Abstract
Free full text
Guillain-Barré syndrome associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection: causality or coincidence?
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), originating from Wuhan, is spreading around the world and the outbreak continues to escalate. Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) typically present with fever and respiratory illness.1 However, little information is available on the neurological manifestations of COVID-19. Here, we report the first case of COVID-19 initially presenting with acute Guillain-Barré syndrome.
On Jan 23, 2020, a woman aged 61 years presented with acute weakness in both legs and severe fatigue, progressing within 1 day. She returned from Wuhan on Jan 19, but denied fever, cough, chest pain, or diarrhoea. Her body temperature was 36·5°C, oxygen saturation was 99% on room air, and respiratory rate was 16 breaths per min. Lung auscultation showed no abnormalities. Neurological examination disclosed symmetric weakness (Medical Research Council grade 4/5) and areflexia in both legs and feet. 3 days after admission, her symptoms progressed. Muscle strength was grade 4/5 in both arms and hands and 3/5 in both legs and feet. Sensation to light touch and pinprick was decreased distally.
Laboratory results on admission were clinically significant for lymphocytopenia (0·52 × 109/L, normal: 1·1–3·2 × 109/L) and thrombocytopenia (113 × 109/L, normal: 125–300 × 109/L). CSF testing (day 4) showed normal cell counts (5 × 106/L, normal: 0–8 × 106/L) and increased protein level (124 mg/dL, normal: 8–43 mg/dL). Nerve conduction studies (day 5) showed delayed distal latencies and absent F waves in early course, supporting demyelinating neuropathy (Table 1, Table 2 ). She was diagnosed with Guillain-Barré syndrome and given intravenous immunoglobulin. On day 8 (Jan 30), the patient developed dry cough and a fever of 38·2°C. Chest CT showed ground-glass opacities in both lungs. Oropharyngeal swabs were positive for SARS-CoV-2 on RT-PCR assay. She was immediately transferred to the infection isolation room and received supportive care and antiviral drugs of arbidol, lopinavir, and ritonavir. Her clinical condition improved gradually and her lymphocyte and thrombocyte counts normalised on day 20. At discharge on day 30, she had normal muscle strength in both arms and legs and return of tendon reflexes in both legs and feet. Her respiratory symptoms resolved as well. Oropharyngeal swab tests for SARS-CoV-2 were negative.
Table 1
Distal latency, ms | Amplitude, mV | Conduction velocity, m/s | F latency, ms | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Left median nerve | |||||
Wrist–abductor pollicis brevis | 3·77 (normal ≤3·8) | 5·90 (normal ≥4) | .. | .. | |
Antecubital fossa–wrist | 7·96 | 5·70 | 51 (normal ≥50) | .. | |
Left ulnar nerve | |||||
Wrist-abductor digiti minimi | 3·04 (normal ≤3·0) | 6·60 (normal ≥6) | .. | Absent F (normal ≤31) | |
Below elbow–wrist | 6·54 | 6·80 | 56 (normal ≥50) | .. | |
Above elbow–below elbow | 8·29 | 6·60 | 57 | .. | |
Left tibial nerve | |||||
Ankle-abductor hallucis brevis | 7·81 (normal ≤5·1) | 7·30 (normal ≥4) | .. | Absent F (normal ≤56) | |
Popliteal fossa–ankle | 17·11 | 4·80 | 43 (normal ≥40) | .. | |
Right tibial nerve | |||||
Ankle-abductor hallucis brevis | 6·65 (normal ≤5·1) | 8·00 (normal ≥4) | .. | Absent F (normal ≤56) | |
Popliteal fossa–ankle | 15·95 | 6·00 | 43 (normal ≥40) | .. | |
Left peroneal nerve | |||||
Ankle-extensor digitorum brevis | 5·21 (normal ≤5·5) | 1·87 (normal ≥2) | .. | .. | |
Below fibula–ankle | 12·50 | 1·49 | 43 (normal ≥42) | .. | |
Right peroneal nerve | |||||
Ankle–extensor digitorum brevis | 11·30 (normal ≤5·5) | 2·90 (normal ≥2) | .. | .. | |
Below fibula–ankle | 18·20 | 2·70 | 43 (normal ≥42) | .. |
Table 2
Amplitude, μV | Conduction velocity, m/s | ||
---|---|---|---|
Left median nerve | |||
Digit 2–wrist | 15·9 (normal ≥18) | 68 (normal ≥50) | |
Left ulnar nerve | |||
Digit 5–wrist | 16·4 (normal ≥18) | 61 (normal ≥50) | |
Left superficial fibular nerve | |||
Lateral calf–lateral ankle | 13·0 (normal ≥6) | 52 (normal ≥40) | |
Right superficial fibular nerve | |||
Lateral calf–lateral ankle | 10·8 (normal ≥6) | 55 (normal ≥40) | |
Left sural nerve | |||
Calf–posterior ankle | 15·9 (normal ≥6) | 53 (normal ≥40) | |
Right sural nerve | |||
Calf–posterior ankle | 15·6 (normal ≥6) | 49 (normal ≥40) |
On Feb 5, two relatives of the patient, who had taken care of her during her hospital stay since Jan 24, tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and were treated in isolation. Relative 1 developed fever and cough on Feb 6, and relative 2 developed fatigue and mild cough on Feb 8. Both relatives had lymphocytopenia and radiological abnormalities. In the neurology department, a total of eight close contacts (including two neurologists and six nurses) were isolated for clinical monitoring. They had no signs or symptoms of infection and tested negative for SARS-CoV-2.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of SARS-CoV-2 infection associated with Guillain-Barré syndrome. Given the patient's travel history to Wuhan, where outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 were occurring, she was probably infected during her stay in Wuhan. We consider that the virus was transmitted to her relatives during her hospital stay. Retrospectively, the patient's initial laboratory abnormalities (lymphocytopenia and thrombocytopenia), which were consistent with clinical characteristics of patients with COVID-19,2 indicated the presence of SARS-CoV-2 infection on admission. The early presentation of COVID-19 can be non-specific (fever in only 43·8% of patients on admission2). Considering the temporal association, we speculate that SARS-CoV-2 infection might have been responsible for the development of Guillain-Barré syndrome in this patient. Furthermore, the onset of Guillain-Barré syndrome symptoms in this patient overlapped with the period of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Hence Guillain-Barré syndrome associated with SARS-CoV-2 might follow the pattern of a parainfectious profile, instead of the classic postinfectious profile, as reported in Guillain-Barré syndrome associated with Zika virus.3, 4
However, the limitation of this case is absence of microbiological testing on admission. Besides, the patient's fever and respiratory symptoms developed 7 days after the onset of Guillain-Barré syndrome symptoms. Therefore, it is prudent to consider the alternative explanation that the patient coincidentally developed Guillain-Barré syndrome of unknown cause and acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection nosocomially; although, there was no report of COVID-19 in the neurological ward during her stay nor in her close contacts (except for her two relatives).
Overall, this single case report only suggests a possible association between Guillain-Barré syndrome and SARS-CoV-2 infection, and more cases with epidemiological data are necessary to support a causal relationship. This case also suggests the need to consider potential neurological symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Furthermore, this report should alert clinicians to the risk of inadvertent SARS-CoV-2 infection, even if they work outside of the emergency or infectious disease department.
References
Full text links
Read article at publisher's site: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(20)30109-5
Read article for free, from open access legal sources, via Unpaywall: http://www.thelancet.com/article/S1474442220301095/pdf
Citations & impact
Impact metrics
Citations of article over time
Alternative metrics
Smart citations by scite.ai
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been
supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1016/s1474-4422(20)30109-5
Article citations
Prevalence and Mortality of Pediatrics with Guillain-Barré Syndrome during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Pre-COVID-19 Periods.
Iran J Child Neurol, 18(4):71-79, 29 Sep 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 39478952
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme-2 (ACE2) Downregulation During Coronavirus Infection.
Mol Biotechnol, 13 Sep 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 39266903
Review
Editorial: Mechanisms of Guillain-Barré syndrome and its link with COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccination.
Front Neurol, 15:1459464, 23 Jul 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 39114531 | PMCID: PMC11304503
Assessment of the quality of life of COVID-19 recovered patients at the Ghana Infectious Disease Centre.
PLoS One, 19(7):e0306118, 18 Jul 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 39024249 | PMCID: PMC11257348
Clinical presentation and symptomatology of Guillain-Barré syndrome: A literature review.
Medicine (Baltimore), 103(30):e38890, 01 Jul 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 39058828 | PMCID: PMC11272278
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
Go to all (579) article citations
Other citations
Data
Data behind the article
This data has been text mined from the article, or deposited into data resources.
BioStudies: supplemental material and supporting data
Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
[SARS-CoV-2, a new causal agent of Guillain-Barre syndrome].
Rev Neurol, 71(7):275-276, 01 Oct 2020
Cited by: 2 articles | PMID: 32959360
[Guillain-Barré Syndrome Associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection].
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed), 44(8):513-514, 04 May 2020
Cited by: 16 articles | PMID: 32532531 | PMCID: PMC7198200
Guillain-Barré Syndrome in a Patient With Evidence of Recent SARS-CoV-2 Infection.
Mayo Clin Proc, 95(8):1799-1801, 10 Jun 2020
Cited by: 15 articles | PMID: 32753154 | PMCID: PMC7284228
Guillain-Barré-Strohl syndrome and COVID-19: Case report and literature review.
Neuromuscul Disord, 30(10):859-861, 12 Aug 2020
Cited by: 28 articles | PMID: 32912716 | PMCID: PMC7420397
Review Free full text in Europe PMC