×
Nov 16, 2023 · Participants in the control group evaluate the original reviews, whereas participants in the experimental group evaluate the artificially ...
Dec 1, 2023 · We conducted a randomized controlled trial, in which each evaluator was shown either the original review or the uselessly elongated version at ...
People also ask
May 16, 2024 · Results suggest various problems that exist in reviews of papers -- inconsistency, bias, miscalibration, subjectivity -- also arise in reviewing of reviews.
Nov 2, 2015 · This paper describes some of the main steps that peer reviewers in general and, in particular, those performing reviewes of randomised controlled trials (RCT), ...
Nov 2, 2015 · It can be helpful to begin with a brief read to acquaint yourself with the study, followed by a detailed read and a careful check for flaws.
Missing: Experiments. | Show results with:Experiments.
Oct 22, 2024 · Some types of research, such as randomized controlled trials, may lend themselves to a more specialized form of peer review where training and ...
Jul 11, 2023 · We design a novel randomized controlled trial to test if reviewers exhibit anchoring. In the experimental condition, participants initially see ...
Oct 22, 2024 · This paper describes some of the main steps that peer reviewers in general and, in particular, those performing reviewes of randomised controlled trials (RCT), ...
Jul 12, 2023 · Our experiment reveals no evidence of herding in peer-review discussions. This observation is in contrast with past work that has documented an ...
Jul 1, 2014 · We investigated the effectiveness of open peer review as a mechanism to improve the reporting of randomised trials published in biomedical journals.
Missing: Experiments. | Show results with:Experiments.