50%90%RangeCLSIEUCAST
All Enterobacteriacea (20,709)
    Ceftazidime-avibactamc0.120.25≤0.03 to >3299.9c
    Ceftazidime0.128≤0.015 to >3289.4/1.3/9.387.2/2.2/10.6
    Ceftriaxone≤0.06>8≤0.06 to >886.4/1.1/12.586.4/1.1/12.5
    Ampicillin-sulbactam8>32≤0.25 to >3254.2/17.4/28.454.2/0.0/45.8
    Piperacillin-tazobactam216≤0.5 to >6491.9/3.1/5.088.8/3.1/8.1
    Meropenem≤0.06≤0.06≤0.06 to >898.4/0.1/1.598.5/0.5/1.0
    Levofloxacin≤0.12>4≤0.12 to >482.2/2.0/15.880.7/1.5/17.8
    Gentamicin≤14≤1 to >891.1/1.3/7.689.5/1.6/8.9
    Tigecycline0.251≤0.03 to >498.0/1.9/0.192.6/5.4/2.0
    Colistin0.5>8≤0.06 to >8−/−/−75.4/0.0/24.6
E. coli (6,486)
    Ceftazidime-avibactamc0.060.12≤0.03 to 4100.0c
    Ceftazidime0.122≤0.015 to >3291.8/1.5/6.789.1/2.7/8.2
    Ceftriaxone≤0.06>8≤0.06 to >888.8/0.2/11.088.8/0.2/11.0
    Ampicillin-sulbactam8>32≤0.25 to >3250.8/21.3/27.950.8/0.0/49.2
    Piperacillin-tazobactam28≤0.5 to >6495.2/2.2/2.692.9/2.3/4.8
    Meropenem≤0.06≤0.06≤0.06 to 899.8/<0.1/0.199.9/0.1/0.0
    Levofloxacin≤0.12>4≤0.12 to >469.9/0.7/29.469.5/0.4/30.1
    Gentamicin≤1>8≤1 to >887.6/0.5/11.986.8/0.8/12.4
    Tigecycline0.120.12≤0.03 to 1100.0/0.0/0.0100.0/0.0/0.0
    Colistin0.50.5≤0.06 to 8−/−/−99.6/0.0/0.4
K. pneumoniae (4,421)
    Ceftazidime-avibactamc0.120.25≤0.03 to >3299.9c
    Ceftazidime0.1232≤0.015 to >3285.4/1.1/13.584.0/1.4/14.6
    Ceftriaxone≤0.06>8≤0.06 to >885.0/0.4/14.685.0/0.4/14.6
    Ampicillin-sulbactam8>32≤0.25 to >3273.7/6.9/19.473.7/0.0/26.3
    Piperacillin-tazobactam4>64≤0.5 to >6487.4/2.3/10.381.5/5.9/12.6
    Meropenem≤0.06≤0.06≤0.06 to >893.8/0.2/6.094.0/1.5/4.5
    Levofloxacin≤0.12>4≤0.12 to >486.5/1.3/12.285.6/0.9/13.5
    Gentamicin≤12≤1 to >891.5/1.7/6.890.3/1.2/8.5
    Tigecycline0.2510.015 to >499.0/0.9/0.195.1/3.9/1.0
    Colistin0.510.12 to >8−/−/−96.9/0.0/3.1
K. oxytoca (1,159)
    Ceftazidime-avibactamc0.060.25≤0.03 to 4100.0c
    Ceftazidime0.120.50.03 to >3297.4/0.2/2.495.3/2.1/2.6
    Ceftriaxone≤0.062≤0.06 to >890.0/1.1/8.990.0/1.1/8.9
    Ampicillin-sulbactam8320.5 to >3263.2/25.1/11.763.2/0.0/36.8
    Piperacillin-tazobactam28≤0.5 to >6491.7/0.5/7.890.1/1.6/8.3
    Meropenem≤0.06≤0.06≤0.06 to >899.5/0.2/0.399.7/0.2/0.1
    Levofloxacin≤0.120.25≤0.12 to >497.0/0.6/2.495.6/1.4/3.0
    Gentamicin≤1≤1≤1 to >896.8/1.0/2.296.4/0.4/3.2
    Tigecycline0.120.50.06 to 499.9/0.1/0.098.4/1.5/0.1
    Colistin0.50.50.25 to 4−/−/−99.8/0.0/0.2
P. mirabilis (1,626)
    Ceftazidime-avibactamc≤0.030.06≤0.03 to >3299.9c
    Ceftazidime0.060.12≤0.015 to >3299.1/0.7/0.297.2/1.9/0.9
    Ceftriaxone≤0.06≤0.06≤0.06 to >895.7/0.7/3.695.7/0.7/3.6
    Ampicillin-sulbactam116≤0.25 to >3288.7/6.9/4.488.7/0.0/11.3
    Piperacillin-tazobactam≤0.51≤0.5 to >6499.8/0.1/0.199.7/0.1/0.2
    Meropenem≤0.060.12≤0.06 to 299.9/0.1/0.0100.0/0.0/0.0
    Levofloxacin≤0.12>4≤0.12 to >475.2/5.1/19.770.7/4.5/24.8
    Gentamicin≤18≤1 to >889.6/2.7/7.786.3/3.3/10.4
    Tigecycline240.12 to >484.8/14.7/0.547.6/37.2/15.2
    Colistin>8>80.5 to >8−/−/−0.6/0.0/99.4
E. cloacae (2,261)
    Ceftazidime-avibactamc0.120.5≤0.03 to 32>99.9c
    Ceftazidime0.25>320.03 to >3279.1/1.1/19.876.8/2.3/20.9
    Ceftriaxone0.25>8≤0.06 to >875.0/2.1/22.975.0/2.1/22.9
    Ampicillin-sulbactam16>32≤0.25 to >3229.9/22.8/47.329.9/0.0/70.1
    Piperacillin-tazobactam264≤0.5 to >6483.8/8.0/8.280.4/3.4/16.2
    Meropenem≤0.06≤0.06≤0.06 to >899.2/0.2/0.699.4/0.4/0.2
    Levofloxacin≤0.120.5≤0.12 to >494.7/1.5/3.893.6/1.1/5.3
    Gentamicin≤1≤1≤1 to >895.3/0.6/4.195.0/0.3/4.7
    Tigecycline0.250.50.06 to 498.6/1.4/0.095.1/3.5/1.4
    Colistin0.5>80.12 to >8−/−/−79.9/0.0/20.1
S. marcescens (1,260)
    Ceftazidime-avibactamc0.120.5≤0.03 to 1699.8c
    Ceftazidime0.250.50.03 to >3297.1/0.4/2.596.2/0.9/2.9
    Ceftriaxone0.252≤0.06 to >889.5/2.2/8.389.5/2.2/8.3
    Ampicillin-sulbactam32>321 to >327.9/15.2/76.97.9/0.0/92.1
    Piperacillin-tazobactam28≤0.5 to >6496.1/2.6/1.394.3/1.8/3.9
    Meropenem≤0.06≤0.06≤0.06 to >899.0/0.3/0.799.3/0.3/0.4
    Levofloxacin≤0.121≤0.12 to >495.7/2.2/2.192.7/3.0/4.3
    Gentamicin≤1≤1≤1 to >897.6/0.6/1.896.7/0.9/2.4
    Tigecycline0.510.12 to >498.9/0.9/0.294.9/4.0/1.1
    Colistin>8>80.25 to >8−/−/−6.0/0.0/94.0
KPC producers (120)d
    Ceftazidime-avibactamc0.251≤0.015 to >3297.5c
    Ceftazidime>32>324 to >322.5/2.5/95.00.0/2.5/97.5
    Ceftriaxone>8>88 to >80.0/0.0/100.00.0/0.0/100.0
    Aztreonam>16>1616 to >160.0/0.0/100.00.0/0.0/100.0
    Ampicillin-sulbactam>32>3232 to >320.0/0.0/100.00.0/0.0/100.0
    Piperacillin-tazobactam>64>6464 to >640.0/2.5/97.50.0/0.0/100.0
    Meropenem>8>81 to >81.7/5.8/92.57.5/28.3/64.2
    Levofloxacin>4>4≤0.12 to >410.8/1.7/87.59.2/1.6/89.2
    Gentamicin4>8≤1 to >851.7/11.6/36.745.0/6.7/48.3
    Tigecycline0.510.06 to 498.3/1.7/0.091.7/6.6/1.7
    Colistin0.580.25 to >8−/−/−83.1/0.0/16.9
CTX-M-15-like (284)d,e
    Ceftazidime-avibactamc0.250.5≤0.015 to 4100.0c
    Ceftazidime16>320.25 to >3212.6/12.7/74.72.8/9.8/87.4
    Ceftriaxone>8>84 to >80.0/0.0/100.00.0/0.0/100.0
    Aztreonam>16>160.25 to >168.1/4.2/87.72.1/6.0/91.9
    Ampicillin-sulbactam32>324 to >327.7/14.1/78.27.7/0.0/92.3
    Piperacillin-tazobactam8>64≤0.5 to >6474.9/14.5/10.656.9/18.0/25.1
    Meropenem≤0.06≤0.06≤0.06 to 897.9/0.3/1.898.2/1.8/0.0
    Levofloxacin>4>4≤0.12 to >414.0/3.9/82.112.3/1.7/86.0
    Gentamicin>8>8≤1 to >848.1/1.0/50.947.0/1.1/51.9
    Tigecycline0.120.50.03 to 499.3/0.7/0.095.4/3.8/0.7
    Colistin0.50.50.12 to >8−/−/−96.1/0.0/3.9
CTX-M-14-like (107)d,f
    Ceftazidime-avibactamc0.250.5≤0.015 to 0.5100.0c
    Ceftazidime280.06 to >3283.0/12.3/4.741.5/41.5/17.0
    Ceftriaxone>8>8>80.0/0.0/100.00.0/0.0/100.0
    Aztreonam8>16≤0.12 to >1648.1/27.4/24.511.3/36.8/51.9
    Ampicillin-sulbactam16>324 to >3233.0/22.7/44.333.0/0.0/67.0
    Piperacillin-tazobactam28≤0.5 to >6496.2/1.0/2.894.3/1.9/3.8
    Meropenem≤0.06≤0.06≤0.06 to 0.12100.0/0.0/0.0100.0/0.0/0.0
    Levofloxacin>4>4≤0.12 to >415.1/3.8/81.114.2/0.9/84.9
    Gentamicin≤1>8≤1 to >865.1/1.9/33.064.2/0.9/34.9
    Tigecycline0.120.250.06 to 499.1/0.9/0.096.2/2.9/0.9
    Colistin0.510.12 to >8−/−/−94.3/0.0/5.7
aThe most common species and β-lactamase-producing isolates (2013 only) were analyzed separately.
bPercentages of isolates susceptible (S), intermediate (I), and resistant (R) according to 2014 CLSI (9) and EUCAST (10) criteria. −, negative.
cA susceptible breakpoint of ≤8 μg/ml was applied as indicated by PK/PD target attainment simulation studies (11).
dThe KPC- and CTX-M-producing isolates analyzed were collected during 2013 only.
eIsolates also carrying genes encoding KPC or CTX-M-14-like enzymes were excluded from this analysis.
fIsolates also carrying genes encoding KPC or CTX-M-15-like enzymes were excluded from this analysis.

The highest ceftazidime-avibactam MIC result when tested against E. coli isolates (n = 6,468) was 4 μg/ml (1 isolate), and 99.9% of the isolates were inhibited at ≤1 μg/ml (Table 1). Ceftazidime-avibactam (MIC50, 0.06 μg/ml; MIC90, 0.12 μg/ml) displayed very good activity against this bacterial species, being the only agent as potent as meropenem (MIC50, ≤0.06 μg/ml; MIC90, ≤0.06 μg/ml) (Table 2). Ceftazidime alone (91.7% susceptible), piperacillin-tazobactam (95.5%), meropenem (99.8%), and tigecycline (100.0%) (Table 2) were the comparators showing the highest susceptibility rates against these isolates using the CLSI breakpoints. Ceftazidime-avibactam also displayed good activity against ESBL phenotype isolates (12.0% [n = 776]; MIC50, 0.12 μg/ml; MIC90, 0.25 μg/ml) (Table 1).

A total of 5,580 Klebsiella isolates were tested, including 4,421 K. pneumoniae and 1,159 K. oxytoca isolates. Ceftazidime-avibactam inhibited all K. oxytoca isolates and all but three K. pneumoniae isolates at a MIC of ≤8 μg/ml (Table 1). K. pneumoniae isolates displayed elevated resistance rates to the comparator agents tested, and the highest susceptibility rates applying the CLSI breakpoint criteria were those of tigecycline (99.3% susceptible), meropenem (93.2%), and gentamicin (91.3%) (Table 2). The CLSI ESBL phenotypic criteria were observed among 721 (16.3%) K. pneumoniae isolates, and 276 (6.2%) displayed meropenem-nonsusceptible MIC results (CLSI breakpoint criteria). Ceftazidime-avibactam displayed acceptable activity against these resistant subsets (MIC50/90, 0.25/1 and 0.5/2 μg/ml, respectively) (Table 1). K. oxytoca isolates were more susceptible to comparator agents than K. pneumoniae, and various agents were active against ≥90.0% of isolates (Table 2). A total of 119 K. oxytoca isolates exhibited the ESBL phenotype, and ceftazidime-avibactam was active against these isolates (MIC50, 0.25 μg/ml; MIC90, 1 μg/ml) (Table 1).

Ceftazidime-avibactam exhibited potent activity against P. mirabilis (1,626 isolates), with a MIC90 of 0.06 μg/ml and 99.9% of strains (1,625 of 1,626) inhibited at ≤0.5 μg/ml (Table 1). This cephalosporin–β-lactamase inhibitor combination was also very active against ESBL phenotype isolates (MIC50/90, 0.06/0.12 μg/ml) (Table 1). Only one isolate had a ceftazidime-avibactam MIC of >0.5 μg/ml (MIC, >32 μg/ml), and this isolate was highly resistant to all β-lactam agents tested (data not shown). Ceftazidime alone, piperacillin-tazobactam, and meropenem were very active against P. mirabilis isolates, inhibiting >98.0% of the isolates at the current CLSI breakpoints (Table 2).

Ceftazidime-avibactam was highly active against Enterobacter cloacae (2,261 isolates; MIC50 of 0.12 μg/ml and MIC90 of 0.5 μg/ml, with only one isolate not inhibited at ≤8 μg/ml), including ceftazidime-nonsusceptible strains (20.9%; MIC50, 0.12 μg/ml; MIC90, 0.5 μg/ml). The highest ceftazidime-avibactam MIC value among E. cloacae isolates was 32 μg/ml, representing one strain isolated from a urinary tract infection in a medical center located in New York City. This isolate was also resistant to meropenem (MIC, 8 μg/ml) and was negative for all carbapenemase-encoding genes tested, and no hydrolytic activity against carbapenems or ceftazidime was noted for this isolate. Ceftazidime-avibactam MIC values were slightly lower among Enterobacter aerogenes isolates (MIC50/90, 0.12/0.25 μg/ml) than E. cloacae isolates.

Only two Serratia marcescens isolates had ceftazidime-avibactam MIC values of >8 μg/ml (99.8% of isolates [1,258 of 1,260] inhibited at ≤8 μg/ml; MIC50/90, 0.12/0.5 μg/ml). The two isolates displaying a ceftazidime-avibactam MIC of 16 μg/ml displayed negative results for all carbapenemases tested and lack of hydrolysis for ceftazidime.

The ceftazidime-avibactam MIC90 was 0.12 μg/ml against Citrobacter koseri isolates, and 100.0% of the isolates tested (n = 503) were inhibited at ≤2 μg/ml (Table 1). Ceftazidime-avibactam MIC values were slightly higher among Citrobacter freundii isolates (MIC50/90, 0.12/0.5 μg/ml) compared to C. koseri isolates (MIC50/90, 0.06/0.12 μg/ml) (Table 1). One isolate had a ceftazidime-avibactam MIC value of 16 μg/ml, and this isolate carried no carbapenemase genes targeted and displayed no hydrolysis against ceftazidime.

Ceftazidime-avibactam exhibited potent activity against Proteus vulgaris, with a MIC90 of 0.06 μg/ml and the highest MIC at 0.5 μg/ml (Table 1). The activity of this β-lactam–β-lactamase inhibitor combination was also elevated against Morganella morganii isolates, and the MIC50 and MIC90 values were 0.06 and 0.12 μg/ml, respectively. All but one isolate were inhibited at a ceftazidime-avibactam MIC of ≤1 μg/ml.

A total of 99.6% of the Providencia isolates were inhibited at a ceftazidime-avibactam MIC of ≤8 μg/ml (Table 1), and this combination displayed MIC50 and MIC90 values of 0.12 and 0.5 μg/ml, respectively, when tested against these isolates. All 14 isolates displaying elevated ceftazidime-avibactam MIC values of 8 to 16 μg/ml were negative when screened for carbapenemase-encoding genes and displayed no hydrolytic activity against ceftazidime.

Occurrence of β-lactamase-producing isolates in 2013 and activity of ceftazidime-avibactam and comparators.

Among Enterobacteriaceae isolates from 2013 (n = 8,836), the CLSI epidemiological screening criteria for the ESBL phenotype (9) were observed among 743 isolates (12.5% of 5,943 isolates belonging to targeted species), including 368 E. coli isolates (12.3% of the overall samples for this species), 298 K. pneumoniae isolates (17.0%), 38 K. oxytoca isolates (8.0%), and 39 P. mirabilis isolates (5.7%). These isolates were screened against several common β-lactamase-encoding genes.

A total of 307 isolates were positive for CTX-M group 1 (here called “CTX-M-15-like” and including CTX-M-1, CTX-M-15, and CTX-M-3 among others), and this was the most prevalent β-lactamase detected. The CTX-M-15-like enzyme was detected among all four organisms. This β-lactamase was observed alone in 130 strains or in 14 combinations with 1 to 4 other β-lactamase-encoding genes/families, including KPC (10 isolates) (Table 3). Isolates harboring CTX-M-15-like β-lactamase-encoding genes without carbapenemases or other CTX-M groups (n = 284) displayed elevated MIC values for cephalosporins, but ceftazidime-avibactam was very active against these isolates (MIC50/90, 0.06/0.25 and 0.12/0.5 μg/ml, respectively). Meropenem (MIC50/90, ≤0.06/≤0.06 μg/ml), tigecycline (MIC50/90, 0.12/0.5 μg/ml), colistin (MIC50/90, 0.5/0.5 μg/ml), and ceftazidime-avibactam were the most active agents tested against these strains (Table 3).

TABLE 3

Enzymes alone and in combinations detected among isolates collected during 2013 in U.S. hospitalsa

β-Lactamase(s) and enzyme(s)No. of isolates producing enzyme(s) shown
TotalE. coliK. pneumoniaeK. oxytocaP. mirabilis
Carbapenemases
    KPC22
    KPC, CMY II, SHV WT, TEM WT22
    KPC, CTX-M group 1, CMY II, SHV WT, TEM WT11
    KPC, CTX-M group 1, SHV ESBL, SHV WT, TEM WT11
    KPC, CTX-M group 1, SHV WT55
    KPC, CTX-M group 1, SHV WT, TEM WT33
    KPC, FOX, TEM WT11
    KPC, SHV ESBL11
    KPC, SHV ESBL, SHV WT22
    KPC, SHV ESBL, SHV WT, TEM WT4242
    KPC, SHV WT1010
    KPC, SHV WT, TEM WT4444
    KPC, TEM WT6321
ESBLs
    CTX-M group 1130127111
    CTX-M group 1, CMY II11
    CTX-M group 1, CTX-M group 911
    CTX-M group 1, CTX-M group 9, TEM WT22
    CTX-M group 1, SHV ESBL33
    CTX-M group 1, SHV ESBL, SHV WT11
    CTX-M group 1, SHV ESBL, SHV WT, TEM WT33
    CTX-M group 1, SHV ESBL, TEM WT11
    CTX-M group 1, SHV WT2222
    CTX-M group 1, SHV WT, TEM WT5555
    CTX-M group 1, TEM WT786738
    CTX-M group 957552
    CTX-M group 9, SHV ESBL, SHV WT, TEM WT11
    CTX-M group 9, SHV WT44
    CTX-M group 9, SHV WT, TEM WT55
    CTX-M group 9, TEM ESBL11
    CTX-M group 9, TEM WT39354
    SHV ESBL853
    SHV ESBL, SHV WT3838
    SHV ESBL, SHV WT, TEM WT1111
    SHV ESBL, TEM WT422
    TEM ESBL11713
Transferable AmpC
    ACT/MIR, TEM WT11
    CMY II, SHV ESBL, SHV WT, TEM WT11
    CMY II, SHV ESBL, TEM WT11
    CMY II, SHV WT33
    CMY II, TEM WT25205
    CMY II20173
    DHA, SHV WT11
    FOX11
    FOX, SHV WT33
    FOX, TEM WT11
Narrow-spectrum enzymes
    SHV WT2424
    SHV WT, TEM WT22
    TEM WT18126
Negative results46151264
aCombinations were grouped according to the most relevant enzyme present.

KPC serine-carbapenemases were very prevalent, being observed among 120 isolates, most of them K. pneumoniae (113 isolates) (Table 3), but also including E. coli (5 isolates) and K. oxytoca (2 isolates). KPC-encoding genes were detected alone or in the presence of narrow-spectrum enzymes (SHV and/or TEM) in 62 isolates, and combinations with transferable cephalosporinases, CTX-M and SHV ESBL were also noted (Table 3). KPC producers were very resistant to all agents tested (Table 2), and ceftazidime-avibactam (MIC50/90, 0.5/2 μg/ml) and tigecycline (MIC50/90, 0.5/1 μg/ml) were the most active antimicrobial agents against these isolates. Colistin (MIC50/90, 0.5/8 μg/ml) displayed activity against 83.1% of the KPC-producing isolates according to EUCAST breakpoints. One KPC-producing isolate had ceftazidime-avibactam MIC result of >32 μg/ml, and further investigations demonstrated that this K. pneumoniae isolate produced KPC-2 and VIM-4. This isolate, belonging to sequence type 258 (ST258), also carried genes encoding CMY-2 and narrow-spectrum TEM and SHV and had overexpression of the efflux pump AcrAB-TolC and reduced expression of porin OmpK35- and OmpK37-encoding genes (M. Castanheira, L. M. Deshpande, J. C. Mills, R. N. Jones, S. G. Jenkins, and A. N. Schuetz, submitted for publication).

CTX-M group 9 enzymes and the CTX-M-14-like β-lactamase, the most common variant detected in U.S. hospitals within this group (6), were detected among 110 isolates: 94 E. coli, 10 K. pneumoniae, and 6 P. mirabilis isolates (Table 3). The CTX-M-14-like enzyme was the only β-lactamase detected among 57 isolates, and in 39 isolates, a combination of this enzyme and the TEM WT was observed (Table 3). Ceftazidime, piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem, and tigecycline inhibited >80% (83.0 to 100.0%) of the CTX-M-14-like enzyme-producing isolates according to the CLSI breakpoint criteria, and colistin inhibited 94.3% of the isolates when the EUCAST breakpoint was applied. Ceftazidime-avibactam (MIC50/90, 0.12/0.25 μg/ml; highest MIC, 0.5 μg/ml) displayed good activity against these strains (Table 2).

SHV enzymes with an extended spectrum of activity (SHV ESBLs) were detected among 118 isolates, and the vast majority of isolates (109/118) were K. pneumoniae (Table 3). SHV ESBL enzymes were found in all bacterial species, and SHV-12, SHV-5, SHV-7, SHV-2, and SHV-30 (in this order), are the most common SHV ESBL types reported in these U.S. hospitals (6). SHV ESBLs were detected in various combinations with other β-lactamases (Table 3). For the 61 isolates in which an SHV ESBL was the only extended-spectrum enzyme detected, meropenem (MIC50/90, ≤0.06/≤0.06 μg/ml), ceftazidime-avibactam (MIC50/90, 0.25/0.5 μg/ml) (Table 1), and tigecycline (MIC50/90, 0.25/1 μg/ml) were the most active agents (data not shown).

Transferable cephalosporinases (plasmidic AmpCs) were detected among 62 isolates, and 54 strains displayed a positive result for the CMY II probe (here, “CMY-2-like”; 39 E. coli, 7 K. pneumoniae and 8 P. mirabilis isolates) (Table 3). All CMY-2-like enzyme-positive isolates that did not carry carbapenemases or CTX-M enzymes (n = 48) were susceptible to meropenem and tigecycline (100.0% susceptible according to CLSI breakpoint criteria). Ceftazidime-avibactam (MIC50/90, 0.12/0.5 μg/ml) (Table 1), meropenem (MIC50/90, ≤0.06/0.12 μg/ml) (data not shown), and tigecycline (MIC50/90, 0.12/1 μg/ml) were the most active compounds against these isolates.

Other β-lactamases were also detected in smaller numbers, as follows: FOX (6 isolates), TEM ESBL (12 isolates), and one K. pneumoniae isolate each producing DHA and ACT/MIR. Additionally, narrow-spectrum enzymes of the SHV WT (all K. pneumoniae isolates [a ubiquitous enzyme in this species]) and TEM WT were detected among 284 and 348 isolates, respectively (Table 3). Forty-six strains had negative results for all β-lactamases tested. The majority of these β-lactamase-negative isolates were K. oxytoca isolates that might hyperproduce OXY (K1) and were not evaluated in this study, but E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and P. mirabilis isolates displaying borderline MIC values (≤2 μg/ml) for the β-lactams used for the ESBL screening criteria were also noted. Among these isolates displaying negative β-lactamase screening results, one P. mirabilis isolate had a ceftazidime-avibactam MIC of >32 μg/ml; this strain was isolated from an intraabdominal infection in a medical center located in West Roxbury, MA. Screening for all carbapenemases, including metallo-β-lactamases followed up by ceftazidime hydrolysis displayed negative results for the presence of β-lactamases (data not shown).

Enterobacteriaceae isolates are an important cause of infections, and production of β-lactamases, including ESBLs, transferable cephalosporinases, and carbapenemases among these organisms has become a matter of great concern (1, 2, 14) since in most instances these resistance determinants are disseminated by plasmids and other mobile genetic elements carrying resistance genes for other antimicrobial classes.

A high prevalence of CTX-M- and KPC-producing isolates has been noticed in certain areas of the United States, but ESBL phenotype rates and the occurrence of isolates producing these enzymes are very heterogeneous (6, 7). However, due to the constant dissemination of these isolates and transfer of patients among hospitals, treatment options for severe infections caused by these MDR organisms need to be available.

According to recent publications, ceftazidime-avibactam is expected to play a role in the empirical monotherapy of invasive infections suspected to be caused by resistant Enterobacteriaceae pathogens and also potentially as therapy of KPC-producing Enterobacteriaceae infection (14, 15). The in vitro results from this study support this prediction, since ceftazidime-avibactam demonstrated very good activity against most isolates in this large collection of Enterobacteriaceae isolates recovered over 3 years in over 70 hospitals throughout the country. Additionally, as demonstrated for isolates collected in 2012 (7), ceftazidime-avibactam was very active against recent isolates producing the most common β-lactamases detected in U.S. hospitals, including CTX-M and KPC variants. The potent Gram-negative spectrum of activity of ceftazidime-avibactam, including activity against resistant organisms, demonstrates that it warrants further study in difficult-to-treat serious infections where resistant Gram-negative bacteria may occur.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We wish to express our appreciation to the JMI staff members for scientific and technical assistance in performing this study.

This study performed at JMI Laboratories was supported by an Educational/Research grant from Forest/Cerexa, and JMI Laboratories received compensation fees for services in relation to preparing the manuscript, which was funded in part by this sponsor. JMI Laboratories, Inc., received research and educational grants in 2012 to 2014 from Achaogen, Actelion, Affinium, the American Proficiency Institute (API), AmpliPhi Bio, Anacor, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Basilea, BioVersys, Cardeas, Cempra, Cerexa, Cubist, Daiichi, Dipexium, Durata, Exela, Fedora, Forest Research Institute, Furiex, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, Medpace, Meiji Seika Kaisha, Melinta, Merck, Methylgene, Nabriva, Nanosphere, Novartis, Pfizer, Polyphor, Rempex, Roche, Seachaid, Shionogi, Synthes, The Medicines Co., Theravance, Thermo Fisher, Venatorx, Vertex, Waterloo, and Wockhardt.

Some JMI employees are advisors/consultants for Astellas, Cubist, Pfizer, Cempra, Cerexa-Forest, and Theravance. The authors of this study declare they have no conflicts of interest with regard to speaker's bureaus and stock options.

REFERENCES

1. Tacconelli E, Cataldo MA, Dancer SJ, De Angelis G, Falcone M, Frank U, Kahlmeter G, Pan A, Petrosillo N, Rodriguez-Bano J, Singh N, Venditti M, Yokoe DS, Cookson B, European Society of Clinical Microbiology. 2014. ESCMID guidelines for the management of the infection control measures to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in hospitalized patients. Clin Microbiol Infect 20(Suppl 1):1–55. 10.1111/1469-0691.12427. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
2. Sievert DM, Ricks P, Edwards JR, Schneider A, Patel J, Srinivasan A, Kallen A, Limbago B, Fridkin S, National Healthcare Safety Network Team and Participating NHSN Facilities. 2013. Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009-2010. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 34:1–14. 10.1086/668770. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
3. Schwaber MJ, Carmeli Y. 2007. Mortality and delay in effective therapy associated with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production in Enterobacteriaceae bacteraemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother 60:913–920. 10.1093/jac/dkm318. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
4. Shlaes DM. 2013. New β-lactam–β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in clinical development. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1277:105–114. 10.1111/nyas.12010. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
5. Zhanel GG, Lawson CD, Adam H, Schweizer F, Zelenitsky S, Lagace-Wiens PR, Denisuik A, Rubinstein E, Gin AS, Hoban DJ, Lynch JP III, Karlowsky JA. 2013. Ceftazidime-avibactam: a novel cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor combination. Drugs 73:159–177. 10.1007/s40265-013-0013-7. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
6. Castanheira M, Farrell SE, Deshpande LM, Mendes RE, Jones RN. 2013. Prevalence of β-lactamase encoding genes among Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia isolates collected in 26 U.S. hospitals: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2010). Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:3012–3020. 10.1128/AAC.02252-12. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
7. Castanheira M, Farrell SE, Krause KM, Jones RN, Sader HS. 2014. Contemporary diversity of β-lactamases among Enterobacteriaceae in the nine United States census regions and ceftazidime-avibactam activity tested against isolates producing the most prevalent β-lactamase groups. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:833–838. 10.1128/AAC.01896-13. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
8. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2012. M07-A9. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard, 9th ed Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
9. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2014. M100-S24. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: 24th informational supplement. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
10. EUCAST. 2014. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 4.0, January 2014. EUCAST, Basel, Switzerland: http://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints/. Accessed January 2014. [Google Scholar]
11. Cerexa. 2014. Ceftazidime-avibactam briefing package. NDA 206494. Division of Anti-Infective Products, Office of Antimicrobial Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/Drugs/Anti-InfectiveDrugsAdvisoryCommittee/UCM425458.pdf Accessed 8 January 2015. [Google Scholar]
12. Kaiser RM, Castanheira M, Jones RN, Tenover F, Lynfield R. 2013. Trends in Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-positive K. pneumoniae in US hospitals: report from the 2007-2009 SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 76:356–360. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.03.032. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
13. Bernabeu S, Poirel L, Nordmann P. 2012. Spectrophotometry-based detection of carbapenemase producers among Enterobacteriaceae. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 74:88–90. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.05.021. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
14. Lagace-Wiens P, Walkty A, Karlowsky JA. 2014. Ceftazidime-avibactam: an evidence-based review of its pharmacology and potential use in the treatment of Gram-negative bacterial infections. Core Evid 9:13–25. 10.2147/CE.S40698. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
15. Lee CS, Doi Y. 2014. Therapy of infections due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. Infect Chemother 46:149–164. 10.3947/ic.2014.46.3.149. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

Citations & impact 


Impact metrics

Jump to Citations
Jump to Data

Citations of article over time

Alternative metrics

Altmetric item for https://www.altmetric.com/details/3895953
Altmetric
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/3895953

Smart citations by scite.ai
Smart citations by scite.ai include citation statements extracted from the full text of the citing article. The number of the statements may be higher than the number of citations provided by EuropePMC if one paper cites another multiple times or lower if scite has not yet processed some of the citing articles.
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1128/aac.00163-15

Supporting
Mentioning
Contrasting
5
56
1

Article citations


Go to all (77) article citations

Data 


Similar Articles 


To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.