Jump to content

Talk:WWE Breaking Point

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lord Dagon (talk | contribs) at 20:46, 4 September 2009 (→Mention of original match). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconProfessional wrestling Unassessed Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconWWE Breaking Point is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Submission PPV

Shouldnt we put that all the matches will be Submission based?LifeStroke420 (talk) 18:25, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's already mentioned (first line of the Background section). TJ Spyke 18:27, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My bad lolLifeStroke420 (talk) 18:31, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WWE Magazine

The current issue of WWE Magazine seems to indicate that Breaking Point will be an all new event with its own lineage and not a continuation of Unforgiven. "This September WWE debuts its all-submission pay-per-view Breaking Point..." Wwehurricane1 (talk) 01:31, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible for you to add the citation here to the talk page or in the article using the appropriate citation templates? Thanks.--Truco 503 01:53, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
WWE Magazine, August {{citation}}: Check date values in: |date= and |year= / |date= mismatch (help)

Don't have the magazine in front of me for the page number and WWE Magazine doesn't list the author of the individual articles. I'll get the page number to you tomorrow when I get home (I'm at work now).Wwehurricane1 (talk) 02:04, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cite journal would be more accurate than the generic Template:Citation. TJ Spyke 02:42, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rey Mysterio

Rey Mysterio has been busted for being a roid freak, and will be suspended effective 2 September 2009. It is therefore most certain that there will NOT be a Mysterio-Ziggler Intercontinental Championship Match at Breaking Point.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.245.171.61 (talk) 07:29, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We don't know that. No telling when his suspension starts or what WWE will do.--WillC 21:25, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Supension I think starts now or maybe after Breaking Point.Which means Dolph Ziggler will probaly become the IC Champion. (talk)

WWE.com specifically said the suspension starts on September 2. http://www.wwe.com/inside/news/869043 The match at Breaking Point almost certainly will not happen. Wwehurricane1 (talk) 22:22, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
To the IP, you do realize that the Wellness Policy covers more than just steroids? You don't know what he did to violate it. Yes we know the match will not happen, but as of right now the match is still official (they had no choice since they had already taped the #1 contenders match on Superstars the day before announcing the suspension). TJ Spyke 01:58, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Rey Mysterio shouldn't be listed in the match, it should say Dolph Ziggler vs TBD or just be removed all together. WWE publicly announced that he is suspended as of September 2nd, therefore he is in no way able to compete at Breaking Point, therefore there is no way Rey vs Dolph will happen. 71.185.49.253 (talk) 15:34, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That would be OR. The match is official as of August 29 and will stay there until WWE changes it. TJ Spyke 16:05, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
How the hell would it be original research? WWE.com state that Rey will be on suspension when Breaking Point happens. 81.103.175.183 (talk) 16:38, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You don't know what will happen with the match, so it's speculation. The match is still on. Also, don't vandalize by altering other peoples comments. TJ Spyke 16:50, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the IP that the match won't happen, BUT I'm going to have to side with TJ on this one if for no other reason than the fact that Wikipedia doesn't allow spoilers.Wwehurricane1 (talk) 23:12, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's not even about spoilers, literally nothing is known at this point. WWE could change the match, postpone it, cancel it, change their mind about the suspension, etc. 99.9% chance the match won't happen, but anything specific would just be speculation. TJ Spyke 00:11, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's not a spoiler if WWE.com confirmed the fact that Rey is suspended as of September 2nd, therefore there is no possible way that the match can happen, the match should be removed from the listing since there is no way at all that the match can or will occur. 71.185.49.253 (talk) 03:46, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That would be vandalism, plain and simple. WWE themselves added the match to their site the day AFTER announcing the suspension. The match won't likely happen, but as of right now it IS official. It will NOT be removed until WWE changes it, any edit that removes it otherwise will be reverted as vandalism and the user warned. TJ Spyke 03:49, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Just speculation here, but because Mysterio's suspension is being held off until September 2nd, Ziggler/Mysterio will probably happen at the next Smackdown taping, on Sept. 2nd, with Mysterio's suspension coming into effect immediately following his loss to Ziggler.99.254.104.18 (talk) 01:59, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding a point mentioned earlier. The claim that Wikipedia does not allow spoilers is simply false In fact the spoiler guideline Wikipedia:Spoiler states the complete opposite. Granted it does not apply to this case but I thought it needed to be clearified.--76.69.171.178 (talk) 04:43, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Ross has confirmed that the match will NOT take place. The article has been updated accordingly. http://www.jrsbarbq.com/blog/jrs-weekend-updatejeff-hardy-thoughtsreynew-ventures-jr Wwehurricane1 (talk) 19:42, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SPOILER ALERT "'Appens that Johnny Marleyson beat Ray Mosquito for the Ic Title at Smackdown tapings, so Breaking Point will pobably be Marleyson vs Diggler for title. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.245.147.162 (talk) 06:51, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So? This is not for speculation. TJ Spyke 16:01, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Morrison is the IC Champion. Ziggler won a title shot at the PPV. It's COMMON SENSE not "speculation". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.245.147.162 (talk) 07:03, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is speculation it will be at this PPV still or that it will be at a PPV anyway now that there is a new champion.--WillC 08:39, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That is silly. You could say it is speculation that Orton will be there, as his car could crash tomorrow. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.245.147.162 (talk) 17:02, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No it's not silly. Orton has been announced to be in a match at the PPV. Morrison has not, neither has Ziggler. It would be nothing but speculation to say they will ever wrestle each other, yet alone that it will be at Breaking Point. TJ Spyke 19:15, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, I can't believe you just said that. Look, you can't add something that is speculative PERIOD. Okay, and if his car crashes, and we find a reliable source to back it up, then it MAY be added to the article, or perhaps Orton's article. --Lord Dagon (talk) 19:17, 3 September 2009 (UTC) PS - I didn't say that to TJ, I meant to say it to the guy with the car crash theory.--Lord Dagon (talk) 19:20, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you all delete this?

I added after Dolph Zigler's match.. "Dolph Ziggler w. Maria" .. Shouldn't she be listed, shes going to manage him.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.74.109.91 (talk) 13:18, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a source that she will be at ringside for him? Otherwise that violates WP:OR. This was pointed out on your talkpage. TJ Spyke 15:10, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mention of original match

Just need an answer for this question, so here goes. Originally, it was announced that Mysterio would face Ziggler with the Intercontinental title on the line, but now it has been cancelled. Will the article have any mention whatsoever of the original match? And no, I'm not suggesting Morrison vs. Ziggler, just saying so nobody thinks I am. I am just curious as to the mention of the original match.--Lord Dagon (talk) 02:41, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Once wwe.com officially removes the match, I don't see why not. TJ Spyke 02:50, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm just sayin', but it will be Morrison vs Ziggler (Jim Ross stated that the winner of Mysterio and Morrison would face him and ecen showed Ziggler watching the match) mention the origional match, though. MC Steel (talk) 06:45, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When does it air in Australia?--Lord Dagon (talk) 15:30, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think it already has. I think it airs at 3PM in Australia, which is like 2AM here, so it's already aired. TJ Spyke 15:32, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And if I am not mistaken, once it airs in Australia, updates concerning fore-coming PPV events can be posted, right?--Lord Dagon (talk) 20:46, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:WWE_Breaking_Point&oldid=311897545"