Talk:Louis C.K.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Semi-protected edit request on 22 January 2023
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change the statement of “Matt and Shane’s Secret Podcast” as a history podcast to a comedy podcast. The podcast is not a history podcast, it is a comedy podcast that delves into history in these few instances with Louis CK. JClay44 (talk) 04:42, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- I've just removed the word "history" and it now says that it is "a podcast hosted by comedians ...", which hopefully communicates the point. — Bilorv (talk) 11:22, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Sexual misconduct allegations in own section
As a fan of Louis CK and as someone who is largely okay with him returning to comedy, it's still a little strange for me that his sexual misconduct allegations are described - allbeit in full - in a subsection paragraph of his career.
They are a prominent part of his life and career and should be in their own top level section after both his career and personal life. It doesn't do their significance justice otherwise. 79.66.8.116 (talk) 10:18, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Per WP:CSECTION, "best practice is to incorporate positive and negative material into the same section", in order to follow a neutral point of view and due weight considerations. As you say, this is a part of C.K.'s career, and that's why it should be within that section. — Bilorv (talk) 11:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Should "Louis C.K.: Back to the Garden" be listed with the rest of his comedy specials?
It was a ticketed livestream event with a 10 day streaming window. Does that make it too disctinct for inclusion? CanningIO (talk) 21:46, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- I'd include it, though it could do with some secondary sources in the body. (At the minimum: what were its themes? What did critics think?) — Bilorv (talk) 18:29, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
- Totally a special, imo. Surprised not to see it there.--109.110.78.228 (talk) 22:17, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- B-Class biography articles
- B-Class biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Low-importance biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Actors and filmmakers work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class Comedy articles
- Top-importance Comedy articles
- WikiProject Comedy articles
- B-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- B-Class American television articles
- Mid-importance American television articles
- American television task force articles
- B-Class District of Columbia articles
- Low-importance District of Columbia articles
- WikiProject District of Columbia articles
- WikiProject United States articles