User talk:HugoTHornet

Welcome!

Hello, HugoTHornet, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 17:52, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HugoTHornet, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi HugoTHornet! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:LanceStephenson2014SigningBall.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:LanceStephenson2014SigningBall.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:BabyZhang.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BabyZhang.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:BabyZhang.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BabyZhang.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 20:26, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:RyuichiSakamotoSingle.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:RyuichiSakamotoSingle.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:46, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Hello, I'm Bagumba. Your recent edit to the page Lance Stephenson appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so I have removed it for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 00:53, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Lance Stephenson‎‎, you may be blocked from editing. Feel free to provide the specific source that the trade is official. —Bagumba (talk) 00:59, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Jeremy Lin, nothing can be official until July 9 after July moratorium. A gentle reminder to also provide a verifiable source for future edits.—Bagumba (talk) 01:59, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Ron Rivera, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:46, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ron Rivera

I saw that you reverted my edit to Ron Rivera but included a source in your edit summary. I went ahead and added the source to the article for you. It's always best to include sources with your edits (especially BLPs) instead of simply reverting and putting it in the edit summary. Sources are much more beneficial when they're included within the article itself. Please let me know if you have any questions. I'll be happy to answer them. Happy editing :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:56, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

test. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.61.153.65 (talk) 01:23, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Hi, thanks for updating this. In the future, please be sure not to leave a bare URL. I've corrected it here: [1] You can learn more at the wikilink I posted here, or simply copy the previous week's source and substitiute in the new week's URL, title and access date. Thanks. - eo (talk)

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rich Cho, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Decatur High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Tillman

For future reference, the presentation of Charles Tillman's infobox right now is the way an infobox should look when a player is retired. List all numbers the player had, remove stat week and season, and remove roster status and the opening should state "_______ is a former American football player" not retired.--Rockchalk717 06:30, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sir Purr 2016.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sir Purr 2016.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:36, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Bradford

Please don't change his team until it's official (e.g. announced by one of the teams). News reports have been wrong before. There is no deadline. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 15:05, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, HugoTHornet. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 22 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Green Bay Packers page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, please don't do this again. — foxj 01:06, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Bagumba (talk) 00:51, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HugoTHornet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Idiot cousin was using my phone HugoTHornet (talk) 00:58, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As below, and per WP:COMPROMISED, I have extended the block to indefinite, as this account is compromised. SQL ^{Query me!} 04:12, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm not an admin, but please see WP:COMPROMISED. 331dot (talk) 02:25, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

HugoTHornet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is ridiculous, I have done a lot of good edits for this site and then suddenly I'm banned because someone used my account while I wasn't paying attention. I really hope we can work something out because if you look at my contributions I'm not a troll or sock puppet, I read your guidelines and I really don't know what else to say. I'll change my password if I have to so this doesn't happen again. I am disabled and editing is one of my part time hobbies.HugoTHornet (talk) 08:12, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=This is ridiculous, I have done a lot of good edits for this site and then suddenly I'm banned because someone used my account while I wasn't paying attention. I really hope we can work something out because if you look at my contributions I'm not a troll or sock puppet, I read your guidelines and I really don't know what else to say. I'll change my password if I have to so this doesn't happen again. I am disabled and editing is one of my part time hobbies.[[User:HugoTHornet|HugoTHornet]] ([[User talk:HugoTHornet#top|talk]]) 08:12, 23 June 2017 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=This is ridiculous, I have done a lot of good edits for this site and then suddenly I'm banned because someone used my account while I wasn't paying attention. I really hope we can work something out because if you look at my contributions I'm not a troll or sock puppet, I read your guidelines and I really don't know what else to say. I'll change my password if I have to so this doesn't happen again. I am disabled and editing is one of my part time hobbies.[[User:HugoTHornet|HugoTHornet]] ([[User talk:HugoTHornet#top|talk]]) 08:12, 23 June 2017 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=This is ridiculous, I have done a lot of good edits for this site and then suddenly I'm banned because someone used my account while I wasn't paying attention. I really hope we can work something out because if you look at my contributions I'm not a troll or sock puppet, I read your guidelines and I really don't know what else to say. I'll change my password if I have to so this doesn't happen again. I am disabled and editing is one of my part time hobbies.[[User:HugoTHornet|HugoTHornet]] ([[User talk:HugoTHornet#top|talk]]) 08:12, 23 June 2017 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}