User talk:Deb

Coming here to ask why I deleted your article? Read this page first...

If that doesn't help, read these FAQs.

1. Why did you delete my page when I hadn't finished writing it?

Answer: Don't create new articles unless you are sure they meet wikipedia's criteria, particularly notability and verifiability. If you want to practice, there is the sandbox facility and Wikipedia:Articles for creation where you can get a second opinion from a more experienced contributor. And if you really can't help yourself, use {{underconstruction}} so other people will know you are still working on it.

2. Why did you delete my page for advertising? I wasn't trying to advertise!

Answer: Read Wikipedia:NPOV for guidance on how to word an article so that it doesn't sound like an advertisement.

3. Why did you delete my page for advertising? It was about a non-profit organisation!

Answer: Non-profit organisations advertise all the time - it's still promotion and the rule applies to them just as it does to commercial bodies. See no 2 above.

4. Why did you delete my article without warning?

Answer: Because you are not entitled to a warning if you don't follow the guidelines. See no 1 above.

5. Why didn't you do a google search and find references for my article and put them in for me instead of just deleting it?

Answer: Because I don't have time to do the boring bits for you. I have enough boring bits of my own to work on, thank you.

And please SIGN YOUR POSTS, otherwise I don't know who is asking me the question!

Archives: 1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15

Moving of "Sweet Freedom album" to "Sweet Freedon (Michael McDonald album)"

Was this really neccessary as the original title was unique and you lost the link from Michael McDonald discography page by not leaving a redirect. Delangle9

Yes, it was really necessary as there is already an article about another album called this.Deb (talk) 15:30, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Why didn't I get a disambiguity then? (although I am a relative newcomer to Wiki) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Delangle9 (talk • contribs) 15:37, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

This is confusing as I've had exactly the opposit happen before. A long title I put in like yours was shortened to a title like my original by another "watcher".

I start by writing a page in Word then creating a link from the artist's discography page to get a new empty Wiki page, copy/paste from Word then check everything is OK with Wiki. Usually if the title I give it in the link already exists then I don't get an empty page so I go back the the link and expand the title as you did to get an empty page. The latter didn't happen in this case so I assumed the title was unique. I haven't yet tried using the sandbox, but will get round to it sometime.

I'm Ok with this album taking second place as it is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Delangle9 (talk • contribs) 16:13, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of Cracker Loc

The article was deleted for being too short. but does the article itself need to be long when all the info on the person (which included their works) was provided via links within the article?

Deletion of ACEMD

Dear Deb, I would ask you to reconsider your swift deletion of my page. It wasn't any more of an 'advert' than any of the other pages in the Category:Molecular_dynamics_software, many of which, incidentally, are also on the topic of commercial software. Indeed, I was careful to maintain a neutral perspective and list only facts. The article I wrote was referenced and meaningful for a reader interested in the wider subject. Yes, it was short (many others in the category are similarly so), but it's hardly encouraging me to expound upon the topic if my work gets deleted in the time it takes me to go and make a cup of tea. talk

Deletion of Aljadidah

Aljadidah is a arabic news platform with a notable number of users and the first arabic news portal focusing on women rights in Austria. The extension of the article with info and refs was in progress while the article was deleted by you. Is it possible to reactivate or at least to move into my sandbox for further enhancements? David.trattnig (talk) 13:10, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of Mike Fulton Charlie

You've stated no legitimate reasoning in deleting the page especially since it is under construction and needs a lot of work to be done to it till it is completed. The page was legitimate and or it was stated previously that more information would be depicted as it was compiled and written about him. Please refrain from issuing a deletion of the page until it is fully constructed or at least constructed to a somewhat better level of structure, if after it is fully constructed and does not have meaning behind the page you are free to delete it. Commodore4eva (talk) 19:29, 11 November 2013 (UTC) commodore4eva

Deletion of Nanda Mallawaarachchi

You deleted Nanda Mallawaarachchi with a log reason of "G2: Test page)". The creator has inquired about this at the Help desk. The page does not look like a test page to me. It looks like an WP:AFC draft created in the wrong namespace. I am asking you to please undelete it and move it to the proper position, or indicate your reasons for not doing so. DES ^(talk) 01:44, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

The Infobox had some additional coding that caused the page to display as this. I restored the article and fixed it (I hope you don't mind) : ). - -Jreferee (talk) 02:12, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for doing that. I couldn't see any content. Deb (talk) 11:20, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of Frank louis allen

You deleted Frank louis allen with a logged reason of A7. The article included the text "Despite this he is a successful artist who has had work published and displayed in Hollywood Gallery's, as well as various Exhibitions around California." While clearly not enough to survive an AfD, I think this does constitute a 'claim of significance' sufficient to avoid an A7 Speedy. The article is somewhat promotional, and may well be an autobiography, but those issues can be dealt with through editing. Would you consider undeleting this? DES ^(talk) 02:07, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

It is a claim, but not a plausible one. I'd say that the fact he's had work displayed in a gallery in Hollywood is not an indication of success - for all we know, his work may be on display in the toilets, or it may be some very minor gallery. However, I can move it to his user page, which may be what he really intended.Deb (talk) 11:08, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

I agree this is far from proof of notability. It could indicate someone of no significant accomplishment or someone about whom a very good article could be written. By my standards that is enough to decline an A7, although not enough to survive an AfD without improvement, nor enough to pass a review at AfC. DES ^(talk) 12:20, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

The more I look at it, the more I feel it doesn't even qualify as a claim of notability. It doesn't seem to me to meet the criteria in WP:ARTIST. However, I did google on the gentleman before I deleted it and couldn't find any indication of notability there either. Deb (talk) 13:44, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

It is my position that a claim under A7 need not and often will not meet any of the specialized notability guidelines, nor the GNG. Any allegedly factual statement that is not preposterous, and that might indicate that if research were done notability might plausibly appear is sufficient. While I can't say there is a clear consensus for that standard, there is a clear consensus that a claim that passes A7 is a "much lower bar" than establishing true notability, and that a claim need not be referenced at all. I had a good deal to do with the debates that created A7 and then expanded it to other kinds of subjects, and I think the "lower bar" concept was widely accepted from the first, and essential to A7 being adopted as a CSD. Note that the CSD wording is not "claim of notability" but "claim of significance". I would also say, if you have to Google to be sure, it isn't an A7, it is a PROD (although i am glad you did check) DES ^(talk) 15:43, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

No, sorry, I don't agree. For me, having had paintings displayed in "Hollywood galleries" would never be a claim of significance for an artist, nor would having had "exhibitions in California", nor indeed would being "successful". However, had I found some evidence of notability in a google search, I might have cut him a bit of slack. Deb (talk) 16:47, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of Ashwini Kumar Chopra

You deleted Ashwini Kumar Chopra under A7. The deleted text includes "senior journalist, Resident Editor, Punjab Kesari" and "Ashwini is well known for his daily page one, Special Editorial with bold and popular wording." I think that, taken together, these form a "plausible claim of significance". Obviously the article needed significant work, but i don't think an A7 speedy delete appropriate. DES ^(talk) 02:53, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

I think there is a case for restoring it, so I've done that. I hope someone will work on it to bring it up to standard. Having said that, the wording you quote is at best subjective. My initial googling came up with very little, but a search on the name of the paper helped me find some evidence of notability. Deb (talk) 11:17, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Block of 119.160.119.85

Hi Deb, you blocked 119.160.119.85 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) indefinitely per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yasir72.multan, would please consider reducing the block to a month or three (especially since any innocent users the IP may get assigned to aren't able to appeal on wiki)? Assuming the IP is very static, a couple of months is still a reasonable period of time for a sockmaster who hasn't been active for very long. Thanks and regards, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:13, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page.Deb (talk) 11:12, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of Visionborne

Hi Deb, can you help me to write a better description for this company? You deleted my description and I can't understand what was wrong with it.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luca986 (talk • contribs) 12:36, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of AdTrap page

You deleted the page AdTrap citing "A3: Article that has no meaningful, substantive content". I understand the reason but I was right in the middle of fleshing out the article. I haven't been active on Wikipedia in some time so I was not aware of the sandbox feature. Could that page be restored so I can move it into my sandbox to further develop the page? --BiloxiGeek (talk) 11:54, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Page protection

Hi again. I think Mind Your Manners (Pearl Jam song) is another page that needs protection. IP editors adding non-notable trivia myself and another user keep removing. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 09:08, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

And thanks again. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 13:09, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Family of Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge page protection

Hi Deb. In the meantime, could you please restore the consensus version that Virgosky reverted four times today, either with no valid reason specified or no reason specified at all? (it is not the final version because I refrained from reverting in the heat of the moment, and I don't see why I should be penalized for that) HelenOnline 15:49, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

You Should Be Aware

Hi Deb, thank you for your assistance. I just wanted you to be aware about the notice below, which I copy and pasted from my own Talk page [1], because you were the Administrator who assisted us. Virgosky (talk) 17:18, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Virgosky reported by User:HelenOnline. Thank you. HelenOnline 16:56, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Please note I did not post this notice here and I am sure it is not appropriate to copy and paste a signed talk page post to a different talk page. Rather add a diff link to the actual post (since removed). HelenOnline 18:15, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Please see WP:TALKNO for talk page behaviour that is unacceptable (including this). HelenOnline 18:22, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Deb. You have new messages at Antiqueight's talk page.
Message added 16:22, 30 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 16:22, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

You deleted my page Toby Vaughan

In your deletion you mentioned attacking as the reason but I didn't say anything derogatory at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tobe le rone42 (talk • contribs) 15:52, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Perhaps you should have worded it more carefully then. Deb (talk) 16:04, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, which part did you take offence to to make you remove it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tobe le rone42 (talk • contribs) 16:28, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

The bit that was a hoax. Deb (talk) 19:13, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

None of it was a hoax. Why would you be so arrogant to think that my life and work in my band which were very well known in North London, Herfordshire and Essex is a hoax?? Could you please reinstate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tobe le rone42 (talk • contribs) 10:14, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

 Comment: It seems like the article is about the user himself. If so, it wouldn't make sense if the user would attack himself, would it? --HYH.124 (talk) 12:32, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

You would be surprised how many people set up accounts in other people's names in order to say insulting things about them! Deb (talk) 13:23, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

'(Friendly (talk page stalker) Rather like this perhaps. — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 17:17, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Sounds faintly obscene, actually! :-) Deb (talk) 18:05, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Ha, ha! I can understand what you mean. — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 18:24, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Why are you deleting my page?

You are deleting a legitimate entry for a real magazine that has a large following. Can you explain why I am unable to add Celtic Guide magazine to Wikipedia? Why have you blacklisted the website for it?

Csemerick — Preceding unsigned comment added by Csemerick (talk • contribs) 19:06, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Screenshot of IE8 glitch.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Screenshot of IE8 glitch.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Past tense of 'bear'

See this link. It seems like "beared" is a word. I am puzzled. Any idea? HYH.124 (talk) 12:15, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Re: Article title

Hello, Deb. You have new messages at Talk:Daughter of Emperor Xiaoming of Northern Wei.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Signature

Just to notify you that you forgot to sign off at User talk:Tobe le rone42. Please remember to sign off next time. I signed on behalf of you. --Huang (user page | talk | contribs | info) 10:53, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

killer kittens is mad

you end my page of the the dead kid

Killer kittens (talk) 14:30, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Bit weird....

Mike Fulton Charlie

Could you have a look in at Commodore4eva's talk page? I'm sure both of us are talking English, but we don't seem to be communicating... Peridon (talk) 22:11, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Metro Manila malls

Hi. I see that you have been deleting articles on three notable shopping malls of my metropolis so far, without even nominating those articles first for AFD so that contributors are given a chance to improve and rescue them. What is with this unilateral deletion without getting consensus? I am telling you those malls you deleted are all notable given their size, popularity and location, Isetann Cinerama Recto and Forum Robinsons are connected to metro/MRT stations for instance and are popular shopping centers by the five biggest mall developers in the Philippines.--RioHondo (talk) 01:19, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

LambdaNative

Hi Deb, I noticed you tagged LambdaNative as being an advertisement, which is clearly not what I intended. If you look at Marmalade (software), which I tried to write this in parallel to, it is quite similar in structure and content, albeit a bit shorter as it doesn't have as much history. There are a reasonable amount of references, but I would appreciate if you could point me to the places you feel need to be rewritten. Thanks MatthiasG (talk) 21:16, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Notion press

Dear Deb, Earlier, you had deleted this page due to lack of sufficient references and notability. Now I have a few source (newspapers) that state the publisher as the first free-publishing company in India. Also I want to know if yourstory.com can be considered a reliable source. I have posted the article here. Can you please see this and let me know if this passes the notability criteria? Regards--Challengethelimits (talk) 01:45, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you Deb. I will reword a few sentences and launch it to the main space. I will, in the process, add some newspaper references of regional languages.--Challengethelimits (talk) 03:44, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Am I returning?

No, probably not. Wikipedia has become a prime example of the Iron Law of Oligarchy.

This section appears to be a random sample of what the problems of Wikipedia are and will always continue to be. If my objections to it need clarification, send me e-mail. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 06:35, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. Feel free to notify my talk page, or send me an e-mail, if you have any question on which I may be helpful. I am more likely to see the e-mail. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 02:43, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

PWCT or Programming Without Coding Technology or etc..

Hi Deb,

I must admit I am rather confused about this 'new' page which you deleted back In October. [2].

It seems to have been re-created, as PWCT (software) then cut and pasted to PWCT (programming language) by Mahmoud Fayed (talk · contribs), then cut-and pasted again to PWCT by another editor Msfclipper (talk · contribs). And 212.57.215.5 (talk · contribs) also gets involved adding and removing spurious AfDs, while IIRC still editing the original page that had not been redirected.

Active Afd at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PWCT (programming language) Regards, 220 of ^Borg 10:02, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Advertisement Tag for *REDACTED*

Hi Deb. Many thanks for your notification and review of the Academy of Financial Trading page. I have to say, I am however a little confused regarding the decision to list the page as an advertorial. Having read through the terms on conditions of wikipedia on many occasions, I'm struggling to see the connection when comparing this page to others of a similar nature. From my personal perspective, this particular page contains an almost identical information flow and similar method of citations as the page which it was initially based on; *REDACTED*. That being said, the particular proofing of the information provided on the page has been removed of any flamboyant terms and language that users may consider to be advertorial, following a similar template of that used by other companies in the Online Education field.

I would truly relish the opportunity if you could provide me some further insight into how you believe this page could be improved upon, as with the ever growing presence of Online education firms, I know many agree that documentation of these providers is becoming essential!

Kind Regards IgniyteJames (talk) 12:09, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of Authority Brand

Hey Deb, first of all thanks for your time for checking out the new articles i've posted. The one you deleted was one of a "system" of definition for brands present in a book i've recently read. In some ways you are right about the book cited as reference being the only one presenting this kind of definition (as far as i know). This was not intended to be an advertising for the book, but to complete the categorization of brands present in the book. If instead of deletion you would like some refinements about the article i will be glad to do it. Since i am also pretty new in the wiki scene, i'd like to know how to put the article back online (if you agree).

Thanks again for your time, Fabio.pisano (talk) 13:28, 21 November 2013 (UTC)Fabio

Deletion of Vadde Ramesh

Hello Deb, You have recently deleted an Article Vadde Ramesh, who was notable indian telugu film producer, passed away on 2013 November 21. I dont know on which basis you deleted the article. you could have try to know about him before deleting the article or could have informed me before doing so. It took me more than two hours to create that article and you simply deleted it with one click. I request you to notify the authors before doing so as such actions will highly discourage the authors from adding reliable content to wiki. for your information, I am not a new Wiki user, rather a very old (from 2007) wiki member, who has added notable number of articles. An Interwiki article about Vadde Ramesh is available in Telugu wikipedia వడ్డే రమేష్
For more information about Vadde Ramesh, I request you to refer this linkVadde Ramesh On Internet Search--Sultankhadar (talk) 16:51, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

So you think it's my job to find references and put them in the article for you? It isn't. Deb (talk) 17:06, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Comebuy.com

Hi,

I see that You deleted my page. Why? It wasn't promotional or something like that. I spent 2 hours trying to write a new article, as well as improving other articles about Singapor. Could you please put it back, and maybe open a discussion about it? I think it's wrong to delete it just like this. --PearToPear (talk) 22:27, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Pavletic111 Unnecessary attempt of deletion of couple of year old Serbo-Croatian Wikipedia pages

I have noticed that you deleted a couple of pages I tried to create with all the proper links and connections, as well as all the necessary International publications, as well as proper and legitimate connections and articles. Why? Also I have on top of that also noticed that you attempted to delete, or suggested deletion of a couple of year old Serbo-Croatian Wikipedia page https://sh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Pavletić

• This is what I call disingenuous. Way back last year you were warned not to create articles promoting yourself and your work. You should have listened to that advice.Deb (talk) 13:28, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Pavletic111 unnecessary attempt of deletion of couple of year old Serbo-Croatian pages

The original creator of the "VIlla Maria" page, who had originally made the official connection to this Serbo-Croatian link, has also inquired about this at the Help desk. The page does not look like a test page, or any such anonymous self-promotional attempt. This page has been created couple of years ago, and since then has been added, cleaned up, and corrected by multiple people. I am asking you to please not touch this official Serbo-Croatian Wikipedia page, and remove your unnecessary comments, as this has also been brought up to at the Help Page, as deliberate attempts of deletion of anything connected to my name Pavletic, due to this username Pavletic111, or any personal un-objective reasons of any personal nature. Therefore please refrain from further attempts of deletion of such or any older Serbo-Croatian sites, as such attempts will be brought up further to the Help Desk. As well as deletion of the official movie 476 A.D. Chapter One: The Last Light of Aries. At the same time, I'm asking you now to please also undelete the pages for the official film 476 A.D. Chapter One: The Last Light of Aries, which has all the necessary links to it, and move it to the proper position, or indicate your reasons for not doing so. However, please refrain from further attemts to desrupt any older Serbo-Croatian pages. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pavletic111 (talk • contribs) 04:22, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

No idea what you are talking about. I am not aware of having touched the article Villa Maria. Deb (talk) 13:30, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

deletion articles Marina Oceania

Hi Deb

I am writing to you about deletion articles '''Marina Oceania''' in Cambodia. I want to explain my motives of writing this article. This is the first professional marina in the country's history. And the opening of the marina is really significant. Construction of the marina agreed and supported by the Government of Cambodia. Local and foreign media wrote about the marina. I want to rewrite the article again in an abridged version. Please do not judge strictly, and I hope for your understanding. If you give me some advice on how to write an article about this event, I will be very grateful to you.

My regards, amantula (talk) 20:56, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi Deb

Thank you for your help. With regard to the marina in Cambodia, I tried to play by the rules and watched Wikipedia page about marinas - a list of marinas. I looked for other information marinas and wrote an article on the model .. Hundreds of marines in this list and each of them can produce notes. But how else to do?

And more. Information about this marina in Wikipedia is not advertising, because there are not the target audience and is not a place for customers. Information is available only in addition the general list of marinas.

I would love to discuss this issue and would take advice, but do not know where in there is a discussion and who else to talk about? Give me a simple way to debate, please. With all due respect,amantula (talk) 10:46, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Differentiation Colruyt Group vs Colruyt Supermarket

Hi Deb,

Thanks for your message - I agree that the page looked too promotional, so I took out all statements that could be seen as promotional and resorted to facts only. I think this is now in line with the G11 requirements (An article about a company or a product which describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for deletion criterion) Note that it's important to differentiate between the "holding" and the "supermarkets", which was the prime reason for creating the article. A similar differentation has also been made on the Dutch sections and is already been accepted there for 3 years and subject to review by multiple authors.

David — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rademakd (talk • contribs) 15:31, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

User:Cyffaleyenda18

The content of this page is written like an article and seems to be highly promotional in tone. If I hadn't seen that you had moved it to the user page, I would have speedied it on sight as a spam user page. I'm not prepared to override a GF edit by another admin, but I wonder if you should either reconsider keeping the text, or editing out all the promotional stuff (most of it). What do you think? Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:27, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Fine Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:40, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

geworkbench features

Hi Deb - I have posted a question regarding your August 14 2013 edit of the "Features" section title of Geworkbench to the Talk:Geworkbench page. Kncsmith (talk) 19:18, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

TVbeople

may i know why have a speed delete with the article TVbeople? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sdee (talk • contribs) 10:02, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

that is quoted with reference and also have the article in Chinese version for years.--TINHO (talk) 10:18, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

that is the offical website and you should ask me for more reference but not have a a speed delete with that. I deeply disappointed with your action that without any notification.--TINHO (talk) 10:35, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Deleting

You deleted my page before I was even done building it. I am not using this as a promotion, nor advertising, nor for recruitment.

I have read soapbox section you sent me. I would ask you allow users to finish their sections before you delete them. -Kelly Rubash

Answer

• I am still learning how to use this site
• You deleted my page and have given me no explanation.

How long does it take for an answer, does anyone know? Kellyrubash (talk) 18:49, 26 November 2013 (UTC)kellyrubash

What is the question? Deb (talk) 20:30, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Deleted Article BODYARMOR SuperDrink

Hi Deb, you recently deleted an article I wrote on BODYARMOR SuperDrink citing it as Unambiguous Advertising. I have since read the Wikipedia: NPOV on your talk page and have rewritten the article in an attempt to make the article objective and neutral. It is currently on my sandbox, my username is ianvor. I would like to get your input as to whether it is ready to publish. Should I just republish the article and see if it receives any admin feedback? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ianvor (talk • contribs) 18:02, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the timely response to my question. I have read the NPOV Tutorial that you suggested and updated the article on my sandbox to incorporate your comments. Would you mind taking another look? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ianvor (talk • contribs) 19:22, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you again for your feedback, you have been very helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ianvor (talk • contribs) 20:53, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Deleted

You just deleted the lizzy sports complex article. I wish to inform you that I have no personal interest in the Lizzy Sports Complex article I only thought it would be of interest to other people as I noticed there were no article to that respect on Wikipedia. I however believe this is an important landmark that should be found on Wikipedia since its the first of its kind in Ghana. so if you still don't see the need then I won't thank you.Flixtey (talk)

The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo

Thanks Deb for this. Perhaps you could add to "from the film" The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (2011 film), the American remake, which makes the comparison with the novel even greater. Cheers! — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 15:38, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of Angela Curran

Hi I was wanting to know why my article Angela Curran was deleted with no reasons left? CDFW (talk) 16:47, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Gilgamesh Brewing

Hi Deb. I can't see what was there but this article was on my watchlist. There is pretty substantial coverage for it as here. Could you please move the article to my userspace so I can work on it and address any promotional issues? There may be content and soruces to use in the article and its history, even if it was advertorial at the time of its deletion. Thanks. Candleabracadabra (talk) 14:27, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Deletion for : No explanation of significance (real person/animal/organization/web content/organized event

You deleted my page citing the reason "No explanation of significance (real person/animal/organization/web content/organized event" when the page I was creating was for one of the biggest heat source manufacturers in the UK and Ireland which is searched for thousands of times per month. I don't agree with you that this should have been deleted as it deserves a reference in Wikipedia for the people that are trying to find out more about the company. More content would have been added as I have requested the people who are involved with the company add their parts - I just laid the foundation. Please reconsider. Grahammayfly on behalf of the Grant Engineering company.

Lee Garim

Thanks... I try to follow the rules, I just don't always exactly know them^^ Ccmontgom (talk) 23:15, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

i am starting an artical serious about stone manufacturers in Qatar and the gulf area, if you like it or not, but it should be useful for others