Talk:James Dudley/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 20:41, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I am reviewing this article and think that the article is fine as far as it goes. However, there is more information in the references that is not used in the article, particularly this one:[1] but also this one:[2] that could provide more of a flavor of his personality. I think the fact that he was 74 when he was rehired is significant. Also, I enjoyed some of the descriptions of his talents in those articles. Xtzou (Talk) 20:41, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Further comments

The article does not follow WP:LEAD, an important component of the GA criteria.

Xtzou (Talk) 16:33, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

• Glad you like the pullquote, as I don't want to override your judgment regarding the article. Xtzou (Talk) 16:55, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality: Clearly written

   B. MoS compliance: Complies with required elements of the MoS

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources: Reliable sources

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: Well referenced

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects: Sets the context

   B. Focused: Remains focused on the topic

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: Pass!

Congratulations! Xtzou (Talk) 16:56, 29 May 2010 (UTC)