Jump to content

User talk:Kathleen.wright5: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Email this user
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
removed newsletters - now on newsletter page
Template:archive box
Line 1: Line 1:
User talk:Kathleen.wright5 <>< {{email user}}
User talk:Kathleen.wright5 <>< {{email user}}


{{talkarchive}}
{{archive box}}




Revision as of 06:04, 24 September 2021

User talk:Kathleen.wright5 <><


Regarding your edits to Doctor Who:

Your recent edit to Doctor Who (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a non-talk page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 00:20, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Kathleen.wright5, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! ·:· Will Beback ·:· 03:15, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your name isn't part of an IP address. Secretlondon 00:07, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed you, but you could have removed yourself. Secretlondon 04:34, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you,

Thank you for checking over my spelling on my User page. I have to admit I am not the best speller out there and I thank you for looking over it for me. An Apple a day keeps -The Doctor- Away.. Or does it! (talk)(contribs) 04:26, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

Please don't link every common word in articles. It gets kind of annoying, doesn't it? And here is a real link that discusses the topic in more detail. Thanks. --Russ (talk) 14:17, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dad's Army

I have added Internal Links to this article. Kathleen.wright5 14:09, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can over-do the links. A lot of the links you made don't link to anything. Do you plan to write articles for them all, or do you think anyone else will. Some of them, like the link to Walker have nothing to do with Private Walker -- SteveCrook 14:26, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And I agree entirely with --Russ and -- SteveCrook as I've just spent half an hour removing or redirecting your wikilinks in just one section of this article which went to disambiguation pages or the wrong place! Curb your enthusiasm please and TRY wikilinks once you have created them to see where they lead..... Zir 15:45, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed most of the Internal Links at "Lost in Space". Kathleen.wright5 10:55, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you - whilst I don't want to dampen your enthusiasm, might I suggest that after a good start you've been going a bit OTT recently. If you revisit some of the pages in your contributions where you have "Added Internal Links" and take a look at the Discussion page you'll find comments under the one that you left (and not just my comments).
In particular take a look at your recent edits to The Salvation Army which hasn't been reverted (yet) - at one point under The Flag, for instance, it says "The red on the flag symbolizes the blood shed by Christ". ← Try these links - it's pure comedy - but not meant to be.
Can't stress enough that you don't over-link and thoroughly TEST any wikilinks that you do create. Your last edits ABC Television go to a Disambiguation Page (dab) rather than to ABC Television (Australia) where they are meant to.
Best of luck & tread carefully as some people can be very proprietorial about articles..... Zir 12:13, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You're new here, and probably wondering what "edit any page, any time" means.

These links may be helpful:

Learn how to write and edit articles: Wikipedia:Tutorial
Learn about the policies and guidelines: Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines
Ask questions if you need help: Wikipedia:Help Desk

Esanda

Is this what you're looking for? Esanda Finance Corporation Ltd

A previous article, Esanda Finance, was deleted because it did not assert the notability of the company. I'm afraid the new article will be deleted soon too unless it is expanded. Every article in Wikipedia must have a notable subject. Mere existence is sufficient. The guidelines for notability for companies can be found in WP:CORP. Try to find articles about the company and ways in which it has been recognized by 3rd-parties.

The other articles you're looking for are:

Cheers, ·:· Will Beback ·:· 09:51, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

State leaders by year

Would you please explain what you are doing to the State leaders by year article. Assuming that you are making good faith edits, important wikilinks to articles for each individual year individual are being incorrectly removed. This article is actually an index to all of the detailed articles, arranged by year. If you need help with this, please let me know by responding here. This talk page is on my watchlist so I will see when you make a response. Thanks. Truthanado 02:08, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are trying to remove red links. Although it is normally a good idea to do that, in this article, the red links are okay. Eventually, someone will create articles for the red-link years. Apologizing for the time you have spent on this, I suggest you revert the article to the version before you started your edits today. If you need help doing that, let me know. Truthanado 02:20, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop trying to remove the red links in this article. All of the effort you are spending will probably be reverted. In this article, it is OKAY to have red links because there will eventually be articles written to correctly wikilink to. Truthanado 02:27, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Let me help with the revert you've started. You don't need to undo each one individually. I'll do it for you and then explain, okay? Truthanado 02:33, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The article has been reverted to just before you started your edits today. Here is what I did; this works for any article. Open the history page and click on the article you want to revert to. In this case, that is:
(cur) (last) 01:51, 21 July 2007 Singularity (Talk | contribs) (220,066 bytes) (afd closed, keep) (undo)
When that version of the article opens, click edit this page, enter the reason for the revert in the Edit summary and click Save page. Presto. Article is reverted. Undo works best for reverting just 1 edit. BTW, I notice from your user page that you are in Australia. A nice country, I've been there a few times on business, Brisbane and Perth. Cheers. Truthanado 02:42, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Could you tell me where I can find the "REDLINKS to be removed department"? I don't think this article should be included. I suspect it may have been included by a BOT who just blindly looks for red links. Truthanado 02:51, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As I suspected, Wikipedia:WikiProject Red Link Recovery/Most red links#Overview shows that this list is automatically generated (meaning a human doesn't do it or peruse the results). Note the second paragraph, which describes the situation for this article:
"While it is perfectly valid to have a red link to a topic that will one day have an encyclopaedic article of its own, some articles may contain red links to topics that never will (or should!) exist. If any of the articles below do this, correct them then remove from the list."
The Wikipedia community appreciates your work to reduce the number of red links in articles. Unfortunately, this article is one that doesn't need to be fixed. There are many others ... happy hunting. Truthanado 03:06, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Please Extend Article

Hmm, Well I'll try my best, I'm not farmiliar with that though but I wouldn't mind doing a bit of research. If it does get deleted though I'll save a copy of it as a sub off my userpage. I'll add a link here under this when I finally add it and please feel free to add to it. An Apple a day keeps -The Doctor- Away.. Or does it! (talk)(contribs) 00:19, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Added Esanda History Website

So far I am writing up a short thing using my own words but I think it might be a good idea maybe even to talk to the PR officer of the company even if just sending an email. I've found no other websites so far but I'll keep on looking. An Apple a day keeps -The Doctor- Away.. (talk)(contribs) 00:00, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Where to find Contents Template?

Well, It's automatically added when you have four or more headlines I believe. An Apple a day keeps -The Doctor- Away.. (talk)(contribs) 01:42, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Radio Stations

Hi Kathleen

I notice that you are adding categories to radio stations. This is unnecessary as the articles are already in narrower categories. You may find that other editors may remove this category later, I won't bother myself! Graeme Bartlett 23:03, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And some might get concerned that there are more templates than info in some stubs! - cheers SatuSuro 14:28, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed.. Muzzamo 23:47, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ICU and green cross

I though about it, Kathleen, and it would have taken me about 60 seconds to change the original. But I decided to go with something a little more distinctive. Besides, a green cross probably violates some other UN resolution or something. Plus I'm a M*A*S*H fan. :-) - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 06:21, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Local Radio articles

I switched them back because the main ABC template was just meant to be related to the divisions and those kind of things. I did, however, add a 'See Also' section to the existing template with links to other relevant articles. timgraham 00:17, 4 October 2007 (UTC) 11:18, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AYBS?

You might like mine better. ;) -- ALLSTAR ECHO 16:17, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{:User:Allstarecho/AreYouBeingServed}}

Clock

Not sure what you mean about the clock incident? I'm assuming you tried to use the clock on my page? It's free, it just has to be userfied. Go to User:Allstarecho/Clock, click edit this page, copy all of the code there, go to User:Kathleen.wright5/Clock and create the page, paste the code, change anywhere you see my user name to your own user name, then anywhere you see +5 hours you'll need to change to match your time. I don't know the time offset of exactly where you are but I think it's +10 hours from GMT. You'll have to fiddle with that. Once your all done, place it anywhere you want it on your user page and/or talk page with {{User:Kathleen.wright5/Clock}} :) -- ALLSTAR ECHO 15:08, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Using the "Show preview" button

Hi, Can I suggest that you use the "show preview" button before making a series of changes? It is much easier to look at the revision history for an article. A good example of where you have not done this would be your edits to the article Life FM (Adelaide). Muzzamo 23:54, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kathleen, I noticed that you have done this again in the article Cruise_1323. Could you please take more care? Muzzamo 06:56, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

UNno!

Howzit Kathleen, I was wondering around and stumbled on your user page. I was interested to see a button saying that you favour the abolition of the United Nations, and was just curious to know why. (If you feel like telling me you can do it by clicking on my name, and adding a section on my discussion page, as I have done to your page.) Adam Brink 13:02, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No no no! Don't remove it on my account! I am not an administrator, and will never be one as I (1) don't have the time; (2) am happy to let other people do it. Even if was I would not be able to remove anything from your user page, and anyway: you have a right to free expression, and should exercise it how you please. I was telling the truth when I said that I was simply curious. You have many buttons reflecting views that I am sympathetic to and simply wondered what the UN one was all about. I've never really thought about its role in the WMD thing was. As I recall though, Hans Blix was UN appointed; and the whole reason why there is a 'Coalition of the Willing' (*sigh*, who came up with that name?) was because the UN had _not_ allowed itself to be bullied by the US. But perhaps you are right, and I don't suggest we should arm wrestle about it. I will say though that in my part of the world (Sub-Saharn Africa) the UN does phenomenal work through the WHO, ILO and the UNHCR. I realise they could do better in geo-political matters, but I don't think they don't try - the US is just too powerful. Adam Brink 15:12, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

for teaching me a new stub type. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 14:20, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Me neither, but it's one more option. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 14:28, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Banksia Park

Problem was a reference without a close /ref tag (may have originally been my fault, I didn't bother to check the history). Seems to be fixed now. Orderinchaos 04:16, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

page-blanking

I don't quite follow the thinking behind this edit. If a redirect target is wrong, then by all means point it to a more appropriate page, or replace it with more appropriate content (for example, a disambiguation page). If it's completely inappropriate for it to exist at all, list it at WP:RFD. Just blanking it isn't a good option, as it retains the page, and it then ends up cluttering up special:uncategorizedpages, and the like. Hope that's of some help. Alai 17:07, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject BBC

Comment
Comment
You have been placed on the Inactive members list. If you would like to continue contributing to the project, please move your name back onto the active members list here. Thank You, Tiddly-Tom 17:28, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Loire Valley

Kathleen.wright5 wrote:

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.|Article Loire Valley Kathleen.wright5 13:44, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your warm welcome, but I think you mixed up with someone else. Croquant 19:04, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject BBC Stubs

Hopefully I have done what you wanted, you can see it by clicking the link above. Tiddly-Tom 08:33, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe, no problem. Come back and speak to me if I can help you with anything else, Tiddly-Tom 08:44, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ICU deleted articles

Just remove them from the main page, I suppose. I don't think there's any need to build a sort of Wiki-graveyard. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 16:13, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

regarding your geo-coordinates tags

Thank you for tagging the articles. I hope that you will continue to do so, because it makes it easier for me to add coordinates if I know what articles are missing. Thanks again! Sseballos 19:34, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When specifying a value for the "date" parameter in a maintenance tag (such as {{locateme}}), please remember to specify the month and the year, to ensure that pages are placed into the proper categories. Thanks, Black Falcon (Talk) 04:38, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Just wanted to say that I'm pleased as punch to see you're doing some work on this. I started this project years ago, and kind of lost sight of it. But I think it's a good and important thing to keep track of templates with red links for many reasons (not the least of which is avoiding junk!) I'd like to see the project rebooted from the most recent database dump. What do you think? Cheers! bd2412 T 10:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked Beland (the techie who set it up in the first place) to reboot. So, hopefully there will soon be a brand new and up to date list of templates with redlinks to work from. I will offer you whatever guidance I can from my previous experience working on this project. Cheers again! bd2412 T 08:47, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, Wikipedia:Templates with red links is officially up and running anew - check out the seventy-seven pages of templates with redlinks generated in the most recent database dump! You are now (as of this moment) officially in charge of this project. Congratulations, and cheers! bd2412 T 04:49, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Prophets

Please don't add to the P's in C category people who are already in the sub-cat Category:Prophets of the Hebrew Bible. Thank you. Johnbod (talk) 08:22, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to say the same thing. Category:Prophets of the Hebrew Bible is a sub-category of both category:Prophets in Christianity and category:Prophets in Judaism. See WP:SUBCAT: "In straightforward cases an article should not be in both a category and its subcategory."
The main point of the Hebrew Bible categories is to avoid unnecessary duplication of categories for subjects that are relevant to both Judaism and Christianity. I hope this is helpful. - Fayenatic (talk) 13:13, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, many thanks for that. I'm not sure how reliable that 2nd group are - it has Nebuchadrezzar II but what about all his dinner-guests? Johnbod (talk) 21:03, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agur

An atheist guy as a prophet of Christianity... hmmm...

I added a citation needed tag in the list. As in "sez who?". elpincha (talk) 03:23, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject BBC

Hey :) I notice you have been adding the banner to some of the talk pages of articles currently not covered by the project, Thank you! If you like, feel free to also assess them when adding them to the talk pages. It does not take long to get the idea of the assessment system. Doing the assessment at the same time as tagging takes a lot less time than tagging the page, and then someone else assessing them. If you don't want to, you don't have to, just an idea for if you had not thought about it. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. Thanks again, Tiddly-Tom 18:37, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The |importance= parameter still remains. Also, for people to assess articles they will look here. How are they to know, without looking through all the articles which need to be assessed and which don't? I am not saying you have to, but just explaining the consequences fully for other editors. Tiddly-Tom 07:04, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bhavabhushan Mitra

Hi Kathleen, lovely to hear from you. I'd say it can be discharged from ICU. I wouldn't take all the tags off though. It has many references now but could do with more. We could keep on the tag for an expert too. And the merger could be done. A good example of improvement through co-operation I'd say. ICU can move on to the more difficult cases. All the best. Itsmejudith (talk) 11:49, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll help you on that article. But we have a more general problem that the initial enthusiasm for the ICU seems to have waned. Either the original members have to start paying attention again or we have to get some new members. How about if you and I jointly write a message to all the members gently chivvying them up? Itsmejudith (talk) 08:56, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Specifically in regard to Esanda, I don't think it meets the notability criteria. I can't find any non-trivial external references to it. It gets 815 google hits but most are listings in business directories. Can we agree to tag it for merge with its parent company? Itsmejudith (talk) 09:08, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
How about a joky message "Calling all clinicians! Can you help clear the Intensive Care Unit backlog? Some patients are lingering in the unit and the beds are needed for new urgent cases. Please come and use your bold editing skills." And we would also add a message to the ICU talk page explaining that we felt that a backlog was developing and that was why we needed to send the message. What do you think? Itsmejudith (talk) 09:17, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed you've been busy adding {{WPE}} to lots of London stuff. I've given up arguing against parent project tagging of their offshoots! - but, since everyone is now multiply tagging London articles, could I ask you to use {{WikiProjectBannerShell}} to collapse the banners, we have a ridiculous situation where many articles now have more adopters than sections in the articles. Cheers Kbthompson (talk) 11:48, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, much appreciated ... hopefully the next round - architects, I reckon - will have the good grace to use the BannerShell, and not just 'bot' the lot ... cheers, and good luck with your corner of wiki. Kbthompson (talk) 23:41, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

 Merry Christmas, Kathleen.wright5! Wishing you a very Merry Christmas!

Best regards from myself! -- S♦s♦e♦b♦a♦l♦l♦o♦s (Merry Christmas!)
Post this merry message on any other user talk page you can find.

GREETINGS

WISH YOU A HAPPY AND ACTIVE NEW YEAR.--BobClive (talk) 07:31, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What a coincidence, 26 January! Thanks for the information.--BobClive (talk) 16:04, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:National Sportsperson of the Year

The Union Flag is not the flag of Northern Ireland. regards --Vintagekits (talk) 22:27, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Christianity notice

I will join, but I'm afraid I can't join the other wikias. I am still in school, and have limits to my computer time with homework and all. I can join Wikiproject Christianitythough. Thanks! SpencerT♦C 01:34, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adelaide Wikimeetup 3

Riverside Precinct Adelaide Meetup
Next: 15 November 2024
Last: 6 March 2020
This box: view • talk • edit

Hi Kathleen - we're planning a third meetup in Adelaide sometime in the coming weeks, and would love to have you there. If you can, please help decide a location, a date and a time here. Thanks! ~ Riana ⁂ 12:10, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. You needed to link [[Cameron "Buck" Williams]]. SpencerT♦C 11:44, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stub categories

Hi there, and thanks for tackling the stub categories. If you need guidance on how to format them (or templates), take a look at the main stub page or ask on the talk page (where you were before). Welcome to it - Cheers! Her Pegship (tis herself) 00:52, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem - I'll take a look tomorrow (I'm in California). Usually the template is created first, then the category; more on that later. G'night! Her Pegship (tis herself) 05:16, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Context MBA and the Macintosh?

Hi Kathleen, I can't find any evidence that Context MBA was ever available for the Mac, just for the pre-Mac Apple III. Should this be reverted, or alternatively, do you have anything that can be added to the article that discusses this?--NapoliRoma (talk) 14:54, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It has now been reverted. Kathleen.wright5 21:00, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks!--NapoliRoma (talk) 01:10, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A quick lesson on stubs

...if you don't mind... After a stub type is approved, the template is created. Here's the typical code to use:

<div class="boilerplate" id="stub">''This article related to [[<topic>]] is a [[Wikipedia:Stub|stub]]. You can help Wikipedia by {{plainlink|url={{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|action=edit}} expanding it}}''.</div>[[Category:<Topic> stubs<noinclude>| </noinclude>]]

Once the template has been created, click on its category. It should be a red link at the moment and you'll get a "create this category" page. There you can use this code:

{{WPSS-cat}}{{popstub}} {{Stub Category|article=[[<topic>]]s|newstub=<stub template code>|category=<parent category>}} [[Category:<parent category again>|μ]]

You just fill in the topic in the template, the same topic in the category page, the stub template code in the category page, and the parent category in the category page. (For example, the parent of "Book stubs" would be the category "Books".) I hope this isn't too confusing. You can take a look at the two categories you created earlier if you want to see more; I have cleaned up the code a bit. Cheers! Her Pegship (tis herself) 17:03, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cite your sources

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Virgo (astrology). Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. These articles are enough of a mess without established editors adding unreferenced qualities. Pairadox (talk) 00:52, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, and the same is applicable to all of the astrology articles (I just didn't want to give you twelve different warnings). Each instance needs to be sourced directly to a reliable, off-wiki source - Wikipedia can't use itself as a source. Pairadox (talk) 01:01, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
So are you going to provide sources or am I going to remove your additions? Pairadox (talk) 20:44, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you can remove the additions, but Virgo I added to someone else's work. Taurus and Sagittarius I did myself and Scorpio, Capricorn, Aquarius and Pices were done by other editors, which is why I thought it was OK to use the medical astrology link. Kathleen.wright5 21:45, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Understood. I really have no opinion on the info itself, I just want to make sure that it's tied to a third party source. Pairadox (talk) 22:04, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adelaide Wikimeetup 3

Riverside Precinct Adelaide Meetup
Next: 15 November 2024
Last: 6 March 2020
This box: view • talk • edit

Hi Kathleen.wright5 - after some planning we've decided to hold the third Adelaide Wikimeetup on Sunday, 17th February, 2008. The meeting will be held at Billy Baxter's in Rundle Mall at 11:30AM. Further details and directions are available on the meetup page. Please RSVP here by 20:00UTC on 15th February 2008 (that's 6AM Saturday for our time zone) so that we can inform the restaurant about numbers. Hope to see you there!

You are receiving this message because you are in Category:Wikipedians in South Australia or are listed at WP:ADEL#Participants. If this has been sent in error, please accept our apologies!

On behalf of Riana ⁂, 11:26, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question about Importance ratings

Hi Kathleen,

I'm TrickyApron, and I recently went through a bunch of WikiProject Christianity articles on films and removed their Importance=top ratings in accordance with the guidelines on Assessment. There, the criteria for assessing articles as Top Importance is that "The article is one of the core topics about Christianity. Generally, this is limited to those articles that are are included as sections of the main Christianity article." I see that you've changed many of them back to Top Importance - perhaps Mid Importance would be better? I'll wait a few days to hear from you before I revert the changes.

Peace, TrickyApron (talk) 04:54, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Responding to "How to create ICU page when template has been deleted?" on my talk page

Hi,

If further discussion is needed, let's please keep it here rather than ping-ponging between your talk page and mine.

You asked: "How do I create an ICU page as outlined in - To admit an article to ICU, when the template - Wikipedia:Intensive Care Unit/Article name, has been deleted? I want to formally admit 2 articles in Category:Articles placed in the Wikipedia Intensive Care Unit, Allen Joines and Senang Hati Foundation"

What I did was, working from the instructions in Wikipedia:Intensive_Care_Unit#To_Admit_an_Article_to_the_ICU, click on the redlink Wikipedia:Intensive Care Unit/Article name, and then change Article name to the actual name of the article which I wanted to admit (e.g., Allen Joines). Having done that, the rest of the admission process went smoothly, if a bit tediously. Does that help? If not, I'll try to help more.

If you can improve the admission process instructions, feel free to do so.

Cheers, -- Boracay Bill (talk) 13:41, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Microsoft Windows and software articles

Hi, please don't tag articles that are not about Microsoft Windows with {{WikiProject Microsoft Windows}}. This Wikiproject is solely for articles about the operating system itself. A similar policy applies to other Wikiprojects about other operating systems. Thanks. -/- Warren 22:11, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Fiador (tack)

Hello!

I would use a {{horse-stub}} tag and just make it a general horse stub. I don't see a more specific stub category for horse tack, and there seem to be some other horse tack articles (such as Aurigan) in there.

Hope this helps! — KathrynLybarger (talk) 18:14, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Australia incorporation meeting

Hi there Kathleen.wright5! As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation has recently approved Wikimedia Australia as an official chapter. In order to acknowledge this, and to appoint an interim committee, approve our statement of purpose and our rules, and appoint a Public Officer, Wikimedia Australia will be having a meeting at Computerbank in Melbourne. For those of us who are located in other cities, we shall be holding conference calls to the main meeting.

The meeting will be held at 2:30PM on Sunday, 20th April 2008, Adelaide time. In order for us to organise this meeting, we need your help! Please drop by at our meta subpage with suggestions as to venues, conference calling services, etc. It will be at 2:30 so we can meet up for lunch beforehand if anyone's open for that!

Hoping to see you there! ~ Riana ⁂ 01:50, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this message because you are an active Wikimedian in Adelaide and are on this list. If you think I've missed anyone out, please feel free to copy-paste this and send it to them too!

Blanking of articles

Please stop blanking articles. Blanking of articles is (almost) never the proper way to handle bad content on the project. And already tagged copyvios do not fit the "almost". All of your blankings are now showing up on reports of blank pages, mixed in with vandalism blankings. I'm going to revert the blankings to their copyvio tagged state so that they can be properly handled, and not bloat up the reports. - TexasAndroid (talk) 13:25, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Let me stress that I too have full assumptions that this all happened in a good faith effort to do right by the project. I used admin roll-back on some of them because of the sheer number that needed to be reverted. Admin rollback is normally supposed to be used for reverting vandalism. I want to stress that my use in this case was not in any way intended to show or imply that I thought that these edits were vandalism. As for what next, I'll let you deal with Moonriddengirl on that. She sounds to be much more an expert on handling copyvios than I am. For myself, I'm a short pages patroller, and it was on the short pages reports that I found all these blankings. - TexasAndroid (talk) 13:52, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BCC Research

Thanks very much for the help! I think I just needed to be more patient initially and wait for the community to recognize the validity of the company. Stuartfost (talk) 23:07, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eventually, I would like to move this sub page to the main site, and you have greatly aided my cause thank you Stuartfost (talk) 23:08, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article has been deleted.

Hey, just wanted to let you know I got Wikipedia:Templates with red links rebooted and all set up to work on again, if you'd like to help out with it (or run it). Cheers! bd2412 T 09:38, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of minor Biblical figures

Hey, I noticed you're interested in Bible topics, so I thought you might want to work on this one. Cheers! bd2412 T 06:39, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CKB/Wikipedia

Well... I AM an administrator at the Christianity Knowledge Base, but I'm just a regular user at Wikipedia. Arch O. La Grigory Deepdelver 19:28, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome edits

Just wanted to comment on the addition of stubs to the radio stations. Hopefully that should spark some expanding of them. Keep watching my edits, I'll keep creating radio stations and more than likely some of them will be religious. Thanks a lot! Milonica (talk) 18:14, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for expansion of the categorisation of religious programmes

Dear Kathleen, thank you for expanding the category of "Religious programmes".It is good of you to do this, and to leave a note on my talk-page. I was also pleased to see that you had included an Australian programme, which will prevent the programme from having too biassed a coverage (being based in the United Kingdom, I know mainly about British programmes).You might be interested to know that at WP: Council, quite lively discussion is going on about whether we should have a project group for religious programmes. I was interested to see that you belong to something called "WikiChristianity". I did not know of this.I have heard of Conservapedia, but I take it that this will not be so heavily orientated to ultra-conservatism as Conservapedia (I have not read Conservapedia all that often myself. Thank you again for the message. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 21:23, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redundancy

The aforementioned category is redundant, as it already covers the same topics already covered in Category:Religious television series and a new category, Category:Religious radio programs, as well as more-specific subcategories within. Please be more careful making categories in the future, and double check to see if similar categories exist. -- azumanga (talk) 03:32, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to User:John Carter's user page

Hey, I noticed you recently removed a redlink to a deleted article from User:John Carter, it was in a list of articles he had created. It's not generally cool to go tampering with editors' user pages except to undo vandalism, at least not without mentioning it. Some editors will remove dead cats after a CSD but even that's controversial and I'd normally let users manage their own redlinks. --Doug.(talk • contribs) 17:05, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Many thanks for reclassifying the contents of the category I created "Religious programmes". At the time of creating it, I did not know of the similar categories, and I agree that it is rather superfluous to multiply categories here. Although I tend toinclusionism rather than deletionism, I think the "Religious programmes" category could be deleted now. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 21:16, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mom jeans

I rescued it. What I did was to type in Mom jeans and press go, which took me to Saturday Night Live but at the top was a little note saying I had been redirected from Mom jeans, which was linked. I was then able to access the page history and took the page back to a previous version. However, the redirect was a good faith edit. If there is not much more to say about this term then maybe it should be merged with SNL. The correct way to do this would be to tag it for merge and invite discussion. Best wishes. Itsmejudith (talk) 08:43, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Updated:Redirects at User:Grutness/Stub discoveries to vet

Hi Kathleen - you wrote: I've updated your Redirects list on the above page. Every strikethru or removal has been explained.

To be honest, I wish you hadn't, though I realise your intentions were good. As it says at the top of the page, "If you take any of the other stubs to either WSS/D or SFD, score through it on the list using <s> and </s>"" - a lot of those you scored through haven't been near either the discovery page or SFD, so shouldn't have been scored through ({{cook-tool-stub}} is one that immediately springs to mind that hasn't been to either) - I still need to go through them and see whether any of them are possible sfd candidates (again, cook-tool-stub is one possibility). I'm going to un-score the lot for now and check through them when I get the chance to see which ones still need to be looked at. Grutness...wha? 06:38, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NZ stubs

Hi Kathleen! What that means is that the template {{NewZealand-poli-stub}} is upmerged; since it doesn't yet have 60+ articles, it temporarily deposits the article in both Category:New Zealand stubs and Category:Politics stubs. Once it has enough articles, its separate category (presumably Category:New Zealand electorate stubs) will be created. HTH, Her Pegship (tis herself) 16:07, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re Cat:India geography stubs

Hi Kathleen - you wrote: I've de-redlinked and cleaned up a section of the Agartala article on the above page. I know it's not a stub anymore, but it looks so much better now. Would it be OK to do the rest of the articles on the above page?

I'd forgotten I put that there - that was a long time ago! Yes, sure - feel free to remove any that look like they're now written in proper English. It's worth noting that the list is very old - there are a lot of newer articles that are just as bad as those original ones were. I'm not sure why, but it seems to be a problem that is worse with subcontinental articles than any others (possibly a large number of Indian editors with English as a second language?) Grutness...wha? 00:20, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ASGAP

Well done on your hard work - but hey linking species to specific ASGAP work groups - isnt that a bit misleading? Maybe you are going to do something to follow up but - the links appear to be going to the species/genera (good stuff) - but that is nothing to do with the specific work group - your hard work I am, not doubting - but I fear the equivalent of an american geographically challenged teenager (who person our project with amazing things like the trivia project) might feel that being directed to the species genera rather than a work group might wonder if its a road travelled without adequate sign post? please reprimand my ignorance if I have it wrong - cheers SatuSuro 09:22, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What would you say to a change in the words at the lead into the list? I realise how long it would have taken to done those links - I am not trying to denigrate that - I am just thinking of some of the enlightened users of this old goldfishbowl :( SatuSuro 09:29, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NOonono - please dont de link - I think I originally added the list because my parents were members from year zero for the association and I have all the publications - nah we need to think of a nifty lead sentence to the list - hey I am so impressed by the fact that you did the hard work - its the way the sentence read that will clear the issue - as for my talk - I speak with too many admins too much (see my talk stats) - one of them protected it at some point and probably forgot to undo it - not that I want it undone considering the number of twinkle warnings and reversions of IP's I have been doing recently :| SatuSuro 09:36, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok - suggestion - Study Groups - the following species/genera of Australian plants relate to study groups that have existed within the history of the ASGAP - some may not be currently active - however the following list indicates the comprehensive nature of the study groups and the extent to which ASGAP members have dealt with the variety of flora within Australia.

Please feel free to edit/re-write - but imho that would support your hard work and the article would be an excellent example of a lead into the diversity of oz flora SatuSuro 09:42, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do whatever you like - I would suggest that if it hasnt been mentioned above - that the groups do sometimes become inactive and then reform and they are not all constant at any one time over the decdes - and thanks for doing it - cheers (im off for a few hours now) SatuSuro 09:54, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Australia Museum Stub

Thanks so much for helping with this stubbing. I think it's a needed and useful stub, so hope it will survive its discussion. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 14:05, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

and thanks for letting me know it passed! TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 13:49, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recat

Oh thanks for that. I did ask Pegship to create the Bengali film cat. It seems a major cooincidence it was done soon after ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 10:04, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck

Indonesian airport stubs and arts are like looking into the mouth of hades believe me - you must have a constitution of iron and a head for unravelling confusion - one of my fellow indonesian project eds spent most of his on wiki time reverting deliberate fraudulent rubbish from a complex sock nuisance fella - trust you have a very good idea of indonesian geography and are able to sustain good sense of calm in the face of some very poor english eds from indonesia out to frustrate your attempts at cleanup. I admire your courage . Also my apologies if I undid your work or appeared rude at talk at Gordon Splits - I could explain but not on wiki - cheers SatuSuro 15:23, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In that case ignore the above message, or most of it - the actual content issue is irrelevent to you then - what a relief SatuSuro 01:33, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indonesian airport stubs

Hi Kathleen - It looks OK to me; all I did was change the template wording a bit and add parent cats to the stub category. What problem were you having? Her Pegship (tis herself) 17:40, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message - well done with the hard work - please accept my apologies in advance for the highly unlikely event of any of them ever getting to higher status - appreciate what I think might be your sense of humour - glad you didnt meet the monsters SatuSuro 13:24, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sotai (Bible)

Regarding the article Sotai (Bible) that you recently created;

It currently does not contain sufficient information or details to warrant an article on wikipedia.

Could you please consider either improving the article, or merging the information into a main article.

Specifically, if it is to remain as a stand-alone article, it would require a suitable paragraph or two at the beginning, explaining the context etc, with links to other articles as appropriate; for example,

Sotai is a character in the Hebrew Bible.

It would also require external reference(s) to establish the facts - perhaps a link to an authorized edition of the text?

If there is little or no content that is likely to be added to the article, please consider removing it.

I hope this is constructive advice,

Any questions, please ask on my own homepage,

Regards,

--  Chzz  ►  00:52, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removed - Judaism-stub

on Kabbalah related articles - why?--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 07:39, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, fair enough. I'll give you a hand since I have just undone three--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 08:58, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seven Archangels

Hi Kathleen. I am not going to be able to contribute to this article because my understanding is largely within the earlier Jewish tradition and not the Christian tradition which is what the article is about--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 23:27, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dark tunnel

My watch list says you have entered it - and that particular article as well (sigh) - please any counsel, sympathy or general muffled hysteria about the state of Indonesian articles is always welcome at my talk - as to any remedies - thats another matter - cheers or should that be condolences SatuSuro 11:54, 23 June 2008 (UTC) Now my watch list is lighting up like the sydney harbour bridge - oh well you clearly need no conversation about it after all then SatuSuro 12:11, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As for popcats you gotta be joking - the average edit in the indonesian project is to overpopulate the indonesian rupiah or indonesian idol articles - new articles on the catholic church in indonesia havent appeared in almost a year or more :( SatuSuro 12:14, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for explanation SatuSuro 13:10, 23 June 2008 (UTC) Thanks also for cleanup in the WP Indonesia project - it is appreciated - dont say I didnt warn you :( thanks again SatuSuro[reply]

RCTI - is a classic nightmare article - the list of presenters - the indonesian editors love lists - they just love them - just a nightmare for the WP Indonesia english project - unencylopediac lists they always slip em in - anyways signing off thanks again SatuSuro 13:59, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From Indonesia?

You ask to SatuSuro about Indonesia. Are you from Indonesia? Michel mapaliey (talk) 08:41, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have responded to the odd question and have received no reply SatuSuro 09:23, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

...although I use a different version of both. I tend to not be an "early adopter" of technology for precisely this sort of reason. Orderinchaos 10:23, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Me too. Just got a brand new computer, and I insisted that Windows XP be installed and not Vista. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 15:11, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
So funny, I was one of the earliest people to receive MS DOS V1 in the 80s, and since then have waited at least a year before upgrading to next version of MS offering. With Windows I wisely waited almost 2 years, and with Vista I will likely wait more given its complexity. Hmmm, by the time I retire I will be waiting a full decade to upgrade a Microsoft product :)--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 22:09, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External Linking to DVD Retail

Hello. Can you stop adding links to DVDs to be purchased online. Such links are not acceptable and are regarded as spam. Think about it: if we accept just one of those links then there is no good reason why several hundred retailers cannot make a similar claim to be eligible for a link on such an article and pretty soon almost any entertainment article could become a five hundred strong list of retail copies of DVDs, videos, albums etc. Thanks --bodnotbod (talk) 08:16, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Left Behind

Hello, I removed this from Into the Storm because the article is about an upcoming film unrelated to the Left Behind series. I Googled for a possible answer to your action, and I see that there is a book called "Into the Storm (Left Behind: The Kids #11)". What you can do is move the film article to Into the Storm (film) and create a book article at Into the Storm (book), then treat the original Into the Storm as a disambiguation page (like Body of Lies, for instance). Let me know if you need any help! —Erik (talk • contrib) - 16:32, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

s:Wikisource:WikiProject Bible dictionaries

Are there any Wikisource members in this project, if so would you like to help with the above project. I'm trying to revive this project, but the other two members haven't been near it since 2006. At the moment it consists of copying pages of Easton's Bible Dictionary (1897) If anyone's interested please reply on my talk page. Kathleen.wright5 02:55, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I may be interested. I do not understand where the pages of Easton's Bible Dictionary (1897) are. A lot of the links are red.--Carlaude (talk) 20:48, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page move vandal on Envirowiki

Kathleen, a page move vandal has been very active on Envirowiki recently. I fixed the front page but heaps of others are still afflicted. The easiest way to fix it is for a sysop to rollback from the move log. I have left messages for Naught101 but he has not yet responded. Perhaps you can help?

He also attacked Greenlivingpedia but I have sorted this out, including blocking page moves for non-sysops.

Regards, Peter Campbell 23:48, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:s:Wikisource:WikiProject Bible dictionaries

If you know the whereabouts of the other two users, could you ask them if they're still interested in this project, if not I will remove their names from the members list. Kathleen.wright5 24:03, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tetraminoe
Soarin777
--Carlaude (talk) 02:44, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Edmiston Jr.

hello. He was a West Virginia congressman. Would it not be better to include both? Dlohcierekim 04:11, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

10m/6m Club

Thanks for the headsup. I deleted the page as a CSD G4, improperly recreated in project space. Please let me know if you see it anywhere again. Lankiveil (speak to me) 10:37, 6 October 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Leon Liebgold

Leon Liebgold played a rabbi. Was he a rabbi?Xx236 (talk) 10:32, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

SpencerMerry Christmas! is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Just wanting to pop in to see how you're doing...haven't talked in a while. SpencerMerry Christmas! 03:02, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


GREETINGS

WISH YOU A HAPPY NEW YEAR!--BobClive (talk) 08:18, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Environmental Chemistry cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Environmental Chemistry cover.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:15, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Image417.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Image417.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:09, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Vwc2008mascot.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Vwc2008mascot.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 22:33, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:MFD

That's a weird one - but I've found out the cause. The clue was that the message was down by the userboxes. looks like Wikipedia:Intensive Care Unit/UBX - one of the userboxes you've got on that section - has been nominated for deletion, and that's where the message is coming from. Your page is safe :) Grutness...wha? 23:20, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The nominator had used the wrong MfD message template when the userbox was nominated. Hopefully it's fixed now. Grutness...wha? 23:24, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Billy Sneddon.jpg

"What links here" is your friend :) WP:FFD has only recently changed its name from WP:Images for deletion, and there's still some teething problems. That particular FFD IFD was never closed, but it was a pretty clear-cut "keep", so I'll close it (once I've worked out how - I don't deal with IFD/FFD very often). Grutness...wha? 05:46, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshots categories

Why are you tagging images that are not screenshots of Windows Vista, with Category:Screenshots of Windows Vista? You're making extra work for me, reviewing every edit you've made and correcting these mistakes. Please endeavor to be more careful... thanks. Warren -talk- 15:35, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, by adding screenshots of non-free software to categories, you are inadvertently creating galleries in the category articles themselves. This is explicitly against Wikipedia's image use policy (see WP:NFCC #9). To avoid this, you need to add "__NOGALLERY__" to every category article for which you are adding non-free images. It would be better still to create new categories specifically for screenshots, so that they can be found by navigating the image categories. Thanks. Warren -talk- 15:42, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

The intolerable heat of Perth Wa has brought out a very bad sense of hmour in relation to anything at the moment - so please ignore user page fiddling - but thanks for pointing out the clock error - i may well go back and fix it some time - but when it cooler - cheers SatuSuro 13:15, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

wikiproject Serbian Orthodox Church

thanks for link. I started voting. Can you chach have i done it on apropriate way?--Vojvodaeist 10:48, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Serbian Orthodox Church isn't new religiouss movement. It was constitute in 1219 by Saint Sava. Since than it has long and interesting (for me) history and of course present.--Vojvodaeist 13:35, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I saw mistake and I will fix it.--Vojvodaeist 07:01, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

spam blacklist

Yes, I did get your reply, thank you.

I think it was added because of excessive spam: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam/2007_Archive_Aug#webtv-club.com_tv-cb.com. If you think the link should be added, see MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist, where it could be whitelisted.

I don't have a lot of experience with the spam blacklist, and if this isn't the reply you were looking for, you my want to try talking to Lustiger seth. SpencerT♦C 20:33, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Amanda Blair.jpg

Hi! Thank you for correction :) I didn't know that when I added this photo to the article. Regards, Patrol110 (talk) 15:14, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Welcomed!!

Thank you very much. I am please to be on Christianity Wiki. I am glad that there is something out there that is what I believe.--God'sGirl94 (talk) 12:06, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thank you. I have an account there now!! --God'sGirl94 (talk) 17:17, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cyrillic

For what it's worth, it looks like a stub someone had tried to write about the biochemist Tikhol Michailov Stoyanov Antov, possibly in Bulgarian rather than Russian. Unfortunately my Russian isn't up to working out exactly what it was all about, and my Bulgarian is non-existent - but it looks like the editor who put it there had also tried to create it as a stub before (see The_acaunt_"_Biochemist_T.M.S.Antov). Grutness...wha? 01:19, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category Changes/Deletions

Hi, I appreciate your contributions to several articles in the Christian Film category recently. However, I've undone your revisions, as these articles ( Left Behind, etc.) are under the scope of Christian Films Task Force. Our task force uses the information in Category:Christian Films to create our worklists, and removing the articles from the mentioned category hinders our work. You may not realize it, but changing categorization on these articles to Category:Films Released by Cloud Ten Pictures could also easily be viewed as over-categorization and quite possible even as an attempt at advertising. I don't believe this was your intent at all. Please let me know if you have any questions about why I've made these revisions! God Bless, --Filmcom (talk) 23:00, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Television images?

I saw the edits you did for the Celebrate Freedom 2007 images stating that they were Christian television images. How can they be television if they were taken from a cell phone camera? Would it be for the fact that the images taken were about the television station itself? Please advise. Chris (talk) 17:12, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WFSH-FM is about a radio station though. Would this be classified as Christian radio station image? Chris (talk) 20:05, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just noting

... this. Blurpeace 22:32, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Uncategorized

Hi, I can see you've added a lot of "{{Uncategorized}}" tags to tempates. This also adds the "Uncategorized" tag to the articles containing the template (See here, here, here). Please use "<noinclude>{{Template:Uncategorized}}</noinclude>" format, like i corrected here. Flying Saucer (talk) 01:07, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop (and revert!) This is a terrible idea. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:55, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here's an example: {{Ireland Steam Locomotives}} (and many other similar nav templates)
These templates and their redlinks have value to WP. They represent a structured naming system and most particularly the links between an article name and the short-form presentation of this article within its context. This is not a trivial choice, and it's by far best set-up by an editor (or small group) working on the template beforehand, so as to do it consistently and appropriately. Later editors may then create the article as time permits, but at least its naming will have some degree of appropriate structure and consistency. Stripping redlinks loses these suggested names. Article names for these complex nav templates are difficult, it's a bad move to push their creation onto a variety of article creators one-by-one.
Look at {{LNER Locomotives}} for an even stronger example and the link [[GCR Class 9F|N5]] N5. Without the redlink, how would the new article creator be guided to create under GCR Class 9F rather than LNER Class N5 ? Andy Dingley (talk) 10:36, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've raised some discussion of this at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains#Stripping redlinks from navigation templates. If you can suggest a suitable forum re the redlinks project, that would be useful. Thanks Andy Dingley (talk) 10:49, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, sorry I haven't responded, I've been away. Well, here I am. I'll address the discussion now. bd2412 T 14:50, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I received an duplicate message about the VeriChip logo, but if the Verichip Corporation changed it name, this is new for me... This is the reason to delete the image right?! Well i think I fulfilled the request on wikipedia about non-free image anyway... I think that we can keep the logo as an old logo of the company, we can see many articles with old logos in articles... Thanks.

All the best!! Light WarriorConspiracy?!? 22:39, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Except for URLs in the External links section that have not been used to support any article content, please do not do not delete a URL solely because the URL does not work any longer per WP:DEADLINK. Thanks Reubot (talk) 10:21, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Salvation Army userbox

Hi Kathleen,

Thank you for contacting me! I like the userbox you made. I used to have a lot of userboxes on my userpage, but I ended up getting rid of all the ones that weren't directly pertinent to my editing of Wikipedia. I therefore don't think that I'll use the Salvation Army userbox on my userpage. It's good to see that I'm not the only user in the "Salvationist Wikipedians" category anymore. I would love to see a Salvation Army-related article up to featured status; at the moment, we don't even have any that are at good status. I may pick one to work on eventually, but I have other things to be working on at the moment. On a separate note, I notice that your talk page is getting fairly long and likely difficult for some computers to load properly. You may want to check into this guide about how to archive talk pages so that this one doesn't get too unmanageable.

Happy editing,

Neelix (talk) 12:43, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Cave of Adullam

An article that you have been involved in editing, Cave of Adullam, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Sreifa (talk) 15:43, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Meetup 12 June 2011

Hi! I just wanted to let you know that Liam Wyatt is in town, so we were thinking of doing a quick meetup at Brunelli's cafe in Rundle Street, Adelaide (at the Rundle Mall end, near the car park) at 6pm on Sunday, with a possibility of drinks afterwards. So if you're interested we hope to see you there. :) - Bilby (talk) 03:13, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Please see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K. P. Yohannan. Thanks. BigJim707 (talk) 01:39, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative

WikiWomen Unite!
Hi Kathleen.wright5! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved!

Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 00:59, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RfC:Infobox Road proposal

WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to {{infobox road}}. Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.

You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:AUS

Nbound (talk) 22:41, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!
Hi Kathleen.wright5! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! EdwardsBot (talk) 19:10, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Invitation to Adelaide Wikipedia Users Group meetings

Hi, in case you're not already aware of it, a group of Adelaide Wikipedians has been meeting on a monthly basis since April, with the aim of improving the scope and quality of articles on South Australian topics. We meet at UniSA's City West campus, and our 23 July meeting will have a guest speaker from the National Trust of SA.

This coming Sunday, 6 July, we will be holding our first Edit-a-thon. This will be an opportunity for new editors to come and learn either basic or more advanced editing from very experienced wikipedians, so if you know anyone who would like to get some practice, please let them know - and beginners will be very welcome. Cheers, Bahudhara (talk) 05:06, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kathleen.wright5. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Challenge for Oceania and Australia

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Oceania/The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge are up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. The Australia challenge would feed into the wider region one and potentially New Zealand could have a smaller challenge too. The main goal is content improvement, tackling stale old stubs and important content and improving sourcing/making more consistent but new articles are also welcome if sourced. I understand that this is a big goal for regular editors, especially being summertime where you are, but if you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Oceania and Australia like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1700 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for the region but fuelled by a series of contests to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. The Africa contest scaled worldwide would naturally provide great benefits to Oceania countries, particularly Australia and attract new editors. I would like some support from existing editors here to get the Challenges off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile and potentially bring about hundreds of improvements in a few weeks through a contest! Cheers.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PositiveID-logo.gif

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PositiveID-logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kathleen.wright5. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Kathleen.wright5. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!

Merry Christmas and Happy New year

Hello! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a prosperous 2021 on the behalf of Christmas task force of WikiProject Holidays.

"Christmas is not a time nor a season, but a state of mind. To cherish peace and goodwill, to be plenteous in mercy, is to have the real spirit of Christmas!"
-Calvin Coolidge
Quotations related to Calvin Coolidge at Wikiquote
Sent by Path slopu (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Holidays, WikiProject Christianity and their related projects. © Copyleft 2020

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:18, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Detector dogs has been nominated for renaming

Category:Detector dogs has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:36, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kathleen.wright5&oldid=1046149381"