User talk:Rukario-sama: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 20:47, 3 June 2024

^ㅈ^ -(•••)

Buttons

Of course the table is about the 3DS vs. the DS series. However, you have failed to understand why I undid your edit twice. I'm saying that the section is not supposed to name the buttons: It's to compare what kinds of buttons are on the different systems. In short: The section is not supposed to say, "Oh, the 3DS has A, B, X, and Y buttons, like the DS series." It's to say, "The 3DS has push-buttons, like the DS series." Your rationale for revert my edits twice is that some buttons aren't push-buttons, etc. I am aware of that. If what kind of button needs to be specified, then you are welcome to fix that. TheStickMan^[✆Talk] 01:37, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Stick Man. There is no need to distinguish between buttons. A button is a button. Please stop reverting this. Sergecross73 msg me 02:15, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you really not tell the difference between "A button and B button" and "A button and 3D slider". Do I really need to explain why they are different? Sergecross73 msg me 03:38, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay, I misunderstood what you meant too. But yeah, the sliders, while both being sliders, have pretty different effects, where as all the push buttons do essentially the same thing. It's one of those things where, if too much details goes into these charts, it's gets cluttered and/or overwhelming. Sergecross73 msg me 14:01, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Card slots?

Really? I totally missed that row. Sorry. I reverted that edit. TheStickMan^[✆Talk] 00:39, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, it was my fault. Don't worry about it. I just have to not be so hasty with the reverts next time... TheStickMan^[✆Talk] 02:57, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Mega Man Legends 3. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Artem Karimov (talk) 08:07, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What made you think it's unsourced?? edit: Haha oh wow how that phrase appeared in my mind! Well I think it's relevant because when something decided to quit or something, it will create group of protestors that wanted to bring it back to work. One largest protestor group was formed within facebook. Unreliable? Unnoticable? Oh please! Rukario-sama ^ㅈ^ -(...) 04:14, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In Wikipedia we don't write about any 100K+ facebook groups but about what is covered by external reliable sources. Please read the policies before editing the article again. Artem Karimov (talk) 02:50, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RFC

I have opened an RFC regarding your edits. You are welcome to post the response there. Artem Karimov (talk) 06:53, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nintendo table

Hi. I see you reverted some of my recent revisions to that table. May I ask if you saw something wrong with my edits or why would you like the footnotes over the text within the cells? Personally, the way they were done, I definitely don't think either was perfect, but I have reasons to prefer very much the version you deleted... Maybe we could work together and reach some kind of compromise? :) Thanks. Daniel Carrero (talk) 11:42, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I felt that older table with notes was better... notes better left in abc list than to in fill in (parentheses) everywhere in the table. It's a matter of opinion. On a side note, TheStickMan reverted my edits saying that we should follow table layout from the source.Rukario-sama ^ㅈ^ -(...) 06:21, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I searched all the history of Comparison of Nintendo portable consoles for changes by you and User:The Stick Man to the software comparison table and turns out I didn't find the exact reversion of edits you mentioned... What did you try to change that day that makes it so different from the source? Daniel Carrero (talk) 08:42, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I searched through my contribution list but couldn't find it. I could recall someone (maybe not TheStickMan) reverted my edits because it isn't the same as the source. I can't remember what was my edits nor if that's the correct table I've edited on XD sorry it was long time ago. Oh well, all I know, the source can be used to backup someone's claim. I can almost remember it was used against me for that table.Rukario-sama ^ㅈ^ -(...) 09:49, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly don't remember either. TheStickMan^[✆Talk] 12:47, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

True, the source can be used to backup someone's claim. But there's a problem with how it's done at the moment: The table at Comparison of Nintendo portable consoles#Software comparison was originally a verbatim copy of http://www.nintendo.com/3ds/software-comparison, down to the placement of footnotes, and is still almost identical to the page at Nintendo.com, which I believe is copyright violation.

I'd like to keep the same information but with original wording. (My last revision, with the text within the cells and in a more concise manner, is one way to do it, but others might have different ideas) Daniel Carrero (talk) 14:16, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You could've said that before... yeah I agree we should write notes in our words. FYI I must have remembered wrong about someone reverted my edits - nobody reverted my edits. It was me making an edit and felt it was no good and closed it without save :P I remember that now. Really sorry for taking your time looking into edit history XDRukario-sama ^ㅈ^ -(...) 09:05, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not providing an edit summary

Hi.

Please supply an edit summary with every and each revert, especially when you are reverting an edit that cites a policy in its defense. This is mandatory and part of our revert policy.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 20:50, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Join the Nintendo Task Force!

Hello, Rukario-sama and welcome! You are receiving this message because we noticed your excellent work on Nintendo-related articles. We need your help at the Nintendo Task Force! There is still much work to be done, so feel free to head over and help us enhance the quality of Nintendo related pages on Wikipedia!

--Arkhandar (Talk • Contribs) 18:54, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of video game emulators

Hi. I saw you removed RPCS3 from List of video game emulators for no reason. Please don't do that. --Odie5533 (talk) 10:42, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Collegial behavior

You apparently misunderstand some basic Wikipedia behavioral policies. Editors shall not make edits without detailed explanation, especially invasive edits; the onus is on the editor to explain one's self, not on everyone else to scramble to research and discern the editor's intended meaning, if any, and to try to differentiate the edit from potential vandalism. To try to correct vandalism by creating a different disruptive behavior, isn't good, as you've already been instructed. Editors shall communicate through clear language (WP:REVERT), not through edit warring (WP:3RR), especially not silently, especially when corrected repeatedly and solicited for explanation. And editors will not commit personal attacks (WP:NPA), especially when caught blatantly violating said policy. Editors can be blocked for wanton violation of these policies. — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 06:57, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I will keep that in mind. My apologies. Rukario-sama ^ㅈ^ -(...) 07:15, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

I just wanted to randomly say that I had been away from Wikipedia for a long time, but that I'd read and appreciated the definitions that you'd clarified about the word "figurine". I didn't reply, but it'd been percolating around in my mind since then, and I've been maintaining the Amiibo article with the word "figurine" instead of "figure" since I came back. Also IMHO, I think the giant sized figures like the classic GI Joe or the modern superhuge Stormtroopers are creepy and unwieldy and outrageously expensive. I don't know how any kid is supposed to play with those, lol. FYI!

— Smuckola(talk) 13:20, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of video game exclusives

I see that you copied every applicable Wii U game to the List of video game exclusives (eighth generation) article. You are perfectly entitled to do so, of course, it's just that the page begins to slow down, the larger its file size. There are some 263 8th-gen PlayStation 4 exclusives, yet I only listed some of the more notable examples for this very reason. Can you imagine how long it would take to load the article if every PS4 and XBO title was included? It would be unworkable! Could I possibly persuade you to remove some of the more obscure Wii U titles from the list? — TPX 09:47, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think removing the less notable games is something that Wikipedia wanted (WP:COMPREHENSIVE? And possibly violates WP:NPOV). But I've excluded the Wii games that are eShop-exclusive and you can see how it might look like here: user:Rukario-sama/sandbox. Notice that there are many games with red links removed! Though there are still some notable games that are eShop-exclusive that got excluded. But again, it'd might violate some Wikipedia standards if I've only included more notable ones and ignore the rest. Should List of video game exclusives (eighth generation) to only include games that are available in retail, or include both retail and download? More PS4 & XBone games are welcomed I guess. On a side note, the refs are definitely in need of a clean up and possibly delete the upcoming games when it has the expired TBA dates and the source that's over 1yr ago. Rukario-sama ^ㅈ^ -(...) 21:23, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

iOS 9.1 Jailbreak

Hi,

I just want to make sure why u dont exept my suggestion in regards to iOS 9.1 jailbreak? Is there anything I did make wrong? I just wanted to help...

Thanks, TH2009 (talk) 20:45, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of Wii U software game count

Thank you for adding those tips to count them up! Takinzinnia (talk • contribs) 19:33, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Additional information about a game

Do you mind adding the title information about Mini Mario & Friends: amiibo Challenge to the Mario vs. Donkey Kong page? Thanks. Zacharyalejandro (talk) 18:12, 1 February 2016 (UTC)Zacharyalejandro[reply]

Sorry, I'm not good at writing a paragraph but I'll do something about it. I'm sure the "amiibo" in title should be capitalized too? Rukario-sama ^ㅈ^ -(...) 21:34, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Nintendo 3DS games

I would advise that the List of Nintendo 3DS games stay where it was with the name Nintendo eShop being merged with the release date, instead of making it really messier. Zacharyalejandro (talk) 00:34, 17 February 2016 (UTC)Zacharyalejandro[reply]

I don't know why you would need to change your own edit from February 12th on the page. I would like the previous edit by Adamical made and left that way. Thanks! Zacharyalejandro (talk) 04:43, 20 February 2016 (UTC)Zacharyalejandro[reply]

Take your discussion over to its talk page than here and please stop trying to start this edit war between you and me. I have a reason to have eShop moved to another cell. Rukario-sama ^ㅈ^ -(...) 08:12, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sergecross73 msg me 23:03, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removing edits causing possible vandalism.

Could you possibly remove the release dates of February 27, 2016 in the accending order to the First Released column on List of Wii games? Thanks. Zacharyalejandro (talk) 03:38, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Vgrtbl will use the current date when the third parameter were left blank, so that's what we're seeing it as "February 28, 2016". This template without third parameter stayed because it'd require too much of work to copy/paste this template for each date added. I know, it's not much of an excuse when they've been there for too long... I've filled in the empty third parameters now. Rukario-sama ^ㅈ^ -(...) 06:22, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Nintendo 3DS games

If you want to change it back to the way it was, talk to Adamical about all this, because he started this whole mess!! Zacharyalejandro (talk) 00:39, 27 April 2016 (UTC)Zacharyalejandro[reply]

I can see that. I'll talk about it in the talk page. Rukario-sama ^ㅈ^ -(...) 00:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Wii U software/missing games and references

Hello. I have noticed that there are a lot of games that need to be added from time to time since April 25th or since my last edit on the games. If you can possibly find out what games need to be added, because regularly there are many games being added over time. Here is where you can look and add to the list:

http://www.nintendo.com/games/game-guide/#filter/wii_u%7C-%7C-%7C-%7C-%7C-%7C-%7C-%7C-%7C-%7C-%7C-%7C-%7C-%7Crelease%7Cdes%7C- http://www.nintendo.co.uk/Search/Search-299117.html?q=&faf=GAME&gst=wiiu_disc%7Cwiiu_digitaldistribution https://www.nintendo.co.jp/wiiu/software/list.html

Hopefully you can help expand the current list with me, when you have time. Thanks for your help.

Note: This also goes for the List of Nintendo 3DS games as well.

Zacharyalejandro (talk) 21:56, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Failing to build a consensus

Please see the discussion I have started here. You need to do more to stimulate debate and await feedback before making sweeping changes. — TPX 21:22, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominted List of video games (eighth generation) for deletion. You can state your reason(s) why we should keep the new article here. Thanks. — TPX 13:04, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comply changes back to JP, NA, EU, AUS until release dates are found.

What you did on List of Wii games, is utterly confusing for me to try and find release dates for the remaining games on the list. I don't know why you decided to change without having the list be completed with the remaining release date. Could you explain why you should change it now instead of wait until every release date is found on the page? Zacharyalejandro (talk) 18:28, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't List of Wii games originally had JP|EU|AUS|NA not JP|NA|EU|AUS? There's a new consensus going around that alphabetical order should be followed. We can only manipulate the headings to the way we want to stay true with alphabetical order. List of Nintendo Switch games recently received the new headings: JP|NA|PAL, then List of Wii U software and List of Wii games now pursuit a follow up changes in a slightly different headings for the "consistency" argument that TPX has recently brought up in Talk:List of Nintendo Switch games. EU coming before AUS in the headings will not follow alphabetical order. Do you have any idea what to edit the headings to work like EU|AUS while not breaking the alphabetical order? Or even better, try to accustom to this newly aligned column order... Rukario-sama ^ㅈ^ -(...) 01:37, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'm used to the JP, EU, AUS, NA heading. I guess I'll just have to live with it since it will take me time to get acquainted with the new heading on List of Wii games. Zacharyalejandro (talk) 18:48, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Converting AUS to AU for titles, developers and publishers.

When I was updating the List of Wii games page, updated with developers and publishers and all that, I thought to myself, 'if we are listing these pages with Australasia instead of Australia, could we change all the AUS into AU? What are your thoughts? Zacharyalejandro (talk) 17:45, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AU as in Australia and AUS for Australasia? Or the other way around? Rukario-sama ^ㅈ^ -(...) 05:20, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The other way around, change from AUS to AU as in Australasia, like how the letters AUS meant for Australia and AU is for Australasia, if that makes sense. Zacharyalejandro (talk) 07:34, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, okay, I thought it's the other way because Australasia has two extra letters "as" unlike Australia. This wouldn't matter once we go with full region name in the headings, but for superscript letters in date cells if you are certain Australasia = "AU" then yea we could try convert AUS to AU in them. Rukario-sama ^ㅈ^ -(...) 08:35, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Utter sloppiness

I have removed your speedy tags from {{XConsole}} and {{NX}} because both templates are still in use. Worse, because you did not bracket the speedy tags with <noinclude></noinclude> you caused several other pages which use these templates to be sent, spuriously to CAT:CSD. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:12, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gamelist counter.

Could you implement the gamelist counter used in List of Nintendo Switch games in the List of Wii games? Cause I added in the multiplatform part a few months ago and I didn't know how many games appear as multiplatform because there are a lot on there and it would take a lot of time to count them all. So could you do that for me? I would really appreciate it! Thank you. Zacharyalejandro (talk) 20:43, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It'd be possible to include this template into list of Wii games if the exclusive column is using the same template names as used in List of Nintendo Switch games I.E. Template:Yes, Template:No, etc.. Another possible solution is to duplicate that game counter template in a different template name then edit its search strings to find Template:Exclusive, Template:XCC, etc, and it could be used in List of Wii U games as well only if we're fine with seeing numbers in parentheses gone. I'm terribly new to Lua language, so these are all I can think that'll work. I have better luck with regular expression and command line. Rukario-sama ^ㅈ^ -(...) 03:55, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Too many Firefox version history charts!

Rukario-sama, it seems that you keep moving the Firefox version history chart from the History of Firefox article to the Firefox version history article and making a lot of duplicate reference links while breaking the References section. I mean, this is not right. Why does the "Firefox version history" article have too many version history charts? Are you breaking the rules here? --Angeldeb82 (talk) 15:12, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from History of Firefox into Firefox version history. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:56, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

<span style="text-shadow: 0px 0px 2px #58f;">[[User:Rukario-sama|<font color="#58f">Rukario</font><font color="#555">-sama</font>]]</span> <span style="text-shadow: 0px 0px 2px #555;">[[User talk:Rukario-sama|<font color="#555">^ㅈ^ -(...)</font>]]</span>

: Rukario-sama ^ㅈ^ -(...)

to

<span style="text-shadow: 0px 0px 2px #58f;">[[User:Rukario-sama|<span style="color:#58f">Rukario</span><span style="color: #555">-sama</span>]]</span> [[User talk:Rukario-sama|<span style="text-shadow: 0px 0px 2px #555; color: #555">^ㅈ^ -(...)</span>]]

: Rukario-sama ^ㅈ^ -(...)

—Anomalocaris (talk) 18:31, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for updating your signature! —Anomalocaris (talk) 07:15, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:XSony

Template:XSony has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 19:59, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Module:Gamelist counter

Module:Gamelist counter has been nominated for merging with Module:Table row counter. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 01:41, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Rukario-sama. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Update to scripts by AlexTheWhovian/Alex 21

Hello! This is a generic message created and copied to all editors using scripts that I have created. As I have recently changed my username from "User:AlexTheWhovian" to "User:Alex 21", any scripts that I have created that are listed at your common.js page may, at the moment, no longer be working. To fix this, simply update all occurrences of "User:AlexTheWhovian" to "User:Alex 21"; see here for an example. All the best! -- /Alex/₂₁ 11:07, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Firefox version history

The outcome of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Firefox version history is explained in the close for that discussion. If you disagree with that determination, you can appeal the decision at Wikipedia:Deletion review, or initiate a broader request for comment to propose a more holistic solution. bd2412 T 13:12, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Console

Template:Console has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:31, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kiwi Farms edits

Hi, please see the discussion here: Talk:Kiwi Farms#URL

Cheers! 98.155.8.5 (talk) 20:15, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, nevermind! I see that you've already commented. But still, you may want to think about engaging in the conversation a bit more rather than boldly adding the URL like that, especially following an edit war. Please think about WP:BLP considerations. Cheers! 98.155.8.5 (talk) 20:18, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'd hate to get involved into discussion that's going to be get a little too long but I'll comment there for one last time and then I'll want to be done with it. Rukario-sama ^ㅈ^ -(...) 23:54, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rukario-sama: where did you interact with this IP address prior to the Kiwi Farms RFC? It seems like you two were having a separate conversation elsewhere. Pilaz (talk) 16:06, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have previous conversations with this guy. Maybe I was being contacted because I have higher editor status. Rukario-sama ^ㅈ^ -(...) 20:11, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be somewhat within WP:CANVASS territory; luckily you had already taken place in the discussion, so we'll take this nudge by this IP editor with a grain of salt and treat it as a failed canvass attempt on their part. There seems to be no connection other that they must have really liked what you wrote somewhere on the Kiwi Farms talk page, I assume. Pilaz (talk) 23:12, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert - gender and sexuality

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Sideswipe9th (talk) 20:41, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Edition

Template:Edition has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 20:47, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]