Jump to content

Nemi ships

Coordinates: 41°43′20″N 12°42′6″E / 41.72222°N 12.70167°E / 41.72222; 12.70167
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Andi d (talk | contribs) at 09:05, 21 January 2011. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The remains of the hull of one of the two ships recovered from Lake Nemi. Workers in the foreground give an indication of scale.

The Nemi Ships were ships built by the Roman emperor Caligula in the 1st century AD at Lake Nemi. Although the purpose of the ships is only speculated on, the larger ship was essentially an elaborate floating palace, which contained quantities of marble, mosaic floors, heating and plumbing such as baths among its amenities. Both ships featured technology long thought to be recent inventions. It has been stated that the emperor was influenced by the lavish lifestyles of the Hellenistic rulers of Syracuse and Ptolemaic Egypt.

Location

View of Lake Nemi from the Sacred Way

Lake Nemi (Italian: Lago di Nemi, Template:Lang-la) is a small circular volcanic lake in the Lazio region of Italy Template:Km to mi south of Rome. It has a surface of Template:Km2 to mi2 and a maximum depth of 33 metres (108 ft).

There is considerable speculation regarding why the emperor Caligula chose to build two large ships on such a small lake and from the size of the ships it was long held that they were pleasure barges. However, as the lake was sacred, no ship could sail on it under Roman law (Pliny the Younger, Litterae VIII-20) implying a religious exemption.[1]

Caligula particularly favoured the Egyptian Isis cult which he had established in Rome and also supported that of Diana Nemorensis whom, in the Roman tradition of syncretism, he likely viewed as an aspect of Isis.

Situated on opposite sides of the lake and atop the crater walls, are the towns of Genzano which was dedicated by the Romans to the goddess Cynthia, a cult associated with that of Diana Nemorensis and Nemi, which did not exist in Roman times. The name Nemi derives from the Latin nemus Aricinum (grove of Ariccia), Ariccia being an extremely important nearby town associated with the worship of Diana and the god Virbius.[2] Located at Nemi are the ruins of an ancient temple dedicated to Diana, which was connected by the Via Virbia to the Via Appia (the Roman road between Rome and Brindisi).[3]

During the Roman empire the area around Genzano was used by wealthy Roman citizens for its clean air, uncontaminated water and cooler temperatures during the hot summer months. The lake has its own microclimate and is protected from wind by the crater walls. Goethe, Lord Byron and Gounod had all lived in Nemi and been inspired by the magical reflection of the Moon seen in the centre of the lake during summer. This phenomenon is the source of the Roman name for the lake, Speculum Dianae (Diana's Mirror).[3]

Recovery

Local fishermen had not only always been aware of the existence of the wrecks, but had explored them and removed small artifacts. In 1446, Cardinal Prospero Colonna and Leon Battista Alberti followed up on the stories regarding the remains and discovered them lying at a depth of 18.3 metres (60 ft) which was too deep for effective salvage. However, they caused significant damage to the ships by using ropes with hooks to tear planks from them. Alberti learned little more than the type of wood and that it was covered in lead sheathing. In 1535, Francesco De Marchi dove on the wreck using a diving bell. From material recovered he added the knowledge that mortise and tenon joints had been used in their construction. Despite salvaging entire structures and parts there was no academic interest in the ships so no further research was performed and the objects recovered were lost and their fate remains unknown.[3]

By 1827, interest had revived and it had become a widespread belief that earlier material recovered had either been part of a temple to Diana or was from the villa of Caesar cited by Suetonius. Annesio Fusconi built a floating platform to recover the wrecks but was unsuccessful.[3]

In 1895, with the support of the Ministry of Education, Eliseo Borghi began a systematic study of the wreck site and discovered the site contained two wrecks instead of the one expected. Among the material Borghi recovered was the bronze tiller head of one of the rudders and many bronze heads of wild animals. Felice Barnabei, director general of the Dept of Antiquity and Fine Art submitted a report requesting the recovery cease due to the "devastation of the two wrecks." An engineer from the Italian Navy surveyed the site to determine the feasibility of recovering the two ships intact and concluded that the only viable way was to partially drain the lake.[3]

In 1927, the Italian dictator Benito Mussolini ordered Guido Ucelli to drain the lake and recover the ships. With the help of the Navy, Army, industry and private individuals, an ancient Roman underground water conduit linking the lake to farms outside the crater was reactivated, and after connecting the conduit to a floating pumping platform, on 20 October 1928 the lake level began dropping. By 28 March 1929, the water level had dropped 5 metres (16 ft) and the first ship (prima nave) broke the surface. By 10 June 1931, the prima nave had been recovered and the second ship (seconda nave) was exposed. By this time the water level had dropped more than 20 metres (66 ft) with over 40 million cubic metres of water removed. As a result of the weight reduction, on 21 August 1931, 500,000 cubic metres of mud erupted from the underlying strata causing 30 hectares (74 acres) of the lake floor to subside. Work ceased and, while the risks of continuing the project were debated, the lake began refilling. As the seconda nave had already partially dried out the submersion caused considerable damage. On 10 November 1931, the Minister of Public Works ordered the project and all research be abandoned.[3]

On 19 February 1932, the Navy Ministry, which had been a partner in the recovery, petitioned the Prime Minister to resume the project. Joining with the Ministry of Education they received permission to take over responsibility and pumping to drain the lake recommenced on 28 March. Due to technical problems the seconda nave could not be recovered until October 1932. A purpose built museum constructed over both ships was inaugurated in January 1936.[3]

Construction

Stern-mounted rudder of a Roman boat, 1st century AD (RG-Museum, Cologne).

Both vessels were constructed using the Vitruvian method, a shell first building technique used by the Romans.[1]

  • Step 1: construction of the profile.
  • Step 2: construction of the keel and the flat bottom up to the second order of cincti, in two phases.
  • Step 3: construction of the shell up to the third wale (topgallant bulwarks).
  • Step 4: Insertion of the ribs, first those with trabes (crossbeam bracing) and then those without.

The hull had been sheathed in three layers of lead sheeting to protect the timbers from shipworms but as there are none in fresh water lakes, this design feature was not only useless but costly. It is however evidence that the ships hulls were constructed following standardised Roman shipbuilding techniques rather than being purpose built. The topside timbers were protected by paint and tarred wool with many surfaces decorated with marble, mosaics and gilded copper roof tiles. There was a noticeable lack of coordination between the structure of the hull and that of the superstructures, which suggests that naval architects designed the hulls, while civil architects then designed the superstructure to use the space available after the hulls were completed.[1] After their recovery, the ships hulls were found to be completely empty and unadorned.

They were steered using 11.3 metres (37 ft) long quarter oars, with the Seconda nave equipped with four, two off each quarter and two from the shoulders while the Prima Nave was equipped with two. Similar pairs of steering leeboards appear frequently in early 2nd century depictions of ships.[4]

The Seconda nave was almost certainly powered by oars as structural supports for the rowing positions protrude along the sides of the hull. The Prima nave had no visible means of propulsion so was likely towed to the centre of the lake when in use.[3]

A lead pipe found on one of the wrecks had Property of Gaius Caesar Augustus Germanicus stamped on it while many tiles had dates of manufacture. Together it leaves little doubt as to when the ships were built or for whom.[4]

Only one year after being launched, the ships were stripped of precious objects, ballasted and then intentionally sunk following the assassination of Caligula.[3]

Prima nave

The first ship recovered was 70 metres (230 ft) long with a beam (width) of 20 metres (66 ft).

The hull was divided into three "active" or main sections. The general shape of the hull appears wider at the stern and thinner at the bow, in fact, the main section is not amidships but is displaced towards the stern. The superstructures appear to have been made of two main blocks of two buildings each, connected by stairs and corridors, sitting on raised parts of the deck at either end. This distribution gives the ship a discontinuous look and has no similarity to any other ancient construction.[1]

Seconda nave

The second ship recovered was the larger at 70 metres (230 ft) in length and with a beam of 24 metres (79 ft).

The superstructure appears to have been made with a main section amidships, a heavy building at the stern and a smaller one at the prow. Although nothing remains of the stern and prow buildings their existence is indicated by the shorter spacing of the decks supporting cross beams and distribution of ballast.[1] The arrangement of the Seconda nave superstructures is comparable to that of the shrines depicted on an Isian lamp held by the Museum of Ostia. If not coincidental, this is further evidence of Isis worship rather than Diana.[1]

Technology

The main discovery was proving that the Romans were capable of building large ships. Before the recovery of the Nemi ships, scholars often ridiculed the idea that the Romans were capable of building a ship as big as some ancient sources reported the Roman grain carriers were.[5]

For centuries large numbers of lead bars have been found on the Mediterranean seabed and there was debate over whether they were anchor stocks or not. It was argued by some that iron tipped wooden anchors secured by ropes were not heavy enough to be effective so they had to have metal stocks and there was considerable academic controversy over the issue. The Nemi ships, constructed during the transition period when iron anchors were replacing wooden ones, were the first Roman wrecks found to have intact anchors, confirming that the lead bars were indeed anchor stocks.[6] Two types of anchor were found, one of oak with iron-tipped flukes and a stock of lead while the other was of iron with a folding timber stock that closely matched the design of the Admiralty pattern anchor re-invented in 1841. In the 1960s, a similar anchor was found in Pompeii and in 1974 another was found buried near Aberdarewllyn in Gwynedd, Wales. These further discoveries confirmed that these technologically advanced anchors were a standard Roman design.[6]

Both ships had several hand operated bilge pumps that worked like a modern bucket dredge, the oldest example of this type of bilge pump ever found. The pumps were also operated by the oldest crank handles yet discovered.[7] However, the reconstruction of the cranked pump which was assembled from various fragments, including a wooden disk and an eccentric peg, has been dismissed as "archaeological fantasy".[8]

Piston pumps (ctesibica machina: Vitruvius X.4?7) supplied the two ships with hot and cold running water via lead pipes. The hot water supplied baths while the cold operated fountains and supplied drinking water. This plumbing technology was later lost and only re-discovered in the Middle Ages.

Each ship contained a rotating statue platform. One platform was mounted on caged bronze balls and is the earliest example of the thrust ball bearing previously believed to have been first envisioned by Leonardo Da Vinci but only developed much later. Previous Roman ball bearing finds (used for water wheel axles in thermal baths) had a lenticular shape. The second platform was almost identical in design but used cylindrical bearings. Although consensus is that the platforms were meant for displaying statues, it has also been suggested that they may have been platforms for Deck cranes used to load supplies.[9]

Destruction

The ships were destroyed in World War II on the night of 31 May 1944, when they were burned by a fire.[10] There are conflicting views on which side was responsible for the destruction:

At that time, Allied forces were pursuing the retreating German army northward through the Alban Hills toward Rome. On May 28, a German artillery post was established within 400 feet (120 m) of the museum … An official report filed in Rome later that year described the tragedy as a willful act on the part of the German soldiers. A German editorial blamed the destruction on American artillery fire. The true story of what happened that night will probably never be known.[10]

Only the bronzes, a few charred timbers and some material stored in Rome survived the fire. Due to the destruction, research effectively stopped until interest revived in the 1980s.

Project Diana

Photographs, the drawings made for the Italian Navy survey and those made by the archaeologist G. Gatti survived which has allowed reconstructions to be made of the two ships.

The Association Dianae Lacus (lake of Diana) was founded in 1995 to preserve the cultural and history of the Nemi Lake area and initiated Project Diana, which involves constructing a full size replica of the Roman prima nave (first ship) of Lake Nemi. As there is no record of the shape and size of the buildings and temples built on the deck the replica will be constructed to deck level only and when completed will be moored on the lake in front of the museum.

On July 18, 1998, the town council of Nemi voted to fund the construction of the forward section and work commenced in the Torre del Greco shipyards. This section was completed in 2001 with the section transported to the Nemi museum where the rest of the vessel would be constructed. The estimated final cost of the reconstruction is 7.2 million Euros (US$10.7 million).[3] On 15 November 2003, Assimpresa, the second largest confederation of employers and businesses in Italy, announced it would sponsor the project by supplying all the timber required. However, the project may have stalled as no press releases have been made since 2004 and the Dianae Lacus website has closed.

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f "Notes on the Architecture of Some Roman Ships: Nemi and Fiumicino pdf" (PDF). Hellenic Institute for the Preservation of Nautical Tradition. Aug/Sept 1985. Retrieved October 29, 2009. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  2. ^ Virbius is the Latin name for Hyppolytus, a young man whom Diana loved.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Purtell, John (March 18, 2001). "Project Diana". Association Dianae Lacus. Retrieved October 29, 2009.
  4. ^ a b Lucas, Alan (March 2005). "The Lake Nemi Ships". Afloat Magazine. Retrieved October 29, 2009.
  5. ^ "Caligula's Nemi Ships". Nordic Underwater Archaeology. Retrieved October 29, 2009.
  6. ^ a b Muckelroy, Keith (1978). Maritime archaeology: New studies in archaeology. Pages 148-149: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521293480.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location (link)
  7. ^ Bunch, Bryan H. (2004). The history of science and technology. Page 81: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. ISBN 0618221239.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location (link)
  8. ^ White, Jr. 1962, pp. 105f.; Oleson 1984, pp. 230f.
  9. ^ Russo, Flavio & Ferruccio (2009). Ancient Engineers' Inventions: Precursors of the Present. Page 171: Springer. ISBN 904812252X.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location (link)
  10. ^ a b Deborah N. Carlson, "Caligula's Floating Palaces." Archaeology. May/June 2002, Vol. 55, Issue 3, p. 26

Sources

41°43′20″N 12°42′6″E / 41.72222°N 12.70167°E / 41.72222; 12.70167

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nemi_ships&oldid=409132324"