Jump to content

Talk:Tina Turner: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Tina Turner/Archive 4) (bot
 
(19 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talkheader|archive_age=90|archive_units=days}}
{{Talkheader}}


{{Article history
{{Article history
Line 26: Line 26:
|otd2date=2019-11-26|otd2oldid=927913097
|otd2date=2019-11-26|otd2oldid=927913097
}}
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=no|class=GA|collapsed=yes|vital=yes|living=no|listas=Turner, Tina|1=
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=no|class=GA|collapsed=yes|vital=yes|listas=Turner, Tina|1=
{{WikiProject Biography|filmbio-work-group=yes |filmbio-priority=Mid |musician-work-group=yes |musician-priority=High }}
{{WikiProject Biography|filmbio-work-group=yes |filmbio-priority=Mid |musician-work-group=yes |musician-priority=High }}
{{WikiProject Religion|importance=Low |Interfaith=yes |InterfaithImp=}}
{{WikiProject Religion|importance=Low |Interfaith=yes |InterfaithImp=}}
Line 85: Line 85:
'''Restore to American'''. [[MOS:NATIONALITY]] is determined solely by relevance to the subject's notability. Arguments like {{tq|"She was not American at the time of her death"}} completely miss the point, [[Isaac Asimov]] wasn't an American at the time of his ''birth'' but he's cited in the guidelines as a person who should be referred to solely as an American because his birthright Russian citizenship isn't relevant to his notability. Turner's citizenship change came years after retirement and she really only has notability as an American. Describing her as an "American-Swiss singer" or "American-born Swiss singer" doesn't make any sense to me because she didn't have an active professional music career (e.g. releasing any new material or performing live) as a Swiss national. --[[User:Shivertimbers433|Shivertimbers433]] ([[User talk:Shivertimbers433|talk]]) 19:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
'''Restore to American'''. [[MOS:NATIONALITY]] is determined solely by relevance to the subject's notability. Arguments like {{tq|"She was not American at the time of her death"}} completely miss the point, [[Isaac Asimov]] wasn't an American at the time of his ''birth'' but he's cited in the guidelines as a person who should be referred to solely as an American because his birthright Russian citizenship isn't relevant to his notability. Turner's citizenship change came years after retirement and she really only has notability as an American. Describing her as an "American-Swiss singer" or "American-born Swiss singer" doesn't make any sense to me because she didn't have an active professional music career (e.g. releasing any new material or performing live) as a Swiss national. --[[User:Shivertimbers433|Shivertimbers433]] ([[User talk:Shivertimbers433|talk]]) 19:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)


:For legal and administrative purposes, which is what is really decisive and important, Tina Turner was no longer a citizen of the United States at the time of her death, but was a citizen of Switzerland. Totally independent of whether as a Swiss she did one thing or the other. What we cannot have a biographical article without a specific nationality. American-born Swiss is the best option, as she was born in the USA and died as a citizen of Switzerland. [[User:Alsoriano97|_-_Alsor]] ([[User talk:Alsoriano97|talk]]) 05:26, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
== Short description ==


'''Keep as is''' - not only was she continually notable while in Switzerland (where she lived for some two decades before becoming a citizen), but she pointedly renounced her U.S. citizenship. [[User:Dumuzid|Dumuzid]] ([[User talk:Dumuzid|talk]]) 20:20, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Why is the short description changing back and forth? The short description first says as "American-born Swiss singer" even if the nationality in the lead is omitted last June by [[Talk:Tina Turner/Archive 4#Lead section|community consensus]]. I changed it to "American and Swiss singer" then it got reverted back to "American-born Swiss". I changed it again to "American and Swiss", but it was reverted back. Because of all this edit war in the short description, can the nationality in the short description be removed too, or should it be kept? '''[[User:RapMonstaXY|<span style="color:#ffcc03;">RM</span><span style="color:#025DA6;">X</span><span style="color:#F16A81;">Y</span>]]''' <small>([[User talk:RapMonstaXY|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/RapMonstaXY|contribs]])</small> 05:50, 10 November 2023 (UTC)


[https://www.britannica.com/biography/Tina-Turner Britannica] has {{tq|American-born}} alone, which seems reasonable. I also agree with Shivertimbers433's interpretation of MOS. [[User:Hameltion|Hameltion]] ([[User talk:Hameltion|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Hameltion|contribs]]) 03:13, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
:I'm all for removing nationality from the short description to stay consistent with the consensus last year which agreed to remove nationality from lede. [[User:Clear Looking Glass|Clear Looking Glass]] ([[User talk:Clear Looking Glass|talk]]) 02:02, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
::Hmmm. I don't recall that consensus (which is not to say it did not happen!). I think [[MOS:NATIONALITY]] tells us it probably belongs in the lead, as it is not actually 'controversial,' but I am happy to go wherever consensus leads. Cheers. [[User:Dumuzid|Dumuzid]] ([[User talk:Dumuzid|talk]]) 02:48, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
:::@[[User:Dumuzid|Dumuzid]] - The last consensus ended in [[Talk:Tina Turner/Archive 4#Lead section|June 2023]]:
:::{{tq|Consensus is that nationality should not be mentioned in the first sentence.}}
:::I find it odd though, since a mere '''month''' after the user who started the May 2023 RfC closed it, they opened a new one in [[Talk:Tina Turner#RfC: Restore nationality|July 2023]] asking if we should restore it. Even before Turner died, her talk page was long filled with discussions about her nationality (I'll admit I started one or two years ago), but I thought removing the nationality would end this debate for now. EDIT: Also, per [[WP:ETHNICITY]], nationality can be omitted in some cases. Like [[Elon Musk]] for example. [[User:Clear Looking Glass|Clear Looking Glass]] ([[User talk:Clear Looking Glass|talk]]) 05:52, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
::::Again, happy to go with consensus here, and not intending to be argumentative. I may well be in the minority (and so far seem to be!). I am not familiar with the granular details of Mr. Musk's life, but I suspect I would argue for inclusion there too. I guess what sticks in my craw just a little bit here is that the facts are in no way in dispute, and the issue was obviously of some importance to the article subject herself. I don't really understand the controversy--although I *do* understand trying to do away with it by removing nationality from the lead, even if it would not be my chosen course of action. Oh well, with apologies to [[Wallace S. Sayre]], Wikipedia disputes are so vicious because the stakes are so low. Cheers! [[User:Dumuzid|Dumuzid]] ([[User talk:Dumuzid|talk]]) 14:33, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
:I also agree with removing nationality from the short description, consistent with the decision taken on the lead following the 2023 RfC. [[User:Qflib|Qflib]] ([[User talk:Qflib|talk]]) 13:14, 7 February 2024 (UTC)


:American-born seems appropriate and less contentious term to use in nationality related discussions. [[User:エンドくさん|エンドくさん]] ([[User talk:エンドくさん|talk]]) 10:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
== Black heritage ==


== Nowhere on this page do you mention her collaboration with David Bowie in 1984. ==
Can someone explain to me why Tina Turner's black heritage as an ethnicity is not mentioned in the titular paragraph [[User:Shiznaw|shiznaw]] ([[User talk:Shiznaw|talk]]) 21:35, 19 February 2024 (UTC)


Nowhere on this page do you mention her collaboration with David Bowie in 1984 on the song "Tonight", album "Tonight" recorded at "LeStudio" [[Special:Contributions/2607:FEA8:BB9F:6219:F141:72D:1570:B7C2|2607:FEA8:BB9F:6219:F141:72D:1570:B7C2]] ([[User talk:2607:FEA8:BB9F:6219:F141:72D:1570:B7C2|talk]]) 22:45, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
:According to [[MOS:ETHNICITY]], ethnicity, religion or sexual orientation should not be emphasised in the lead section of a biography unless it is relevant to the subject's notability. Tina Turner's notability primarily stems from her accomplishments in the music industry rather than her ethnicity. &#8209;&#8209;[[User:Neveselbert|Neveselbert]] ([[User talk:Neveselbert|talk]] <b>·</b> [[Special:Contribs/Neveselbert|contribs]] <b>·</b> [[Special:EmailUser/Neveselbert|email]]) 18:14, 21 February 2024 (UTC)


== Capitol Records ==
== Tina’s Page Needs to be Locked ==


'''If you ask me, I think Tina’s page needs to be locked just like everyone else’s. There’s no special treatment.''' [[Special:Contributions/2601:346:4300:55B0:5964:3171:3440:748D|2601:346:4300:55B0:5964:3171:3440:748D]] ([[User talk:2601:346:4300:55B0:5964:3171:3440:748D|talk]]) 01:45, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
According to your page on the album "Tonight". David Bowie secured her Capitol Records contrat in 1984 but here you say it was after the Ritz in 1983. What is it? [[Special:Contributions/2607:FEA8:BB9F:6219:F141:72D:1570:B7C2|2607:FEA8:BB9F:6219:F141:72D:1570:B7C2]] ([[User talk:2607:FEA8:BB9F:6219:F141:72D:1570:B7C2|talk]]) 22:54, 17 August 2024 (UTC)


:Please remember this is an all-volunteer project, and different pages more often than not have different volunteers, so discrepancies are not uncommon. The best response is to find a reliable source which can help to clear things up. That said, I can't seem to find the reference on either page; could you be a bit more specific, please and thanks? Cheers. [[User:Dumuzid|Dumuzid]] ([[User talk:Dumuzid|talk]]) 23:39, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
:I agree. [[Special:Contributions/2601:346:4300:55B0:7188:34B4:F4A3:B37F|2601:346:4300:55B0:7188:34B4:F4A3:B37F]] ([[User talk:2601:346:4300:55B0:7188:34B4:F4A3:B37F|talk]]) 22:44, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
::Unless there is some vandalisim or sockpuppetry going on, pages are not locked. If you think you have a good reason, you may request protection at [[WP:RFPP]]. <span class ="nowrap"><b>[[User:NightWolf1223|<span style="color:blue">NW1223</span>]]&lt;[[User talk:NightWolf1223|<span style="color:blue">Howl at me</span>]]&bull;[[Special:Contributions/NightWolf1223|<span style="color:blue">My hunts</span>]]&gt;</b></span> 00:05, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

== Mother ==
I read a source that says that she did not attend her mother’s funeral because Ike was there, however her mother was cremated, and her ashes were scattered at sea, however find a grave is not reliable although it says she was buried. Source here: <ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.thefreelibrary.com/All+I+wanted+was+my+mother%27s+love%3B+Tina+Turner%2C+the+queen+of+rock...-a063085359|title=All I wanted was my mother's love; Tina Turner, the queen of rock 'n'roll, talks for the first time about the heartache of family rejection.|date=1999}}</ref> Zelma’s biography on Family Search also mentioned her being buried. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:TheGreatestLuvofAll|TheGreatestLuvofAll]] ([[User talk:TheGreatestLuvofAll#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/TheGreatestLuvofAll|contribs]]) 22:41, 14 March 2024 (UTC)</small>

{{talk-ref}}

== Sister and cousins killed ==

Her older half sister’s name may be Evelyn Juanita Lovelace, not Currie. Her father’s name is Percy Lovelace and according to her death certificate her real name is Lovelace. Turner's sister and cousins were killed in 1954. [[User:TheGreatestLuvofAll|TheGreatestLuvofAll]] ([[User talk:TheGreatestLuvofAll|talk]]) 21:16, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 12:28, 3 November 2024

Good articleTina Turner has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
In the newsOn this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 15, 2008Good article nomineeListed
March 13, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
October 3, 2012Good article reassessmentKept
In the news News items involving this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on May 24, 2023, and May 24, 2023.
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on November 26, 2017, and November 26, 2019.
Current status: Good article

Media-reporting error

[edit]

Most media reports have described the Villa Algonquin in Küsnacht as a property with ten buildings and ponds. But this description is of Tina Turner's large estate in Stäfa, at the village's extreme Eastern tip, as shown in satellite images. At the villa Turner was a tenant from 1998 onwards, remaining so through a change in ownership in 2020 until her death. The estate she bought in September 2021 but did not move to. Both are directly on Lake Zürich. Küsnacht is 8 km from Zürich. Stäfa is 25 km away from the city.

RfC: Restore nationality

[edit]

Do you think her nationality and citizenship in the lead should be restored? Maybe the first sentence of the lead can describe Turner as "an American and Swiss singer."

How do you think? RMXY (talk) 08:42, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's excellent the way it is. Qflib, aka KeeYou Flib (talk) 16:03, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also, an RfC on this topic was already carried out and closed last June (see above). We should stay with consensus decision-making - this is the Wikipedia way, anyway. Qflib, aka KeeYou Flib (talk) 16:05, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I know I've had several replies to this, but I just realized this was asked again by the same user a month after their last consensus they started was closed on 19 June 2023 to remove nationality. The recent consensus removes the constant debate of whether she should be just "American" or "American-born Swiss", etc and IDK what's wrong with it. Clear Looking Glass (talk) 05:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please vote below this line

[edit]

Comment - Normal format used regularly would be American-Swiss. The opposition to such a normal term flabbergasts me. Do some Americans think there are no black people in Switzerland; that a great American star like Turnar can't possibly have been an American-Swiss singer? Why in this particular case does it rub some people the wrong way to use what's normal? Gives me a very uneasy felling, to put it mildly. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 18:49, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

American-born Swiss singer is the best option for me. She was not American at the time of her death. _-_Alsor (talk) 10:39, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have restored "American-born Swiss." That was the format for years (same one as "American-born Greek" for Maria Callas). Removing any reference whatsoever to Turner's nationality -- as if she were stateless -- contravenes Wikipedia usage; the nationality is always mentioned, and in the very first sentence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.255.77.207 (talk) 19:36, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
the nationality is always mentioned - This is not true at all. Per WP:ETHNICITY, nationality can be omitted if it is disputed or agreed to be omitted. Elon Musk is a notable example.
Anyways, this has been a tedious back and fourth for years. The problem is, many people feel that she is notable for being an American, not Swiss. Describing her as "Swiss" would not be accurate to her life/birth/identity/etc. While others argue that because she obtained Swiss citizenship, and died there, she has every right to be called "Swiss". In the end, this has been going on for years and I think omitting it removes much of the headache it has brought over the years. Clear Looking Glass (talk) 01:55, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What is really happening is that American editors are offended that Tina Turner was no longer American. Ridiculous patriotic issue. Tina Turner, for legal purposes, ceased to be an American to acquire Swiss nationality. And so it must be said: American-botn Swiss singer, as a matter of common sense. We can't make anything up on Wikipedia. _-_Alsor (talk) 01:35, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do some Americans think there are no black people in Switzerland - No one's denying that people of African descent live in Switzerland, the same way Europeans can be Japanese citizens or be from India. But her career and her all but 10 years of her life have been as an American, and this is where many of the discussions have disagreed on calling her "Swiss".
In the end, various users agreed that we should omit her nationality; especially since this debate has been going on for years and is now being brought up again. As to answer this once again brought back RfC, I agree to keep it as it is, and to stay with the last consensus which wasn't even made a full year ago. Clear Looking Glass (talk) 01:59, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as is as per Clear Looking Glass. See WP:Consensus. I wish people would take the time to read the discussion history on this issue, although I admit it's now in the archive (see the “Lead Section” part of [[1]]) in which numerous editors participated). Let's leave this for now and move on to improving the page. Qflib (talk) 13:12, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:CCC. _-_Alsor (talk) 01:40, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tennessee comment The second paragraph in the lead begins: Born in Tennessee... The state is not linked, but most people outside of America (at best, possibly North America) are likely not familiar with it, so United States should be mentioned (MOS:NOFORCELINK) or even used in place of Tennessee. I understand that the consensus was not to mention nationality in the lead sentence, but that doesn't preclude providing some context of her locale somewhere else in the lead, which is currently missing for anyone not already familiar with her.—Bagumba (talk) 01:29, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Restore to American. MOS:NATIONALITY is determined solely by relevance to the subject's notability. Arguments like "She was not American at the time of her death" completely miss the point, Isaac Asimov wasn't an American at the time of his birth but he's cited in the guidelines as a person who should be referred to solely as an American because his birthright Russian citizenship isn't relevant to his notability. Turner's citizenship change came years after retirement and she really only has notability as an American. Describing her as an "American-Swiss singer" or "American-born Swiss singer" doesn't make any sense to me because she didn't have an active professional music career (e.g. releasing any new material or performing live) as a Swiss national. --Shivertimbers433 (talk) 19:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For legal and administrative purposes, which is what is really decisive and important, Tina Turner was no longer a citizen of the United States at the time of her death, but was a citizen of Switzerland. Totally independent of whether as a Swiss she did one thing or the other. What we cannot have a biographical article without a specific nationality. American-born Swiss is the best option, as she was born in the USA and died as a citizen of Switzerland. _-_Alsor (talk) 05:26, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as is - not only was she continually notable while in Switzerland (where she lived for some two decades before becoming a citizen), but she pointedly renounced her U.S. citizenship. Dumuzid (talk) 20:20, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Britannica has American-born alone, which seems reasonable. I also agree with Shivertimbers433's interpretation of MOS. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 03:13, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

American-born seems appropriate and less contentious term to use in nationality related discussions. エンドくさん (talk) 10:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nowhere on this page do you mention her collaboration with David Bowie in 1984.

[edit]

Nowhere on this page do you mention her collaboration with David Bowie in 1984 on the song "Tonight", album "Tonight" recorded at "LeStudio" 2607:FEA8:BB9F:6219:F141:72D:1570:B7C2 (talk) 22:45, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Capitol Records

[edit]

According to your page on the album "Tonight". David Bowie secured her Capitol Records contrat in 1984 but here you say it was after the Ritz in 1983. What is it? 2607:FEA8:BB9F:6219:F141:72D:1570:B7C2 (talk) 22:54, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember this is an all-volunteer project, and different pages more often than not have different volunteers, so discrepancies are not uncommon. The best response is to find a reliable source which can help to clear things up. That said, I can't seem to find the reference on either page; could you be a bit more specific, please and thanks? Cheers. Dumuzid (talk) 23:39, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]