Jump to content

Talk:Cuniculture: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Fixed {{Vital article}}
Arctino (talk | contribs)
m Reverted 1 edit by 117.214.234.55 (talk) to last revision by Cewbot
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Vital article|class=start|level=5|topic=Technology}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Mammals|importance=low|Pocket-pet=yes}}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Mammals|class=start|importance=low|Pocket-pet=yes}}
{{WikiProject Agriculture|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Agriculture|class=start|importance=mid}}
}}
}}



Latest revision as of 12:37, 7 September 2024

Untitled

[edit]

Shouldn't this be cuniculture? --Zundark 21:50 Jan 18, 2003 (UTC)

cuniculture, cunniculture', both are fine. Does that matter ?
How can cunniculture be fine? The Latin word for rabbit is cuniculus. The Latin word cunnus means something quite different (as in cunnilingus). --Zundark 14:32 Jan 19, 2003 (UTC)

yeah, i think this article is actually about something... else.---Stevert

is it a typo for bunniculture perhaps? :) Nevilley

Suggestions for Expansion

[edit]

Please feel free to run with these (I will edit as well as I have time). Please include international aspect whenever possible

  • livestock used (ie, species)
  • Current extent & subsectors (meat/fur) of the industry (a table might be nice)
  • history - Done Kerani (talk) 08:36, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • current trends
    • developed nations vs developing nations
    • international trade
  • techniques & methods (to include preferred breeds)
  • pictures would be awesome

Kerani (talk) 02:23, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced claim

[edit]

The most recent edit ( 19:34, 17 September 2015‎ 2620:72:0:22c:f4d0:a98d:5e07:f14e ) changed the last line in the intro paragraph from "The distribution of rabbit farming varies around the globe, and while it is on the decline in some nations, in others it is expanding." to "For the past decade, world champion rabbit fanciers have used cages constructed with walnut frame and tungsten wire." This is uncited, and a cursory Google search finds no corroboration. In addition, it appears to be bunk, on its face. I only took the time to look it up because it seemed so odd. Is there any reason not to undo this edit? I felt I should ask, but given how little talk there is on this page and that the post has been up for over three months without attention, I will probably revert it anyway myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.179.116.155 (talk)

Agreed, I also saw that. Just fixed it. HoworHow 06:21, 29 February 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by HoworHow (talkcontribs)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cuniculture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:07, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cuniculture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:55, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]