Talk:Cuniculture: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:18, 31 December 2015

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Mammals: Pocket pets Start‑class Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Pocket pets work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Agriculture Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Shouldn't this be cuniculture? --Zundark 21:50 Jan 18, 2003 (UTC)

cuniculture, cunniculture', both are fine. Does that matter ?

How can cunniculture be fine? The Latin word for rabbit is cuniculus. The Latin word cunnus means something quite different (as in cunnilingus). --Zundark 14:32 Jan 19, 2003 (UTC)

yeah, i think this article is actually about something... else.---Stevert

is it a typo for bunniculture perhaps? :) Nevilley

Suggestions for Expansion

Please feel free to run with these (I will edit as well as I have time). Please include international aspect whenever possible

livestock used (ie, species)
Current extent & subsectors (meat/fur) of the industry (a table might be nice)
history - Done Kerani (talk) 08:36, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
current trends
- developed nations vs developing nations
- international trade
techniques & methods (to include preferred breeds)
pictures would be awesome

Kerani (talk) 02:23, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Material has been cut & pasted from domestic rabbit to use as a framework but still needs expanding, internationalizing, and clarificationKerani (talk) 12:37, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced claim

The most recent edit ( 19:34, 17 September 2015‎ 2620:72:0:22c:f4d0:a98d:5e07:f14e ) changed the last line in the intro paragraph from "The distribution of rabbit farming varies around the globe, and while it is on the decline in some nations, in others it is expanding." to "For the past decade, world champion rabbit fanciers have used cages constructed with walnut frame and tungsten wire." This is uncited, and a cursory Google search finds no corroboration. In addition, it appears to be bunk, on its face. I only took the time to look it up because it seemed so odd. Is there any reason not to undo this edit? I felt I should ask, but given how little talk there is on this page and that the post has been up for over three months without attention, I will probably revert it anyway myself.

@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 [[User:Kerani|Kerani]] ([[User talk:Kerani|talk]]) 02:23, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
 ::* Material has been cut & pasted from [[domestic rabbit]] to use as a framework but still needs expanding, internationalizing, and clarification[[User:Kerani|Kerani]] ([[User talk:Kerani|talk]]) 12:37, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
+== Unsourced claim ==
+The most recent edit ( 19:34, 17 September 2015‎ 2620:72:0:22c:f4d0:a98d:5e07:f14e ) changed the last line in the intro paragraph from "The distribution of rabbit farming varies around the globe, and while it is on the decline in some nations, in others it is expanding." to "For the past decade, world champion rabbit fanciers have used cages constructed with [[walnut]] frame and [[tungsten]] wire." This is uncited, and a cursory Google search finds no corroboration. In addition, it appears to be bunk, on its face. I only took the time to look it up because it seemed so odd. Is there any reason not to undo this edit? I felt I should ask, but given how little talk there is on this page and that the post has been up for over three months without attention, I will probably revert it anyway myself.