Abstract
Free full text
KAT2A coupled with the α-KGDH complex acts as a histone H3 succinyltransferase
Abstract
Histone modifications, such as the frequently occurring lysine succinylation1,2, are central to the regulation of chromatin-based processes. However, the mechanism and functional consequences of histone succinylation are unknown. Here we show that the α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase (α-KGDH) complex is localized in the nucleus in human cell lines and binds to lysine acetyltransferase 2A (KAT2A, also known as GCN5) in the promoter regions of genes. We show that succinyl-coenzyme A (succinyl-CoA) binds to KAT2A. The crystal structure of the catalytic domain of KAT2A in complex with succinyl-CoA at 2.3 Å resolution shows that succinyl-CoA binds to a deep cleft of KAT2A with the succinyl moiety pointing towards the end of a flexible loop 3, which adopts different structural conformations in succinyl-CoA-bound and acetyl-CoA-bound forms. Site-directed mutagenesis indicates that tyrosine 645 in this loop has an important role in the selective binding of succinyl- CoA over acetyl-CoA. KAT2A acts as a succinyltransferase and succinylates histone H3 on lysine 79, with a maximum frequency around the transcription start sites of genes. Preventing the α-KGDH complex from entering the nucleus, or expression of KAT2A(Tyr645Ala), reduces gene expression and inhibits tumour cell proliferation and tumour growth. These findings reveal an important mechanism of histone modification and demonstrate that local generation of succinyl-CoA by the nuclear α-KGDH complex coupled with the succinyltransferase activity of KAT2A is instrumental in histone succinylation, tumour cell proliferation, and tumour development.
Metabolic enzymes such as pyruvate kinase M2, fumarase, and pyruvate dehydrogenase complex translocate into the nucleus and have instrumental roles in the epigenetic regulation of gene expression and DNA repair3–5. KAT2A, a member of the GCN5-related N-acetyltransferase (GNAT) superfamily, was identified as a histone acetyltransferase (HAT) that binds to acetyl-CoA and transfers its acetyl group to histones6,7. Mass spectrometric analyses of immunoprecipitated KAT2A from human HEK-293 cells and U251 glioblastoma (GBM) cells identified several known KAT2A-associated proteins, such as histone H3, RAD50, and TAF6L (Supplementary Table 1); it also revealed that oxoglutarate dehydrogenase (OGDH) (Extended Data Fig. 1a), which is a component of the α-KGDH complex that catalyses the conversion of α-ketoglutarate (α-KG) to succinyl- CoA, interacts with KAT2A. In addition, immunoblotting analyses of immunoprecipitated endogenous KAT2A with antibodies against the three components of α-KGDH—OGDH, dihydrolipoyl succinyltransferase (DLST), and dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase (DLD)—revealed that these endogenous proteins were associated with each other (Fig. 1a). Cell fractionation (Fig. 1b, Extended Data Fig. 1b) and immunofluorescence (Extended Data Fig. 1c) analyses of U251 cells revealed that about 1–1.6% of total OGDH, DLST, and DLD was localized in the nucleus (Extended Data Fig. 1b). About 13–16% of nuclear α-KGDH bound to KAT2A (Extended Data Fig. 1d, top), whereas about 2.3% of KAT2A (Extended Data Fig. 1d, bottom), which was found in nuclei but not in mitochondria (Extended Data Fig. 1e, f), interacted with OGDH.
To determine which component of the α-KGDH complex binds to KAT2A, we depleted individual components of α-KGDH in U251 cells (Fig. 1c, top) and incubated an immunoprecipitated α-KGDH complex depleted of different components with purified His–KAT2A. Immunoblotting analyses demonstrated that OGDH depletion, which did not affect the interaction between DLST and DLD (Extended Data Fig. 1g), abolished the interaction between KAT2A and the DLST–DLD complex (Fig. 1c, bottom). By contrast, depletion of DLST or DLD had no effect on the binding of OGDH to KAT2A (Fig. 1c, bottom). Co-immunoprecipitation analyses showed that OGDH depletion disrupted the association of endogenous KAT2A with the DLST–DLD complex in U251 cells (Extended Data Fig. 1g). These results suggest that OGDH binds to KAT2A.
We next used NLStradamus software8 to analyse the amino acid sequences of OGDH, DLST, and DLD and found a putative nuclear localization sequence (NLS) in DLST. We mutated the Arg224 and Lys226 residues in the putative NLS into alanine and glutamic acid, respectively, and found that expression of the DLST(R224A/K226E) mutant reduced nuclear accumulation of the α-KGDH complex (immunofluorescence analyses, Extended Data Fig. 1h; cell fractionation, Fig. 1d and Extended Data Fig. 1i). These results indicate that Arg224 and Lys226 in the NLS of DLST are essential for nuclear translocation of the α-KGDH complex.
To understand the nuclear function of the α-KGDH complex, we investigated whether the nuclear α-KGDH complex, which generates succinyl-CoA, contributes to histone succinylation. As shown in Fig. 2a, expression of DLST(R224A/K226E), which did not alter α-KGDH activity (Extended Data Fig. 2a), total cellular levels of acetyl- CoA or succinyl-CoA (Extended Data Fig. 2b), or total cellular protein succinylation (Extended Data Fig. 2c), markedly reduced histone H3 succinylation in U251 cells. Given that KAT2A associated (Fig. 1a) and co-localized with α-KGDH and histone H3 (Extended Data Fig. 2d), we depleted KAT2A in U251 cells; this resulted in an approximately 35% reduction in histone H3 succinylation and substantial inhibition of histone H3 K9 and K14 acetylation (Fig. 2b). These results suggest that the nuclear α-KGDH complex and KAT2A are involved in histone H3 succinylation.
Because KAT2A binds to acetyl-CoA and acts as a histone acetyl transferase, we investigated whether KAT2A directly transfers the succinyl group of succinyl-CoA to histone H3. We performed an in vitro succinylation assay and showed that wild-type His–KAT2A, but not heat-inactivated His–KAT2A, succinylated histone H3 (Fig. 2c). Notably, KAT2A-mediated histone H3 succinylation was inhibited by CoA at high doses (Extended Data Fig. 2e). These results suggest that CoA competes with succinyl-CoA to bind to KAT2A and that the CoA group in succinyl-CoA is involved in its interaction with KAT2A.
To further understand KAT2A-mediated histone H3 succinylation, we crystallized the catalytic domain of KAT2A (residues 497–662) and its complex with succinyl-CoA. We obtained two crystal forms— P41212 and P213—for the apo and complex forms of KAT2A, respectively. The structures were analysed by molecular replacement with the known structure of the KAT2A–acetyl-CoA complex (Protein Data Bank ID: 1Z4R)9,10. To avoid model bias, we removed the acetyl-CoA moiety from the model for molecular replacement. We refined the final crystal structures to 2.9 Å resolution for the apo protein and 2.3 Å resolution for the complex (Extended Data Table 1). The overall structures of apo KAT2A and KAT2A–succinyl-CoA are similar to that of the KAT2A–acetyl-CoA complex, with root-mean-square deviations of 1.38 Å and 1.39 Å, respectively, for 163 common Cα atoms (Fig. 2d). Succinyl-CoA has a similar chemical structure to acetyl-CoA (Extended Data Fig. 2f) and uses its CoA moiety to bind to a deep hydrophobic pocket in KAT2A. Superimposition of the apo, succinyl-CoA-bound, and acetyl-CoA-bound structures of KAT2A demonstrated major differences in three loop regions (Fig. 2d). Notably, loop 2, which connects helices α 1 and α 2 (residues 530–535) was drawn closer to the binding pocket by about 2.2 Å upon binding of either acetyl-CoA or succinyl-CoA (Fig. 2d). Loop 3, which connects helix α 7 and strand β 7 (residues 639–648), can affect substrate specificity11,12. Compared with acetyl-CoA, succinyl-CoA makes additional Van der Waals interactions with side chains of M534, Y645, and A648 on KAT2A and forms hydrogen bonds with the side chain of Y645 and the main-chain carbonyl of Y613 (Extended Data Fig. 2g). In particular, the contacts made by the succinyl group with Y645 and A648 push loop 3 of KAT2A outward to a more distant location to accommodate the longer succinyl group (Fig. 2e). Loop 1, which connects helix α 1 and strand β 1 (residues 507–513), is distant from the active site of KAT2A (Fig. 2d). Because loop 1 is associated with high-temperature factors in all three structures, we consider this region inherently flexible. Therefore, structural variations in loop 1 do not necessarily correlate with substrate binding.
The contact between succinyl-CoA and loop 3 is closer than that between acetyl-CoA and loop 3 (Fig. 2e), suggesting that succinyl- CoA binds to KAT2A with a higher affinity than does acetyl-CoA. As expected, mixing purified KAT2A with purified histone H3 in the presence of equal amounts of succinyl-CoA and acetyl-CoA showed that succinyl-CoA markedly inhibited KAT2A-mediated H3K9 acetylation, whereas acetyl-CoA caused a much smaller decrease in KAT2A-mediated histone H3 succinylation (Extended Data Fig. 2h). In addition, we measured the velocity of enzyme-catalysed reaction at infinite concentration of substrate (Vmax) and Michaelis constant (Km) of the modification of histone H3 by KAT2A in the presence of succinyl-CoA or acetyl-CoA. The Km of KAT2A was lower towards succinyl-CoA than that towards acetyl-CoA, suggesting that KAT2A has a higher binding affinity for succinyl-CoA than for acetyl-CoA (Extended Data Fig. 2i). In addition, KAT2A succinylated histone H3 with a 20% higher velocity than that with which it acetylated histone H3 (Extended Data Fig. 2j). Disruption of the interaction between succinyl- CoA and Y645 in KAT2A by mutating Y645 to alanine reduced the binding ability and catalytic activity of KAT2A towards succinyl-CoA but not towards acetyl-CoA (Extended Data Fig. 2i). Consistent with these in vitro results, reconstituted expression of the KAT2A(Y645A) mutant in U251 cells with depleted endogenous KAT2A, which did not affect histone H3 K14 acetylation, reduced histone H3 succinylation when compared with reconstituted expression of wild-type KAT2A (Fig. 2f). These results indicate that Y645 in KAT2A binds specifically to succinyl-CoA and contributes to enhanced binding of KAT2A to succinyl-CoA.
By comparing the structure of the KAT2A–succinyl-coA complex to that of Tetrahymena thermophila KAT2A (ttKAT2A) in complex with a peptide-CoA bisubstrate13, we found that the succinyl group partially occupies the binding site of the lysine substrate (Extended Data Fig. 2g). Similar stereochemical conflicts were also noted in the structures of KAT2A in complex with propionyl-CoA and butyryl-CoA14. We hypothesize that during catalysis, the acyl chain flips from the binding pocket (Fig. 2d, e) into an alternative pocket in the enzymatic active site to accommodate the binding of a lysine substrate and allow subsequent lysine succinylation. KAT2A has two such alternative pockets that could potentially accommodate succinyl or an even longer acyl chain; one is surrounded by 643KDYEGA648 in loop 3, 575EI576 in β 4, and 612TY613 in β 5 (Extended Data Fig. 2k, magenta) whereas the other is surrounded by 531LPR534 in loop 2 and 614ADEYA618 in α 5 (Extended Data Fig. 2g, k, cyan). This situation is similar to that of EP30015 (also known as p300), a HAT from the GNAT superfamily that catalyses the transfer of acetyl and small hydrophobic acyl groups to histone H3. Although EP300 can use a few acyl-CoA groups, its activity gets weaker with increasing acyl chain length16, possibly owing to the size and hydrophobic nature of the flip pocket that excludes long-chain and charged acyl-CoA (for example, succinyl-CoA) variants. As expected, purified EP300 failed to catalyse H3 succinylation (Extended Data Fig. 2l).
We performed mass spectrometric analyses of KAT2A-succinylated histone H3 and found that H3K79 was succinylated (Extended Data Fig. 3a). H3K79 succinylation, which was also detected by a specific antibody (Extended Data Fig. 3b), was blocked by mutating K79 into arginine (Fig. 3a). Consistent with this finding, histone H3K79 succinylation was identified in U87 and U251 cells by immunoblotting (Fig. 3b) and mass spectrometric analyses (Extended Data Fig. 3c), and this succinylation was reduced by KAT2A depletion (Fig. 3b and Extended Data Fig. 3d), but not EP300 depletion (Extended Data Fig. 3e). However, quantification of succinyl-CoA and acetyl-CoA revealed that the nucleus contains much less succinyl-CoA than acetyl-CoA in both U87 and U251 cells (Extended Data Fig. 3f). Because KAT2A interacts with the α-KGDH complex in the nucleus, we hypothesized that succinyl-CoA generated by this complex serves as a local source of succinyl-CoA for KAT2A-dependent histone succinylation. To test this hypothesis, we performed an in vitro succinylation assay by mixing purified KAT2A, histone H3, NAD+, α-KG and CoA in the presence of immunoprecipitated wild-type OGDH or inactive OGDH(P459A/Y460A), which has lost its enzymatic activity (Extended Data Fig. 3g). We showed that only KAT2A coupled with wild-type OGDH succinylated H3K79 (Fig. 3c), and this succinylation was observed even in the presence of a high concentration of acetyl-CoA (Extended Data Fig. 3h). In addition, immunoprecipitated KAT2A from the nuclei of 293 cells expressing wild-type DLST but not DLST(R224A/K226E) succinylated purified histone H3 in the presence of α-KG and absence of exogenous succinyl-CoA (Extended Data Fig. 3i). Consistent with this finding, reconstituted expression of the DLST(R224A/K226E) mutant reduced H3K79 succinylation by about 70%, but did not reduce H3K9 or H3K14 acetylation (Fig. 3d). These results indicate that nuclear α-KGDH couples with KAT2A to mediate H3K79 succinylation.
KAT2A in the SPT–ADA–KAT2A–acetyltransferase (SAGA) complex functions as a HAT, and disruption of this complex inhibits histone acetylation6. Depletion of TAF9 RNA polymerase II, which is a core component of the human SAGA complex that is required for its function6, reduced acetylation of histone H3K9 and H3K14 without affecting succinylation of H3K79 (Extended Data Fig. 3j). Thus, in different complexes, KAT2A functions as either a HAT or a succinyltransferase.
To assess the chromatin occupancy of H3K79 succinylation and its correlation with KAT2A at a high resolution, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation–sequencing (ChIP–seq) assays. We identified 17,107 H3K79 succinylation-enriched peaks, 12,505 KAT2A-binding-enriched peaks, and 249 α-KGDH-binding-enriched peaks, which were widely distributed in the genome of U251 cells. Compared with the non-repetitive genome background, the ChIP–seq peaks for H3K79 succinylation (50.6%), KAT2A-binding (26.8%), and α-KGDH-binding (84.3%) were enriched in the gene promoter regions (Extended Data Fig. 3k), and the average distributions of H3K79 succinylation, KAT2A, and α-KGDH in the promoter regions were strongly enriched at transcription starting sites (TSSs) and adjacent regions within 2 kb (Fig. 3e). We identified 7,186 H3K79-succinylated (Supplementary Table 2), 1,868 KAT2A-binding (Supplementary Data Table 3), and 228 α-KGDH-binding (Supplementary Table 4) gene promoters (Extended Data Fig. 3l). Furthermore, 676 annotated gene promoter regions were occupied by both H3K79 succinylation and KAT2A (Supplementary Table 5); these regions represented 9.4% of H3K79 succinylation peaks and 36.2% of KAT2A-occupying peaks, suggesting that the binding of KAT2A to gene promoter regions for succinylation is transient and dynamic and that ChIP–seq analyses identify KAT2A-associated gene promoters only at the point when KAT2A binds to histone H3 (a similar situation also applies for α-KGDH). By contrast, H3K79 succinylation is relatively stable and can be accumulated. This assumption was supported by results showing that the purified KAT2A that was pulled down by immobilized and biotin-labelled nucleosome was dissociated from the immobilized nucleosome and succinylated K79 of histone H3 from purified and soluble nucleosomes (Extended Data Fig. 3m). A high percentage of α-KGDH-binding peaks (198 of 228, 86.8%) overlapped with peaks of H3K79 succinylation (Supplementary Table 6), suggesting that α-KGDH has a critical role in H3K79 succinylation. In addition, 59 (25.9%) of the α-KGDH-bounded-promoters were co-occupied by KAT2A (Supplementary Table 7), suggesting that α-KGDH and KAT2A dissociate from histone with differing dynamics. To further support the idea that KAT2A is instrumental in H3K79 succinylation, we showed that KAT2A depletion resulted in a 96% decrease in H3K79 succinylation-enriched gene promoters (Extended Data Fig. 3n, Supplementary Table 8).
We next used gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) to examine genes with H3K79 succinylation in their promoter regions for 1,329 canonical pathways defined from various databases. H3K79- succinylated genes were significantly enriched in 130 of 1,329 cell signalling pathways (P < 0.001, FDR q < 0.001) (Extended Data Fig. 4). Hypergeometric tests on RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data revealed that important cell signalling pathways, such as the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), activator protein 1 (AP1), and cell cycle pathways, were significantly suppressed by the expression of V5-tagged shRNA- resistant rDLST(R224A/K226E) (V5–rDLST(R224A/ K226E)) or Flag–rKAT2A(Y645A) mutants (P < 0.01, FDR q < 0.05) (Extended Data Fig. 5a–c). In addition, PIK3R1 (encoding PI3K regulatory subunit alpha, also known as p85α ), JUN (encoding c-Jun), and PRKDC (encoding DNA-dependent protein kinase, catalytic subunit, also known as DNA-PKcs) were among those genes with the most significantly changed expression, the most important regulators in the significantly enriched pathways (P < 0.01, FDR q < 0.05), or important hitches (critical genes involved in the function of multiple signalling pathways) between these pathways. KAT2A depletion significantly reduced succinylation in these selected gene promoter regions (P < 0.01) (Fig. 3f). Consistently, the mRNA (Extended Data Fig. 5d and 5e) and protein (Fig. 3g and 3h) expression of these genes in U87 cells was inhibited by reconstituted expression of Flag– rKAT2A(Y645A) or V5–rDLST(R224A/K226E). Similar inhibition was also observed in U251 cells (Extended Data Fig. 5f–i). Together, these results strongly suggest that the α-KGDH complex, associated with KAT2A in gene promoter regions, plays an instrumental role in the regulation of gene expression.
H3K79 succinylation occurred in 7,186 genes, and is therefore likely to affect many cellular activities and cell growth. Reconstituted expression of Flag–rKAT2A(Y645A) and V5–rDLST(R224A/K226E) inhibited proliferation of both U87 (Fig. 4a) and U251 (Extended Data Fig. 6a) cells. We then intracranially injected U87 cells with reconstituted expression of wild-type Flag–rKAT2A, Flag–rKAT2A(Y645A), wild-type V5–rDLST, or V5–rDLST(R224A/K226E) into athymic nude mice. Expression of the mutant proteins inhibited brain tumour growth (Fig. 4b and Extended Data Fig. 6b) and reduced expression of Ki67 (Fig. 4c and Extended Data Fig. 6c), p85α, DNA-PKcs, and c-Jun (Extended Data Fig. 6d) in tumour cells. Immunoblotting analyses of histone extracts from tumours expressing these mutants revealed a reduction in histone H3K79 succinylation but not in H3K9 or H3K14 acetylation (Fig. 4d, Extended Data Fig. 6e, f). These results support the importance of the nucleus-localized α-KGDH complex in brain tumour growth.
Histone modifications play critical roles in the regulation of gene expression6. We have shown that the α-KGDH complex interacts with KAT2A in the nucleus. This enables KAT2A to access the concentrated succinyl-CoA generated locally by the α-KGDH complex and thereby compensates for the low concentration of succinyl-CoA in the nucleus. Structural analyses demonstrated that the succinyl group of succinyl-CoA protrudes to the very end of a flexible loop 3 to interact specifically with Y645 in loop 3, leading to increased binding of succinyl-CoA (over acetyl-CoA) to KAT2A. The high binding affinity of succinyl-CoA and high local concentrations of succinyl-CoA generated by the KAT2A-associated α-KGDH complex facilitated histone succinylation in spite of the relatively low concentration of succinyl- CoA in the nucleus. Thus, KAT2A, as well as being a HAT, is also a histone succinyltransferase; these findings underscore the importance of the coupling of the metabolic enzyme complex α-KGDH and KAT2A for gene expression, tumour cell proliferation, and tumour formation.
METHODS
No statistical methods were used to predetermine sample size. The experiments were not randomized and the investigators were not blinded to allocation during experiments and outcome assessment, unless otherwise stated.
Materials
The antibodies used in the experiments are listed in Supplementary Table 9. DNase-free RNase A and propidium iodide were purchased from EMD Biosciences. PolyJet in vitro DNA transfection reagent was purchased from SignaGen Laboratories. Purified active full-length KAT2A was obtained from Cayman Chemicals. Bacterial purified human histone H3 protein was obtained from New England BioLabs. GelCode Blue Stain Reagent was obtained from Pierce. H3K79 (EIAQDFKTDLRFQ) and succinylated H3K79 (EIAQDFK[succinylated] TDLRFQ) peptides were obtained from Signallway Antibody. The in vitro assembled nucleosome containing biotin-labelled DNA was obtained from EpiCypher. The in vitro assembled nucleosome with His-histone H3 was obtained from BPS Bioscience.
Cell lines and cell culture conditions
Parental U87, U251, and 293 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. Parental U87 and U251 cell lines used in the experiments were authenticated by using short tandem repeat profiling. The cells were examined for mycoplasma contamination by using a Cycleave polymerase chain reaction (PCR) mycoplasma detection kit (Takara Bio). U87 and U251 GBM cells and 293 cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with 10% bovine calf serum (HyClone). Protein expression and reconstitution experiments were conducted using established stable cell lines.
DNA constructs and mutagenesis
PCR-amplified human OGDH, DLST, and DLD were cloned into pcDNA6V5HisB and pcDNA3.1/hygro(+ )-Flag vectors. A full-length KAT2A open reading frame was cloned into pcDNA3.1/hygro(+ )- Flag, pcDNA6V5HisB, and pET32a vectors. A full-length H3F3A (encoding histone H3.3) open reading frame was cloned into the pET32a vector. The pET28a-LIC–KAT2A core domain (encoding residues 47–210) was obtained from Addgene (plasmid #25482). pcDNA6V5HisB–DLST(R224A/K226E), pcDNA3.1/ hygro(+ )-Flag–KAT2A(Y645A), and pET32a–H3(K79R) were made by using a QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene).
A control pGIPZ vector was generated by using the control oligonucleotide GCTTCTAACACCGGAGGTCTT. pGIPZ KAT2A shRNA was generated with GCATTAAAGCAGCGTATC. pGIPZ OGDH shRNA was generated with CATCTACCACTTGCAATTA. A control pLKO-1 vector was generated with the control oligonucleotide CCGCAGGTATGCACGCGT. pLKO-1 OGDH (TRCN0000028580), DLST (TRCN0000344818), DLD (TRCN0000275684), and TAF9 (TRCN0000014568) shRNAs were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich.
Mass spectrometric analysis
To identify KAT2A-dependent succinylation of lysines on histone H3, an in vitro KAT2A-succinylated sample of purified histone H3 was exhaustively acetylated with acetic anhydride and triethylamine in acetonitrile, evaporated to dryness, and resuspended in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate buffer containing RapiGest (Waters Corporation). The sample was heated to 95 °C for 10 min and then allowed to cool; 100 ng of sequencing-grade modified trypsin (Promega) was then added to the sample. Digestion of the sample took place overnight at 37 °C and was analysed using LC–MS/MS with an Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Proteins were identified via a database search of the fragment spectra against the national Swiss-Prot protein database (European Bioinformatics Institute) by using the Mascot software program (version 2.3; Matrix Science) and the SEQUEST software program (version 1.20) via Proteome Discoverer (version 1.3; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Specific succinylated H3 lysine identification was conducted as described previously2.
To identify the KAT2A-interacting proteins, KAT2A and its interacting proteins were immunoprecipitated from U251 cells. The protein sample was heated to 95 °C in the presence of SDS–PAGE loading buffer for 10 min and then allowed to cool. The heated sample was loaded into and accumulated in an SDS–PAGE stacking gel via electrophoresis at 100 V for 5 min. Gel band samples were subjected to in-gel digestion, as described previously3, and then analysed using LC–MS/MS with an Orbitrap Fusion Tribrid mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) interfaced with a Dionex UltiMate 3000 Binary RSLCnano System. The raw data files were processed using the Proteome Discoverer software program (version 1.4), and the International Protein Index database was searched for spectra by using the Mascot software program (version 2.3.02) on an in-house server. Search results were trimmed to a 1% false discovery rate using the Percolator algorithm (Matrix Science).
Transfection
Cells (4 × 105) were cultured in a 60-mm dish for 18 h and then transfected using PolyJet in vitro DNA transfection reagent (SignaGen Laboratories) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Nuclear fractionation analysis
Nuclei from U87 or U251 cells were obtained using a Nuclei Pure Prep Nuclei Isolation Kit from Sigma-Aldrich according to the manufacturer’s guidelines.
Histone extraction
Cells were collected and washed twice with ice-cold PBS, then resuspended in triton extraction buffer (TEB: PBS containing 0.5% Triton X-100 (v/v), 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), 0.02% (w/v) NaN3) at a cell density of 107 cells per ml. Cells were then lysed on ice for 10 min with gentle stirring and centrifuged at 2,000 r.p.m. for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was removed and discarded. The cells were washed with TEB and centrifuged as before, and then the pellet was resuspended in 0.2 N HCl at a cell density of 4 × 107cells per ml. Histones were acid extracted overnight at 4 °C. Then, samples were centrifuged at 2,000 r.p.m. for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was removed and protein content determined using the Bradford assay, and pH was neutralized by adding 10% (v/v) 2 M NaHCO3. Aliquots were stored at − 20 °C.
Immunofluorescent microscopic analysis
Cells were seeded on coverslips 24 h before fixation for immunofluorescent assays. The cells were washed three times in PBS (5 min per wash) and then fixed and permeabilized in a freshly prepared mixture of methanol and acetone (80:20) for 10 min at − 20 °C. The cells were then washed three times in cold PBS as before. Cells were blocked for 1 h in a blocking solution (3% bovine serum albumin and 1% horse serum) at 25 °C. Primary antibodies diluted at 1:100 in a blocking solution were added and the mixture was incubated overnight at 4 °C. The cells were again washed three times in PBS. Secondary antibodies diluted at 1:2,000 in a blocking solution were added and the mixture incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Once more, the cells were washed three times in PBS. ProLong Gold antifade reagent with DAPI medium was added. The slides containing the cells were allowed to sit for 10 min in the dark. The coverslips were sealed with a nail hardener. Immunofluorescent microscopic images of the cells were obtained and viewed with an IX81 confocal microscope system (Olympus America).
Cell proliferation assay
A total of 5 × 104 cells were plated and counted 9 days after seeding in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium with 10% bovine calf serum. Data are presented as the means ± s.d. from three independent experiments.
Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting analysis
Proteins were extracted from cultured cells using a modified buffer, and immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting analyses with corresponding antibodies were performed as described previously3. A lysis buffer with 0.2% Triton X-100 was used for immunoprecipitation of Flag-rKAT2A expressed in HEK-293 cells. The peptide of H3K79 (EIAQDFKTDLRFQ) was added in the antibody to histone H3K79 succinylation (5 μg ml−1) to further enhance the specificity. The intensities of immunoblotting analyses were measured using ImageJ software.
Expression and purification of recombinant proteins
Full-length His–KAT2A and the His–KAT2A catalytic domain were expressed in BL21 strain of Escherichia coli. The cultures grew at 37 °C to an optical density (at a wavelength of 600 nm) of about 0.6 and were then treated with 0.5 mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at 18 °C. Cell pellets were collected, resuspended in BugBuster lysis buffer (EMD Millipore) with a supplement of cocktail proteinase inhibitors and DNase I, and processed using sonication. Soluble His-tagged proteins were purified by using the ÄKTA system with 5 ml of a HisTrap column (GE Healthcare Life Sciences), as described previously9. The protein purity was identified via gel staining with GelCode Blue Staining.
Crystallization and structure determination
The purified recombinant KAT2A catalytic domain was dialysed with 20 mM HEPES-NaOH (pH 7.5) and 150 mM NaCl and concentrated to 4 mg ml−1 for crystallization. For co-crystallization, 10 mM succinyl-CoA was added to the protein solution. Prism-shaped crystals appeared within 1 day in hanging drops containing 1.5 μl protein solution and 0.5 μl mother liquor (in 0.1 M sodium acetate, pH 4.6, and 1.4 M ammonium sulphate or 0.5 M lithium chloride and 1.2 M ammonium sulphate). Crystals usually grew to full size within 7 days. KAT2A crystals were frozen in mother liquor substituted with 25% glycerol. X-ray diffraction data on the crystals were collected at 77 K by the Life Sciences Collaborative Access Team at the Advanced Photon Source. Data for the apo structure were collected at a wavelength of 0.97872 Å at Beamline 21-ID-F; data for the succinyl-CoA complex were collected at a wavelength of 0.97857 Å at Beamline 21-ID-G. One crystal was used for each structure, and values in parentheses (Extended Data Table 1) are for highest-resolution shell. Diffraction images were processed using HKL-2000 software. For structure determination, the human KAT2A–acetyl-CoA complex structure (Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics (RCSB) Protein Data Bank ID: 1Z4R) was used for molecular replacement. The acetyl-CoA ligand was removed from the model to reduce model bias. Molecular replacement was calculated using the Phaser software program in the PHENIX software suite17. The structure models were then manually adjusted using the Coot software program18 and refined using PHENIX. The final coordinates of apo KAT2A have a MolProbity overall score of 1.80 and a clash score of 12.23, with 96.79% favoured, 3.21% allowed and no outlier in the Ramachandran plot, 0.32% rotamer outlier and no Cβ deviation. The final coordinates of succinyl- CoA complex have a MolProbity overall score of 1.40 and a clash score of 7.08, with 98.64% favoured, 1.36% allowed and no outlier in the Ramachandran plot, no rotamer outlier or Cβ deviation. Structure figures were prepared using the PyMOL molecular graphics system (version 1.2r3pre). The coordinates have been deposited at the RCSB Protein Data Bank under accession numbers 5TRM and 5TRL for the apo and succinyl-CoA structures, respectively.
In vitro α-KGDH enzymatic activity assay
Immunoprecipitated Flag-tagged α-KGDH from 293 cells was incubated with the α-KGDH buffer (50 mM MOPS HCl, pH 7.4, 0.2 mM MgCl2, 0.01 mM CaCl2, 0.3 mM cocarboxylase, 0.12 mM CoA, 2 mM β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, 2.6 mM l-cysteine) and 5 mM α-ketoglutarate at 30 °C for 30 min. At the end of the reaction, 10 U diaphorase and 20 μM resazurin were added to generate a fluorescent signal in proportion to the amount of NADH generated by α-KGDH. The α-KGDH enzyme activity was measured via direct coupling of the NADH production with conversion of resazurin to resorufin by diaphorase. Resorufin was measured fluorometrically at an excitation wavelength of 544 nm and emission wavelength of 590 nm. Data are presented as the means ± s.d. of three independent experiments.
In vitro histone H3 succinylation assay
To analyse KAT2A-catalysed histone H3 succinylation, we incubated purified wild-type His–histone H3 or His–histone H3(K79R) with purified full-length active KAT2A in the presence of HAT buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 50 mM KCl, 5% glycerol, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM PMSF, 10 mM sodium butyrate) and 2 μM succinyl-CoA at 37 °C for 10 min. Histone H3 succinylation was determined by using immunoblotting analysis.
To analyse α-KGDH-dependent histone H3 succinylation, we incubated the immunoprecipitated Flag-tagged OGDH from 293 cells with purified wild-type histone H3, full-length active KAT2A, and 5 mM α-ketoglutaric acid in the presence of α-KGDH buffer (50 mM MOPS HCl, pH 7.4, 0.2 mM MgCl2, 0.01 mM CaCl2, 0.3 mM cocarboxylase, 0.12 mM CoA, 2 mM β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, 2.6 mM l-cysteine) at 30 °C for 30 min. Histone H3 succinylation was determined with use of immunoblotting analysis.
To analyse nuclear α-KGDH–KAT2A complex-dependent histone H3 succinylation, we transfected the vector expressing wild-type Flag–rKAT2A with the vector expressing wild-type V5–rDLST or the V5–rDLST NLS mutant. The nuclear α-KGDH–KAT2A complex was immunoprecipitated with anti-Flag agarose beads. Purified wild-type histone H3, nuclear α-KGDH–KAT2A complex, and 5 mM α-ketoglutaric acid were incubated in the presence of α-KGDH buffer at 30 °C for 3 h. Histone H3 succinylation was determined by using immunoblotting analysis.
Steady-state kinetics of KAT2A activity for histone H3 modifications
Immunoprecipitated full-length Flag–KAT2A from 293 cells was immobilized on anti-Flag-agarose beads and incubated with purified histone H3 (4 μM) in HAT buffer in the presence of 0.009 μM, 0.027 μM, 0.082 μM, 0.247 μM, 0.741 μM, 2.222 μM, 6.667 μM, or 20.000 μM of acetyl-CoA or succinyl-CoA at 25 °C for 5 min. The reaction mixture was precipitated via centrifugation at 1,000g for 5 min. The production of CoA in the supernatant was quantitatively analysed using a modified protocol from the PicoProbe Acetyl-CoA Fluorometric Assay Kit (BioVision). In brief, 25 μl supernatant was mixed with 1 μl PicoProbe, 1 μl acetyl-CoA substrate mix, 2.5 μl acetyl-CoA enzyme mix, and 20.5 μl acetyl-CoA assay buffer. The CoA can react to form NADH, which interacts with OicoProbe to generate fluorescence (Ex/Em = 535/587 nm). An identical reaction was set up for each acetyl-CoA or succinyl-CoA titration without KAT2A protein and used as the blank control. Data are presented as the means ± s.d. of three independent experiments.
Quantitative analysis of nuclear succinyl-CoA and acetyl-CoA
The nuclei were obtained from U251 and U87 cells and analysed using LC–MS/MS. In brief, nuclear extracts were processed for protein precipitation followed by solid-phase extraction. Fifteen per cent trichloroacetic acid (TCA) in water was applied to remove proteins and other interference substances from the nuclear samples. The supernatant was subsequently transferred to a Waters HLB solid-phase extraction cartridge for further sample clean-up. The final reconstitution samples were injected into a Gemini C6-phenyl 100 × 4.6 mm 3 μM high-performance liquid chromatography column (Phenomenex). The mobile phase consisted of ammonium acetate and acetic acid in both aqueous and organic phases. Data acquisition was performed using a 6460 Series Triple Quadrupole LC/MS (Agilent Technologies) via multiple reaction mode (MRM) electrospray positive mode.
Quantitative real-time PCR
Total RNA of cells was extracted using an RNeasy Plus Kit (QIAGEN). cDNA was prepared using a High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems). Quantitative real-time PCR analysis was performed by using 2 × iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad) in the following conditions: 5 min at 95 °C, and then 40 cycles at 95 °C for 30 s, 58 °C for 20 s, and 72 °C for 15 s using a Bio-Rad CFX96 Real-Time System. Data were normalized according to expression of a control gene (ACTB) in each experiment. The data are presented as the means ± s.d. from three independent experiments.
The following primer pairs were used for quantitative real-time PCR: PIK3R1, 5′-GGGTGAAGCTCGTGTGTGGA-3′ (forward) and 5′-GTGTGACCGAAGAC AGGGCT-3′ (reverse); JUN, 5′-TCTGGGAAGTGAGTTCGCCT-3′ (forward) and 5′-ATGCCTCCCGCACTCTTACT-3′ (reverse); PRKDC, 5′-AGGCGGCT TACCTGAGTGAT-3′ (forward) and 5′-CACGAAGGCCCGCTTTAAGA-3′ (reverse); and ACTB, 5′-CATCGAGCACGGCATCGTCA-3′ (forward) and 5′-TAGCACAGCCTGGATAGCAAC-3′ (reverse).
ChIP and ChIP–seq assay
ChIP was performed using a SimpleChIP Enzymatic Chromatin IP Kit (Cell Signaling Technology). Chromatin prepared from cells in a 15-cm dish was used to determine total DNA input and was incubated overnight with specific antibodies or normal rabbit IgG. The following primer pairs were used for candidate gene promoter region validation: PIK3R1, 5′ - CCGGCGTCCTGTGAG ATCC -3′ (forward) and 5′-GCAACTCCGGGGGCAAATG-3′ (reverse); JUN, 5′-AGTTCAACAACCGGTGCGAG-3′ (forward) and 5′-AGAGTCCCGGA GCCAACTTT-3′ (reverse); and PRKDC, 5′-GGAGCCGGTGTGCGTTG-3′ (forward) and 5′-GGCCGCGGATCAGTTGATGA-3′ (reverse).
ChIP sequencing was performed at the Sequencing and Microarray Facility at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. In brief, indexed libraries were prepared from 20 ng Bioruptor-sheared (Diagenode) ChIP DNA using a Hyper Library Preparation Kit (Kapa Biosystems). The libraries were amplified using three cycles of PCR and then assessed for quality using a Fragment Analyzer High Sensitivity NGS Fragment Analysis Kit (Advanced Analytical Technologies) and quantified using a Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The indexed libraries were pooled at three libraries per pool and sequenced in one lane of a HiSeq2000 Sequencer (Illumina) using the 36-nt single-read configuration.
RNA-seq
Total RNA was extracted from cells using a PureLinkTM RNA Mini Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Illumina compatible libraries were prepared using the KAPA Stranded mRNA-Seq Library Preparation Kit for Illumina platforms (KAPA Biosystems). In brief, 250 ng total RNA was enriched for poly-A-tailed mRNA using Kapa’s mRNA Capture beads. Poly-A-enriched RNA was fragmented to a median size of 150 bp using chemical fragmentation and converted into double- stranded cDNA with dUTP incorporated into the second cDNA strand. The ends of the double-stranded cDNA were polished, 5′-phosphorylated, and 3′-A-tailed for the ligation of indexed adaptors. Adaptor-ligated DNA fragments were amplified by eight cycles of PCR. The strand with incorporated dUTP was not amplified. The resulting libraries were quantified by qPCR and assessed for size distribution using the 4200 TapeStation (Agilent Technologies), and then multiplexed (four per pool) and sequenced on the Illumina’s NextSeq500 using the mid-output, 75-bp paired-end read format.
Analyses of RNA-seq and ChIP–seq data
We used a series of cutoffs to analyse the RNA-seq and ChIP–seq data and selected the genes that met the following two criteria: 1) expression that was significantly altered by either KAT2A(Y645A) or DLST(R224A/K226E) mutant expression (P < 0.05 and FDR q < 0.1 in the RNA-seq data); and 2) enriched H3K79 succinylation in promoter regions (fold enrichment > 2 and FDR q < 0.1 in the ChIP–seq data).
Gene set enrichment and pathway analyses
GSEA of the results from next-generation sequencing data was performed using GSEA v2.2.3 software with the gene lists for 1,329 canonical pathways in collection C2.CP from Molecular Signature Database (MSigDB) V5.2. Both the GSEA software and the MSigDB are maintained by the Broad Institute. Collection C2.CP includes curated pathway maps from multiple established pathway databases, including REACTOME, KEGG, BIOCARTA, PANTHER and Pathway Interaction Database (PID).
GSEA of the ChIP–seq data was based on the fold-enrichment (FE) measurement for 20,338 genes by using the ‘GSEA preranked’ option.
GSEA results were visualized using the EnrichmentMap v2.0.1 plugin in the Cytoscape v3.2.1 network visualization platforms.
Hypergeometric tests were used to identify pathways enriched with significantly altered genes. We used the ConsensusPathDB-human (CPDB) platform developed at the Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, which contains 5,068 canonical pathways defined in 12 public sources (including KEGG, REACTOME, BIOCARTA, PID, WikiPathways, and NetPath).
The hypergeometric distribution
Intracranial injection
U87 cells (5 × 105) with or without modified gene expression were intracranially injected into female 4-week-old athymic nude mice (in 5 μl of Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium per mouse), as described3. Five mice were randomly grouped before tumour cell injection. The mice were killed 30 days after injection. The brains were removed, fixed in 4% formaldehyde, and embedded in paraffin. Tumour formation was determined by haematoxylin and eosin staining. Tumour volume was calculated by 0.5 × L2 × W.
Mice were monitored for signs of tumour burden, including weight loss, laboured breathing, hunched posture, and abnormal vocalization when handled. If mice exhibited any indication of these signs, they were killed together with other experimental mice. Otherwise, all mice were killed 30 days after injection. The use of animals was approved by the Institutional Review Board of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Immunohistochemical analysis
Mouse tumour samples were fixed, paraffin-embedded, sectioned (5 μm), and stained with Mayer’s haematoxylin and eosin (BioGenex Laboratories). Slides were then mounted using universal mount (Research Genetics) and examined with a light microscope.
Sections of paraffin-embedded xenograft tissue were stained with antibodies against telomerase or Ki67 or with nonspecific IgG as a negative control. The immunohistochemical staining was performed using a VECTASTAIN ABC kit (Vector Laboratories) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Statistical analysis
The significance of differences in the experimental data was determined using Student’s t-test (two-tailed) unless specifically indicated. Differences in means were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05. The P and FDR q values in the GSEA were obtained from 1,000 permutations19.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request. The ChIP–seq and RNA-seq data have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) with the accession numbers GSE97994 (ChIP–seq data) and GSE98050 (RNA-seq data). The crystal structural coordinates were deposited at the RCSB Protein Data Bank (PDB ID 5TRM and 5TRL for the apo and succinyl-CoA structures, respectively).
Extended Data
Extended Data Figure 1
Extended Data Figure 2
Extended Data Figure 3
Extended Data Figure 4
Extended Data Figure 5
Extended Data Figure 6
Extended Data Table 1
Apo (PDB ID: 5TRM) | succinyl-CoA complex (PDB ID: 5TRL) | |
---|---|---|
Data collection | ||
Space group | P41212 | P213 |
Cell dimensions | ||
a, b, c (Å) | 173.474, 173.474, 347.637 | 175.728, 175.728, 175.728 |
α, β, γ(°) | 90, 90, 90 | 90, 90, 90 |
Resolution (Å) | 50-2.9 (2.95-2.9) | 50-2.3 (2.34-2.3) |
Rmerge | 12.0 (56.1) | 14.6 (99.8) |
I/σ(I) | 15.1 (2.7) | 28.1 (2.4) |
Completeness (%) | 99.7 (100) | 100 (99.9) |
Redundancy | 6.2 (5.6) | 21.5 (12.8) |
Refinement | ||
Resolution (Å) | 48.2-2.90 (2.93-2.90) | 30.1-2.30 (2.33-2.30) |
Unique reflections | 117236 (11588) | 80101 (7952) |
Rwork/Rfree | 21.5/27.3 | 19.7/21.3 |
No. atoms | ||
Protein | 31738 | 10537 |
Ligand/ion | N/A | 440 (succinyl-CoA) |
(specify/describe) | ||
Water | N/A | 599 |
B factors | ||
Protein | 32.53 | 34.03 |
Ligand/ion | N/A | 43.85 |
Water | N/A | 39.93 |
R.m.s. deviations | ||
Bond lengths (Å) | 0.009 | 0.004 |
Bond angles (°) | 0.867 | 0.776 |
One crystal was used for each structure. Values in parentheses are for highest-resolution shell.
Supplementary Material
supplementary information 1
supplementary table 1
supplementary table 2
supplementary table 3
supplementary table 4
supplementary table 5
supplementary table 6
supplementary table 7
supplementary table 8
supplementary table 9
Acknowledgments
We thank L. Li at the University of Texas Health Science at Houston for technical support and D. Norwood and T. Locke for critical reading of this manuscript. This work was supported by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke grant R01 NS089754 (Z.L.), National Cancer Institute grants 2R01 CA109035 (Z.L.), R01 CA169603 (Z.L.), MD Anderson Support Grant P30CA016672, Welch Foundation grant C-1565 (Y.J.T.), and the National Institutes of Health Brain Cancer Specialized Program of Research Excellence (2P50 CA127001). Z.L. is a Ruby E. Rutherford Distinguished Professor.
Footnotes
Supplementary Information is available in the online version of the paper.
Online Content Methods, along with any additional Extended Data display items and Source Data, are available in the online version of the paper; references unique to these sections appear only in the online paper.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Readers are welcome to comment on the online version of the paper.
Author Contributions Z.L., Y.J.T., D.X., and Y.W. conceived and designed the study and wrote the manuscript. Y.W., R.L., Y.X., Y.Z., and J.L. performed the biochemistry experiments to identify the succinyltransferase activity of KAT2A. Y.R.G., Y.W., and Y.J.T. generated co-crystal structures of KAT2A and Co-enzyme A analogues. Z.Y. and K.L. performed bioinformatics analyses. L.T. and P.Y. performed quantification analyses of acetyl-CoA and succinyl-CoA in cells. X.L. identified the nuclear localization sequence on DLST. X.Q. performed animal tissue studies. D.H. identified KAT2A-mediated histone H3 succinylation residue. P.Y., J.-H.L., D.X., J.L., and J.H. provided technical support.
References
Full text links
Read article at publisher's site: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25003
Read article for free, from open access legal sources, via Unpaywall: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5841452
Citations & impact
Impact metrics
Citations of article over time
Alternative metrics
Article citations
Up-regulated succinylation modifications induce a senescence phenotype in microglia by altering mitochondrial energy metabolism.
J Neuroinflammation, 21(1):296, 14 Nov 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 39543710 | PMCID: PMC11566524
Bioinformatics analysis of PSAT1 loss identifies downstream pathways regulated in EGFR mutant NSCLC and a selective gene signature for predicting the risk of relapse.
Oncol Lett, 29(1):9, 17 Oct 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 39512505 | PMCID: PMC11542166
Acetylation, ADP-ribosylation and methylation of malate dehydrogenase.
Essays Biochem, 68(2):199-212, 01 Oct 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 38994669 | PMCID: PMC11451102
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
Electro-acupuncture Suppresses Ferroptosis to Alleviate Cerebral Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury Through KAT3B-Mediated Succinylation of ACSL4.
Appl Biochem Biotechnol, 28 Sep 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 39340629
Molecular architecture of the mammalian 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex.
Nat Commun, 15(1):8407, 27 Sep 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 39333186 | PMCID: PMC11436768
Go to all (223) article citations
Data
Data behind the article
This data has been text mined from the article, or deposited into data resources.
BioStudies: supplemental material and supporting data
GEO - Gene Expression Omnibus (2)
- (1 citation) GEO - GSE98050
- (1 citation) GEO - GSE97994
Protein structures in PDBe (4)
-
(3 citations)
PDBe - 1Z4RView structure
-
(3 citations)
PDBe - 5TRLView structure
-
(3 citations)
PDBe - 5TRMView structure
-
(1 citation)
PDBe - 1M1DView structure
Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
KAT2A succinyltransferase activity-mediated 14-3-3ζ upregulation promotes β-catenin stabilization-dependent glycolysis and proliferation of pancreatic carcinoma cells.
Cancer Lett, 469:1-10, 11 Oct 2019
Cited by: 40 articles | PMID: 31610265
The Acyl-CoA Specificity of Human Lysine Acetyltransferase KAT2A.
Biochemistry, 61(17):1874-1882, 22 Aug 2022
Cited by: 7 articles | PMID: 35995428 | PMCID: PMC9454090
Molecular Basis of KAT2A Selecting Acyl-CoA Cofactors for Histone Modifications.
Research (Wash D C), 6:0109, 04 Apr 2023
Cited by: 1 article | PMID: 37040526 | PMCID: PMC10076270
Compartmentalised acyl-CoA metabolism and roles in chromatin regulation.
Mol Metab, 38:100941, 14 Feb 2020
Cited by: 112 articles | PMID: 32199817 | PMCID: PMC7300382
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
Funding
Funders who supported this work.
NCI NIH HHS (4)
Grant ID: P50 CA127001
Grant ID: R01 CA109035
Grant ID: P30 CA016672
Grant ID: R01 CA169603
NHGRI NIH HHS (1)
Grant ID: U54 HG007990
NINDS NIH HHS (1)
Grant ID: R01 NS089754