Jump to content

Achterdam: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
m Reverted edits by 46.169.242.38 (talk) (HG) (3.4.12)
Tags: Huggle Rollback Reverted
Line 44: Line 44:
Following the October 2000 abolition of the law banning brothels, sex establishments in Alkmaar, such as the houses on the Achterdam, have been allowed provided they have a license from the municipal council.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://alkmaar.regelingenbank.nl/regelingen/Algemene-plaatselijke-verordening/23-10-2010 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120530092732/http://alkmaar.regelingenbank.nl/regelingen/Algemene-plaatselijke-verordening/23-10-2010 |url-status=dead |archive-date=30 May 2012 |title=Algemene plaatselijke verordening Alkmaar, zoals geldig vanaf 23-10-2010], artikel 3.2.1 |trans-title=Alkmaar General Bylaw valid from 23 October 2010, article 3.2.1 |language=nl |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |website=www.alkmaar.regelingenbank.nl |publisher=Regelingenbank Alkmaar |access-date=4 September 2015 }}</ref> In the 2000s there were between 120 and 125 prostitution windows operating in Achterdam.
Following the October 2000 abolition of the law banning brothels, sex establishments in Alkmaar, such as the houses on the Achterdam, have been allowed provided they have a license from the municipal council.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://alkmaar.regelingenbank.nl/regelingen/Algemene-plaatselijke-verordening/23-10-2010 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120530092732/http://alkmaar.regelingenbank.nl/regelingen/Algemene-plaatselijke-verordening/23-10-2010 |url-status=dead |archive-date=30 May 2012 |title=Algemene plaatselijke verordening Alkmaar, zoals geldig vanaf 23-10-2010], artikel 3.2.1 |trans-title=Alkmaar General Bylaw valid from 23 October 2010, article 3.2.1 |language=nl |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |website=www.alkmaar.regelingenbank.nl |publisher=Regelingenbank Alkmaar |access-date=4 September 2015 }}</ref> In the 2000s there were between 120 and 125 prostitution windows operating in Achterdam.


From May 2001, prostitutes needed full EU passports or EU residence permits to work in Achterdam. As a result, all Bulgarians and Rumanians women could no longer work in Achterdam. This left a number of empty windows which were filled by other, Latin American women and (older) Dutch sex workers.<ref name="tampep" />
From May 2001, prostitutes needed full EU passports or EU residence permits to work in Achterdam. As a result, all Bulgarians and Rumanians women could no longer work in Achterdam. This left a number of empty windows which were filled by other East Europeans, Latin American women and (older) Dutch sex workers.<ref name="tampep" />


During the 2000s there were complaints about the alleged nuisance resulting from prostitution in Achterdam. This led to the windows having to close by 1am.
During the 2000s there were complaints about the alleged nuisance resulting from prostitution in Achterdam. This led to the windows having to close by 1am.
Line 63: Line 63:
In 2007, 92 of the windows were run by Koos Nool, who also owned some of the windows. Others were owned by [[Cor van Hout]], who was involved in the [[kidnapping of Freddy Heineken]]. When Nool applied to renew his licenses, Alkmaar Mayor Piet Bruinooge refused the license renewal on the advice of the Bureau BIBOB,<ref name=RvS,20juli11>[http://www.raadvanstate.nl/uitspraken/actuele_uitspraken/hoofdzaken/zoekresultaat/?zoeken_veld=&verdict_id=XgDkoO8dt3U= Uitspraak Raad van State, Bestuursrechtspraak, 20 juli 2011, zaaknummer 200909931/1/H3.]</ref> on suspicion of [[money laundering]] and that the windows had been brought with money from crime.<ref name=nrc20juli11>NRC Handelsblad, 20 juli 2011.</ref><ref name=RvS.2.4>Uitspraak Raad van State 20 juli 2011 (zie eerdere voetnoot), punt 2.4</ref><ref name=nrc12nov09>NRC Handelsblad, 12 November 2009.</ref> Nool challenged the decision in the Alkmaar Court, which decided there was "insufficient information on the serious risk that the permit would be misused for illegal purposes".<ref name="september">{{cite web |url= http://www.ditisalkmaar.nl/foto/achterdam |title= Over Stikvoortrood en prostitutie |date= 22 September 2010 |website= Dit is Alkmaar |access-date= 16 October 2017 |language= nl |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160610200112/http://www.ditisalkmaar.nl/foto/achterdam |archive-date= 10 June 2016 |url-status= dead }}</ref><ref name=nrc12nov09/> On appeal in the Administrative Law Division of the Council of State (ABrVS), based on further information from the Bureau BIBOB, the Court ruled the Mayor had been justified in refusing the permit application.<ref>{{cite web |url= https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/e-library/documents/policies/organized-crime-and-human-trafficking/crime-prevention/docs/final_report_eu_study_administrative_approaches_to_crime_en.pdf |title= Administrative ApApproacheso Crime |editor1-last= Spapens |editor1-first= A.C.M. |editor2-last= Peters |editor2-first= M |editor3-last= Van Daele |editor3-first= D |date= 2015 |website= European Commission |access-date= 16 October 2017 }}</ref>
In 2007, 92 of the windows were run by Koos Nool, who also owned some of the windows. Others were owned by [[Cor van Hout]], who was involved in the [[kidnapping of Freddy Heineken]]. When Nool applied to renew his licenses, Alkmaar Mayor Piet Bruinooge refused the license renewal on the advice of the Bureau BIBOB,<ref name=RvS,20juli11>[http://www.raadvanstate.nl/uitspraken/actuele_uitspraken/hoofdzaken/zoekresultaat/?zoeken_veld=&verdict_id=XgDkoO8dt3U= Uitspraak Raad van State, Bestuursrechtspraak, 20 juli 2011, zaaknummer 200909931/1/H3.]</ref> on suspicion of [[money laundering]] and that the windows had been brought with money from crime.<ref name=nrc20juli11>NRC Handelsblad, 20 juli 2011.</ref><ref name=RvS.2.4>Uitspraak Raad van State 20 juli 2011 (zie eerdere voetnoot), punt 2.4</ref><ref name=nrc12nov09>NRC Handelsblad, 12 November 2009.</ref> Nool challenged the decision in the Alkmaar Court, which decided there was "insufficient information on the serious risk that the permit would be misused for illegal purposes".<ref name="september">{{cite web |url= http://www.ditisalkmaar.nl/foto/achterdam |title= Over Stikvoortrood en prostitutie |date= 22 September 2010 |website= Dit is Alkmaar |access-date= 16 October 2017 |language= nl |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160610200112/http://www.ditisalkmaar.nl/foto/achterdam |archive-date= 10 June 2016 |url-status= dead }}</ref><ref name=nrc12nov09/> On appeal in the Administrative Law Division of the Council of State (ABrVS), based on further information from the Bureau BIBOB, the Court ruled the Mayor had been justified in refusing the permit application.<ref>{{cite web |url= https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/e-library/documents/policies/organized-crime-and-human-trafficking/crime-prevention/docs/final_report_eu_study_administrative_approaches_to_crime_en.pdf |title= Administrative ApApproacheso Crime |editor1-last= Spapens |editor1-first= A.C.M. |editor2-last= Peters |editor2-first= M |editor3-last= Van Daele |editor3-first= D |date= 2015 |website= European Commission |access-date= 16 October 2017 }}</ref>


A number of females of Turkish-German descent were convicted of [[human trafficking]] in 2008 (the so-called SNEEP Case). They had been forcing women to work as prostitutes. The victims were lured to the Netherlands and forced to work in the windows. Some women were forced to undergo [[breast enlargement]] surgery and have the traffickers initials tattooed on their neck.<ref name="background">{{cite web |url= https://www.alkmaar.nl/gemeente/webcms/site/gemeente/files/p_64278.pdf |title= Background information Achterdam |website= Alkmaar |access-date=16 October 2017 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url= https://ec.europa.eu/anti-trafficking/sites/antitrafficking/files/the_sneep_case_en_1.pdf |title= The SNEEP case |date= 11 July 2008 |website= European Commission |access-date= 16 October 2017 }}</ref>
A number of females of Turkish-German descent were convicted of [[human trafficking]] in 2008 (the so-called SNEEP Case). They had been forcing women, mostly from East Europe, to work as prostitutes. The victims were lured to the Netherlands and forced to work in the windows. Some women were forced to undergo [[breast enlargement]] surgery and have the traffickers initials tattooed on their neck.<ref name="background">{{cite web |url= https://www.alkmaar.nl/gemeente/webcms/site/gemeente/files/p_64278.pdf |title= Background information Achterdam |website= Alkmaar |access-date=16 October 2017 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url= https://ec.europa.eu/anti-trafficking/sites/antitrafficking/files/the_sneep_case_en_1.pdf |title= The SNEEP case |date= 11 July 2008 |website= European Commission |access-date= 16 October 2017 }}</ref>


A Moroccan man was jailed for 1 year for trafficking a girl to Achterdam in November 2010.<ref>{{cite web |url= https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:RBSGR:2010:BO5076&showbutton=true |title= Uitspraken |website= de Rechtspraak |access-date= 16 October 2017 |language= nl }}</ref>
A Moroccan man was jailed for 1 year for trafficking a girl to Achterdam in November 2010.<ref>{{cite web |url= https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:RBSGR:2010:BO5076&showbutton=true |title= Uitspraken |website= de Rechtspraak |access-date= 16 October 2017 |language= nl }}</ref>

Revision as of 21:47, 15 August 2023

Achterdam
Achterdam by night
Achterdam by night
Length150 m (490 ft)
LocationAlkmaar, The Netherlands
Coordinates52°37′53″N 4°45′7″E / 52.63139°N 4.75194°E / 52.63139; 4.75194
Other
Known forWindow Prostitution
Websiteachterdam.nl

The Achterdam is a red light district in the Dutch city of Alkmaar, 30 km North of Amsterdam. It is the only place in Alkmaar where window prostitution is permitted. It is situated about 10 minutes walk from the Alkmaar train station. It is a 150-metre-long street with window prostitution on both sides. The area has about 69 windows with rooms.[1] Mainly Eastern European women work there.[2]

Windows

There are about 69 windows with rooms.[1] The rate paid by prostitutes to rent rooms is 125 Euros per day, with prostitutes applying daily for rooms on a first come, first served basis.[1]

The windows are all privately owned and the street is administered under the guidance of the Municipal government and police.[3] There is a private security service[3] and security cameras[4] for safety.

In order to prevent exploitation and trafficking[3] a number of measures are in place:

  • Owners of the windows can have no financial involvement with the tenants[3]
  • Prostitutes must be over 21 years of age and have identity papers,[1][3] be registered with the municipality of Alkmaar (GBA) and the Chamber of Commerce (KvK), as well as health insurance.[5]
  • Prostitutes have to be interviewed[5] and there is an in-depth check on their identity papers[3] before they are allowed to rent a window
  • Third parties may not rent windows on behalf of the prostitutes

The rent for the room includes cleaning, maintenance, towels, bed linen and wi-fi.[5]

Opening hours are from 09:00 to 01:00.[5]

The prostitutes are all members of the Association of Achterdam[6] and are visited weekly by support workers from Aanloophuis De Steiger.[7] Medical check-ups are available on alternate Tuesdays[6]

History and municipal policy

Prostitution has been practiced in Alkmaar for at least two centuries. In 1811, the French government (Alkmaar was part of the French Empire at this time) set regulations for "huizen van ontucht" in Alkmaar. This was one of the first cities with rules for prostitution.[8]

In 1991, the city council adopted a policy paper Prostitutie en overige sexinrichtingen vast ("Prostitution and other sex institutions"). It was intended to be model European prototype.[8] The Achterdam window prostitution it proposed was first operational in 1973.[1]

Following the October 2000 abolition of the law banning brothels, sex establishments in Alkmaar, such as the houses on the Achterdam, have been allowed provided they have a license from the municipal council.[9] In the 2000s there were between 120 and 125 prostitution windows operating in Achterdam.

From May 2001, prostitutes needed full EU passports or EU residence permits to work in Achterdam. As a result, all Bulgarians and Rumanians women could no longer work in Achterdam. This left a number of empty windows which were filled by other East Europeans, Latin American women and (older) Dutch sex workers.[6]

During the 2000s there were complaints about the alleged nuisance resulting from prostitution in Achterdam. This led to the windows having to close by 1am.

In 2004 and again in 2015, the window operators held an "open day" during which members of the public could tour the premises and speak to the prostitutes.[10]

In 2007 licenses were revoked for brothels alleged to be involved in money laundering.

Following changes in licensing rules in 2011 the number of prostitution windows was limited to a maximum of 69.

In 2012 the Central Alkmaar Residents' Association campaigned for the end of all window prostitution in Achterdam, while the window operators proposed an end to the 69-window limit.[11]

There have been anti-trafficking raids at various times. The biggest was in March 2013 when more than 500 employees of the Municipality of Alkmaar, Public Prosecutor’s Office and the police were involved in the raid. All prostitutes, window owners and anybody in the street at the time were arrested and questioned.[12]

Criminality

Two prostitutes were murdered in Achterdam in 1996. One of the murderers was identified from CCTV but fled the country. The second murderer was never identified.[13]

In 2007, 92 of the windows were run by Koos Nool, who also owned some of the windows. Others were owned by Cor van Hout, who was involved in the kidnapping of Freddy Heineken. When Nool applied to renew his licenses, Alkmaar Mayor Piet Bruinooge refused the license renewal on the advice of the Bureau BIBOB,[14] on suspicion of money laundering and that the windows had been brought with money from crime.[15][16][17] Nool challenged the decision in the Alkmaar Court, which decided there was "insufficient information on the serious risk that the permit would be misused for illegal purposes".[8][17] On appeal in the Administrative Law Division of the Council of State (ABrVS), based on further information from the Bureau BIBOB, the Court ruled the Mayor had been justified in refusing the permit application.[18]

A number of females of Turkish-German descent were convicted of human trafficking in 2008 (the so-called SNEEP Case). They had been forcing women, mostly from East Europe, to work as prostitutes. The victims were lured to the Netherlands and forced to work in the windows. Some women were forced to undergo breast enlargement surgery and have the traffickers initials tattooed on their neck.[19][20]

A Moroccan man was jailed for 1 year for trafficking a girl to Achterdam in November 2010.[21]

In March 2013 two men, one Hungarian, the other Romanian, were was arrested for human trafficking during a raid on Achterdam.[22] In November that year another man was arrested, again for trafficking.[23]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d e "Rossebuurt Alkmaar Kamerverhuur" [Alkmaar Red Light District - Room Rental] (in Dutch). Retrieved 15 October 2017.
  2. ^ "Achterdam". GuRoute.com. Retrieved 1 April 2018.
  3. ^ a b c d e f "Achterdam Informatie". De Achterdam (in Dutch). Retrieved 15 October 2017.
  4. ^ "Alkmaar". AXXXTW. Retrieved 15 October 2017.
  5. ^ a b c d "Achterdam Verhuur" (in Dutch). Retrieved 15 October 2017.
  6. ^ a b c "Transnational Aids/STD Prevention Among Migrant Prostitutes In Europe Project Final Report" (PDF). TAMPEP. June 2002 – June 2004. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 November 2013. Retrieved 15 October 2017.
  7. ^ "Het Achterdam Team". Aanloophuis De Steiger (in Dutch). Retrieved 15 October 2017.
  8. ^ a b c "Over Stikvoortrood en prostitutie". Dit is Alkmaar (in Dutch). 22 September 2010. Archived from the original on 10 June 2016. Retrieved 16 October 2017.
  9. ^ "Algemene plaatselijke verordening Alkmaar, zoals geldig vanaf 23-10-2010], artikel 3.2.1" [Alkmaar General Bylaw valid from 23 October 2010, article 3.2.1]. www.alkmaar.regelingenbank.nl (in Dutch). Regelingenbank Alkmaar. Archived from the original on 30 May 2012. Retrieved 4 September 2015.
  10. ^ Brandsma, Hans (20 March 2015). "Open dag in Alkmaarse hoerenstraat" [Open Day in Alkmaar's Whore Street]. Noordhollands Dagblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 8 September 2015.
  11. ^ "Prostitutie Alkmaarse Achterdam moet helemaal weg" [Prostitution in Achterdam, Alkmaar must end completely]. Nu (in Dutch). Netherlands. 19 May 2012. Retrieved 7 September 2015.
  12. ^ "Telraam (abacus) action (Achterdam) 2013" (PDF). Alkmaar. Retrieved 16 October 2017.
  13. ^ du Plessis, Jean. "A brief survey of 'Frame' Prostitution in the major cities of the Netherlands" (PDF). Retrieved 16 October 2017.
  14. ^ Uitspraak Raad van State, Bestuursrechtspraak, 20 juli 2011, zaaknummer 200909931/1/H3.
  15. ^ NRC Handelsblad, 20 juli 2011.
  16. ^ Uitspraak Raad van State 20 juli 2011 (zie eerdere voetnoot), punt 2.4
  17. ^ a b NRC Handelsblad, 12 November 2009.
  18. ^ Spapens, A.C.M.; Peters, M; Van Daele, D, eds. (2015). "Administrative ApApproacheso Crime" (PDF). European Commission. Retrieved 16 October 2017.
  19. ^ "Background information Achterdam" (PDF). Alkmaar. Retrieved 16 October 2017.
  20. ^ "The SNEEP case" (PDF). European Commission. 11 July 2008. Retrieved 16 October 2017.
  21. ^ "Uitspraken". de Rechtspraak (in Dutch). Retrieved 16 October 2017.
  22. ^ "Telraam (abacus) action (Achterdam) 2013" (PDF). Alkmaar. Retrieved 16 October 2017.
  23. ^ agrobinson (8 November 2013). "Hungarians and Limburg Locals Arrested for Human Trafficking". NL Times. Retrieved 16 October 2017.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Achterdam&oldid=1170574009"