Arthur Firstenberg: Difference between revisions
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Add: title. Changed bare reference to CS1/2. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by BrownHairedGirl | #UCB_webform 245/2899 |
→Campaign against microwave technology: Link added on Certiorari Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
| archive-date = June 28, 2009 |
| archive-date = June 28, 2009 |
||
| url-status = dead |
| url-status = dead |
||
}}</ref> The case was dismissed in 2011.<ref>{{Cite web |title=ARTHUR FIRSTENBERG v. CITY OF SANTA FE, 11-CV-08 JAP/WDS {{!}} Casetext Search + Citator |url=https://casetext.com/case/arthur-firstenberg-v-city-of-santa-fe |access-date=2021-04-30 |website=casetext.com}}</ref> An appeal was brought before the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals (Santa Fe Alliance, et al. v. City of Santa Fe, et al., Case No. 20-2066),<ref>https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinion/20-2066Case No. 20-2066</ref> which, on March 30, 2021, reversed in part and affirmed in part the lower court. A Petition for Certiorari was filed to the United States Supreme Court on October 25, 2021,<ref>https://certpool.com/dockets/21-629 Case No. 21-629 Docket</ref> and was set for conference on March 4, 2022.<ref>https://certpool.com/dockets/21-629 March 4, 2022 Conference</ref> On that day the Petition was denied. The Court denied or disposed of 102 other Petitions on March 4, 2022, and granted none. On average the Supreme Court receives 7,000-8,000 Petitions for Certiorari every year and typically grants about 80, roughly 1% of those received.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/faq_general.aspx | title=Frequently Asked Questions: General Information - Supreme Court of the United States }}</ref> |
}}</ref> The case was dismissed in 2011.<ref>{{Cite web |title=ARTHUR FIRSTENBERG v. CITY OF SANTA FE, 11-CV-08 JAP/WDS {{!}} Casetext Search + Citator |url=https://casetext.com/case/arthur-firstenberg-v-city-of-santa-fe |access-date=2021-04-30 |website=casetext.com}}</ref> An appeal was brought before the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals (Santa Fe Alliance, et al. v. City of Santa Fe, et al., Case No. 20-2066),<ref>https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinion/20-2066Case No. 20-2066</ref> which, on March 30, 2021, reversed in part and affirmed in part the lower court. A Petition for [[Certiorari]] was filed to the United States Supreme Court on October 25, 2021,<ref>https://certpool.com/dockets/21-629 Case No. 21-629 Docket</ref> and was set for conference on March 4, 2022.<ref>https://certpool.com/dockets/21-629 March 4, 2022 Conference</ref> On that day the Petition was denied. The Court denied or disposed of 102 other Petitions on March 4, 2022, and granted none. On average the Supreme Court receives 7,000-8,000 Petitions for Certiorari every year and typically grants about 80, roughly 1% of those received.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/faq_general.aspx | title=Frequently Asked Questions: General Information - Supreme Court of the United States }}</ref> |
||
In January 2010, Firstenberg filed a lawsuit against his neighbor, seeking damages of $530,000,<ref name="register2010">{{Citation |
In January 2010, Firstenberg filed a lawsuit against his neighbor, seeking damages of $530,000,<ref name="register2010">{{Citation |
Revision as of 15:48, 5 June 2022
Arthur Robert Firstenberg (born May 28, 1950)[1] is an American author and activist on the subject of electromagnetic radiation and health.[2] He is the founder of the independent campaign group the Cellular Phone Task Force.[3] His 1997 book Microwaving Our Planet: The Environmental Impact of the Wireless Revolution was published by the group. He is the author of The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life (AGB Press 2017).[4]
Education
Born May 28, 1950, in Brooklyn, New York, Firstenberg was a Westinghouse scholar who received a BA in mathematics from Cornell University in 1971 and continued into medical school from 1978 to 1982. Firstenberg did not complete medical school due to illness, which he attributes to electromagnetic hypersensitivity brought on by receiving over 40 diagnostic dental x-rays.[5]
Campaign against microwave technology
Since 1996, Firstenberg has argued in numerous publications that wireless technology is dangerous, and "the telecommunications industry has suppressed damaging evidence about its technology since at least 1927."[citation needed]
In 1997, the Cellular Phone Taskforce was the lead petitioner in a challenge to the Federal Communications Commission's RF radiation exposure limits, which was joined by dozens of other parties including the Ad Hoc Association of Parties Concerned About the Federal Communications Commission Radio Frequency Health and Safety Rules ("AHA").[6] The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled for the FCC. An appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which was supported by an amicus curiae brief written by Senators Patrick Leahy and Jim Jeffords, was denied.[7]
In May 2008, Firstenberg and other groups accused the city of Santa Fe, New Mexico, of discrimination against those allergic to EM radiation for having free wireless networks in city buildings.[8][9] The case was dismissed in 2011.[10] An appeal was brought before the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals (Santa Fe Alliance, et al. v. City of Santa Fe, et al., Case No. 20-2066),[11] which, on March 30, 2021, reversed in part and affirmed in part the lower court. A Petition for Certiorari was filed to the United States Supreme Court on October 25, 2021,[12] and was set for conference on March 4, 2022.[13] On that day the Petition was denied. The Court denied or disposed of 102 other Petitions on March 4, 2022, and granted none. On average the Supreme Court receives 7,000-8,000 Petitions for Certiorari every year and typically grants about 80, roughly 1% of those received.[14]
In January 2010, Firstenberg filed a lawsuit against his neighbor, seeking damages of $530,000,[15] for "refusing to turn off her cell phone and other electronic devices."[16] He claimed that because of shared wiring, electromagnetic fields from his neighbor's electronic devices were keeping him up at night and destroying his health.[15] He stated that he was made homeless as a result.[16] The First District Court of New Mexico dismissed the case in September 2012, citing lack of sufficient supporting evidence.[17] Firstenberg filed an appeal of the dismissal in the District Court in December 2012.[18] On March 9, 2015, the New Mexico Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal by the district court.[19]
Arthur also is a member of an organization in Santa Fe, New Mexico, called "Once a Forest",[20] which promotes fire suppression on public lands. The group opposes forest management policies such as thinning and prescribed fire. Their views are controversial.
See also
- Electromagnetic radiation and health
- Mobile phone radiation and health
- Wireless electronic devices and health
References
- ^ U.S. Public Records Index Vol 2 (Provo, UT: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.), 2010.
- ^ Curiel, Jonathan (2007-01-14), Worries cell phones could damage your cells, San Francisco Chronicle, retrieved 2010-02-28
- ^ "Cell Phone Task Force". Retrieved 4 January 2022.
- ^ Firstenberg, Arthur (2017). The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life. Santa Fe, NM: AGB Press. ISBN 978-0-692-68301-9.
- ^ Scheeres, Julia (January 22, 2002), "Mendocino, CA: Microwave Hot Seat", Wired
- ^ OpenJurist 205 F3d 82 Cellular Phone Taskforce v. Federal Communication
- ^ O'Connor, Jared (2003), "National League of Cities Rising: How the Telecommunications Act of 1996 could expandTenth Amendment jurisprudence", Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, 30 (2): 275–314, retrieved March 2, 2010
- ^ Schwartz, Gadi; Panas, Joshua (2008-05-20), Group wants Wi-Fi banned from public buildings, retrieved 2008-05-24
- ^ Pein, corey (June 24, 2009), "Tuned Out", Santa Fe Reporter, 36 (25), archived from the original on June 28, 2009, retrieved June 25, 2009
- ^ "ARTHUR FIRSTENBERG v. CITY OF SANTA FE, 11-CV-08 JAP/WDS | Casetext Search + Citator". casetext.com. Retrieved 2021-04-30.
- ^ https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinion/20-2066Case No. 20-2066
- ^ https://certpool.com/dockets/21-629 Case No. 21-629 Docket
- ^ https://certpool.com/dockets/21-629 March 4, 2022 Conference
- ^ "Frequently Asked Questions: General Information - Supreme Court of the United States".
- ^ a b Ray, Bill (January 11, 2010), "Santa Fe man demands half a mill for being near iPhone", The Register
- ^ a b Sharpe, Tom (January 7, 2010), "Wi-Fi foe sues neighbor for using electronics", The New Mexican
- ^ "Anti-Wireless Activist Loses Lawsuit Claiming Wi-Fi Signals Made Him Homeless". Cellular-news. September 19, 2012.
- ^ Hay, Kiera. "Anti-WiFi Activist Firstenberg Back With Challenge to Hotel Cell Tower". ABQ Journal. Retrieved 15 July 2013.
- ^ "Decision against Santa Fe anti-WiFi suit upheld by state appeals court". Albuquerque Journal. 2015-03-09. Retrieved 2015-03-11.
- ^ Firstenberg, Arthur (July 25, 2015), "Deforestation: A Crime of the Highest Order", The New Mexican
External links
- "Cellular Phone Task Force" Website.
- "Radio Wave Packet" (2001), Article by Firstenberg.
- "Electromagnetic Fields (EMF): Killing Fields" by A. Firstenberg "The Ecologist v.34, n.5, 1 jun 2004"