User talk:Thomas Phuck

Welcome!

Hello, Thomas Phuck, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Bishonen | talk 20:10, 28 April 2013 (UTC).[reply]

..but please don't edit war

Your recent editing history at Simona Williams shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Moreover, I was a little startled to see your post on Talk:Simona Williams stating that you suspect another user of being motivated by an "affiliation" with the subject of the article, and claim that you have evidence to support that claim. ("Just ask if needed.") It's a serious accusation, which I hope you haven't made at random. Yes, evidence is certainly needed. Please e-mail it to me via the "e-mail this user" feature here. Don't post it on wikipedia, as "outing" users is a serious offence. I don't want any unnecessary information about the user via e-mail either; just your evidence, please. Alternatively, remove your post containing these claims.

You are a new user; yet I see you refer to quite a few policies and guidelines in your edit summaries and talkpage posts, and seem fond of WP:BURO. It really doesn't support you much, you know. You should be aware that the most important policy for biographies is WP:BLP; please make sure you read it. Bishonen | talk 20:10, 28 April 2013 (UTC).[reply]

I've received your e-mail with links supporting your claims. Thank you very much. Bishonen | talk 13:01, 29 April 2013 (UTC).[reply]

@ Bishonen: I've sent you another mail.

and BTW: I never commented on the UserName "Thomas Phuck" (and you didn't request for comments), but - it was in fact NOT chosen for baiting or trolling the small minded views, or the ignorance towards the real world, which clearly seems to be held by some Wikipedia Admins. (The UserName story isn't all that long, but I don't see any reason why I should bother to write it here, since I'm leaving Wikipedia); OK, I'll admit that I'd love to see the Wikipedia Admins faces, if they'd ever found the Church of Denmark Youth Choir's official short name (WebSite: http://fuk.dk/ ; About-page: http://fuk.dk/om-fuk/ )

Thomas P. 15:58, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

@ Others: I'm leaving - but to avoid disapointing the prejudice self-centered Wikipedia royalty, I'll throw them a goodbye song: goo.gl/HoncW
Thomas P. 15:58, 30 April 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomas P. FINAL WORD (talk • contribs)

- I can't figure out your e-mail from the link you sent me. I'd be happy to comment on your request about the project template, for instance, if I had a way to contact you privately. But I don't much like to respond to e-mails here in public; too unsymmetrical for my taste. My comments might be confidential, too, you know. Feel free to send me an actual, ordinary e-mail address, if you wish. Bishonen | talk 17:14, 30 April 2013 (UTC).[reply]

- - Rp to your latest mail: not sure I want (another) Google account. Google knows too much about me already. I'll see. Bishonen | talk 20:02, 9 May 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Blocked: April 2013

After reading through Wikipedia:Username policy and Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention/Instructions a couple times now, I've decided to block this account. I have however left the ability to create another account, and I've also left talk page access available if you would like to have something copied over to a Wikipedia:Changing username request. Specifically I cite Usernames that seem intended to provoke emotional reaction ("trolling"). I will also watchlist this page, and check back in the next day or two to see if there's something I can assist you with. You may also want to read through WP:SPA as well.

You can also use the {{helpme}} template or request an unblock by viewing WP:UNBLOCK — Ched : ? 22:33, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thomas Phuck, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

-- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 01:35, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]