Jump to content

Talk:Maggie Smith

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 71.167.157.25 (talk) at 12:50, 14 October 2013 (add "image requested|of=Smith (preferably several images at various stages of her career)|actors and filmmakers|people of England"). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Stage work

I am sure that she has done a lot more than listed.

Peter Pan - when did she play Peter ? -- Beardo 13:22, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In the 1991 Spielberg film "Hook" she played the aged Wendy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vermont57 (talkcontribs) 02:41, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Francesco da Mosta

Ah bless! I hadn't the heart to delete the entry under her personal life which states that Maggie is a good friend of Francesco da Mosta, though I'm not sure that I shouldn't have. Yes, I saw the BBC programme where Maggie appears from the statuary, replete with Baudaker, and is air-kissed to death by dear Francesco...but he said himself that she is mostly"...a good friend of his wife's mother." Should we also add that she is good friends with Judi Dench, or was pally with Kenneth Williams, or was even more intimate with Rod Taylor? Surely of much more interest....

MARC & NATASHAYgrasil 03:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Filmography

Her filmography is incomplete- I added her role in The Honey Pot, but I believe there are others. Also, is the line "Her portrayal of Professor McGonnagall may be regarded as flawless." really objective or unbiased?

Her production list

Her production list is of very poor quality. She has done so much more than what is listed there. It'll probably end up being me who gets round to sorting it out, it always is - I'm constantly doing 20 things at once on this site... Lradrama 07:58, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Maggie Smith in London.jpg

Image:Maggie Smith in London.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:42, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

British

I have changed English to British as her mother was scottish. Besides techically there are no "English" and there hasnt been for over 300 years. British is the official nationality of anyone born within the United Kingdom. --Camaeron 13:27, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

English/Scottish/Welsh are commonly used on Wikipedia. Her mother is immaterial, she has birth and long residence in England. --UpDown 20:47, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Surely her strong Scottish accent should be a contrinuting factor in this, too? Tpacw (talk) 20:49, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Scottish accent? I only noticed that in The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie. -- JackofOz (talk) 22:27, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It creeps out in HP sometimes, too. Tpacw (talk) 14:05, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In both these roles she was supposed to sound Scottish, and having a Scottish mother would have helped. But whatever accents she - or any actor - may pull off in the context of a movie is absolutely irrelevant to their nationality in real life. She's particularly associated with England, rather than Britain as a whole; and English is a recognised nationality. Nationality is not so much a matter of legal definition, but of self-identification. If she had ever made statements that she prefers to be referred to as a British actress rather than an English actress, that would be good reason for changing it to British. I'm not aware of any such statements. -- JackofOz (talk) 21:35, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rush Hour 3

Didn't she have a cameo in Rush Hour 304:02, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Per debate and discussion re: assessment of the approximate 100 top priority articles of the project, this article has been included as a top priority article. Wildhartlivie (talk) 07:34, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The image File:MinervaMcGonagall.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --09:08, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Geography

Smith was born in Ilford, then Essex...

So she was born in Ilford first, and later in Essex? Or Ilford was first in Essex, and later it wasn't? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.129.49.238 (talk) 06:11, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The latter is the case. She was born in 1934; Ilford was in Essex prior to 1965, and has been in London since then. Jim Michael (talk) 19:01, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Death?

Smith's page has been updated to reflect a date of death of October 12, 2009 but there is no sourcing and I have not been able to find information to substantiate this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.32.174.113 (talk) 10:28, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to have just been vandalism. Very childish. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.237.90.125 (talk) 09:22, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not only childish, but also highly disrespectful, crass and crude; especially, when it refers to one of the finest actresses of all time. 59.184.171.157 (talk) 09:29, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Awards

The link under the Awards section, <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_awards_and_nominations_received_by_Maggie_Smith>, redirects to the Maggie Smith article itself. 67.233.156.206 (talk) 08:44, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dame Margaret Cross

Is there any reference to show that she ever uses this title? Also, the infobox is headed "Dame Maggie Smith", a formula we seem at pains to avoid in the lede. We have to sort this out. -- Jack of Oz ... speak! ... 19:47, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 1

Listed in ehr filmography but she was not in part 1. If she filmed any scenes, they were not used, so either "Scenes deleted" needs to added in notes or this film removed.12.162.122.5 (talk) 19:13, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Picture

Can someone find a new picture for her FFS? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.225.158.89 (talk) 02:57, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Horrible picture

The current picture is just awful; doesn't even look like her. Surely someone can come up with something better than that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.1.128.87 (talk) 01:39, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, that photo is horrible.--Britannicus (talk) 20:17, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification needed

Could someone please reword the following sentence:

"She married actor Robert Stephens on 29 June 1967 at Greenwich Register Office, ten days after their first child was born."

Does this mean that:

  1. Their marriage took place 10 days after their first child was born, or
  2. Their first child was born 10 days after their marriage took place?

I don't know the answer so if someone could reword to reflect the clear meaning that'd be great. matt (talk) 21:17, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]