Jump to content

User talk:MLRoach

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 00:09, 20 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Please leave comments and I will reply on this page. If I post on your talk page, I will check there for your reply to keep the conversation in one place. Thanks!

Are you an administrator?

[edit]

If not, I would like to nominate you as an administrator!----Boeing7107isdelicious|Sprich mit meine Piloten 04:25, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't. Even when I was an active user, I had no interest in being an administrator. --Matt (talk) 03:24, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, thanks for your response anyway. I just wondered, why?----Boeing7107isdelicious|SPRiCh miT meineN PiloteN 13:59, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Too much administrivia, too many people claiming "OMG corrupt administrator!" because they don't like Wikipedia's policies, didn't want to spend my free time doing that instead of my other hobbies. --Matt (talk) 15:40, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

American Airlines hull loss

[edit]

I got those references:

Sorry my poor English. --B767-500 (talk) 16:37, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I stand corrected. --Matt (talk) 17:18, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I agree you originally point, which stating that maybe aircraft was unsure about hull lost. --B767-500 (talk) 17:38, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PitAirportLogo.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PitAirportLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:36, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Association of Independent Technological Universities

[edit]

Category:Association of Independent Technological Universities, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 06:18, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]