User talk:1549bcp

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:47, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Great job on making the original Thirty-Six Immortals of Poetry article. I am glad someone else is also interested in the subject, and willing to put together a nice page on it. Ph0kin (talk) 07:14, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Wikipedia should give you a trophy! Wyclif (talk) 02:12, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Anglicans Online for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anglicans Online is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anglicans Online until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DiamondRemley39 (talk) 01:03, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Benedicta Ward death requires a source

Hello. You never respond to messages; you tend to just delete them and not engage. I have kept communication about the articles we've both worked on to a minimum to try to honor what I perceive to be your preferred mode of operating. Just so you know, the Benedicta Ward article was protected because 3 users, including you, tried to edit it to call the subject deceased without adding a source. You say you got it from a "direct source" in your edits. If you mean that you were told that she had died, that is not an acceptable source. Just as with term papers, articles published, etc., Wikipedia articles must have sources, including and especially if Wikipedia is going to say someone has died. Here is a link to the Biographies of Living Persons policy that you may find of use, and an excerpt from that page to consider: "Wikipedia must get the article right.[...] Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion. Users who persistently or egregiously violate this policy may be blocked from editing.". That is all I wanted to say. You seem to know much about a few subjects. Please share your knowledge AND citations to Wikipedia. Have a nice day. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 20:37, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of W. N. Chattin Carlton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article W. N. Chattin Carlton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W. N. Chattin Carlton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mooonswimmer 22:56, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

BLP violation on Katherine Hancock Ragsdale

I rolled back your edit because you included personal information that should not be on Wikipedia (and you did not cite a source). Please become familiar with WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:BLPPRIVACY. Adding a living person's date of birth when such is not public knowledge--even if it is "public record"--is not appropriate for Wikipedia. Some things should remain private. It can lead to issues of identity theft, for example. Thank you. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 13:25, 7 June 2022 (UTC)