Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider removing the range of bf:Media from bf:media #73

Closed
melanieWacker opened this issue Dec 30, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

Consider removing the range of bf:Media from bf:media #73

melanieWacker opened this issue Dec 30, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
BF 2.2 Include in BIBFRAME 2.2 update

Comments

@melanieWacker
Copy link

This is a recommendation from the final report of the PCC Task Group on Sinopia Application Profiles (https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/taskgroup/Sinopia-Profiles-TG-Final-Report.pdf) -- See page 15.
From the report "The addition of ranges to BF properties introduces challenges regarding inferencing and linked data best practices. At a practical level, a range may restrict the breadth of possible vocabularies that are usable according to best practice. "
bf:media was identified as one of the properties where catalogers may want to use a term from a vocabulary where the current range does not apply.
Based on the report, PoCo voted on Dec. 18, 2020 to support this recommendation.

@jodiw01 jodiw01 added domain/range BF 2.2 Include in BIBFRAME 2.2 update approved Issue resolved and approved and removed approved Issue resolved and approved labels Sep 23, 2022
@kefo
Copy link
Member

kefo commented Oct 18, 2022

@kefo kefo closed this as completed Oct 18, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
BF 2.2 Include in BIBFRAME 2.2 update
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants