User talk:Ajdebre

---

Serbs: Infobox Religion

Actually, the religion section of the infobox for Serb ethnic group in Serbian language states that "Доминира православна, али има и протестаната, римокатолика и муслимана.", i.e. "Predominantly Orthodox, but also Protestant, Roman Catholic and Muslim" I merely translated this text into English and added "Judaism and non-religious". As far as other ethnic groups are concerned, see also, for instance, the infobox on ethnic Hungarians, which apart from the two principal religious groups mentions much smaller communities of i.e. Greek Catholic or Jewish (ethnic) Hungarians.

Smaller religious groups should be included, as, after all, the article is on ethnic Serbs, and not on the Serbian Orthodox Church (note, for instance, that there are non-Serb members of Serbian Orthodox Church, i.e. most of the christian Roma - about half of all Roma in Serbia, and also some Vlach and Macedonian communities).

Alternatively, if you insist on defining ethnic Serbs as exclusively Serbian Orthodox, the population number would have to be corrected: total population would then have to be smaller, as it would refer to individuals who both (1) self-identify as ethnically Serbian AND (2) belong to the Serbian Orthodox Church. Estimating this number is actually much more difficult than it seems, even for Serbia: the census data collected information on ethnicity and religious affiliation separately. Therefore, for instance, the census data for religion would include non-ethnic-Serb memebers of the Serbian Orthodox Church (I've given three examples) and indeed, for ethnicity, it records ethnic Serbs who are not SOC affiliated. Therefore the population numbers referenced in the infobox would necessarily have to be adjusted for every country, starting with Serbia -- and would still be imprecise.

As estimating population size of an ethnic group is a difficult task without adjusting for religion, it would be far better to simply mention the smaller religious communities.

If you don't mind, I am also posting this reply in the talk section of the article.

Konfino (talk) 15:29, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Reverting my change of religion for the article on Serbs violates neutral POV: your personal preferences aside, I dont see how you can ignore individuals who (1) self-identify as ethnic Serbs AND (2) have a religion different from Serbian Orthodox.Konfino (talk) 16:35, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Crna Reka Monastery

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Crna Reka Monastery, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.andrijailic.com/roots-045.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:27, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Serb Uskoks

I have nominated Serb Uskoks, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serb Uskoks. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --Jesuislafete (talk) 21:41, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Etymology of Romanian words

Do you have a source for your edit at List of Romanian words of possible Dacian origin? Thanks. — AdiJapan 18:18, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Why?

Sorry I undid your edit. All I wanted was for you to explain why you changed that part of the Slobodan article. I don't know your reasoning. If you would explain it, I might not oppose it. Chrisrus (talk) 23:05, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Novak Grebostrek

The article Novak Grebostrek has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not clear how this meets notability guidelines

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 09:27, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Serbian flag takovo.png

Thank you for uploading File:Serbian flag takovo.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 14:40, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Architecture of Serbia

Zdravo! Počeo si lepo da radiš na ovom članku, pa te pitam da nastavimo zajedno! Vredi, i biće dobro na kraju!

Ajde, bre! :) Tadija (talk) 19:55, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Cultural Property of Great Importance

Hello! Please, join Wikipedia:WikiProject Cultural Property of Great Importance, and expend Serbia related Articles, and help creation of new and better Wikipedia, with WP:CPGI high on the list.

Also, you can invite new members, that will help WP even more.

All best, Tadija (talk) 13:30, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Niko Bellic

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Niko Bellic. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niko Bellic. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sinişa Dragin

A tag has been placed on Sinişa Dragin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Andyo2000 (talk) 05:26, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bregović (surname)

The article Bregović (surname) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable surname, article has no encyclopedic content except a "list" of one single person.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 03:20, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Ajdebre! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 15 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 332 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Dogge Doggelito - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Goran Bjelogrlić - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Nebojša Čović - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Milanko Renovica - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Goca Božinovska - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Šemsa Suljaković - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
7. Miloš Bojanić - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
8. Željko Šašić - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
9. Tozovac - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
10. Aleksandar Damjanović - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...
11. Philip Zepter 12. Boro Drljača 13. Sinişa Dragin 14. Dragan Vučić 15. Vassilis Saleas

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:45, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Pece Atanasovski

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Pece Atanasovski, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.tousauxbalkans.net/Cat%C3%A9gorie:Pece_Atanasovski. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:12, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

List of Serbian monarchs

Hej, Ajdebre, why did you reverted all tables? You have something different in mind? I just wanted all tables to be the same. All best, --Tadija (talk) 12:08, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

? What did you answered? I want to edit all tables in there. :) -Tadija (talk) 13:36, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of White Serbs

I have nominated White Serbs, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Serbs. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 16:27, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar

File:R37-yo0365-Orden-dvoglavog-orla-s-macevima.png		The Serbian Barnstar of National Merit
		For major contribution in expanding and creating Serbia related articles. Tadija (talk) 15:11, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
		This WikiAward was given to Ajdebre by Tadija (talk) on 15:11, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Nego šta! Sve po zasluzi! Samo napred! :) --Tadija (talk) 15:58, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vasilije Trbić

A tag has been placed on Vasilije Trbić requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 02:01, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Sent to AfD your article Persecution of Serbs

Persecution of Serbs

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Persecution of Serbs sulmues --Sulmues 15:18, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Tozovac.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Tozovac.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? feydey (talk) 13:01, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Aco_p.jpg

I have tagged File:Aco_p.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. feydey (talk) 13:02, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Bilja_krstic1.jpg

I have tagged File:Bilja_krstic1.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. feydey (talk) 13:03, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Dara_bubamara.jpg

I have tagged File:Dara_bubamara.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. feydey (talk) 13:03, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Bajamali.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Bajamali.jpeg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 10:43, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Hisar Hill

Да ли се овде односи на брдо, парк и археолошки локалитет у Лесковцу; или на онај Хисар код Прокупља? --93.86.231.143 (talk) 08:55, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Translation

Is this refers to the mountain, park and archaeological site ofLeskovac, or the Hisar at Prokuplje? --93.86.231.143 (talk) 08:55, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Tower of Jug Bogdan is in Prokuplje. It may be that? --Tadija^taking 18:18, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

I know there are two "Hisars".

One is at the end of urban area of Leskovac. There is the Park "9 Jugovića" and an archaeological site (probably Triballi settlement).

And the other one is in Prokuplje. There is Tower of Jug Bogdan [6] and an archaeological site.

Search on Google Maps for words "leskovac hisar" and it will show you the locations of them. --109.93.195.51 (talk) 12:50, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

POMOC MOLIM TE

Shanticm Otvorio sam novo poglavlje na clanku Serbs of Kosovo i neki lik mi stalno revertuje edite valjda je Albanac sta li.nece ni da prica,nista samo revertuje i daje neka tupava objasnjenja. Nisam bas vican u stvarima oko tih konflikata. Da li bi ti hteo da sredis tu stvar? Shanticm (talk) 02:31, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Albanian colonisation of Kosovo

I have nominated Albanian colonisation of Kosovo, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albanian colonisation of Kosovo. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 18:30, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Seems that you've already been notified for the AfD, as the creator of the article. Take a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albanian colonisation of Kosovo. Cheers. kedadial 22:08, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Imas li ideju kako da spasemo clanak, ovi ce lako da nas preglasaju? --Alexmilt (talk) 22:24, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Cultural Property of Great Importance

Hello! I noticed you've made edits to Cultural Property of Great Importance articles or that you are in some way connected to Serbia and Cultural Heritage. I thought you may be interested in joining WikiProject Cultural Property of Great Importance We are a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Serbian Cultural Property of Great Importance. Please take a look to edit an article or add one of your own. If you would be interested in joining feel free to visit the Participants Page! Thank You. Tadijaspeaks 19:17, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Ajde bre! :)

Thanks for joining! See Project main page for more information, or ask me! All best!

This user participates in
WikiProject
Cultural Heritage of Serbia.

You may use it on your page, or just leave it here! :) --Tadija^speaks 19:17, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fittja Boys

The article Fittja Boys has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Cannot find significant coverage in the media/new sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tim1357 ^talk 02:06, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Panos Markovic

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Panos Markovic, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://wiki.phantis.com/index.php/Panos_Markovits. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:45, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Panos Markovic

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Panos Markovic. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of 2010 Istok earthquake

I have nominated 2010 Istok earthquake, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Istok earthquake. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Mikemoral♪♫ 02:46, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Panos Markovic

The article Panos Markovic has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. NativeForeigner ^Talk/_Contribs 05:23, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Elez

The article Elez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a dab-type page, but all entries are red links with no other incoming links, and there is no other content.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Auntof6 (talk) 08:42, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Tireless Contributor Barnstar

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For creating exactly 100 articles. Keep up the great work! Tadijaspeaks 15:31, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:13, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Few words about...

Hello, my friend! Hope you are good. Can you see this (User_talk:Tadija#maps) and this (Talk:List_of_Serbian_monarchs#Cleaning_of_false_monarchs). You should say something, as you are the creator, and you are familiar with De Administrando Imperio. Also, you help will be very useful! :) All best, be good! --Tadija^speaks 14:21, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

New one

I created House of Vojinović article. See it, and fix, if i made some mistakes. All best. --Tadija^speaks 15:52, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Edit war

Hello. You appear to be involved in a slow-moving but still disruptive edit war on Perović . While the three-revert rule is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits. Note that posting your thoughts on the talk page alone is not a license to continue reverting. You must reach consensus. Continued edit warring may cause you to be blocked. Toddst1 (talk) 16:09, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. If you engage in further inappropriate behaviour in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article/topic ban. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 16:09, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

The ARBMAC related warning above warning has been recorded in the ARBMAC log. Toddst1 (talk) 16:16, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Kokonješte

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kokonješte, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.dunav.org.il/dance_research/serbia_kokonjeste.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:54, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kokonješte

A tag has been placed on Kokonješte requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Theleftorium ^(talk) 10:53, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Copyright block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of a week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating copyright policy by copying text into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to quote non-free text. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Theleftorium ^(talk) 11:58, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

After taking a look at the history of your talk page, I found even more warnings, dating back to as far as March 2006. See for example [7] and [8]. I have therefore extended your block to indefinite. You are still allowed the contest the block at any time. Theleftorium ^(talk) 14:16, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Ajdebre (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand my errors, the copyright violations are just unproffesional mistakes, in the past it has happened that i copy-paste material that i was thinking to edit right away but ending in a saved page (I know, dumb), and most of the images are fair-use material that i should've put effort in right away, however these errors have mostly been made in the past (before i was an active editor) and my wish is not to contribute negative material, not on my behalf nor wikipedia's, if you give me time i will process my errors.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I understand my errors, the copyright violations are just unproffesional mistakes, in the past it has happened that i copy-paste material that i was thinking to edit right away but ending in a saved page (I know, dumb), and most of the images are fair-use material that i should've put effort in right away, however these errors have mostly been made in the past (before i was an active editor) and my wish is not to contribute negative material, not on my behalf nor wikipedia's, if you give me time i will process my errors. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand my errors, the copyright violations are just unproffesional mistakes, in the past it has happened that i copy-paste material that i was thinking to edit right away but ending in a saved page (I know, dumb), and most of the images are fair-use material that i should've put effort in right away, however these errors have mostly been made in the past (before i was an active editor) and my wish is not to contribute negative material, not on my behalf nor wikipedia's, if you give me time i will process my errors. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand my errors, the copyright violations are just unproffesional mistakes, in the past it has happened that i copy-paste material that i was thinking to edit right away but ending in a saved page (I know, dumb), and most of the images are fair-use material that i should've put effort in right away, however these errors have mostly been made in the past (before i was an active editor) and my wish is not to contribute negative material, not on my behalf nor wikipedia's, if you give me time i will process my errors. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Possibly unfree File:Arandjelovac coat.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Arandjelovac coat.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Theleftorium ^(talk) 14:22, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Sinan Sakic.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sinan Sakic.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Theleftorium ^(talk) 14:26, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Aco p.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Aco p.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Theleftorium ^(talk) 14:26, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Jana t.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jana t.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Theleftorium ^(talk) 14:27, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Goga Sekulic.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Goga Sekulic.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Theleftorium ^(talk) 14:27, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Milos Bojanic.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Milos Bojanic.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Theleftorium ^(talk) 14:27, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Opanci.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Opanci.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Theleftorium ^(talk) 14:30, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:SNS2.gif

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SNS2.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Theleftorium ^(talk) 14:33, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Serb Clans1.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Serb Clans1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Theleftorium ^(talk) 14:36, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Momcilo Perisic.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Momcilo Perisic.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Theleftorium ^(talk) 14:45, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sajkaca.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Sajkaca.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Theleftorium ^(talk) 14:51, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Sonja Kolacaric.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sonja Kolacaric.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Theleftorium ^(talk) 15:14, 24 July 2010 (UTC)