Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Rho family GTPases serve as molecular switches, transducing signals from the extracellular environment to elicit cellular responses such as changes in gene expression, morphology, and migration (Hall, 1998; Sastry and Burridge, 2000). Of the 14 known Rho proteins, Cdc42, Rac1, and RhoA are the most thoroughly characterized (Takai et al., 2001). Each of these GTPases contributes to cell motility by stimulating rearrangements in the actin cytoskeleton. Cdc42 and Rac1 stimulate the formation of filopodia and lamellipodia, respectively (Ridley et al., 1992; Kozma et al., 1995; Nobes and Hall, 1995). Both of these protrusive structures allow cells to extend into new areas. Accordingly, filopodia and lamellipodia are commonly found along the circumference of spreading cells and at the leading edge of migrating cells (Hall, 1998). In addition, Cdc42 is necessary for the establishment of polarity (Nobes and Hall, 1999; Erickson and Cerione, 2001).

Active RhoA stimulates the formation of focal adhesions and stress fibers (Ridley and Hall, 1992). Induction of these structures is thought to occur via the concerted activities of the RhoA effectors Dia and Rho kinase/ROCK/ROK but may involve other targets (Kimura et al., 1996; Watanabe et al., 1999). Rho kinase stimulates myosin-based contractility by directly and indirectly elevating phosphorylation of the regulatory myosin light chain (Kaibuchi et al., 1999). The resulting activation of myosin triggers myosin filament formation and bundling of filamentous actin into stress fibers. The tension exerted by stress fibers is responsible for the maturation of focal complexes into focal adhesions by aggregating integrins and their associated proteins (Chrzanowska-Wodnicka and Burridge, 1996). Precise regulation of RhoA is crucial for efficient cell migration. Although some RhoA activity is required for migration, possibly to maintain sufficient adhesion to the substrate, high RhoA activity inhibits movement (Takaishi et al., 1994; Ridley et al., 1995; Nobes and Hall, 1999).

Because Rho proteins are involved in dynamic cellular processes, such as migration, their activity is tightly controlled by both positive and negative regulators (Van Aelst and D'Souza-Schorey, 1997). These GTPases are activated by guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs), which catalyze the release of GDP, allowing GTP to bind and thereby activate the proteins. Rho proteins return to an inactive state upon hydrolysis of GTP to GDP, a reaction that is potentiated by GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs). Rho GTPases are also regulated by guanine nucleotide disassociation inhibitors, which extract Rho proteins from the plasma membrane (Olofsson, 1999). Deciphering how extracellular signals alter the activity of GEFs, GAPs, and guanine nucleotide disassociation inhibitors is critical to understanding the regulation of Rho family GTPases. Originally it was postulated that adhesion was necessary, but not sufficient, for activation of RhoA (Hotchin and Hall, 1995). Subsequent studies demonstrated that adhesion to fibronectin or integrin engagement with arginine, glycine, and aspartic acid (RGD)-containing peptides is sufficient for stimulating RhoA-dependent stress fibers (Barry et al., 1997). Ren et al. (1999) directly measured RhoA activity, revealing that adhesion to fibronectin regulates RhoA activity in a triphasic manner. RhoA is rapidly and transiently inhibited (10–30 min) when cells first bind to fibronectin. This initial inactivation is followed by an activation phase that peaks between 60 and 90 min. In the final phase, RhoA activity gradually decreases, by 2–3 h, to a level slightly higher than that of the initial inhibition.

We demonstrated in earlier studies that the initial integrin-triggered inhibition of RhoA is mediated by c-Src–dependent activation of p190RhoGAP (Arthur et al., 2000). Here we have examined the biological significance of this RhoA inactivation in cell spreading and migration. Our results suggest that localized RhoA inactivation by p190RhoGAP in response to integrin-mediated adhesion contributes to efficient cell spreading and migration by enhancing both membrane protrusion and cell polarity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

RESULTS

Adhesion-dependent Regulation of RhoA activity by p190RhoGAP

To investigate the biological function of p190RhoGAP in integrin-mediated signaling, we generated pooled populations of Rat1 fibroblasts stably expressing dominant negative, GAP-deficient HA-p190RhoGAP^R1283A (p190-RA cells), empty vector (mock cells), or overexpressing wild-type HA-p190RhoGAP (wt-p190 cells). Expression of GAP-deficient p190RhoGAP has previously been shown to have a dominant negative effect on the endogenous protein (Arthur et al., 2000). By generating stable lines, we selected for cells expressing levels of p190RhoGAP below what is required to induce the previously described severe phenotype characterized by cell retraction and beaded extensions (Tatsis et al., 1998). Expression levels of the exogenous p190RhoGAP variants were approximately four to five times higher than endogenous p190RhoGAP and had no effect on RhoA expression (Figure ​(Figure1A). 1A).

Open in a separate window

Figure 1

p190RhoGAP inhibits RhoA in an adhesion-dependent manner. (A) Expression levels of pooled populations of Rat1 cells stably transfected with dominant negative and wild-type p190RhoGAP. Whole cell lysates from Rat1 cell lines expressing dominant negative HA-p190RhoGAP^R1283A (p190-RA), wild-type HA-p190RhoGAP (wt-p190), or empty vector (mock) were subjected to immunoblotting with monoclonal antibodies against HA or p190RhoGAP, to assess the expression level of the exogenous p190RhoGAP variants, or RhoA as a loading control. (B) Similar levels of RhoA activity in control cells and cells expressing dominant negative p190RhoGAP in the absence of adhesion. mock, wt-p190, and p190-RA cells, as well as mock cells transduced with C3 transferase or transfected with constitutively active RhoA GEF (Lsc), as negative and positive controls, were placed in suspension for 1 h and then RhoA activity was measured. Note: longer film exposures revealed detectable levels of active RhoA in wt-p190 cells but not in cells treated with C3 transferase. (C) p190RhoGAP is required for RhoA inactivation in response to adhesion on fibronectin (FN). Mock or p190-RA cells were plated on fibronectin for 0, 10, 20, 30, 45, and 60 min. Cells were then lysed and subjected to RhoA activity assays.

To examine the effect of exogenous wild-type or dominant negative p190RhoGAP, we measured RhoA activity by precipitating active GTP-bound RhoA with GST-RBD (Ren et al., 1999). In suspension, mock and p190-RA cells had similar levels of RhoA activity, whereas RhoA activity levels were reduced in wt-p190 cells (Figure ​(Figure1B).1B). RhoA activity was also assessed in mock cells treated with the RhoA inhibitor C3 transferase or transfected with the exchange factor Lsc as negative and positive controls, respectively, for the assay. C3 transferase decreased RhoA activity to undetectable levels, whereas RhoA activity was elevated in cells expressing Lsc (Figure ​(Figure1B). 1B). Adhesion of mock cells to fibronectin stimulated a rapid and transient decrease in RhoA activity (Figure ​(Figure1C).1C). However, RhoA inactivation in response to fibronectin was antagonized in p190-RA cells. Cells expressing dominant negative p190RhoGAP continued to show a decrease in RhoA activity in response to fibronectin adhesion, but this inactivation was greatly attenuated. These data are consistent with our previous studies (Arthur et al., 2000) and suggest that RhoA inhibition by fibronectin-stimulated signaling is mediated by p190RhoGAP. Furthermore, these data suggest that the activity of endogenous p190RhoGAP requires adhesion, given that dominant negative mutants of this GAP modify RhoA activity in adherent cells but not in suspended cells.

Regulation of the Actin Cytoskeleton by p190RhoGAP during Cell Spreading

Because RhoA regulates the organization of filamentous actin, we examined the actin cytoskeleton as cells initially adhered to fibronectin. We found that mock and wt-p190 cells spreading on fibronectin were nearly devoid of stress fibers at early time points but had extensive F-actin–rich ruffles and lamellipodia around the periphery of the cell (Figure ​(Figure2A).2A). In contrast, p190-RA fibroblasts had few ruffles or other protrusions but exhibited robust stress fibers. This phenotype was exaggerated in Rat1 cells transiently transfected with a vector encoding dominant negative HA-p190RhoGAP^R1283A (Figure ​(Figure2B)2B) and found to be sensitive to the RhoA-specific inhibitor C3 transferase (data not shown). The precocious development of stress fibers in cells expressing dominant negative p190RhoGAP at early time points is in accord with the elevated RhoA activity observed in p190-RA cells (Figure ​(Figure1C).1C). Stress fibers developed in mock cells after 60 min on fibronectin (data not shown), consistent with the elevation in RhoA activity in these cells at this time point (Figure ​(Figure1C).1C). These data suggest that RhoA inhibition by p190RhoGAP is necessary for the prevention of premature stress fiber formation as cells spread on fibronectin.

Open in a separate window

Figure 2

p190RhoGAP is necessary for the prevention of premature stress fiber formation in cells spreading on fibronectin. Mock, p190-RA, and wt-p190 cells (A) or Rat1 cells transiently transfected with pEGFP-C1 (GFP) or the dominant negative pKH3-HA-p190RhoGAP^R1283A vector (B) were plated on fibronectin for 20 min, and then F-actin and the HA epitope (transient transfections only) were labeled. Note: the exposure time for the image of actin morphology in the cell transiently expressing HA-p190RhoGAP^R1283A was shortened to compensate for intense phalloidin labeling. Bar, 20 μm.

Regulation of Cell Spreading by p190RhoGAP

Given that RhoA-mediated contractility inhibits membrane protrusion (Rottner et al., 1999; Cox et al., 2001) and that RhoA inactivation by fibronectin is antagonized in cells expressing dominant negative p190RhoGAP (Figure ​(Figure1C),1C), p190RhoGAP may regulate cell spreading. To test this hypothesis, we measured the relative area of individual cells during adhesion (Figure ​(Figure3A).3A). At early spreading time points (20 min), the area of p190-RA cells was significantly smaller than that of mock cells. Furthermore, the area of wt-p190 cells was significantly greater than the area of mock cells. After 3 h on fibronectin, we observed no significant difference in the areas of mock, p190-RA, and wt-p190 cells (data not shown). To determine whether the decreased spreading by p190-RA cells was a result of high RhoA activity (Figure ​(Figure1C),1C), the RhoA-specific inhibitor C3 transferase was introduced into cells. We found that RhoA inhibition by a low dose of C3 transferase partially rescued the decrease in spreading by p190-RA cells (Figure ​(Figure3B).3B). These data are consistent with the described role of RhoA inhibition in enhancing membrane protrusion (Rottner et al., 1999) and suggest that RhoA inactivation by p190RhoGAP contributes to efficient cell spreading on fibronectin.

Open in a separate window

Figure 3

RhoA inhibition by p190RhoGAP is necessary for efficient cell spreading on fibronectin. Suspended mock, p190-RA, and wt-p190 cells (A) or mock and p190-RA transduced with GST or C3 transferase (B) were plated on fibronectin for 20 min, fixed, and then stained with Coomassie blue. The relative areas of individual cells in digital images were measured. The mean area of the control (mock cells) was set at 100%. The relative areas ± SEM were calculated from the mean areas of four separate experiments.

Regulation of Cell Migration by p190RhoGAP

The signaling and cytoskeletal dynamics that occur in spreading cells are generally thought to mimic events at the leading edge of migrating cells. Previous studies have demonstrated that p190RhoGAP localizes to membrane protrusions found at both the periphery of spreading cells and the leading edge of migrating cells (Nakahara et al., 1997; Brouns et al., 2000). We found similar subcellular localization patterns by endogenous and stably expressed HA-tagged wild-type or GAP-deficient p190RhoGAP in Rat1 cells (data not shown). These findings suggest that p190RhoGAP may be active at the leading edge of motile cells where they are actively engaging the extracellular matrix. Consistent with this hypothesis, we found that the RhoA activity in subconfluent p190-RA cells plated on fibronectin for 3 h was elevated relative to mock cells (Figure ​(Figure4).4). These data suggest that p190RhoGAP signaling participates in the final decrease in RhoA activity observed when cells are plated on fibronectin for 2–3 h or longer (Ren et al., 1999). As expected, RhoA activity was low in wt-p190 cells. The activity of Cdc42 and Rac1 were also examined with the use of a previously described technique (Bagrodia et al., 1998); however, no differences were detected among the mock, wt-p190, and p190-RA cell lines (data not shown).

Open in a separate window

Figure 4

p190RhoGAP is necessary for maintenance of low basal RhoA activity in cells on fibronectin. Mock, wt-p190, and p190-RA cells were plated on fibronectin for 3 h and RhoA activity was measured.

To further explore the role of p190RhoGAP in motility, we examined the morphology of cells as they migrated into a monolayer wound (Figure ​(Figure5).5). We found that the p190-RA cells were less able to extend membrane protrusions into the wound area, relative to either mock or wt-p190 cells. In contrast, wt-p190 cells often extended elaborate growth cone-like protrusive structures (Figure ​(Figure5, 5, arrowhead). Furthermore, both mock and wt-p190 cells, but not p190-RA cells, elongated into the wound. These observations suggest that RhoA inhibition by p190RhoGAP participates in cell elongation and the formation or maintenance of membrane protrusions in migrating cells.

Open in a separate window

Figure 5

p190RhoGAP promotes membrane protrusion and cell elongation. Mock, p190-RA, and wt-p190 cells allowed to migrate into monolayer wounds for 3 h were labeled with Texas Red-phalloidin to reveal the morphology of the actin cytoskeleton. The position of the wound edges at the beginning of the assay are indicated by black arrowheads. Both mock and wt-p190 cells, but not p190-RA cells, elongated into the wound. In addition, wt-p190 cells often extended elaborate growth cone-like protrusions (white arrowhead). Bar, 20 μm.

To quantitate migration, assays were performed with the use of Transwell filters. The top and bottom surfaces of the filters were coated with fibronectin, cells were added to the upper chamber, and migration was allowed to proceed for 3 h (Figure ​(Figure6A).6A). We found that migration was enhanced in wt-p190 cells. Conversely, significantly fewer p190-RA cells were able to migrate through the filters compared with mock cells. To determine whether the decrease in migration by p190-RA cells was due to excessive RhoA signaling, the RhoA effector Rho kinase was inhibited with Y-27632 (Uehata et al., 1997a). Although Y-27632 did not significantly alter the motility of mock cells, treatment with this inhibitor partially rescued the migration defect exhibited by p190-RA cells (Figure ​(Figure6B).6B). These data, together with our finding that dominant negative p190RhoGAP elevated basal RhoA activity in adherent cells (Figure ​(Figure4),4), support our hypothesis that localized RhoA inhibition at the leading edge by p190RhoGAP enhances cell migration.

Open in a separate window

Figure 6

p190RhoGAP is necessary for efficient migration. (A) Transwell filters coated with fibronectin were used to measure migration by mock, p190-RA, and wt-p190 cells. Cells that had migrated to the lower surface of the filters were counted. (B) Similar assays were performed with mock and p190-RA cells treated with 3 μM Rho kinase-specific inhibitor Y-27632. The mean number of control cells (mock cells) that migrated through the filter was set at 100%. The relative number of cells per field ± SEM was calculated from the means of four separate experiments.

Requirement of p190RhoGAP for the Establishment of Polarity

Although our spreading and wound healing data implicate p190RhoGAP in the regulation of membrane protrusion, we investigated additional factors that might contribute to the migration defect exhibited by p190-RA cells. We initially observed that the nuclei in p190-RA cells were often positioned centrally within the cell, unlike mock and wt-p190 cells (not shown). Accordingly, we sought to determine whether p190RhoGAP is necessary for the establishment of cell polarity, i.e., the ability to orient in the direction of migration. To address this issue, the nuclei and Golgi were labeled in wounded monolayers (Figure ​(Figure7).7). Cells along the edge of monolayer wounds were considered polarized if the Golgi was localized to the wound-side of the nucleus, as previously described (Kupfer et al., 1982; Nobes and Hall, 1999). Approximately two-thirds of the Golgi in the mock and wt-p190 cells were facing the wound. However, we found that significantly fewer p190-RA cells were polarized relative to either the mock or wt-p190 cells. In fact, polarization of p190-RA cells on the edge of wounds was not significantly different from the random distribution observed in a confluent monolayer. These findings suggest that localized RhoA inhibition by p190RhoGAP is necessary for cells to establish polarity in the direction of migration, in addition to enhancing membrane protrusion.

Open in a separate window

Figure 7

p190RhoGAP is necessary for the establishment of polarity. Mock, p190-RA, and wt-p190 cells were allowed to migrate into monolayer wounds for 2 h. The cells were triple-labeled with Hoechst 33342, GM130 (Golgi marker) antibodies, and Texas Red-phalloidin to reveal the nuclei (blue), Golgi (green), and F-actin (red), respectively. Bar, 20 μm. Cells along the edge of the wounds were scored as polarized if the Golgi was orientated to the wound-side of the nucleus, as previously described (Kupfer et al., 1982). The number of cells with Golgi facing an arbitrary point in a confluent monolayer was also counted as a measure of random orientation. The percentage of polarized cells ± SEM was calculated from the means of four separate experiments.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we examined the biological consequence of adhesion-mediated RhoA inactivation by p190RhoGAP. The impetus for this work came from several earlier studies that implicated p190RhoGAP signaling in response to adhesion. p190RhoGAP is tyrosine phosphorylated by the binding of antibodies to β1 integrins (Nakahara et al., 1997), translocates to a detergent-insoluble fraction upon adhesion to fibronectin (Sharma, 1998), and colocalizes with F-actin in lamellipodial protrusions (Nakahara et al., 1997; Brouns et al., 2000). Furthermore, we have previously described a signaling mechanism in which integrin ligation triggers RhoA inhibition via c-Src–dependent activation of p190RhoGAP (Arthur et al., 2000).

Here we show that adhesion-dependent RhoA inhibition by p190RhoGAP is necessary for efficient cell spreading and migration. Cells expressing dominant negative p190RhoGAP failed to decrease RhoA activity from high basal levels, resulting in premature stress fiber formation and impaired spreading. In contrast, overexpression of wild-type p190RhoGAP promoted cell spreading. The observation that p190RhoGAP localizes to membrane protrusions at the leading edge of migrating cells suggests that this GAP is active during migration. Consistent with this hypothesis, RhoA activity was elevated in subconfluent adherent cells expressing dominant negative p190RhoGAP. In migrating cells, expression of dominant negative p190RhoGAP inhibited both cell elongation and membrane protrusion, whereas these behaviors were enhanced in cells overexpressing wild-type p190RhoGAP. Accordingly, expression of dominant negative p190RhoGAP inhibited migration, whereas overexpression of p190RhoGAP enhanced motility. Interestingly, dominant negative p190RhoGAP also blocked the ability of cells to establish polarity in the direction of migration. We propose that RhoA inhibition by p190RhoGAP in response to adhesion to fibronectin contributes to both spreading and migration by enhancing cell protrusion, elongation, and polarity.

Cell migration is a complex process involving extension of membrane protrusions at the leading edge, the formation of adhesions, detachment, and retraction at the rear of the cell (Lauffenburger and Horwitz, 1996). Although it is well established that Cdc42 and Rac1 activity are crucial for protrusion (Van Aelst and D'Souza-Schorey, 1997), other studies have shown that RhoA inhibition is also involved. Introduction of the RhoA inhibitor C3 transferase into cells stimulates membrane ruffling (Rottner et al., 1999). Furthermore, expression of wild-type RhoA (Cox et al., 2001) or constitutively active RhoA (E.A. Cox and A. Huttenlocher, personal communication) inhibits the extension of membrane protrusions. These studies support our hypothesis that localized RhoA inactivation by p190RhoGAP is a permissive step that allows membrane extension. Without this inhibition, RhoA activity would functionally antagonize the formation of protrusions through excessive contractility. Consequently, RhoA inhibition by p190RhoGAP activity contributes to the protrusive activity required for both spreading and migration.

Recent studies have shown that the nonreceptor tyrosine kinase FAK (Ren et al., 2000), in addition to c-Src and p190RhoGAP (Arthur et al., 2000), is necessary for the initial fibronectin-stimulated RhoA inactivation. Interestingly, the phenotype we observed in spreading Rat1 cells expressing dominant negative p190RhoGAP resembles that of spreading cells that lack FAK (Sieg et al., 1999). It is presently unclear whether FAK participates in RhoA inhibition by the integrin→c-Src→p190RhoGAP-signaling mechanism or if it lies in a parallel pathway. Consistent with the idea that FAK participates in c-Src–mediated p190RhoGAP activation, in FAK null cells adhesion activates c-Src and yet fails to inhibit RhoA (Sieg et al., 1998; Ren et al., 2000). In addition, a scaffolding role has been assigned to the FAK-related kinase Pyk2/CAKβ/CADTK/RAFTK because it binds both c-Src and p190RhoGAP and mediates p190RhoGAP tyrosine phosphorylation by c-Src in response to heregulin (Zrihan-Licht et al., 2000). Thus, it seems likely that FAK mediates tyrosine phosphorylation of p190RhoGAP by c-Src in response to adhesion, just as Pyk2 does downstream of heregulin stimulation. Intriguingly, Masiero et al. (1999) recently showed that FAK coimmunoprecipitates with p190RhoGAP in adherent cells.

An unexpected finding in this work was that inhibition of p190RhoGAP resulted in a failure of cells to develop the polarity that is associated with migration into a wounded monolayer. Polarity of migration is associated with selective protrusion of lamellipodia and filopodia at the leading edge, with persistence of a leading edge, and suppression of lateral protrusions (Nabi, 1999). It is also associated with orientation of the Golgi and centrosome to a region in front of the nucleus in the direction of migration (Kupfer et al., 1982; Euteneuer and Schliwa, 1992). Little is also known about the signaling pathways that are initiated by wounding a monolayer that give rise to polarized cytoskeletal organization and directed migration, although Cdc42 activity is necessary (Nobes and Hall, 1999; Erickson and Cerione, 2001). We first suspected that the effect of the dominant negative form of p190RhoGAP on polarity might be mediated directly or indirectly by diminished Cdc42 activity. However, we did not detect any change in activity of this Rho family protein. One possibility is that the elevated RhoA activity inhibits signaling downstream from Cdc42. Alternatively, it could be that RhoA-mediated contractility exerts its inhibitory effect on polarity by opposing the formation or maintenance of protrusive structures (Rottner et al., 1999; Cox et al., 2001). In this latter scheme of functional antagonism, an implication is that the protrusive structures contribute themselves to the development of polarity and are upstream of the polarized orientation of the Golgi. In future work it will be interesting to explore the hierarchy of these structures with respect to their role in governing polarity of cell migration.

Further evidence that p190RhoGAP is important for mediating cell polarity has arisen from studies of the p190RhoGAP-binding partner, p120RasGAP. The observation that recruitment of p120RasGAP to p190RhoGAP correlates with stress fiber disassembly in a Src-dependent manner has led to the conclusion that p120RasGAP is important for the activation of p190RhoGAP (Ellis et al., 1990; Settleman et al., 1992; Chang et al., 1995; van der Geer et al., 1997; Roof et al., 1998; Fincham et al., 1999). If p120RasGAP contributes to the activation of p190RhoGAP, then it would be predicted that neutralization of p120RasGAP or p190RhoGAP would produce similar phenotypes. Strikingly, p120RasGAP null cells have defects in cell elongation and polarity, which result in impaired migration (Kulkarni et al., 2000), similar to our observations of Rat1 cells expressing dominant negative p190RhoGAP. The importance of the p190RhoGAP-p120RasGAP association is further underscored by the demonstration that disruption of this complex with inhibitory peptides impairs migration and polarization (Kulkarni et al., 2000).

Together, our results and those of previous studies lead us to propose the following signaling mechanism by which adhesion to fibronectin controls cell behavior via regulation of RhoA (Figure ​(Figure8).8). The binding of the fibronectin RGD motif to integrins initially triggers RhoA inactivation by c-Src–dependent activation of p190RhoGAP (Arthur et al., 2000), a mechanism that likely includes FAK (Ren et al., 2000). RhoA inhibition by p190RhoGAP alleviates contractile forces that would otherwise collapse protrusions required for spreading. Next, RhoA is activated (Ren et al., 1999), resulting in the formation of stress fibers and strong adhesion through clustering of integrins to form focal adhesions (Chrzanowska-Wodnicka and Burridge, 1996). The delayed activation of RhoA by adhesion to fibronectin may be triggered by the activation of a GEF in response to binding of the RGD site to integrins (Barry et al., 1997) or by the heparin-binding domain of fibronectin triggering syndecan-4 signaling (Woods and Couchman, 1992; Bloom et al., 1999; Saoncella et al., 1999), or both. Subsequently, RhoA activity decreases to a lower basal level (Ren et al., 1999). The mechanism by which RhoA activity declines with time has not been determined, but our observation that dominant negative p190RhoGAP elevates RhoA activity at longer time points suggests that p190RhoGAP is involved in this decrease. Localized RhoA inhibition by p190RhoGAP at the leading edge allows cells to polarize and extend the membrane protrusions that are essential for cell migration. In ongoing studies, we are investigating the signaling components responsible for activation of RhoA by fibronectin binding to syndecans and integrins.

Open in a separate window

Figure 8

Proposed model for the regulation of RhoA by fibronectin. Adhesion to fibronectin regulates RhoA in a triphasic manner. RhoA is initially inhibited by integrin-triggered c-Src–dependent activation of p190RhoGAP. This inactivation of RhoA is necessary for efficient cell spreading by preventing Rho-mediated contractility from developing in nascent protrusions. In the second phase, integrin or syndecan signaling triggers stress fiber and focal adhesion formation via activation of RhoA. Finally, RhoA activity is reduced to a low basal activity. Low basal RhoA activity in adherent cells is maintained, at least in part, by localized p190RhoGAP activity and is necessary for the establishment of polarity and contributes to both membrane protrusion and cell elongation.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Abbreviations used:

REFERENCES