Anti-democratic thought: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 15:20, 10 August 2023

Redirect to:

Criticism of democracy

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+#REDIRECT [[Criticism of democracy]]
-{{More footnotes|date=August 2013}}
-'''Anti-democratic thought''' refers to opposition to [[democracy]]. Anti-democratic thought is identified as [[anti-egalitarianism]] typically, although not always is associated with it.{{Citation needed|date=December 2015}}. Important figures associated with anti-democratic thinking include [[Martin Heidegger]], [[Hubert Lagardelle]], [[Charles Maurras]], [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], [[Adolf Hitler]], [[Plato]], [[Carl Schmitt]], [[Oswald Spengler]], and [[Elazar Menachem Shach]]. A variety of ideologies and political systems have opposed democracy including [[absolute monarchy]], [[aristocracy]], [[fascism]], [[Guardianship of the Islamic Jurists]] (in its absolute form), [[theocracy]], [[neo-feudalism]], [[anarcho-capitalism]].
+{{Rcat shell|
-== Arguments against democracy ==
+{{R to related topic}}
+}}
-=== Plato's rejection of Athenian democracy ===
-The ancient Greek philosopher [[Plato]] rejected [[Athenian democracy]] on the basis that such democracies were anarchic societies without internal unity, that they followed citizens' impulses rather than pursuing the [[common good]], that larger democracies are unable to allow a sufficient number of their citizens to have their voices heard, and that such democracies were typically run by fools. Plato attacked Athenian democracies for mistaking anarchy for freedom. The lack of coherent unity in Athenian democracy made Plato conclude that such democracies were a mere collection of individuals occupying a common space rather than a form of political organization. As a result, Plato accused such democracies of lacking rules outside where its citizens see fit and lacking leadership due to the notion of equality in Athenian democracy. Plato claimed that in Athenian democracy, individuals' pursuit of their own desires led to self-centredness and conflict rather than the pursuit of the common good. Due to the citizens being free to pursue their passions, Plato claimed that rational leadership was impossible in Athenian democracy as elected representatives served the citizens' passions. Plato claimed that the significance of the voice of the individual in an Athenian democracy depreciates as the population of the democracy increases.
-=== Nietzsche ===
-[[Friedrich Nietzsche]] as an opponent of [[Christianity]], saw western democracy as connected to it, claiming that "the ''democratic'' movement is Christianity's heir" and denounced the democratic man for being inherently unable to "feel any shame for being unable to rise above" his desire "to satisfy a host of petty wants through the calculation of long-term self-interest". Nietzsche claimed that in a democracy "[w]hen the individual's highest and strongest instincts break forth with a passion, driving him far and above the average, beyond the lowlands of the herd conscience", "the moral perspective now considers how harmful or harmless an opinion, an emotional state, a will, a talent is to the community, to equality". "Exalted, self-directed spirituality, a will to solitude, even great powers of reason are felt as a danger". "Morality in Europe today is herd animal morality".
-=== Maurras ===
-[[Charles Maurras]], an FRS member of the ''[[Action française]]'' movement, stated in a famous dictum "Democracy is evil, democracy is death". Maurras' concept of ''politique naturelle'' declared recognition of inescapable biological inequality and thereby natural hierarchies, and claimed that the individual is naturally subordinated to social collectivities such as the family, the society, and the state, which he claims are doomed to fail if based upon the "myth of equality" or "abstract liberty". Maurras criticized democracy as being a "government by numbers" in which quantity matters more over quality and prefers the worst over the best. Maurras denounced the principles of [[liberalism]] as described in ''[[The Social Contract]]'' by [[Jean-Jacques Rousseau]] and in ''[[Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen]]'' as based upon the false assumption of liberty and the false assumption of equality. He claimed that the [[parliamentary system]] subordinates the national interest, or common good, to private interests of a parliament's representatives where only short-sighted interests of individuals prevail.
-=== Lagardelle ===
-French revolutionary [[Syndicalism|syndicalist]] [[Hubert Lagardelle]] claimed that French revolutionary syndicalism came to being as the result of "the reaction of the [[proletariat]] against democracy", which he claimed was "the ''popular form'' of [[bourgeois]] dominance". Lagardelle opposed democracy for its universalism, and believed in the necessity of class separation of the proletariat from the bourgeoisie, as democracy did not recognize the social differences between them.
-=== Michels ===
-A major scholarly attack on the basis of democracy was made by German-Italian political scientist [[Robert Michels]] who developed the mainstream political science theory of the [[iron law of oligarchy]] in 1911.<ref name="hyland">James L. Hyland. ''Democratic theory: the philosophical foundations''. Manchester, England, UK; New York, New York, USA: Manchester University Press ND, 1995. Pp. 247.</ref> Michels argued that [[oligarchy]] is inevitable as an "[[iron law of oligarchy|iron law]]" within any organization as part of the "tactical and technical necessities" of organization and on the topic of democracy, Michels stated: "It is organization which gives birth to the dominion of the elected over the electors, of the mandataries over the mandators, of the delegates over the delegators. Who says organization, says oligarchy" and went on to state "Historical evolution mocks all the prophylactic measures that have been adopted for the prevention of oligarchy."<ref name="hyland" /> Michels stated that the official goal of democracy of eliminating elite rule was impossible, that democracy is a [[façade]] legitimizing the rule of a particular elite, and that elite rule, that he refers to as oligarchy, is inevitable.<ref name="hyland" /> Michels had formerly been a Marxist but became drawn to the syndicalism of Sorel, [[Eduoard Berth]], [[Arturo Labriola]], and [[Enrico Leone (economist)|Enrico Leone]] and had become strongly opposed parliamentarian, legalistic, and bureaucratic socialism of [[social democracy]] and in contrast supported an activist, voluntarist, anti-parliamentarian socialism.<ref>Blamires, Cyprian, ''World Fascism: a Historical Encyclopedia, Volume 1'' (Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO, Inc., 2006) p. 418.</ref> Michels would later become a supporter of fascism upon Mussolini's rise to power in 1922, viewing fascism's goal to destroy liberal democracy in a sympathetic manner.<ref>Blamires, Cyprian, ''World Fascism: a Historical Encyclopedia, Volume 1'' (Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO, Inc., 2006) p. 418-419.</ref>
-=== Hitler ===
-[[Adolf Hitler]] blamed Germany's parliamentary government for many of the nation's ills and wrote that he would destroy that form of government. Hitler believed in the [[Führerprinzip|leader principle]] (hence his title, the Leader, ''der Führer''), and he considered it ludicrous that an idea of governance or morality could be held by the people above the power of the leader. As [[Joachim Fest]] described a 1930 confrontation between Hitler and [[Otto Strasser]], "Now Hitler took Strasser to task for placing 'the idea' above the Führer and wanting 'to give every party comrade the right to decide the nature of the idea, even to decide whether or not the Führer is true to the so-called idea.' That, he cried angrily, was the worst kind of democracy, for which there was no place in their movement. 'With us the Führer and the idea are one and the same, and every party comrade has to do what the Führer commands, for he embodies the idea and he alone knows its ultimate goal.'"<ref name="Fest1973">{{Citation |last=Fest |first=Joachim C. |authorlink=Joachim Fest |year=1973 |title=Hitler |isbn=978-3549073018 |postscript=.}}</ref>
-=== Shach ===
-Israeli politician Rabbi [[Elazar Menachem Shach]] promoted [[Judaism|Judaic law]] to be the natural governance for [[Jews]] and condemned democracy, he claimed that "Democracy as a machinery of lies, false notions, pursuit of narrow interests and deceit - as opposed to the [[Torah]] regime, which is based on seeking the ultimate truth". Shach criticized democracy for having no real goals, saying "The whole point of democracy is money. The one does what the other asks him to do in pursuit of his own interest, so as to be given what he himself asks for, and the whole purpose of the transaction is that each would get what they want".
-==See also==
-*[[Criticism of democracy]]
-*[[Chinese skepticism of democracy]]
-*[[Elitism]]
-*[[Fascist (insult)]]
-*[[Minoritarianism]]
-*[[Neoreaction]]
-*[[Oligarchy]]
-*[[Plutocracy]]
-==References==
-{{Reflist}}
-[[Category:Democracy]]
-[[Category:Elections]]