Talk:Ann Marie Buerkle

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 October 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was delete.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Conservatism

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Congress

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) person(s).

Article history

The usual non-partisan external links for this candidate are now in United States House of Representatives elections in New York, 2010#District 25, so if she ends up winning they should be moved to this article. There was originally an article under this name and/or Ann Marie Buerkle (Politician). On the off-chance it might be something more than a campaign site cut-and-paste, it could presumably be restored to provide a base for a new article if she ends up winning. Flatterworld (talk) 19:07, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

She has gotten pretty significant media coverage. So even if she did lose, her article should remain.--Jerzeykydd (talk) 04:03, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Political Views & Actions

Buerkle should have all of her political views and actions listed out on her page. As she is a politician, it is important to document what politicians say & what they do. Since actions can be interpreted differently by different people with different philosophies, it is best to document them all. I tried to find some arguments stating that the patriot act is constitutional, but could not find much. Furthermore the arguments being used to support it contain inherent flaws (which should be mentioned as a subset of the support argument) If there are any flaws for the against argument then put them is a sub-heading of it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.69.2.116 (talk) 17:56, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stop deleting my post. Saying that there is not enough citations & then saying that the citations added too much weight is just ridiculous. There is never going to be a 1/2 page article that explains the facts behind a subject - more data is always needed.

Either you leave in the short paragraph about how her vote for patriot act can be seen as in direct contrast with her campaign promises OR you should leave it all in there. Using opposing arguments as a reason for deleting my edits is very hypocritical. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.69.2.116 (talk) 02:35, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with your addition is that it's only tangentially about Buerkle. It's mainly about the Patriot Act. Some of this information might well be suitable for that article (which I haven't looked at). You should think about whether to edit that article to make sure that the criticisms of the Patriot Act are fairly presented. Your extensive research might well be the basis for improvements to that article.

The only connection to Buerkle, however, is that she made a vague Mom-and-apple-pie campaign statement about preserving constitutional rights, and then you draw the link that her Patriot Act vote was inconsistent with that. I'll wager that many, many candidates said at some point that they favored constitutional rights. That doesn't mean that each of their bios is going to be cluttered with an attack on the Patriot Act. That's what wikilinks are for. Put in a simple statement that she voted to renew the Act, provide a source for that fact, and link to the USA PATRIOT Act article.

By contrast, notice how I wrote the health care section. It wasn't me who made the connection. The source I cited specifically criticized Buerkle, by name. This isn't material that could just be dumped generically into the bios of all the ~~right-wing twits~~ Republicans who voted to repeal PPACA. JamesMLane t c 09:26, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Career

I don't edit wiki articles but there is a silly error in the construction of this article. "Assistant Attorney General of New York" is not an appointed or elected position. It is simply a job. "Assistant Attorney General" is the title given to each of the six hundred and fifty or more trial attorneys working for the AG's office. The presence of this "title" (as well as "In office 1997-2010") in the info bar on the right side makes Ms. Buerkle's experience appear more important than it was. Also, the cite placed on this information is broken. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.130.104.10 (talk) 13:20, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Robo-Signer of Monetary Judgments

As an AAG, her main job-related duty was signing and filing civil monetary judgments of $1,000.00 or more with the Onondaga County Clerk against hospital patient-defendants treated at SUNY Upstate Medical University and Health Center in Syracuse. This preserved--for 20 years from filing date--a legal right (under NYS CPLR) to recover monies which the State of New York had already written off. More telling action of a lawyer than of a nurse, which explains a lot about her career progression and offers true insight to her becoming a politician. 2600:1017:B026:3332:ED48:2775:9E51:F3ED (talk) 03:27, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ann Marie Buerkle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:43, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ann Marie Buerkle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:30, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]