Our results showed that GF was more effective in mitigating the perceptual impact of delays than CF. Nevertheless, this study has a few limitations to be noted.
Nov 29, 2022 · In this study, we designed a gestural filler that can be exhibited when delay occurs during a conversation with a digital human, and compared ...
People also ask
Can gestural fillers reduce user perceived latency in conversation with digital humans?
The results showed that the gestural fillers mitigate user-perceived latency and affect the willingness, impression, competence, and discomfort in conversations ...
Can Gestural Filler Reduce User-Perceived Latency in Conversation with Digital Humans? October 2022 · Applied Sciences. Junyeong Kum; [.
In this study, we designed a gestural filler that can be exhibited when delay occurs during a conversation with a digital human, and compared the effects of the ...
The results showed that the gestural fillers mitigate user-perceived latency and affect the willingness, impression, competence, and discomfort in ...
We also compared the effects of the gestural fillers with conversational fillers. The results showed that the gestural fillers mitigate user-perceived latency ...
We also compared the effects of the gestural fillers with conversational fillers. The results showed that the gestural fillers mitigate user-perceived latency ...
Nov 29, 2022 · In this study, we designed a gestural filler that can control the gesture of a digital human during a conversation and compared the effect of ...
Missing: Latency | Show results with:Latency
Oct 29, 2022 · Can Gestural Filler Reduce User-Perceived Latency in Conversation with Digital Humans? ... There was no statistically significant impact of those ...
Missing: Effects | Show results with:Effects