Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


Improved understanding of the adverse pharmacological properties of aldosterone has prompted investigation of the clinical benefits of blocking aldosterone at the receptor level. This article reviews the pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and tolerability of the two available blocking agents, spironolactone and eplerenone. A Medline search identified clinical studies assessing spironolactone and eplerenone. Priority was given to large, well-controlled, clinical trials and comparative studies. Pharmacological differences between spironolactone and eplerenone include lower affinity of eplerenone for progesterone, androgen, and glucocorticoid receptors; more consistently demonstrated nongenomic properties for eplerenone; and the presence of long-acting metabolites for spironolactone. Both agents effectively treat hypertension and heart failure but comparisons are complicated by the deficiency of head-to-head trials and differences between patient populations. There are differences in the tolerability profiles; spironolactone is associated with dose-dependent sexual side effects. Both agents produce dose-dependent increases in potassium concentrations, although the effect with spironolactone appears to be greater when both agents are administered at recommended doses. Choice of a specific agent should be based on individual patient issues, such as the nature of heart failure and patient concerns about adverse events.

Free full text 


Logo of clincardiolLink to Publisher's site
Clin Cardiol. 2008 Apr; 31(4): 153–158.
Published online 2008 Apr 10. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.20324
PMCID: PMC6652937
PMID: 18404673

A Comparison of the Aldosterone‐blocking Agents Eplerenone and Spironolactone

Allan Struthers, MD,corresponding author 1 Henry Krum, MD, PhD, 2 and Gordon H. Williams, MD 3

Abstract

Improved understanding of the adverse pharmacological properties of aldosterone has prompted investigation of the clinical benefits of blocking aldosterone at the receptor level. This article reviews the pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and tolerability of the two available blocking agents, spironolactone and eplerenone. A Medline search identified clinical studies assessing spironolactone and eplerenone. Priority was given to large, well‐controlled, clinical trials and comparative studies. Pharmacological differences between spironolactone and eplerenone include lower affinity of eplerenone for progesterone, androgen, and glucocorticoid receptors; more consistently demonstrated nongenomic properties for eplerenone; and the presence of long‐acting metabolites for spironolactone. Both agents effectively treat hypertension and heart failure but comparisons are complicated by the deficiency of head‐to‐head trials and differences between patient populations. There are differences in the tolerability profiles; spironolactone is associated with dose‐dependent sexual side effects. Both agents produce dose‐dependent increases in potassium concentrations, although the effect with spironolactone appears to be greater when both agents are administered at recommended doses. Choice of a specific agent should be based on individual patient issues, such as the nature of heart failure and patient concerns about adverse events. Copyright © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords: eplerenone, spironolactone, aldosterone blockade, hypertension, heart failure

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (176K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
1. Struthers AD: Aldosterone blockade in cardiovascular disease. Heart 2004; 90: 1229–1234. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
2. de Gasparo M, Joss U, Ramjoue HP, Whitebread SE, Haenni H, et al.: Three new epoxy‐spirolactone derivatives: characterization in vivo and in vitro. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1987; 240: 650–656. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
3. Gardiner P, Schrode K, Quinlan D, Martin BK, Boreham DR, et al.: Spironolactone metabolism: steady‐state serum levels of the sulfur‐containing metabolites. J Clin Pharmacol 1989; 29: 342–347. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
4. Inspra [Product Information]. Chicago, IL: GD Searle; 2003. [Google Scholar]
5. Chai W, Garrelds IM, de Vries R, Batenburg WW, van Kats JP, et al.: Nongenomic effects of aldosterone in the human heart: interaction with angiotensin II. Hypertension 2005; 46: 701–706. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
6. Romagni P, Rossi F, Guerrini L, Quirini C, Santiemma V: Aldosterone induces contraction of the resistance arteries in man. Atherosclerosis 2003; 166: 345–349. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
7. Miyata Y, Muto S, Kusano E: Mechanisms for nongenomic and genomic effects of aldosterone on Na + /H+ exchange in vascular smooth muscle cells. J Hypertens 2005; 23: 2237–2250. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
8. Fujita M, Minamino T, Asanuma H, Sanada S, Hirata A, et al.: Aldosterone nongenomically worsens ischemia via protein kinase C‐dependent pathways in hypoperfused canine hearts. Hypertension 2005; 46: 113–117. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
9. Michea L, Delpiano AM, Hitschfeld C, Lobos L, Lavandero S, et al.: Eplerenone blocks nongenomic effects of aldosterone on the na+/h+ exchanger, intracellular Ca2+ levels, and vasoconstriction in mesenteric resistance vessels. Endocrinology 2005; 146: 973–980. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
10. Sato A, Liu JP, Funder JW: Aldosterone rapidly represses protein kinase C activity in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes in vitro. Endocrinology 1997; 138: 3410–3416. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
11. Christ M, Gunther A, Heck M, Schmidt BM, Falkenstein E, et al.: Aldosterone, not estradiol, is the physiological agonist for rapid increases in cAMP in vascular smooth muscle cells. Circulation 1999; 99: 1485–1491. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
12. Pitt B, Zannad F, Remme WJ, Cody R, Castaigne A, et al., Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Investigators: The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 709–717. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
13. Pitt B, Remme W, Zannad F, Neaton J, Martinez F, et al.: Eplerenone, a selective aldosterone blocker, in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 1309–1321. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
14. Khan NU, Movahed A: The role of aldosterone and aldosterone‐receptor antagonists in heart failure. Rev Cardiovasc Med 2004; 5: 71–81. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
15. Croom KF, Perry CM: Eplerenone: a review of its use in essential hypertension. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2005; 5: 51–69. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
16. Jeunemaitre X, Chatellier G, Kreft‐Jais C, Charru A, DeVries C, et al.: Efficacy and tolerance of spironolactone in essential hypertension. Am J Cardiol 1987; 60: 820–825. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
17. Sternon J: Spironolactone and altizide in systemic hypertension: ambulatory multicenter study. Am J Cardiol 1990; 65: 24K–27K. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
18. Weinberger MH, Roniker B, Krause SL, Weiss RJ: Eplerenone, a selective aldosterone blocker, in mild‐to‐moderate hypertension. Am J Hypertens 2002; 15: 709–716. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
19. Smith PJ, Talbert RL: Sexual dysfunction with antihypertensive and antipsychotic agents. Clin Pharm 1986; 5: 373–384. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
20. Aldridge SA: Drug‐induced sexual dysfunction. Clin Pharm 1982; 1: 141–147. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
21. Garthwaite SM, McMahon EG: The evolution of aldosterone antagonists. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2004; 217: 27–31. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
22. Sica DA: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mineralocorticoid blocking agents and their effects on potassium homeostasis. Heart Fail Rev 2005; 10: 23–29. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
23. Nishizaka MK, Zaman MA, Calhoun DA: Efficacy of low‐dose spironolactone in subjects with resistant hypertension. Am J Hypertens 2003; 16: 925–930. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
24. Schrijver G, Weinberger MH: Hydrochlorothiazide and spironolactone in hypertension. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1979; 25: 33–42. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
25. White WB, Duprez D, St Hillaire R, Krause S, Roniker B, et al.: Effects of the selective aldosterone blocker eplerenone versus the calcium antagonist amlodipine in systolic hypertension. Hypertension 2003; 41: 1021–1026. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
26. Krum H, Nolly H, Workman D, He W, Roniker B, et al.: Efficacy of eplerenone added to renin‐angiotensin blockade in hypertensive patients. Hypertension 2002; 40: 117–123. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
27. Williams GH, Burgess E, Kolloch RE, Ruilope LM, Niegowska J, et al.: Efficacy of eplerenone versus enalapril as monotherapy in systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol 2004; 93: 990–996. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
28. Pitt B, Reichek N, Willenbrock R, Zannad F, Phillips RA, et al.: Effects of eplerenone, enalapril, and eplerenone/enalapril in patients with essential hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy. The 4E‐Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Study. Circulation 2003; 108: 1831–1838. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
29. Pitt B: Aldosterone blockade in patients with systolic left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation 2003; 108: 1790–1794. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
30. Tamirisa KP, Aaronson KD, Koelling TM: Spironolactone‐induced renal insufficiency and hyperkalemia in patients with heart failure. Am Heart J 2004; 148: 971–978. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
31. McMurray JJ, O'Meara E: Treatment of heart failure with spironolactone–trial and tribulations. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 526–528. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
32. Aldactone (Spironolactone Tablets). Chicago, IL: GD Searle; 2003. [Google Scholar]
33. Sica DA: The risks and benefits of aldosterone antagonists. Curr Heart Fail Rep 2005; 2: 65–71. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
34. Sigurdsson A, Held P, Swedberg K: Short‐ and long‐term neurohormonal activation following acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 1993; 126: 1068–1076. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
35. Berton G, Palatini P: Risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction: role of neurohormones, inflammatory markers and albumin excretion rate. Ital Heart J 2003; 4: 295–304. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
36. Konstam MA, Kronenberg MW, Udelson JE, Kinan D, Metherall J, et al.: Effectiveness of preload reserve as a determinant of clinical status in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The SOLVD Investigators. Am J Cardiol 1992; 69: 1591–1595. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
37. Davidson MH: Controversy surrounding the safety of cerivastatin. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2002; 1: 207–212. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
38. Fleming T, editor. ed: Drug Topics Red Book. Montvale, NJ: Thomson PDR; 2006; 473 658–659. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

Citations & impact 


Impact metrics

Jump to Citations

Citations of article over time

Alternative metrics

Altmetric item for https://www.altmetric.com/details/819698
Altmetric
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/819698

Article citations


Go to all (132) article citations

Other citations