User talk:PeacePeace: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
PaleoNeonate (talk | contribs) →How to legitimately edit again: new section |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*I've restored the declined unblock request, as that needs to remain here per [[WP:BLANKING]]. [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 12:52, 12 September 2020 (UTC) |
*I've restored the declined unblock request, as that needs to remain here per [[WP:BLANKING]]. [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 12:52, 12 September 2020 (UTC) |
||
== How to legitimately edit again == |
|||
Since I've noticed that a sockpuppet of this account was recently blocked, of interest may be [[WP:STANDARDOFFER]] and [[WP:APPEAL]]. An appeal should normally be made from this original account. If it is successful, you could resume editing as PeacePeace. —[[User:PaleoNeonate|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#44a;text-shadow:2px 2px 3px DimGray;">Paleo</span>]][[User talk:PaleoNeonate|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#272;text-shadow:2px 2px 3px DimGray;">Neonate</span>]] – 21:50, 12 January 2022 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 21:50, 12 January 2022
PeacePeace (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was essentially blocked for making suggestions on Talk Pages. Bold Edits are legal. If I was reverted, I never re-reverted or edit warred. Considerable voting to block me was done before I knew about the "court." The blocking is essentially the act of a bully who cannot even tolerate suggestions on Talk Pages if they are contrary to his POV. For example, he took umbrage at a talk page suggestion that like a divorced man seeking to see his children would be better called a divorced man seeking to see HIS children, while the article said "her" children. He used slur words to attack me, instead of rational argument, and never cited any violation of a Wikipedia rule. (PeacePeace (talk) 05:22, 10 September 2020 (UTC))
Decline reason:
That is not the reason for your block, you are blocked as a result of a community consensus for a site ban, and that could only be overturned by an appeal to the community. Such an appeal would need to address all of the problems raised in the ban discussion, which you have not come close to doing here - just arguing that the ban/block is wrong, and making personal attacks on other editors, will not suffice. If you do decide to make a proper appeal, it would be very unlikely to succeed just two days after the ban was imposed, and you were told to wait at least six months - which would give you time to think about it properly and work out a plausible response to the ban. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:54, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I've restored the declined unblock request, as that needs to remain here per WP:BLANKING. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:52, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
How to legitimately edit again
[edit]Since I've noticed that a sockpuppet of this account was recently blocked, of interest may be WP:STANDARDOFFER and WP:APPEAL. An appeal should normally be made from this original account. If it is successful, you could resume editing as PeacePeace. —PaleoNeonate – 21:50, 12 January 2022 (UTC)